Abstract
Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) is widely used for non-invasive retinal vascular imaging, but the OCTA methods used to assess retinal perfusion vary. We evaluated the different methods used to assess retinal perfusion between OCTA studies. MEDLINE and Embase were searched from 2014 to August 2021. We included prospective studies including ≥ 50 participants using OCTA to assess retinal perfusion in either global retinal or systemic disorders. Risk of bias was assessed using the National Institute of Health quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies. Heterogeneity of data was assessed by Q statistics, Chi-square test, and I2 index. Of the 5974 studies identified, 191 studies were included in this evaluation. The selected studies employed seven OCTA devices, six macula volume dimensions, four macula subregions, nine perfusion analyses, and five vessel layer definitions, totalling 197 distinct methods of assessing macula perfusion and over 7000 possible combinations. Meta-analysis was performed on 88 studies reporting vessel density and foveal avascular zone area, showing lower retinal perfusion in patients with diabetes mellitus than in healthy controls, but with high heterogeneity. Heterogeneity was lowest and reported vascular effects strongest in superficial capillary plexus assessments. Systematic review of OCTA studies revealed massive heterogeneity in the methods employed to assess retinal perfusion, supporting calls for standardisation of methodology.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Introduction
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a non-invasive, non-contact imaging modality which provides high resolution, cross-sectional images of the retina and is ubiquitous in ophthalmology practice to diagnose and monitor retinal disorders1. OCT angiography (OCTA) uses moving red blood cells in the retinal vasculature as an intrinsic contrast agent to generate 3-dimensional images of retinal and choroidal blood flow2,3. OCTA is widely used to evaluate retinal perfusion in retinal and systemic disorders4, and demonstrates microvascular impairment in disorders such as diabetes mellitus5, uveitis6, age-related macular degeneration7, atrial fibrillation8, haemorrhagic shock9,10, and systemic hypertensive crisis11. As OCTA is fast, cheap, and does not risk systemic reactions (as fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) or indocyanine green angiography do), its use is fast becoming widespread in research and clinical practice. OCTA is now used alongside OCT and FFA in the diagnosis and management of retinal diseases12.
Many OCTA platforms use proprietary algorithms to estimate and visualise retinal perfusion13,14. However, as different OCTA devices use different algorithms, comparisons of results between studies are constrained13. Further, quantitative metrics derived from the OCTA signal and images lack consistent methodology15, also limiting comparison validity16. The raw signal may be used to derive limited scaled flow information15, and additional processing before image analysis includes thresholding to create binary images from grayscale17, and skeletonization to display vessels as one-pixel width tracings18. The most commonly calculated perfusion metrics from binarised and skeletonised images are17,19:
-
1.
Vessel density (VD)—the total area of perfused vasculature per unit area in a region of measurement (sometimes reported as “perfusion density”).
-
2.
Vessel length density (VLD)—the total length of perfused vessels divided by the total number of pixels in the given area on the skeletonised image.
-
3.
Fractal dimension (FD)—a mathematical parameter describing the complexity of a biological structure, usually applied to skeletonised images20.
-
4.
Foveal avascular zone (FAZ) measurements (Supplementary Fig. 1)—a change in FAZ measurements (e.g. area and perimeter) from baseline suggests altered blood flow21.
A scoping search on the National Library of Medicine PubMed (including Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online—MEDLINE) found no existing systematic reviews or meta-analyses comparing methods of quantitative OCTA analysis. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis with the aim of assessing which OCTA perfusion analysis method most sensitively detects pathological change between patients with disorders affecting retinal perfusion and control patients with normal retinal perfusion. Our secondary aim was to look at the stability of OCTA imaging by identifying papers that studied the test–retest variability of OCTA.
Methods
This systematic review was performed following the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA) statement22.
Inclusion criteria
Full inclusion and exclusion criteria are provided in Supplementary Table 1. We initially sought to investigate the sensitivity and stability of OCTA imaging, therefore we planned to include both studies comparing findings in normal patients with pathology and studies that included patients having repeated OCTA scans over time with or without a control group.
Prospective studies involving ≥ 50 participants were included where OCTA had been used to investigate changes to macula perfusion caused by either retinal or systemic disorders, using any one of the following analysis metrics (either on binarized or skeletonised images): VD, skeletonised VD (SVD), VLD, FD, skeletonised FD (SFD), capillary density index, FAZ measurements and; where agreement between repeated OCTA images was assessed by intra-class correlation coefficient. Included studies were limited to those with a sample size of at least 50 participants to minimise selection bias from the inclusion of small and selective case series. The year of publication was limited from 2014 to August 2021, as the clinical application of OCTA was first described in 201423. Only studies looking at foveal, parafoveal, and whole areas of the macula were included.
Papers published in medical journals and written in English were included—conference abstracts and papers written in languages other than English were excluded.
Exclusion criteria
We excluded studies investigating retinal disorders which cause focal anatomical change (e.g., age-related macular degeneration) or studies that only investigated perfusion in the choroid, choriocapillaris, or peripapillary region. Retrospective studies and studies that did not specify which region of the macula was analysed were excluded.
Search strategy
MEDLINE and Embase were searched using OVID. The applied search strategy is in Supplementary Fig. 2.
Risk of bias assessment
Two authors independently assessed the potential bias in the prospective studies using the National Institutes of Health (NIH) quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies24. A consensus was then reached between the two authors to create the risk of bias table (Supplementary Table 3).
