Abstract
Ge2Sb2Te5 (GST), the most mature phase-change materials (PCM), functions as a recoding layer in nonvolatile memory and optical discs by contrasting the physical properties upon phase transition between amorphous and crystalline phases. However, GST faces challenges such as a large extinction coefficient (k) and low thermal stability of the amorphous phase. In this study, we introduce RuSbTe as a new PCM to address the GST concerns. Notably, the crystallization temperature of the amorphous RuSbTe is approximately 350 °C, significantly higher than GST. A one-order-of-magnitude increase in the resistivity contrast was observed upon phase transition. The crystalline (0.35–0.50 eV) and amorphous (0.26–0.37 eV) phases exhibit relatively small band gap values, resulting in substantial k. Although RuSbTe demonstrates a k difference of approximately 1 upon crystallization at the telecommunications C-band, the refractive index (n) difference is negligible. Unlike GST, which induces both phase retardation and amplitude modulation in its optical switch device, RuSbTe exhibits amplitude-only modulation. This study suggests that RuSbTe has the potential to enable new photonic computing devices that can independently control the phase and amplitude. Combining RuSbTe with phase-only modulators could open avenues for advanced applications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Introduction
Phase-change materials (PCMs) exhibit a reversible phase transition between the amorphous and crystalline phases1. Generally, the amorphous phase exhibits high electrical resistivity and low optical reflectance, whereas the crystalline phase exhibits low resistivity and high reflectance. The contrast in the physical properties upon phase change enables PCM to be used for nonvolatile storage applications such as nonvolatile memory and optical discs1. In addition to these storage techniques, recent studies have demonstrated that PCMs are promising for rewritable photonic elements used in reconfigurable photonic devices2,3,4.
Owing to the successful demonstration of nonvolatile memory and optical disc applications, the Ge2Sb2Te5 (GST) is the most mature and promising PCM for photonic applications with a large contrast in physical properties upon phase transition and high state discrimination1. The large shift in the refractive index (n) of 3.56 at a wavelength of 1550 nm, which corresponds to the telecommunications C-band, provides distinct states in transmission, enabling photonic computing5,6. Meanwhile, the extinction coefficient (k) of GST limits the device size and scalability. This emphasizes the importance of developing low-loss PCMs such as Sb2S3 or Sb2Se33. Another concern regarding GST is the low thermal stability of the amorphous phase, which must be addressed. Long-term retention of encoded data is required for computing applications, such as synaptic weight in neuromorphic computing. To this end, the relatively low crystallization temperature Tx of GST (150 °C) should be improved. Transition-metal-included PCMs are one of the solutions for realizing long data retention owing to their high thermal stability7,8,9,10,11.
In the Ru–Sb–Te ternary system, the stoichiometric compound RuSbTe exhibits semiconductor characteristics12, and it is theoretically predicted that k decreases with increasing wavelength in the infrared region13. Although an amorphous phase of RuSbTe has not been demonstrated to date, the melting point of the bulk materials has been reported in the temperature range of 700–900 °C12, comparable to conventional PCMs14,15. In fact, the as-deposited RuSbTe film shows an amorphous phase, as demonstrated in the following section. Moreover, because Ru doping significantly enhances the thermal stability of amorphous Sb2Te, and GeTe10,11, a high Tx is expected for amorphous RuSbTe. Based on this background, we aimed to develop a stoichiometric ternary RuSbTe material with high thermal stability and optical property modulation upon phase changes for photonic applications.
Results and discussion
Figure 1a shows the temperature dependence of the resistance of the as-deposited film. During the heating process, the resistance gradually decreases up to 100 °C. The resistance remains nearly constant within 100–300 °C but suddenly increases at 350 °C. During cooling, a highly resistive state was maintained, followed by an increase in the resistance to room temperature. In the X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of the as-deposited film, there was no distinct Bragg reflection except for that of the Si substrate, indicating an amorphous phase (Fig. 1b). Meanwhile, the XRD pattern for the 400 °C-annealed film shows Bragg reflection corresponding to the RuSbTe crystal structure (Fig. 1c). By analyzing the XRD pattern for the annealed film by Williamson-Hall method, the grain size was determined to be 2.98 nm, indicating polycrystalline microstructure with small grains. The resistivity for the crystalline phase (3.90 × 10–2 Ωcm) was found to be an order of magnitude larger than that for the amorphous phase (2.86 × 10–3 Ωcm). This type of resistive change classifies RuSbTe as an inverse resistance change PCM8,16,17,18. Since the sudden increase in resistance corresponds to the crystallization in inverse resistance change PCMs8,18, the Tx can be approximately 350 °C, which is much higher than GST by 200 °C. Such high thermal stability is assumed to originate from the high number of coordination bonds formed in the local structure around Ru in the amorphous phase, as predicted for Ru-doped GeTe11.
