Abstract
Feeding behavior, the most fundamental physiological activity, is controlled by two opposing groups of factors, orexigenic and anorexigenic factors. The sulfakinin family, an insect analogue of the mammalian satiety factor cholecystokinin (CCK), has been shown to suppress food intake in various insects. Nevertheless, the mechanisms through which sulfakinin regulates feeding behavior remain a biological question. This study aimed to elucidate the signaling pathway mediated by the anorexigenic peptide sulfakinin in Bombyx mori. We identified the Bombyx mori neuropeptide G protein-coupled receptor A9 (BNGR-A9) as the receptor for sulfakinin through functional assays. Stimulation with sulfakinin triggered a swift increase in intracellular IP3, Ca2+, and a notable enhancement of ERK1/2 phosphorylation, in a manner sensitive to a Gαq-specific inhibitor. Treatment with synthetic sulfakinin resulted in decreased food consumption and average body weight. Additionally, administering synthetic sulfakinin to silkworms significantly elevated hemolymph trehalose levels, an effect markedly reduced by pre-treatment with BNGR-A9 dsRNA. Consequently, our findings establish the sulfakinin/BNGR-A9 signaling pathway as a critical regulator of feeding behavior and hemolymph trehalose homeostasis in Bombyx mori, highlighting its roles in the negative control of food intake and the positive regulation of energy balance.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Regulating feeding in Bombyx mori is crucial for optimizing silk production, as well as maintaining population density and health. However, we still do not fully understand the molecular mechanisms behind feeding regulation in this species. Sulfakinins (SKs), insect neuropeptides akin to the vertebrate gastrin/cholecystokinins involved in feeding regulation, have been shown to play a regulatory role in various insect species, including the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria, the beetle Tribolium castaneum and Dendroctonus armandi1,2,3. The role of Bombyx mori SKs and their receptors in feeding regulation, however, remains to be elucidated.
SKs were first isolated from the head extract of the cockroach Leucopaea maderae4,5 and subsequently characterized in various species, including the cockroach Periplaneta americana6, the locust Locusta migratoria7, the flesh fly Neobellieria bullata8, and the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster9. SKs in insects exhibit varied physiological roles across different species. In Locusta migratoria, SKs have been reported to enhance the release of primary digestive enzymes within the insect gut10,11. Additionally, SKs also elevate heart contraction frequencies in Drosophila melanogaster12,13, and act as modulators of odor preference, locomotion14,15, and metabolism16. Nevertheless, SKs are most renowned for their role as a satiety factor in regulating feeding behavior. SKs have been shown to reduce meal sizes in various insects upon injection, such as the blowfly Phormia regina, and beetles Zophobas atratus and Tribolium castaneum1,2,17,18,19,20.
Sharing structural similarities with vertebrate CCKs, these identified SKs possess a conserved C-terminal hexapeptide (Y(SO3H)GHM/L)RFamide) and a sulfated tyrosine residue critical for their receptor binding and biological function across several insect species5,17,18,19,20. Experiments with synthetic non-sulfated Leucosulfakinins (LSKs) revealed no myotropic activity on the cockroach hindgut, in contrast to sulfated LSKs, which significantly increased spontaneous hindgut contractions5. Similarly, in the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria and brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens, the full efficacy and potency of SKs in reducing feeding also requires a Tyr(SO3H) moiety1,20.
Insect SKs mediate their effects via G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) located on the cell surface membrane. The Drosophila SK receptor (DSK-R1, also known as CCKLR-17D3) emerged as the first cloned and characterized receptor for insect SKs, displaying high affinity for tyrosine-sulfated SK (sSK) and low affinity for nonsulfated SK (nsSK)21. Another receptor, CCKLR-17D1, identified in Drosophila, exclusively responds to sSKs, underscoring the critical role of the sulfated tyrosine residue in SKs for receptor interaction and activity14. This specificity for sSKs was also observed in the beetle Tribolium castaneum. Cell-based receptor assays demonstrated that sulfated SKs more effectively activated the SK receptors in Tribolium castaneum compared to their nonsulfated counterparts, reinforcing the significance of sulfation for receptor activation. Furthermore, knockdown experiments targeting the sk, skr1, or skr2 genes in Tribolium castaneum led to increased food consumption, highlighting the regulatory role of these genes in feeding behavior2,19.
In this study, we describe the cloning of cDNA for the Bombyx mori SK receptor, BNGR-A9. Through a series of assays, including a CRE-driven luciferase reporter system for cAMP measurement, a Fura-2 AM-based calcium mobilization assay, and a receptor internalization assay, we determined that BNGR-A9 serves as a specific receptor for Bombyx SKs. Further support from expression profiling and in vivo experiments demonstrates that the SK/BNGR-A9 signaling pathway plays a crucial role in regulating food intake and hemolymph trehalose levels in Bombyx mori. Our results elucidate the signaling mechanisms underlying silkworm feeding behavior and highlight a potential molecular target for controlling Lepidoptera populations.