Data extraction
Retinal perfusion was compared between healthy control patients and those with defined disease states. Two independent reviewers individually reviewed all titles and abstracts retrieved from the initial search. Duplicates were removed and each reviewer decided on the study’s inclusion based on the title and abstract. Disagreements between reviewers on a paper’s eligibility were resolved by discussion, involving the senior author (RJB) if a decision could not be reached. Reference management software was used to aid the screening process as per the PRISMA flow diagram (Fig. 1). Data were extracted by two reviewers working independently, with disagreements resolved by discussion. The following variables were recorded: study information (first author, year of publication, country location of study, study design), participant information (total number of eyes, total number of patients, sex, mean age), OCTA device and imaging information (instrument manufacturer, number of a-scans, scan size), and OCTA analysis information (vessel layer, macular region, analysis metric mean and standard deviation).
The outcome data (mean and standard deviation) collected included: percentage VD (VD%), SVD, VLD, FD, SFD, FAZ area, FAZ perimeter, FAZ acircularity ratio, and FAZ acircularity index. If unpublished information was required, the corresponding author of the study was contacted. If no response was received within one-month of contact, analysis proceeded based on published data. Only VD data given as a percentage and FAZ area presented as mm2 were included in the study characteristics table.
Statistical methods for the effect of diabetic retinopathy on retinal perfusion
To combine measurements of the continuous variables VD and FAZ, and estimate a value for overall common and random effects, inverse variance weighting was used for pooling. When comparisons were made between pooled standardised mean differences for different sub-analyses, statistical differences were assessed using a Z test, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. An overall standardised mean difference was calculated using the random effects models. A funnel plot was used to detect publication and location bias in the selection of included trials according to the method of Egger et al.25. The R statistical software (Version 4.1.1) (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; see http://www.r-project.org) and its meta package (http://cran.r-project.org/web/package/meta) were used for these analyses.
Statistical methods for evaluating the effect of analysis methods on the assessment of retinal perfusion in diabetes without diabetic retinopathy or with mild non-proliferative retinopathy
Meta-analyses were performed on studies investigating diabetes mellitus with no diabetic retinopathy or with mild, non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (the early stage of diabetic retinopathy in which symptoms are mild or non-existent), using Review Manager 5 (RevMan Version 5.4. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020). Statistical heterogeneity between studies was tested for using the Q-statistic (tests the null hypothesis that all studies share the same common effect) and heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 measure of study heterogeneity (percentage of total variation across studies that is due to true heterogeneity rather than chance). A random effects model was used to address the issue of high levels of heterogeneity of results between studies.
Results
After removing duplicates, electronic searches retrieved 4543 records, of which 191 studies were included, and 88 eligible for qualitative analysis. A PRISMA flow diagram of search results is presented in Fig. 1. Excluded studies are presented in the Supplementary Table 2.
Characteristics of included studies
Study characteristics are presented in Tables 1 and 2. Of the 88 studies included, 78 were cross-sectional, six were longitudinal cohort studies, and four were case–control studies. Five papers met the original inclusion criteria but were not presented in the study characteristics table, as they did not include VD or FAZ data, instead using VLD or FD. Only summary data defined as VD or FAZ is presented as reporting of other analysis methods was too heterogenous. Some studies did not specify which macula region was analysed for VD but did include FAZ data. In these instances, the paper was included but VD data were excluded. While the baseline data were presented from five longitudinal studies that included patients having repeated OCTA scans over time, no studies reported test–retest variability.
Heterogeneity of assessments
The included studies recruited patients with 64 different diagnoses, used seven different OCTA systems (Table 3), defined six different volume scan densities, with four different volume scan sizes, nine different perfusion analysis methods, five different vessel layer definitions for superficial and deep capillary plexi, and examined three different macula regions, giving a total of 197 distinct methods of assessing retinal perfusion, but a potential of more than 7000 different combinations (Table 4). Heterogeneity in OCTA analysis limited data synthesis, however the most studied condition was diabetes mellitus with or without diabetic retinopathy and the most reported analysis methods were VD and FAZ area. We therefore present detailed synthesis of VD and FAZ area in diabetes mellitus.
Risk of bias results
A risk of bias analysis using the NIH quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies (14 questions) and the NIH tool of case–control studies (12 questions) graded 23 studies as good, 47 as fair, and 18 as poor quality (Supplementary Table 3). We retained studies rated as poor quality to illustrate heterogeneity.
Bias was identified predominantly in question 6 (“were the exposure(s) of interest measured prior to the outcome(s)?”), question 7 (“Was the timeframe sufficient so that one could reasonably expect to see an association?”) and question 10 (“Was the exposure(s) assessed more than once?”) of the NIH quality assessment tools because the included studies were mostly cross-sectional and not longitudinal by design. Sample size justification was rarely given (question 5) and study population was not always explicitly defined (question 2). Funnel plots (Fig. 2) showed no evidence of publication bias.
Effect of non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy on retinal perfusion
Twenty-six papers were included, as they had VD% results calculated from the same vessel layer, vascular region, and used the same scan size. In comparison to healthy controls, eyes with diabetic eye disease had, on average, a smaller VD% of − 3.52% (n = 18 studies, 95% CI [− 6.71; − 0.32], p = 0.031; Fig. 3b) and a larger FAZ area of 1.50 mm2 (n = 26 studies, 95% CI [0.2999; 2.7007], p = 0.014; Fig. 3a). In comparison to healthy controls, eyes of patients with diabetes had, on average, a smaller VD% of − 1.7822% (95% CI [− 3.4935; − 0.0708], p = 0.041; Fig. 3d) and a larger FAZ area (0.7046 mm2 (95% CI [0.1826; 1.2266], p = 0.0082; Fig. 3c). Study characteristics are summarised in Table 1.