The optical contrast upon phase transition is a unique feature of PCM. The reflectance change upon phase transition was used to record the principle of optical discs1. GST shows a 20–30% contrast in reflectance at 630 nm upon phase transition, which is used for data reading in product1. In contrast to the optical characteristics of GST, the reflectance spectra of RuSbTe were nearly the same for the two phases in the visible region, as shown in Fig. 2a. The increase in reflectance across the wavelength range of 300–700 nm is attributed to the gradual escalation of n in the infrared region, as illustrated subsequently (Fig. 2b), preceded by a similar trend observed within the visible range. The transmittance gradually increases with increasing wavelength, and the crystalline phase exhibits higher values than the amorphous phase in this measurement range (Fig. 2a).
These results indicated that the optical properties of RuSbTe differed from those of conventional PCMs. As mentioned in Introduction, the refractive index and extinction coefficient in the infrared region are more important for photonic computing devices than the optical properties in the visible region. Figure 2b shows n and k for films in the infrared range (700–2000 nm). The Tauc–Lorentz model was used for data fitting. Similar to the reflectance, the n spectra do not show a clear difference, providing the contrast in the n at 1550 nm, Δn, of 0.12. Compared to the Δn for PCMs considered for photonic computing devices such as GST (3.56), Sb2S3 (0.60), and Sb2Se3 (0.77)3,6, the RuSbTe showed negligible contrast in the refractive index. In contrast to n, the k shows a clear difference between the two phases. Both phases showed k values greater than 1 in the infrared range owing to their small band gaps, as discussed later.
The absorption coefficient, α, in the visible and infrared ranges was calculated using the following equations19,20,21:
where d is the thickness, R is the reflectance, T is the transmittance, and λ is the wavelength. The α for visible range was calculated based on Eq. (1) using the obtained results by spectrophotometer measurement, and that for infrared range was calculated based on Eq. (2) using the obtained results by ellipsometry measurement. Figure 3a shows the calculated α spectra. In both amorphous and crystalline phases, the calculated α based on the ellipsometry results is larger than that based on the spectrophotometer results. However, there is a tendency for α to gradually decrease in the visible region, followed by a drastic decrease in the infrared region. The α is expressed with considering the Fresnel reflection and scattering is expressed as followings22:
where S is the assumed fraction of light that does not reach the detector because of scattering and Ri (i: 1, 2, 3) is the Fresnel reflection at the interfaces of air/film (R1), film/substrate (R2), and substrate/air (R3). The α value calculated without accounting for Fresnel reflection and scattering is underestimated, as indicated by the positive sign of the first term on the right-hand side of Eq. (3). Equation (1) does not include the impact of Fresnel reflection and scattering, resulting in a lower α derived from spectrophotometer measurements compared to that obtained from ellipsometry measurements. Tauc plots were performed to determine the bandgap (Eg), as shown in Fig. 3b,c. In addition to the amorphous phase23, an indirect transition was assumed in the Tauc plots for the crystalline phase because RuSbTe with P21/c symmetry (Fig. 3d) was predicted to show an indirect transition by density functional theory (DFT) calculations (Fig. 3e)24,25. From these Tauc plots, the Eg was determined to be 0.26–0.37 eV and 0.35–0.50 eV for the amorphous and crystalline phases, respectively. For both phases, the Eg estimated from the spectrophotometer measurement is higher than that estimated from the ellipsometry measurement due to the difference in the α. The Eg for the RuSbTe films is smaller values than the photon energy in infrared range (0.62–1.77 eV), leading to the large k. Furthermore, the non-zero values of Eg observed for both the amorphous and crystalline phases contribute to increase the transmittance as the wavelength increases (Fig. 2a).
Contrary to the aim mentioned in the Introduction, the RuSbTe films showed large absorption in both phases. However, it was found that RuSbTe showed a different response in the refractive index upon phase change from conventional PCMs, suggesting the possibility of realizing a new type of device. The changes in n and k obtained in conventional PCMs cause both phase retardation and amplitude modulation, which can be utilized for phase-shifter-type optical switches by combining a Mach–Zehnder interferometer and simple transmission modulator with a straight waveguide, respectively. For a transmission modulator, a phase shift is not favorable because unexpected signal modulations can be induced. RuSbTe exhibits a large contrast in k with nearly no change in n, leading to an amplitude-only modification, as shown in Fig. 4a.