Results
Cloning and comparative analysis of BNGR-A9 and other SK receptors sequences
BNGR-A9 was identified as a potential SK receptor in Bombyx mori through genomic and phylogenetic analyses22,23. In this research, we successfully cloned the full-length cDNA of BNGR-A9 (GenBank: NM_001134272.1) from Bombyx mori larval brain tissue via RT-PCR. The BNGR-A9 protein comprises 464 amino acids, featuring the characteristic seven hydrophobic domains typical of GPCRs. Sequence comparison showed BNGR-A9 shares sequence identities of 31.6%, 29%, 42.8%, and 40.8% with DSK-R1, DSK-R2, TcSKR-1, and TcSKR-2 insect SK receptors, respectively (Fig. 1A).
SK family peptides typically end with the motif -Y(SO3H)GHM/LRF-NH2. Within the Bombyx mori genome, we identified a transcript (GenBank: NM_001130882) coding for a SK precursor. Analysis of conserved cleavage sites revealed a single mature SK peptide featuring -Lys-Arg- or -Arg- and an amidation site (GDDTFDD8YGHLRF-NH2). This mature peptide shares nine residues with SKs from other insects (Fig. 1B). Previous studies have shown SK tyrosine (-8Tyr-) can be sulfated or nonsulfated 6,24. Consequently, we synthesized both sulfated (BmsSK) and nonsulfated (BmnsSK) versions of Bombyx mori SK for further experiments.
Expression of Bombyx SK and BNGR-A9 mRNA across tissues in Bombyx mori
To explore the distribution of SK and BNGR-A9 mRNA, we conducted qRT-PCR on various tissues of fifth instar silkworm larvae (Fig. 2). The findings revealed the highest expression of sk in the brain, consistent with the localization of its potential receptor, bngr-a9. Notably, lower expression levels of bngr-a9 were also found in the testis and fat body, whereas in other tissues, both sk and bngr-a9 mRNA were nearly undetectable (Fig. 2A).
Additionally, we examined the expression patterns of these genes in the brain and midgut during the fifth instar stage. Both genes maintained constant expression in the brain throughout this stage (Fig. 2B). However, in the midgut, both genes gradually increased their expression starting from the third day of the fifth instar stage, peaking on the last day when Bombyx mori completely stops feeding (Fig. 2C). These findings not only suggest the role of the SK signaling pathway in regulating food intake but also hint at its involvement in various physiological processes across different tissues.
Identification of BNGR-A9 as the functional Bombyx mori sulfakinins receptor
The qRT-PCR analyses revealed a close correlation between the expression profiles of sk and bngr-a9, suggesting a strong likelihood that BNGR-A9 serves as a receptor for Bombyx SK. Next, we aimed to verify if BNGR-A9 functions as the receptor for Bombyx SKs. We used a CRE-driven luciferase reporter assay to indirectly measure intracellular cAMP production. Testing various Bombyx neuropeptides in a heterologous expression system, we found that only BmsSK and BmnsSK could activate BNGR-A9 in HEK293 and BmN cells (Fig. 3A and B), regardless of the presence of forskolin (Fig. S1). Other Bombyx mori neuropeptides, including neuropeptide F, myosuppresin from the RF-NH2 family, and peptides such as TKRP5 (tachykinin-related peptide 5), OK (orcokinin), or NTL (natalisin), did not significantly activate BNGR-A9 expressing cells.
Additionally, we tested Bombyx SKs on evolutionary closely related receptors BNGR-A24, -A32, and -A33, which showed no response, confirming BNGR-A9's specificity for Bombyx SKs (Fig. 3C and D). CRE-driven luciferase reporter assay designed to measure cAMP levels, which is a common method to study the activation of Gαs-coupled receptors. Interestingly, the activation effect of Bombyx SKs on luciferase activity was lower than that previously reported for Gαs-coupled receptors such as AKHR or BNGR-A2425,26. This suggests that BNGR-A9 may not strongly couple with Gαs and that Gαq-coupled signaling might predominantly mediate BNGR-A9 activation.
Sulfated Sulfakinin is more effective at activating BNGR-A9 than nonsulfated Sulfakinin
To examine the impact of sulfonation (SO3H) on the activity of SK peptides towards BNGR-A9, we conducted concentration–response analyses. The results showed that sulfated SK (BmsSK) significantly activated BNGR-A9 at concentrations between 1 and 10 nM, achieving an EC50 of 73.3 nM in HEK293 cells and 60.0 nM in BmN cells. In contrast, nonsulfated SK (BmnsSK) required concentrations up to 1μM or even 10μM to activate BNGR-A9, with an EC50 of 119.4 nM in HEK293 cells and 125.3 nM in BmN cells (Fig. 3E, F). Additionally, the activation efficacy of BmnsSK was less than 30% of that observed with BmsSK, suggesting BmnsSK functions as a partial agonist for BNGR-A9.