Effect of analysis methods on the detection of diabetes without diabetic retinopathy
Nineteen papers were included. All included analysis methods across the different vascular plexi and retinal areas detected reduced perfusion in patients with diabetes without diabetic retinopathy compared to healthy controls (Fig. 4), although even within individual analysis methods, such as in the deep capillary plexus (DCP) with foveal perfusion assessed from a 6 × 6 mm macular volume, heterogeneity was still high (I2 = 93%, p < 0.00001). While all methods detected reduced retinal perfusion in diabetes without diabetic retinopathy (Fig. 4a–c), values for VD% in the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) and assessed in the parafoveal area tended to have the lowest heterogeneity and detected the greatest effect on perfusion (Fig. 4a). Study characteristics are summarised in Table 1.
Study characteristics of studies included looking at patients with diseases other than diabetes mellitus
Thirty-seven studies assessed VD and FAZ area in patients with diseases other than diabetes (summarised in Table 2), with a similar breadth of assessments as in the diabetes studies in terms of retinal area imaged, vascular layer segmented, and macular region assessed. Also similar to studies of diabetes, VD detected differences more frequently than FAZ area, parafoveal and whole macula VD more frequently than foveal VD and superficial VD more frequently than deep vessel VD.
Patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) had reduced foveal, parafoveal, or whole macular perfusion, or increased FAZ area81,82,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,100, except in one study83. Similarly, patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) had reduced retinal VD and larger FAZ area in two studies93,94, and not in one92, as did patients with atherosclerosis, stroke and cerebrovascular disease95,101,102,103, and patients with beta thalassaemia104, and diabetic patients with CKD105,106, and microalbuminurea107.
Patients with MS and NMOSD also had lower VD (in the superficial more than the deep retinal circulation) and larger FAZ area96,97,99, with patients with a history of optic neuritis having lower retinal perfusion than patients with MS or NMOSD without prior optic neuritis.
Posterior uveitis, including Behcet’s, Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease, and Fuch’s heterochromic cyclitis had lower retinal VD and higher FAZ area compared to patients or eyes without uveitis6,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116.
Discussion
To our knowledge, we present here the first systematic review and meta-analysis of OCTA analysis methods, demonstrating very high heterogeneity of both OCTA analysis methodology employed and reported OCTA data for individual methods. Heterogeneity in analysis methods is demonstrated by the fact that there were more methods of analysing retinal perfusion (197 in this review) than included studies. The included studies varied in perfusion metric used, macula area analysed, equipment manufacturer, and retinal layer segmentation studied, although VD and FAZ area were commonly reported. Although studies investigating the effect of diabetes mellitus on retinal perfusion reporting similar perfusion metrics offered variable and heterogenous results, the OCTA data consistently demonstrated reduced retinal perfusion in patients with diabetes who had, or did not have, diabetic retinopathy when compared to healthy controls.
Reduced retinal perfusion in diabetes and diabetic retinopathy matches the known pathophysiology of the condition26, reinforcing the clinical validity of retinal perfusion measurement assessment by OCTA in these patients. However, given that early diabetic retinopathy is associated with retinal ganglion cell (RGC) loss27, and RGC degeneration is associated with reduced retinal perfusion28, it is not possible to separate primary vascular pathology from changes secondary to neurodegeneration28. Further, our meta-analysis demonstrates that not all methods of OCTA analysis reliably detected reductions in retinal perfusion in diabetic retinopathy, suggesting that different approaches have differing sensitivity and reliability. Of the approaches analysed, the superficial vascular plexus (SVP) had the lowest heterogeneity in assessment of retinal perfusion and SVP analysis detected the strongest effects, which has been previously reported in a number of conditions29, and is unsurprising given that the superficial retina suffers the fewest noise and projection artefacts19, and has the largest blood vessels, with correspondingly higher perfusion30 and greater potential for regulation of changes in perfusion30. Similarly, retinal perfusion is highest in the parafoveal area, consistent with perfusion assessment in this region detecting the greatest changes.
There are growing calls to standardise OCTA methodology16,31,32. We previously compared different OCTA analysis methods, and they concluded that the high variability between metrics and software meant that the different approaches were often not analogous15, but that VD data was the most reproducible across platforms and should be reported in OCTA studies, potentially being preferred to skeletonized metrics in the absence of software standardization. It is therefore encouraging that VD was most frequently reported in this study, although heterogeneity was still high. A different study by Rabiolo et al.33 compared different OCTA algorithms and found that, while the different algorithms all identified important differences between healthy and affected eyes, absolute values were not comparable. This lack of between-platform comparability limits the wider potential of population-level OCTA data. One meta-analysis of fractal dimension perfusion metrics34 found that heterogeneity due to different analysis methods limited comparisons, similar to our findings, and again supports calls for standardisation in OCTA protocols. In our meta-analyses we saw high levels of heterogeneity at both the macroscopic level and when analysing different individual analysis methods. One explanation for high individual analysis heterogeneity is the variety of OCTA devices used from different manufacturers that implement different algorithms to determine blood flow or segment vascular layers. A standardised method of quantifying Heidelberg OCTA of the macula and peripapillary vessels has been proposed35, although uptake may be limited when manufacturers’ own proprietary algorithms are available15.