Figure 4b schematically depicts the transmission changes in PCM-embedded optical ring resonator. In the case of conventional PCMs such as GST, both the transmission and wavelength for minimum transmission change upon phase transition, as shown in (1) of Fig. 4b, which is not straightforward for optical controlling. Meanwhile, recent studies demonstrated phase-only modulator using Sb2Se3, Ge2Sb2Se4Te, and Ge2Sb2Te3S226,27,28, leading to a phase shift remaining in the transmission ((2) of Fig. 4b). Because the transmission can be simply modified, RuSbTe can become a component to realize new photonic computing devices, which independently control the phase and amplitude, by combining phase-only modulators.
In all-optical switches, metallic heaters cannot be utilized, necessitating the induction of phase change through laser irradiation. However, employing a low-absorption PCM in a phase-only modulator requires high optical power for switching, potentially causing a damage to surrounding components within the optical circuit. To mitigate heat propagation induced during phase-only modulator switching, PCM must be adequately isolated from components, resulting in a large circuit size. Conversely, RuSbTe demonstrates efficient laser absorption owing to its high k. Consequently, RuSbTe offers an advantage in reducing the size of the all-optical switch circuit.
In summary, the phase-change behavior of RuSbTe films was investigated. The fabricated films exhibited an inverse change in resistance between the low-resistive amorphous and highly-resistive crystalline phases. The crystallization temperature of the film was much higher than that of the GST, indicating its high thermal stability. The small optical contrasts in the reflectance and transmittance ruled out the possibility of using RuSbTe films as traditional optical discs. However, the significant difference in k, while almost no difference in n, indicates that the RuSbTe film is a promising reconfigurable transmission modulator with amplitude-only modulation.
Experimental methods
RuSbTe films were deposited on SiO2 (100 nm)/Si or glass substrates by radiofrequency magnetron sputtering using a pure Ru metal target and an Sb2Te3 alloy target. Because the composition of the deposited film tends to be different from that of the original target owing to the different sputtering yields and ion energies of different elements29, a slightly Te-rich alloy composition was employed as a counterpart for Ru. The films were fabricated with a thickness of 100 nm, followed by surface coating with a 10 nm-thick ZrO2 layer without breaking the vacuum. The film thickness was measured using a stylus profilometer (DektakXT; Bruker). The composition of the film was Ru0.31Sb0.28Te0.41 by X-ray fluorescence measurement (EA6000VX; HITACHI).
The temperature dependence of the resistance of the as-deposited film was measured in an Ar atmosphere at atmospheric pressure. The resistance was measured using a resistance-measure unit (MILA-5000 and MILA-5000-TER; ADVANCE RIKO, Inc.) during annealing up to 400 °C within 10 min. This was followed by cooling to room temperature in a lamp furnace. X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were performed on the RuSbTe film grown on a SiO2 (100 nm)/Si substrate with a Cu Kα source (λ = 0.1542 nm) using a conventional 2θ/θ geometry.
The reflectance (R) and transmittance (T) of 100-nm-thick RuSbTe films grown on glass substrates were measured for the perpendicular to the film surface in the wavelength range 200–700 nm using a spectrophotometer (Solid-Spec 3700i; SHIMADZU). The reflectance was measured relative to that of the Al mirror. The transmittance was measured relative to that of the glass substrate. The obtained results using spectrophotometer were analyzed without scattering.
The complex indices of the refraction spectra of the RuSbTe films were measured using a spectroscopic ellipsometer (UVISEL 2; HORIBA). Measurements were performed in the spectral range of 750–2000 nm at an incident angle of 70°. The Tauc–Lorentz model30 was used for data analysis.
Data availability
All data are available in the main text.
References
Wuttig, M. & Yamada, N. Phase-change materials for rewriteable data storage. Nat. Mater. 6, 824 (2007).
Lian, C. et al. Photonic (computational) memories: Tunable nanophotonics for data storage and computing. Nanophotonics 11, 3823 (2022).
Delaney, M., Zeimpekis, I., Lawson, D., Hewak, D. W. & Muskens, O. L. A new family of ultralow loss reversible phase-change materials for photonic integrated circuits: Sb2S3 and Sb2Se3. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 202002447 (2020).
Ríos, C. et al. Integrated all-photonic non-volatile multi-level memory. Nat. Photon. 9, 725 (2015).
Li, X. et al. Fast and reliable storage using a 5 bit, nonvolatile photonic memory cell. Optica 6, 1 (2018).
Shportko, K. et al. Resonant bonding in crystalline phase-change materials. Nat. Mater. 7, 653 (2008).
Kamada, T., Sutou, Y., Sumiya, M., Saito, Y. & Koike, J. Crystallization and electrical characteristics of Ge1Cu2Te3 films for phase change random access memory. Thin Solid Films 520, 4389 (2012).