Beyond the CRE-driven luciferase assay, the Fura-2 AM-based Ca2+ mobilization assay further assessed the signaling activity mediated by SKs through BNGR-A9. As indicated in Fig. 4A and B, both sulfated and nonsulfated SKs at 1 μM concentration triggered responses in BNGR-A9-expressing cells, unlike other tested neuropeptides (tachykinin-related peptide, and neuropeptide F). Dose–response analysis revealed that sulfated SKs stimulated BNGR-A9 at notably lower concentrations (EC50: 29 nM in HEK293 and 51.4 nM in BmN cells) (Fig. 4C–F). Consistent with the luciferase assay findings, BmsSK generated a significantly greater Ca2+ response compared to BmnsSK. Furthermore, agonist-induced internalization is a well-characterized phenomenon for most GPCRs. As indicated in Fig. 5, our results showed that BmsSK induced rapid and significant receptor redistribution within the cytoplasm. These findings collectively indicate that BNGR-A9 acts as the specific receptor for Bombyx sulfated SK and can be partially activated by nonsulfated SK.
Activation of BNGR-A9 via Gαq protein-coupled signaling pathway
The activation of receptor BNGR-A9 by BmsSK leads to intracellular Ca2+ mobilization and CRE-driven luciferase transcription, pointing towards its engagement with a Gαq protein-coupled signaling pathway. To elucidate the specific signaling mechanisms involved, we employed functional assays in conjunction with specific inhibitors. Treatment with FR900359, a Gαq-specific inhibitor27, significantly reduced the luciferase activity increase induced by BmsSK (Fig. 6A and B). Besides, the intracellular cAMP levels in BNGR-A9-expressing HEK293 cells remained unchanged in response to BmnsSK and BmsSK, as detected using a direct cAMP ELISA kit (Fig. S2). Additionally, intracellular IP3 levels were determined using a direct IP3 ELISA kit, revealing a significant elevation following stimulation with BmnsSK and BmsSK in BNGR-A9-expressing HEK293 cells (Fig. 6C). Similarly, the Ca2+ mobilization triggered by BmsSK was completely blocked by FR900359 and the PLC inhibitor U73122, indicating the involvement of these components in BNGR-A9 activation (Fig. 6D and E). However, the PKA inhibitor KT5720 did not affect the BmsSK-induced responses, suggesting a different signaling route (Fig. 6F and G).
Further investigations into ERK phosphorylation in both heterologous and endogenous systems showed that BmsSK activation led to a quick and dose-dependent increase in ERK1/2 phosphorylation, reaching its peak at 5 min in HEK293 cells and 2 h in the silkworm brains (Fig. 7A, B and D). This phosphorylation was notably diminished by pre-incubation with FR900359 (Fig. 7C). Similarly, in silkworm larval brains, BmsSK-induced ERK phosphorylation was inhibited by FR900359, reinforcing the role of Gαq protein-dependent pathways in BNGR-A9 activation (Fig. 7D). These findings indicate the specific activation of BNGR-A9 by Bombyx SK through Gαq protein-coupled signaling.
Sulfakinin-mediated induction of food intake in Bombyx mori through BNGR-A9
We then explored the roles of SK and its receptor BNGR-A9 in regulating food intake in Bombyx mori. At the beginning of the fifth instar, we injected the silkworms with synthetic BmsSK and/or dsRNA that targeting BNGR-A9. In comparison to the control group, both the body weight and food consumption of Bombyx mori larvae notably declined on days 2 and 4 post-injection of synthetic sulfated- SK (Fig. 8A and C). Remarkably, the suppressive effect on food consumption was almost canceled by BNGR-A9 dsRNA, indicating that BmsSK functions as a satiety factor via BNGR-A9. Besides, the down-regulation of BNGR-A9 resulted in a rise in food consumption, while control dsRNA has no such effect (Fig. 8B and C).
Given that trehalose, a non-reducing disaccharide, is the primary blood sugar in insects and a crucial energy source for tissues and cells, we also explored how BmsSK signaling impacts hemolymph trehalose levels. To investigate the role of the BNGR-A9 receptor in BmsSK signaling, we measured trehalose levels in larvae after administering specific dsRNA treatments. Notably, after injecting either BNGR-A9-dsRNA or EGFP-dsRNA and subsequently treating with BmsSK, we observed a significant increase in trehalose levels in the hemolymph of larvae injected with control EGFP dsRNA. However, this increase induced by BmsSK was markedly reduced in larvae that received BNGR-A9 dsRNA, indicating the receptor's role in mediating BmsSK's effects on trehalose levels (Fig. 8D). Interestingly, glucose levels remained unchanged in both the BNGR-A9 and control dsRNA-treated silkworms, indicating a specific regulatory pathway for trehalose without affecting glucose levels (Fig. S3).