Limitations of this study include the heterogeneity in reported OCTA methods, which limited synthesis and comparison of analysis methods and findings across different disease states, but highlights the need for standardisation. VD and PD were often used interchangeably and occasionally not defined. The definitions we include in the introduction were the most common definitions in our included studies. Due to high levels of heterogeneity, it was not possible to reliably meet the initial study aims of determining the most sensitive method of OCTA analysis. There were also no papers that studied the test–retest variability of OCTA. Papers did not routinely report reliability, stability, sensitivity, or specificity data for OCTA analyses, which are crucial for test evaluation approaches to the clinical application of OCTA. Finally, while we report increased FAZ area and decreased VD percentages in both patients with diabetes and with diabetic eye disease compared to healthy controls, we recognise that the breadth of the confidence intervals suggest uncertainty about the exact magnitude of this difference.
Currently, there are no standardised reporting guidelines for studies using OCTA—in contrast to the APOSTEL guidelines for OCT studies36—and the many thousands of possible OCTA analysis methods available limit reliable comparison of data. To ensure valid comparison of OCTA study results and robust definition of disease characteristics in which retinal perfusion is impaired, we support the suggestion that reporting guidelines and standardisation are urgently required. This would allow consistent reporting to support development of OCTA to its full potential as a ubiquitous clinical imaging modality, similar to OCT, rather than the research tool that it often remains at present37. As an initial step, we suggest reporting VD in the parafoveal area and FAZ area as a minimum dataset.
Conclusion
Analysis and reporting of retinal perfusion using OCTA is highly heterogenous, meaning that despite the myriad of published papers assessing retinal perfusion across different diseases, few direct comparisons can be made. In addition, the stability and reliability of OCTA analyses has been under-studied. We strongly support the need for standardisation of methodology along with OCTA reporting guidelines, and suggest that a minimum dataset for OCTA reporting should include parafoveal VD and FAZ area.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- OCT:
-
Optical coherence tomography
- OCTA:
-
Optical coherence tomography angiography
- FFA:
-
Fundus fluorescein angiography
- PD:
-
Perfusion density
- VLD:
-
Vessel length density
- FD:
-
Fractal dimension
- FAZ:
-
Foveal avascular zone
- VD:
-
Vessel density
- MEDLINE:
-
Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online
- EMBASE:
-
Excerpta Medica database
- PRISMA:
-
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis protocols
- SVD:
-
Skeletonised vessel density
- SFD:
-
Skeletonised fractal dimension
- NIH:
-
National Institutes of Health
- VD%:
-
Percentage vessel density
- DCP:
-
Deep capillary plexus
- SCP:
-
Superficial capillary plexus
- RGC:
-
Retinal ganglion cell
- SVP:
-
Superficial vascular plexus
- DM:
-
Diabetes mellitus
- NDR:
-
No diabetic retinopathy
- Cross-sec:
-
Cross-sectional
- SRL:
-
Superficial retinal layer
- HD-OCT:
-
High-definition optical coherence tomography
- NPDR:
-
Non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy
- DRL:
-
Deep retinal layer
- T1DM:
-
Type 1 diabetes mellitus
- T2DM:
-
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
- PDR:
-
Proliferative diabetic retinopathy
- SRVP:
-
Superficial retinal vascular plexus
- DRVP:
-
Deep retinal vascular plexus
- DME:
-
Diabetic macular oedema
- GDM:
-
Gestational diabetes mellitus
- AD:
-
Alzheimer's disease
- MCI:
-
Mild cognitive impairment
- POAG:
-
Primary open angle glaucoma
- PD:
-
Parkinson’s disease
- iRBD:
-
Idiopathic rapid-eye-movement sleep behaviour disorder
- NMOSD-ON:
-
Neuromyelitis optica spectra disorder without optic neuritis
- NMOSD + ON:
-
Neuromyelitis optica spectra disorder with optic neuritis
- MS-ON:
-
Multiple sclerosis without optic neuritis
- MS + ON:
-
Multiple sclerosis with optic neuritis
- aMCI:
-
Amnestic mild cognitive impairment
- CSVD:
-
Cerebral small vessel disease
- CKD:
-
Chronic kidney disorder
- VKHD + SGF:
-
Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada disease with sunset glow fundus
- VKHD-SGF:
-
Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada disease without sunset glow fundus
- VKHD:
-
Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada disease
- SD-OCT:
-
Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography
- SS-OCT:
-
Swept-source optical coherence tomography
- OMAG:
-
Optical microangiography
- SS-ADA:
-
Split-spectrum amplitude decorrelation angiography
- OCTARA:
-
Optical coherence tomography angiography ratio analysis
- CODAA:
-
Complex optical coherence tomography signal difference analysis angiography
- FSPA:
-
Full spectrum probabilistic approach
- NFL:
-
Nerve fibre layer
- GCL:
-
Ganglion cell layer
- IPL:
-
Inner plexiform layer
- INL:
-
Inner nuclear layer
- ONL:
-
Outer nuclear layer
- DVP:
-
Deep vascular plexus
- SCC:
-
Superficial capillary complex
- DCC:
-
Deep capillary complex
References
Adhi, M. & Duker, J. S. Optical coherence tomography–current and future applications. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 24(3), 213–221 (2013).