Hatayama, S. et al. Inverse resistance change Cr2Ge2Te6-based PCRAM enabling ultralow-energy amorphization. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 2725 (2018).
Mori, S., Hatayama, S., Shuang, Y., Ando, D. & Sutou, Y. Reversible displacive transformation in MnTe polymorphic semiconductor. Nat. Commun. 11, 85 (2020).
Tan, Z. et al. Investigation of Ru-doped Sb2Te alloy for high-speed and good thermal stability phase change memory applications. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 32, 20679 (2021).
Xu, Y., Song, S., Yuan, Z., Zhao, J. & Song, Z. High thermal stability and fast speed phase change memory by optimizing GeTe alloys with Ru doping. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 10, 055009 (2021).
Hulliger, F. New semiconducting arsenopyrite-type compounds. Nature 201, 381 (1964).
Saito, Y. et al. Systematic materials design for phase-change memory with small density changes for high-endurance non-volatile memory applications. Appl. Phys. Express 12, 051008 (2019).
Yamada, N., Ohno, E., Nishiuchi, K., Akahira, N. & Takao, M. Rapid-phase transitions of GeTe–Sb2Te3 pseudobinary amorphous thin films for an optical disk memory. J. Appl. Phys. 69, 2849 (1991).
Okamoto, H. Ge–Te (Germanium–Tellurium). J. Phase Equilib. 21, 496 (2000).
Hatayama, S. et al. Cr-triggered local structural change in Cr2Ge2Te6 phase change material. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 43320 (2019).
Ho, H. W. et al. Unravelling the anomalous electrical and optical phase-change characteristics in FeTe. Acta Mater. 112, 67 (2016).
Shuang, Y. et al. NbTe4 phase-change material: Breaking the phase-change temperature balance in 2D Van der Waals transition-metal binary chalcogenide. Adv. Mater. 35, 2303646 (2023).
Vahalová, R., Tichý, L., Vlček, M. & Tichá, H. Far infrared spectra and bonding arrangement in some Ge–Sb–S Glasses. Phys. Status Solidi 181, 199 (2000).
Hatayama, S. et al. Understanding the low resistivity of the amorphous phase of Cr2Ge2Te6 phase-change material: Experimental evidence for the key role of Cr clusters. Phys. Rev. Mater. 5, 085601 (2021).
Hatayama, S., Ando, D. & Sutou, Y. Relation between density and optical contrasts upon crystallization in Cr2Ge2Te6 phase-change material: Coexistence of a positive optical contrast and a negative density contrast. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 52, 325111 (2019).
Ho, H. W. et al. Optical response characteristics arising from delocalized electrons in phase change materials. Acta Mater. 61, 1757 (2013).
Tauc, J., Grigorovici, R. & Vancu, A. Optical properties and electronic structure of amorphous germanium. Phys. Status Solidi 15, 627 (1996).
Jain, A. et al. Commentary: The materials project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 1, 011002 (2013).
Munro, J. M., Latimer, K., Horton, M. K., Dwaraknath, S. & Persson, K. A. An improved symmetry-based approach to reciprocal space path selection in band structure calculations. NPJ Comput. Mater. 6, 112 (2020).
Zhang, Y. et al. Broadband transparent optical phase change materials for high-performance nonvolatile photonics. Nat. Commun. 10, 4279 (2019).
Miyatake, Y. et al. Proposal of low-loss non-volatile mid-infrared optical phase shifter based on Ge2Sb2Te3S2. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 70, 2106 (2023).
Fang, Z. et al. Nonvolatile transmissive metasurface with phase-only modulation. Front. Opt. Laser Sci. 1, 1 (2023).
Saito, Y. et al. Compositional tuning in sputter-grown highly-oriented Bi–Te films and their optical and electronic structures. Nanoscale 9, 15115 (2017).
Jellison, G. E. & Modine, F. A. Parameterization of the optical functions of amorphous materials in the interband region. Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 371 (1996).
Villars, P. (ed.) Inorganic Solid Phases (Springer, 2023).
Acknowledgements
This work is partially supported by National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT) (Grant No. JPJ012368C03701).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, S.H. and Y.S.; investigation, S.H. and K.M.; supervision, Y.S.; writing-original draft, S.H.; writing-review and editing, K.M. and Y.S. All authors have read and agreed to the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hatayama, S., Makino, K. & Saito, Y. Phase-change behavior of RuSbTe thin film for photonic applications with amplitude-only modulation. Sci Rep 14, 8839 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-59235-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-59235-9
- Springer Nature Limited