Discussion
The SK family is pivotal in regulating various physiological processes, including feeding behavior, gut activity, heart rate, odor preference, and metabolism. While the significance of the SK signaling system in these functions is becoming clearer, the specifics of how SKs control feeding behavior are still largely unexplored. Here, we have successfully cloned and identified BNGR-A9 as the specific receptor for SK neuropeptides and explored its role in physiological regulation. Using a CRE-driven reporter system, Ca2+ mobilization assays, and IP3 ELISA assay, we found that the BNGR-A9 receptor is preferentially activated by Bombyx SKs but not by other related neuropeptides. Additionally, BNGR-A9 rapidly relocates from the cell surface to the cytoplasm upon activation by its agonists. Furthermore, exposure to SK resulted in ERK phosphorylation in both HEK293 cells and cultured silkworm brains. Taken together, our findings strongly support the idea that SKs act as functional ligands for BNGR-A9, which can now be more accurately referred to as the Bombyx mori SK receptor (BmSKR).
SKs were initially characterized as neuropeptides that stimulate hindgut contractions in Leucophaea maderae4,5, Zophobas atratus18, and Locusta migratoria7. Subsequent research has predominantly linked SKs to satiety regulation in insects1,2,17,28,29,30, along with their known stimulatory effects on the release of the digestive enzyme amylase from the insect digestive tract28,31. In our study, we used dsRNA-mediated down-regulation of BmSKR and observed an increase in food consumption, while injections of BmsSK induced weight loss. Additionally, we noted that the expression levels of SK and BNGR-A9 in midgut began to increase from the third day of the fifth instar stage and peaked on the last day. This pattern suggests that high expression levels of SK and SKR may inhibit food intake, potentially facilitating the transition from the growth phase to the spinning stage. These results emphasize the critical role of SK signaling in regulating feeding behavior and may suggest a potential role in developmental transitions of insects. Recent studies have further elucidated the role of SKs in invertebrates. For instance, the injection of Zopat-SK-1 markedly increased trehalose levels in the hemolymph, pointing to SKs' involvement in sugar regulation within insect fat body18,32. Our research corroborates these findings, revealing a significant rise in circulating hemolymph trehalose following BmsSK injection. Trehalose, a major storage carbohydrate in insects including Bombyx mori, is synthesized in the fat body from glucose and is tightly regulated by insulin-like peptides (ILPs) and adipokinetic hormone (AKH)33. Notably, previous studies have shown that the insulin receptor enhances SK expression and that insulin like peptide/insulin receptor regulate food intake in a SK-dependent pathway during larval stages34. These discoveries highlight a possible link between trehalose homeostasis and food intake regulated by SK signaling. However, the detailed mechanisms underlying the regulation of feeding behavior and circulating trehalose homeostasis by SKs still need to be further investigated.
The SK family is well conserved in invertebrates and vertebrates during evolution. Similar to the mammalian CCK/gastrin, the posttranslational sulfonation of tyrosine is also critical for the biological activities of insect SKs. Both sulfated and nonsulfated SKs were detected in the corpora cardiac/corpora allata complexes in the American cockroach, Periplaneta americana24. While sulfated sulfakinin has been reported to inhibit food intake in various insects, nonsulfated sulfakinins show little to no such activity, despite their effects on muscle activity, odor preference, and locomotion in Drosophila1,21,35. These sulfated- or non-sulfated peptides were involved in the regulation of different biological processes mainly via activating the membrane G protein-coupled receptors. In vertebrates, two CCK receptors, CCK1R and CCK2R, have been functionally characterized. CCK1R is specifically activated by the sulfated-CCK, while CCK2R is equally activated by both the sulfated or nonsulfated CCKs36. Similarly, in insects, two subtypes of SK receptors have been identified in Drosophila melanogaster14,21 and two in Tribolium castaneum2,19. All four receptors primarily respond to sulfated SKs. Consistent with these findings, our study demonstrates that the orphan receptor BmSKR exhibits high affinity activation by sulfated SKs, with significantly lower activity observed with nonsulfated SKs. These observations suggest the complexity and specificity of SK signaling across species and highlight the importance of posttranslational modifications in modulating their biological activities. The differential responses of sulfated and nonsulfated SKs suggest distinct regulatory roles in various physiological processes, further emphasizing the need for continued investigation into the functional diversity and mechanisms underlying SK signaling pathways.