Chen, C.-L. & Wang, R. K. Optical coherence tomography based angiography. Biomed. Opt. Express 8(2), 1056–1056 (2017).
Shin, Y. U. et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography analysis of changes in the retina and the choroid after haemodialysis. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 17184–17184 (2018).
Courtie, E. et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography as a surrogate marker for end-organ resuscitation in sepsis: A review. Front. Med. 9, 1023062 (2022).
Johannesen, S. K. et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography and microvascular changes in diabetic retinopathy: A systematic review. Acta Ophthalmol. 97(1), 7–14 (2019).
Kim, A. Y. et al. Quantifying retinal microvascular changes in uveitis using spectral domain optical coherence tomography angiography (SD-OCTA). Am. J. Ophthalmol. 171, 101–101 (2016).
Trinh, M., Kalloniatis, M. & Nivison-Smith, L. Vascular changes in intermediate age-related macular degeneration quantified using optical coherence tomography angiography. Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 8(4), 20 (2019).
Alnawaiseh, M. Evaluation of ocular perfusion in patients with atrial fibrillation using optical coherence tomography angiography. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 60(9), 4570–4570 (2019).
Alnawaiseh, M. et al. Feasibility of optical coherence tomography angiography to assess changes in retinal microcirculation in ovine haemorrhagic shock. Crit. Care 22(1), 138–138 (2018).
Park, J. Microcirculatory alterations in hemorrhagic shock and sepsis with optical coherence tomography. Crit. Care Med. 44(12), 2016–2016 (2016).
Terheyden, J. H. Impaired retinal capillary perfusion assessed by optical coherence tomography angiography in patients with recent systemic hypertensive crisis. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 60(9), 4573–4573 (2019).
Kashani, A. H. et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography: A comprehensive review of current methods and clinical applications. Progress Retin. Eye Res. 60, 66–100 (2017).
Wylęgała, A. Principles of OCTA and Applications in Clinical Neurology. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 18, 1–10 (2018).
Arthur, E. et al. Distances from capillaries to arterioles or venules measured using OCTA and AOSLO. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 60(6), 1833–1844 (2019).
Courtie, E. F. et al. Reliability of optical coherence tomography angiography retinal blood flow analyses. Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 12(7), 3 (2023).
Mehta, N. & Liu, K. Methods of quantification for optical coherence tomography angiography image analysis. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 9, 3081 (2019).
Borrelli, E. et al. Guidelines on optical coherence tomography angiography imaging: 2020 Focused update. Ophthalmol. Therapy 9, 697–707 (2020).
Durbin, M. K. et al. Quantification of retinal microvascular density in optical coherence tomographic angiography images in diabetic retinopathy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 135(4), 370–370 (2017).
Courtie, E. et al. Retinal blood flow in critical illness and systemic disease: A review. Ann. Intensive Care 10, 1–18 (2020).
Zahid, S. et al. Fractal dimensional analysis of optical coherence tomography angiography in eyes with diabetic retinopathy. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 57(11), 4940–4947 (2016).
Mihailovic, N. et al. Repeatability, reproducibility and agreement of foveal avascular zone measurements using three different optical coherence tomography angiography devices. PLoS ONE 13(10), e0206045–e0206045 (2018).
Moher, D. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Int. J. Surg. 8(5), 336–341 (2010).
Wang, R., Liang, Z. & Liu, X. Diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography angiography for choroidal neovascularization: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol. 19(1), 1–9 (2019).
Nihr, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Study Quality Assessment Tools (2019).
Egger, M. et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315(7109), 629–634 (1997).
Ciulla, T. A. et al. Ocular perfusion abnormalities in diabetes. Acta Ophthalmol. Scand. 80(5), 468–477 (2002).
Zhou, J. & Chen, B. Retinal cell damage in diabetic retinopathy. Cells 12(9), 1342 (2023).
Hepschke, J. L. et al. Modifications in macular perfusion and neuronal loss after acute traumatic brain injury. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 64(4), 35 (2023).
Ong, J. X. et al. Superficial capillary perfusion on optical coherence tomography angiography differentiates moderate and severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. PLoS ONE 15(10), e0240064 (2020).
Kur, J., Newman, E. A. & Chan-Ling, T. Cellular and physiological mechanisms underlying blood flow regulation in the retina and choroid in health and disease. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 31(5), 377–406 (2012).
Munk, M. R. et al. Recommendations for OCT angiography reporting in retinal vascular disease: A delphi approach by international experts. Ophthalmol. Retina 6(9), 753–761 (2022).
Sampson, D. M. et al. Towards standardizing retinal optical coherence tomography angiography: A review. Light Sci. Appl. 11(1), 63 (2022).
Rabiolo, A. et al. Comparison of methods to quantify macular and peripapillary vessel density in optical coherence tomography angiography. PLoS ONE 13(10), e0205773 (2018).
Yu, S. & Lakshminarayanan, V. Fractal dimension and retinal pathology: A meta-analysis. Appl. Sci. 11(5), 2376 (2021).
Mello, L. G. M. et al. A standardized method to quantitatively analyze optical coherence tomography angiography images of the macular and peripapillary vessels. Int. J. Retina Vitreous 8(1), 75 (2022).
Aytulun, A. et al. APOSTEL 2.0 recommendations for reporting quantitative optical coherence tomography studies. Neurology 97(2), 68–79 (2021).