In mammals, CCKR2 is known to couple with Gαq protein, thereby activating the PLC/Ca2+/PKC signaling cascade, whereas CCKR1 can activate both Gαq protein and Gαs protein, leading to the activation of both the PLC/Ca2+/PKC and cAMP/PKA pathways37,38. However, the G protein coupling and downstream signaling cascades of insect SK receptors remain controversial. Drosophila SK receptor (DSK-R1) has been reported to induce calcium signaling in a PTX insensitive manner, suggesting exclusive involvement of Gαq in DSKR-mediated signaling21. Conversely, in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum, both SK receptors, TcSKR1 and TcSKR2, were found to be activated via Gαs-protein-dependent signaling pathway in transfected Sf9 cells39. However, another recent study employing aequorin-luminescence assay and CRE-driven luciferase reporter assay showed that both T. castaneum SK receptors activated both the Ca2+ and cyclic AMP second messenger-dependent signaling pathways40. Traditionally, the cyclic AMP-response element (CRE)-driven reporter gene-based functional assay has been used to determine the functional activity of Gαs- and Gαi-coupled GPCRs in mammalian cell systems. However, it has been reported that Gαq-coupled receptors could induce CRE-driven reporter gene transcription through a Gαq-dependent PKC/CREB cascade41,42. Indeed, our recent study also demonstrated that a Gαq-coupled Bombyx diapauses hormone receptor (BmDHR) is activated to trigger a significant increase in CRE-driven luciferase activity in a Gαq inhibitor-sensitive manner43. In this study, we utilized the inhibitor FR900359, which specifically blocks Gαq signaling by directly binding to this G protein and inhibiting the release of GDP44,45,46. Pre-incubation with FR900359 completely inhibited BmSKR-induced luciferase transcription, Ca2+ mobilization, and ERK phosphorylation. These findings collectively demonstrate that the Bombyx mori SK receptor primarily couples to the Gαq protein-mediated signaling cascade.
In summary, our study has identified the orphan receptor BNGR-A9 as the specific cognate receptor for Bombyx neuropeptide SKs. Activation by SKs leads to coupling of BmSKR with Gαq protein, initiating a PLC/Ca2+ signaling pathway. Pharmacological analysis indicates that the sulfate group on the Tyr residue is crucial for the full activity of Bombyx SKs. Additionally, quantitative RT-PCR analysis and in vivo experiments highlight the prominent role of the SK signaling system in regulating feeding behavior and circulating trehalose homeostasis. Our findings provide new insights into the mechanisms underlying BmSKR-mediated signaling in food intake control and trehalose level regulation, paving the way for further exploration of the physiological functions of the SK signaling system.
Materials and methods
Materials
For feeding behavior assays and qRT-PCR analyses, the silkworm strain P50 was utilized. Larvae were cultivated on fresh mulberry leaves at 25 °C in standard conditions. BmN cells were generously provided by Dr. Zhifang Zhang of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Synthetic neuropeptides were ordered from GL Biochem (Shanghai, China).
Molecular cloning and plasmid construction
The entire coding region of BNGR-A9 (NM_001134272.1) was obtained by PCR and subsequently cloned into pEGFP-N1 and pCMV-Flag vectors using the primers listed in Table S1. The Flag-BNGR-A9 construct was generated for functional assays, including CRE-luciferase, calcium mobilization, and ERK phosphorylation assays, while BNGR-A9-EGFP was created for receptor visualization purposes. Additionally, for expression in the BmN cell system, the BNGR-A9 gene was inserted into the pIZT/V5-His vector. All constructs were validated by DNA sequencing.
Cell culture and transfection
HEK293 cells were cultured with Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (Gibco, NY, USA) supplied with 10% Fetal bovine serum (Gibco, NY, USA) in a 37 °C humidified incubator containing 5% CO2. BmN cells were maintained in TC 100 insect medium (AppliChem, Darmstadt, Germany) supplied with 10% Fetal bovine serum in a 28 °C incubator. Both HEK293 and BmN cells were transfected with X-tremeGENE (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instruction.
CRE-driven cAMP luciferase assay
HEK293 and BmN cells were transfected with the different Bombyx receptors (Flag-BNGR-A9, -A24, -A32, or A33 for HEK293 cells, and pIZT-BNGR-A9, -A24, -A32, or A33 for BmN cells) along with the corresponding CRE-reporter plasmid47. When cell confluence reached 90–95%, they were treated with various concentrations of Bombyx mori neuropeptides, with or without forskolin. Following a 4-h incubation period, cells were lysed, and luciferase activities were determined using a firefly luciferase kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China).
Intracellular calcium measurement
To monitor the changes of intracellular calcium, Fura-2 AM (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan) was utilized as the calcium indicator, following the methodology outlined in a previous study26. Briefly, HEK293 cells stably expressing Flag-BNGR-A9 were exposed to various concentrations of Bombyx mori neuropeptides and measured using a fluorescence spectrometer (Tecan Infinite 200 PRO). Calcium levels were determined by the ratio of fluorescence excitation at 340 nm to that at 380 nm. If necessary, cells were pre-treated with U73122, FR900359, or KT5720 for 30 min prior to the initiation of the experiment. For assays involving BmN cells expressing pIZT-BNGR-A9, the procedures were conducted at 28 °C, and HBSS was replaced with HBM (Hepes-Buffered Medium: 140 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1.2 mM Na2HPO4, 5 mM NaHCO3, 10 mM glucose, and 20 mM HEPES–NaOH, CaCl2 (1 mM), pH 6.2).
Internalization assay
BNGR-A9-EGFP stably expressing HEK293 cells were seeded onto coverslips and incubated overnight under normal growth conditions. Subsequently, the cells were starved with fresh serum-free DMEM for 1 h and treated with either 100 nM BmsSK or BmnsSK. After a 30-min incubation period, the cells were washed three times with ice-cold PBS and fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature. The images were taken by a fluorescence microscopy (Leica, Germany).
Quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)
The first-strand cDNA of various tissues in fifth larval instar P50 silkworm was synthesized with PrimeScript 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Takara, Japan) using an oligo(dT)18 primer and 1 μg total RNA template in a 20 μl reaction, following the instructions. Subsequently, qRT-PCR analysis for bngr-a9 and sk genes were performed with primers listed in Table S1 using SYBR ExTaq Premix (Takara, Japan). Melt curve analysis was further performed at the end of the PCR cycles to confirm the specificity of primers. Relative quantification was performed via the comparative 2−ΔΔCT method. Specifically, the Ct values of the target genes were normalized to the geometric average of the Ct value of reference genes GAPDH and Actin A3. The experiments were performed in duplicate with three biological replicates.
In vitro dsRNA synthesis and injection
Double-stranded RNAs were synthesized using MEGAscript RNAi T7 Kit (Ambion, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Templates for in vitro transcription were generated by PCR using the primers containing the T7 polymerase promoter sequence at their 5′ ends, as listed in Table S1. For each 20-μl reaction, 1 μg PCR product was added as the template. Following transcription, the reaction mixture was purified by phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. The resulting dsRNA products were diluted with nuclease-free water to achieve the desired concentration (final volume of 2–5 μl).
Feeding behavior assay
Synchronized larvae of the first day of 5th instar were chosen for feeding behavior assay. Silkworms were starved for 12 h to standardize the starting level. To knock down bngr-a9, 5 μg dsRNA/BNGR-A9 or dsRNA/EGFP was injected into the abdomen of the larvae at the indicated time using a 10 μl microsyringe. For silkworms, both treated and untreated with dsRNA, synthetic SK peptide (at a final concentration of 10 nM) was injected daily starting from the second day of the fifth instar. For each trial, twenty synchronized P50 larvae were used. After injection, the silkworm larvae were fed with enough mulberry leaves three times a day and maintained under standard conditions. Larval body weights and food consumption were measured every other day until pupation.
Determination of trehalose of hemolymph
Silkworm larvae were anesthetized by cooling on ice, after which hemolymph was collected using a micropipette from an incision made at the abdominal leg. Approximately 5 mg of phenylthiourea (to achieve a final concentration of 2.5% w/v) was added to the hemolymph in a 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube to inhibit clotting. Hemolymph samples from 10 insects were then centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C to sediment any particulates. For trehalose measurement, the hemolymph underwent pretreatment with trehalase (Megazyme, Chicago, US), following the manufacturer’s protocol. Subsequently, the sugar concentration in the hemolymph was assessed using a glucose oxidase–peroxidase kit (Shanghai Rongsheng Biotech, China).
ERK phosphorylation and western blot
HEK293 cells with Flag-BNGR-A9 were exposed to 100 nM BmsSK for different durations and then lysed using RIPA buffer (Beyotime, China). For ex vivo assays, brains from 5th instar silkworm larvae were treated with BmsSK (100 nM) for 1, 2, or 8 h, either with a pre-treatment of Gαq inhibitor FR900359 for 30 min or without it. After treatment, samples were lysed, homogenized, and their protein concentrations were determined with a BCA protein kit (Takara, Japan). For western blot analysis, equal amounts of protein lysate were used. Protein expression was analyzed using specific primary antibodies: rabbit monoclonal antibodies for total and phosphorylated ERK from Cell Signaling Technology (MA, USA).