Greig, E. C., Duker, J. S. & Waheed, N. K. A practical guide to optical coherence tomography angiography interpretation. Int. J. Retina Vitreous 6(1), 55 (2020).
Agra, C. L. D. M. et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography: microvascular alterations in diabetic eyes without diabetic retinopathy. Arq. Bras. Oftalmol. 84(2), 149–157 (2021).
Carnevali, A. et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography analysis of retinal vascular plexuses and choriocapillaris in patients with type 1 diabetes without diabetic retinopathy. Acta Diabetol. 54(7), 695–702 (2017).
Choi, E. Y. et al. Association between clinical biomarkers and optical coherence tomography angiography parameters in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 61(3), 4–4 (2020).
Cinar, E., Yuce, B. & Aslan, F. Evaluation of early retinal and choroidal microvascular changes in type 2 diabetes patient without retinopathy. Retina-Vitreus 29(1), 58–67 (2020).
de Carlo, T. E. et al. Detection of microvascular changes in eyes of patients with diabetes but not clinical diabetic retinopathy using optical coherence tomography angiography. Retina 35(11), 2364–2370 (2015).
Demir, S. T. et al. Evaluation of retinal neurovascular structures by optical coherence tomography and optical coherence tomography angiography in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus without clinical sign of diabetic retinopathy. Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 258(11), 2363–2372 (2020).
Furino, C. et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography in diabetic patients without diabetic retinopathy. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 30(6), 1418–1423 (2020).
Gołębiewska, J. et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography vessel density in children with type 1 diabetes. PLoS ONE 12(10), e0186479 (2017).
Inanc, M. et al. Changes in retinal microcirculation precede the clinical onset of diabetic retinopathy in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 207, 37–44 (2019).
Kara, O. & Can, M. E. Evaluation of microvascular changes in retinal zones and optic disc in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 259(2), 323–334 (2021).
Meshi, A. et al. Anatomical and functional testing in diabetic patients without retinopathy: Results of optical coherence tomography angiography and visual acuity under varying contrast and luminance conditions. Retina 39(10), 2022–2022 (2019).
Li, T. et al. Retinal microvascular abnormalities in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus without visual impairment or diabetic retinopathy. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 60(4), 990–998 (2019).
Sacconi, R. et al. Multimodal imaging assessment of vascular and neurodegenerative retinal alterations in type 1 diabetic patients without fundoscopic signs of diabetic retinopathy. J. Clin. Med. 8(9), 1409–1409 (2019).
Vujosevic, S. et al. Early microvascular and neural changes in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus without clinical signs of diabetic retinopathy. Retina 39(3), 435–445 (2019).
Yang, J. Y. et al. Microvascular retinal changes in pre-clinical diabetic retinopathy as detected by optical coherence tomographic angiography. Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 258(3), 513–520 (2020).
Zeng, Y. et al. Early retinal neurovascular impairment in patients with diabetes without clinically detectable retinopathy. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 103(12), 1747–1752 (2019).
Forte, R., Haulani, H. & Jürgens, I. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of the three capillary plexuses and choriocapillaris in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus without clinical signs of diabetic retinopathy: A prospective pilot study. Retina 40(2), 333–344 (2020).
Bhanushali, D. et al. Linking retinal microvasculature features with severity of diabetic retinopathy using optical coherence tomography angiography. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 57(9), 519–525 (2016).
Bontzos, G. et al. Retinal neurodegeneration, macular circulation and morphology of the foveal avascular zone in diabetic patients: Quantitative cross-sectional study using OCT-A. Acta Ophthalmol. 99(7), e1135 (2021).
Cao, D. et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography discerns preclinical diabetic retinopathy in eyes of patients with type 2 diabetes without clinical diabetic retinopathy. Acta Diabetol. 55(5), 469–477 (2018).
Ciloglu, E. et al. Evaluation of foveal avascular zone and capillary plexuses in diabetic patients by optical coherence tomography angiography. Korean J. Ophthalmol. 33(4), 359–359 (2019).
Czako, C. et al. Decreased retinal capillary density is associated with a higher risk of diabetic retinopathy in patients with diabetes. Retina 39(9), 1710–1719 (2019).
Kim, M. et al. Electroretinography and retinal microvascular changes in type 2 diabetes. Acta Ophthalmol. 98(7), e807–e813 (2020).
Koçer, A. M. & Şekeroğlu, M. A. Evaluation of the neuronal and microvascular components of the macula in patients with diabetic retinopathy. Doc. Ophthalmol. 143(2), 193–205 (2021).
Li, H. et al. Early neurovascular changes in the retina in preclinical diabetic retinopathy and its relation with blood glucose. BMC Ophthalmol. 21(1), 220–220 (2021).
Ryu, G., Kim, I. & Sagong, M. Topographic analysis of retinal and choroidal microvasculature according to diabetic retinopathy severity using optical coherence tomography angiography. Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 259(1), 61–68 (2021).
Shen, C. et al. Assessment of capillary dropout in the superficial retinal capillary plexus by optical coherence tomography angiography in the early stage of diabetic retinopathy. BMC Ophthalmol. 18(1), 1–6 (2018).
Simonett, J. M. et al. Early microvascular retinal changes in optical coherence tomography angiography in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Acta Ophthalmol. 95(8), e751–e755 (2017).