Data analysis
Data analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism (San Diego, CA), with results presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was assessed through Student’s t-test or two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons, with p values below 0.05 denoted as significant (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001). Dose–response curves were generated via non-linear curve fitting. Adobe Photoshop was used to process images, ensuring uniform brightness and contrast settings across all conditions. All images and data provided represent findings from a minimum of three independent experiments.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- GPCRs:
-
G protein-coupled receptors
- BNGR:
-
Bombyx mori Neuropeptide G protein-coupled receptor
- BmsSK:
-
Bombyx mori sulfated-sulfakinin
- BmnsSK:
-
Bombyx mori Non-sulfated-sulfakinin
- CRE:
-
cAMP response element
- qRT-PCR:
-
Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
- PLC:
-
Phospholipase C
- PKA:
-
Protein kinase A
References
Wei, Z. et al. Sulfakinins reduce food intake in the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria. J. Insect Physiol. 46, 1259–1265 (2000).
Yu, N., Nachman, R. J. & Smagghe, G. Characterization of sulfakinin and sulfakinin receptor and their roles in food intake in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 188, 196–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2013.03.006 (2013).
Liu, B., Fu, D., Ning, H., Tang, M. & Chen, H. Identification and functional characterization of the sulfakinin and sulfakinin receptor in the Chinese white pine beetle Dendroctonus armandi. Front. Physiol. 13, 927890. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.927890 (2022).
Nachman, R. J., Holman, G. M., Cook, B. J., Haddon, W. F. & Ling, N. Leucosulfakinin-II, a blocked sulfated insect neuropeptide with homology to cholecystokinin and gastrin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 140, 357–364 (1986).
Nachman, R. J., Holman, G. M., Haddon, W. F. & Ling, N. Leucosulfakinin, a sulfated insect neuropeptide with homology to gastrin and cholecystokinin. Science 234, 71–73 (1986).
Veenstra, J. A. Isolation and structure of two gastrin/CCK-like neuropeptides from the American cockroach homologous to the leucosulfakinins. Neuropeptides 14, 145–149 (1989).
Schoofs, L., Holman, M., Hayes, T. & De Loof, A. Chromatography and Isolation of Insect Hormones and Pheromones 231–241 (Springer, 1990).
Fonagy, A., Schoofs, L., Proost, P., Van Damme, J. & De Loof, A. Isolation and primary structure of two sulfakinin-like peptides from the fleshfly, Neobellieria bullata. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C 103, 135–142 (1992).
Nichols, R., Schneuwly, S. A. & Dixon, J. E. Identification and characterization of a Drosophila homologue to the vertebrate neuropeptide cholecystokinin. J. Biol. Chem. 263, 12167–12170 (1988).
Zels, S. et al. Sulfakinin is an important regulator of digestive processes in the migratory locust, Locusta migratoria. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 61, 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2015.03.008 (2015).
Nachman, R. J. G., Wilfrid, F. P., Suresh, T., Sreekumar, S. & Holman, G. M. Insect myosuppressins and sulfakinins stimulate release of the digestive enzyme ?-Amylase in two invertebrates: The scallop pecten maximus and insect Rhynchophorus ferrugineus. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 814, 335–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/0196-9781(93)90095-x (1997).
Nichols, R., Manoogian, B., Walling, E. & Mispelon, M. Plasticity in the effects of sulfated and nonsulfated sulfakinin on heart contractions. Front. Biosci. (Landmark Ed.) 14, 4035–4043. https://doi.org/10.2741/3510 (2009).
Nichols, R., Bass, C. & Katanski, C. Structure-activity relationship data and ligand-receptor interactions identify novel agonists consistent with sulfakinin tissue-specific signaling in Drosophila melanogaster heart. Front. Biosci. Landmark Ed. 27, 150. https://doi.org/10.31083/j.fbl2705150 (2022).
Chen, X., Peterson, J., Nachman, R. J. & Ganetzky, B. Drosulfakinin activates CCKLR-17D1 and promotes larval locomotion and escape response in Drosophila. Fly (Austin) 6, 290–297. https://doi.org/10.4161/fly.21534 (2012).
Nichols, R., Egle, J. P., Langan, N. R. & Palmer, G. C. The different effects of structurally related sulfakinins on Drosophila melanogaster odor preference and locomotion suggest involvement of distinct mechanisms. Peptides 29, 2128–2135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2008.08.010 (2008).
Slocinska, M., Marciniak, P., Jarmuszkiewicz, W. & Rosinski, G. New metabolic activity of the nonsulfated sulfakinin Zopat-SK-1 in the insect fat body. Peptides 68, 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2014.05.010 (2015).
Downer, K. E., Haselton, A. T., Nachman, R. J. & Stoffolano, J. G. Jr. Insect satiety: Sulfakinin localization and the effect of drosulfakinin on protein and carbohydrate ingestion in the blow fly, Phormia regina (Diptera: Calliphoridae). J. Insect Physiol. 53, 106–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2006.10.013 (2007).
Marciniak, P., Kuczer, M. & Rosinski, G. New physiological activities of myosuppressin, sulfakinin and NVP-like peptide in Zophobas atratus beetle. J. Comp. Physiol. B 181, 721–730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00360-011-0563-5 (2011).