Somilleda-Ventura, S. A. et al. Circularity of the foveal avascular zone and its correlation with parafoveal vessel density, in subjects with and without diabetes. Cir. Cir. 87(4), 390–395 (2019).
Buyuktepe, T. et al. Role of inflammation in retinal microcirculation in diabetic eyes: Correlation between aqueous flare and microvascular findings. Ophthalmologica 243(5), 391–398 (2020).
Veiby, N. C. B. B. et al. Associations between macular OCT angiography and nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy in young patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. J. Diabetes Res. 2020, 8849116–8849116 (2020).
Zeng, Y. et al. Retinal vasculature–function correlation in non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Doc. Ophthalmol. 140(2), 129–138 (2020).
Rudvan, A. L. L., Can, M. E. & Efe, F. K. Evaluation of retinal microvascular changes in patients with prediabetes. Niger. J. Clin. Pract. 22, 1070–1077 (2019).
Niestrata-Ortiz, M. et al. Enlargement of the foveal avascular zone detected by optical coherence tomography angiography in diabetic children without diabetic retinopathy. Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 257(4), 689–697 (2019).
Oliverio, G. W. et al. Foveal avascular zone analysis by optical coherence tomography angiography in patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes and without clinical signs of diabetic retinopathy. Int. Ophthalmol. 41(2), 649–658 (2021).
Stulova, A. N. et al. OCTA and functional signs of preclinical retinopathy in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers Imaging Retina 52(S1), S30–S34 (2021).
Niestrata-Ortiz, M. et al. Sex-related variations of retinal and choroidal thickness and foveal avascular zone in healthy and diabetic children assessed by optical coherence tomography imaging. Ophthalmologica 241(3), 173–178 (2019).
Toto, L. et al. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of vascular changes in diabetic macular edema after dexamethasone implant using optical coherence tomography angiography. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18(6), 1181 (2017).
Liu, G. & Wang, F. Macular vascular changes in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus by optical coherence tomography angiography. BMC Ophthalmol. 21(1), 170 (2021).
Sugimoto, M. et al. Relationship between size of the foveal avascular zone and carbohydrate metabolic disorders during pregnancy. BioMed. Res. Int. 2019, 3261279 (2019).
Tarek, N. et al. Evaluation of macular and peri-papillary blood vessel density following uncomplicated phacoemulsification in diabetics using optical coherence tomography angiography Noha. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 69(1), 1173–1177 (2021).
Aschauer, J. et al. Longitudinal analysis of microvascular perfusion and neurodegenerative changes in early type 2 diabetic retinal disease. Br. J. Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-317322 (2020).
Sun, Z. et al. OCT angiography metrics predict progression of diabetic retinopathy and development of diabetic macular edema: A prospective study. Ophthalmology 126(12), 1675–1684 (2019).
Bulut, M. et al. Evaluation of optical coherence tomography angiographic findings in Alzheimer’s type dementia. Br J Ophthalmol 102(2), 233–237 (2018).
Chua, J. et al. Retinal microvasculature dysfunction is associated with Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimer’s Res. Therapy 12(1), 1–13 (2020).
Haan, J. D. et al. Is retinal vasculature a biomarker in amyloid proven Alzheimer’s disease?. Alzheimer’s Dement. Diagn. Assess. Dis. Monit. 11, 383–391 (2019).
Lahme, L. et al. Evaluation of ocular perfusion in Alzheimer’s disease using optical coherence tomography angiography. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 66(4), 1745–1752 (2018).
Robbins, C. B. et al. Assessing the retinal microvasculature in individuals with early and late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers Imaging Retina 52(6), 336–344 (2021).
Wang, X. et al. Decreased retinal vascular density in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI): An Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCTA) Study. Front. Aging Neurosci. 12(January), 1–10 (2021).
Wu, J. et al. Retinal microvascular attenuation in mental cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease by optical coherence tomography angiography. Acta Ophthalmol. 98(6), e781–e787 (2020).
Zabel, P. et al. Comparison of retinal microvasculature in patients with Alzheimer’s disease and primary open-angle glaucoma by optical coherence tomography angiography. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 60(10), 3447–3455 (2019).
Zabel, P. et al. Quantitative assessment of retinal thickness and vessel density using optical coherence tomography angiography in patients with Alzheimer’s disease and glaucoma. PLoS ONE 16(3), e0248284 (2021).
Yan, Y. et al. The retinal vessel density can reflect cognitive function in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: Evidence from optical coherence tomography angiography. J Alzheimer’s Dis 79(3), 1307–1316 (2021).
Shin, J. Y. et al. Changes in retinal microvasculature and retinal layer thickness in association with apolipoprotein E genotype in Alzheimer’s disease. Sci. Rep. 11(1), 1847–1847 (2021).
Rascunà, C. et al. Retinal thickness and microvascular pathway in Idiopathic Rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder and Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 2021(88), 40–45 (2020).
Robbins, C. B. et al. Characterization of retinal microvascular and choroidal structural changes in Parkinson disease. JAMA Ophthalmol. 139(2), 182–188 (2021).
Zou, J. et al. Combination of optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography increases diagnostic efficacy of Parkinson’s disease. Quant. Imaging Med. Surg. 10(10), 1930–1930 (2020).
Liu, B. et al. Reduced retinal microvascular perfusion in patients with stroke detected by optical coherence tomography angiography. Front. Aging Neurosci. 13, 628336–628336 (2021).
Aly, L. et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography indicates subclinical retinal disease in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Multiple Scler. J. 28(4), 522 (2021).
Cordon, B. et al. Angiography with optical coherence tomography as a biomarker in multiple sclerosis. PLoS ONE 15(12), e0243236 (2020).
Karaküçük, Y., Gümüş, H. & Eker, S. Evaluation of the effect of fingolimod (FTY720) on macular perfusion by swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography in patients with multiple sclerosis. Cutan. Ocul. Toxicol. 39(3), 281–286 (2020).
Yilmaz, H., Ersoy, A. & Icel, E. Assessments of vessel density and foveal avascular zone metrics in multiple sclerosis: An optical coherence tomography angiography study. Eye 34(4), 771–778 (2020).
Criscuolo, C. et al. Assessment of retinal vascular network in amnestic mild cognitive impairment by optical coherence tomography angiography. PLoS ONE 15(6), e0233975–e0233975 (2020).
Zhang, Y. et al. Retinal structural and microvascular alterations in different acute Ischemic stroke subtypes. J. Ophthalmol. 2020, 8850309 (2020).
Wang, X. et al. The vessel density of the superficial retinal capillary plexus as a new biomarker in cerebral small vessel disease: An optical coherence tomography angiography study. Neurol. Sci. 42(9), 3615 (2021).
Zhang, X. et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography reveals distinct retinal structural and microvascular abnormalities in cerebrovascular disease. Front. Neurosci. 14, 588515 (2020).
Kazanci, E. G., Korkmaz, M. F. & Can Muhammet, F. Optical coherence tomography angiography findings in young beta-thalassemia patients. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 30(3), 600–607 (2020).
Peng, S.-Y. et al. Impact of blood pressure control on retinal microvasculature in patients with chronic kidney disease. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 14275–14275 (2020).
Wang, W. et al. Association of renal function with retinal vessel density in patients with type 2 diabetes by using swept-source optical coherence tomographic angiography. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 104(12), 1768–1773 (2020).
Cankurtaran, V. et al. Retinal microcirculation in predicting diabetic nephropathy in type 2 diabetic patients without retinopathy. Ophthalmologica 243(4), 271–279 (2020).
Değirmenci, M. F. K., Temel, E. & Yalçındağ, F. N. Quantitative evaluation of the retinal vascular parameters with OCTA in patients with behçet disease without ocular involvement. Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers Imaging Retina 51(1), 31–34 (2019).
Smid, L. M. et al. Parafoveal microvascular alterations in ocular and non-ocular Behcet’s disease evaluated with optical coherence tomography angiography. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 62(3), 8–8 (2021).
Yilmaz, P. T., Ozdemir, E. Y. & Alp Pinar, T. Optical coherence tomography angiography findings in patients with ocular and non-ocular Behcet disease. Arq. Bras. Oftalmol. 84(3), 235–240 (2021).
Aksoy, F. E. et al. Retinal microvasculature in the remission period of Behcet’s uveitis. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Therapy 29(January), 101646 (2020).
Agarwal, A. et al. Retinal microvascular alterations in patients with quiescent posterior and panuveitis using optical coherence tomography angiography. Ocul. Immunol. Inflamm. 30, 1781 (2021).
Tian, M. et al. Swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography reveals vascular changes in intermediate uveitis. Acta Ophthalmol. 97(5), e785–e791 (2019).
Fan, S. et al. Evaluation of microvasculature alterations in convalescent Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease using optical coherence tomography angiography. Eye 35(7), 1993–1998 (2021).
Karaca, I. et al. Assessment of macular capillary perfusion in patients with inactive Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease: An optical coherence tomography angiography study. Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 258(6), 1181–1190 (2020).
Aksoy, F. E. et al. Analysis of retinal microvasculature in Fuchs’ uveitis syndrome. Retinal microvasculature in Fuchs’ uveitis. J. Fr. Ophtalmol. 43(4), 324–329 (2020).
Hirano, T. et al. Quantifying vascular density and morphology using different swept-source optical coherence tomography angiographic scan patterns in diabetic retinopathy. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 103(2), 216–221 (2019).
Karst, S. G. et al. Evaluating signs of microangiopathy secondary to diabetes in different areas of the retina with swept source OCTA. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 61(5), 8 (2020).
Marques, I. P. et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography metrics monitor severity progression of diabetic retinopathy—3-Year longitudinal study. J. Clin. Med. 10(11), 2296 (2021).
Vujosevic, S. et al. Peripapillary microvascular and neural changes in diabetes mellitus: An OCT-angiography study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 59(12), 5074 (2018).
Yoon, S. P. et al. Retinal microvascular and neurodegenerative changes in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment compared to controls. Physiol. Behav. 176(3), 139–148 (2017).
Campbell, J. P. et al. Detailed Vascular Anatomy of the Human Retina by Projection-Resolved Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography. Sci. Rep. 7, 42201. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42201 (2017).
Disclaimer
The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Funding
This study was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre (SRMRC).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
E.C. and J.R.M.K. were major contributors in writing the manuscript. E.C. conducted the search, and E.C. and M.T. conducted the initial screening of titles and abstracts. E.C. and J.R.M.K. extracted data. L.F. and E.C. conducted analysis. All authors read, edited, and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Courtie, E., Kirkpatrick, J.R.M., Taylor, M. et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography analysis methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 14, 9643 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54306-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54306-3
- Springer Nature Limited