Yu, N. & Smagghe, G. Characterization of sulfakinin receptor 2 and its role in food intake in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Peptides 53, 232–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2013.12.011 (2014).
Guo, D. et al. Cholecystokinin-like peptide mediates satiety by inhibiting sugar attraction. PLoS Genet. 17, e1009724. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009724 (2021).
Kubiak, T. M. et al. Cloning and functional expression of the first Drosophila melanogaster sulfakinin receptor DSK-R1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 291, 313–320. https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.2002.6459 (2002).
Yamanaka, N. et al. Neuropeptide receptor transcriptome reveals unidentified neuroendocrine pathways. PLoS One 3, e3048. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003048 (2008).
Fan, Y. et al. The G protein-coupled receptors in the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 40, 581–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2010.05.005 (2010).
Predel, R. et al. Post-translational modifications of the insect sulfakinins: Sulfation, pyroglutamate-formation and O-methylation of glutamic acid. Eur. J. Biochem. 263, 552–560 (1999).
Zhu, C. et al. Molecular and functional characterization of adipokinetic hormone receptor and its peptide ligands in Bombyx mori. FEBS Lett. 583, 1463–1468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2009.03.060 (2009).
He, X. et al. Activation of BNGR-A24 by direct interaction with tachykinin-related peptides from the silkworm Bombyx mori leads to the Gq- and Gs-coupled signaling cascades. Biochemistry 53, 6667–6678. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi5007207 (2014).
Lapadula, D. et al. Effects of oncogenic Gαq and Gα11 inhibition by FR900359 in uveal melanoma. J. Mol. Cancer Res. https://doi.org/10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-18-0574 (2018).
Nachman, R. J. et al. Insect myosuppressins and sulfakinins stimulate release of the digestive enzyme α-amylase in two invertebrates: The scallop Pecten maximus and insect Rhynchophorus ferrugineus. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 814, 335–338 (1997).
Maestro, J. L. et al. Screening of antifeedant activity in brain extracts led to the identification of sulfakinin as a satiety promoter in the German cockroach. Are arthropod sulfakinins homologous to vertebrate gastrins–cholecystokinins?. Eur. J. Biochem. 268, 5824–5830 (2001).
Fricker, L. D. Drug Addiction 497–509 (Springer, 2008).
Harshini, S., Nachman, R. & Sreekumar, S. J. P. In vitro release of digestive enzymes by FMRF amide related neuropeptides and analogues in the lepidopteran insect Opisina arenosella (Walk.). Peptides 23, 1759–1763 (2002).
Slocinska, M., Czubak, T., Marciniak, P., Jarmuszkiewicz, W. & Rosinski, G. The activity of the nonsulfated sulfakinin Zopat-SK-1 in the neck-ligated larvae of the beetle Zophobas atratus. Peptides 69, 127–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2015.04.023 (2015).
Arrese, E. L. & Soulages, J. L. Insect fat body: Energy, metabolism, and regulation. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 55, 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-112408-085356 (2010).
Lin, X., Yu, N. & Smagghe, G. Insulin receptor regulates food intake through sulfakinin signaling in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Peptides 80, 89–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2016.03.002 (2016).
Maestro, J. L. et al. Screening of antifeedant activity in brain extracts led to the identification of sulfakinin as a satiety promoter in the German cockroach. Are arthropod sulfakinins homologous to vertebrate gastrins-cholecystokinins?. Eur. J. Biochem. 268, 5824–5830 (2001).
Dufresne, M., Seva, C. & Fourmy, D. Cholecystokinin and gastrin receptors. Physiol. Rev. 86, 805–847. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00014.2005 (2006).
Paulssen, R. H., Fraeyman, N. & Florholmen, J. Activation of phospholipase C by cholecystokinin receptor subtypes with different G-protein-coupling specificities in hormone-secreting pancreatic cell lines. Biochem. Pharmacol. 60, 865–875 (2000).
Yule, D. I., Tseng, M. J., Williams, J. A. & Logdson, C. D. A cloned CCK-A receptor transduces multiple signals in response to full and partial agonists. Am. J. Physiol. 265, G999-1004. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.1993.265.5.G999 (1993).
Yu, N., Swevers, L., Nachman, R. J. & Smagghe, G. Development of cell-based bioassay with Sf9 cells expressing TcSKR1 and TcSKR2 and differential activation by sulfated and non-sulfated SK peptides. Peptides 53, 238–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2014.01.025 (2014).
Zels, S. et al. Signaling properties and pharmacological analysis of two sulfakinin receptors from the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. PLoS One 9, e94502. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094502 (2014).
Chen, W., Shields, T. S., Stork, P. J. & Cone, R. D. A colorimetric assay for measuring activation of Gs- and Gq-coupled signaling pathways. Anal. Biochem. 226, 349–354 (1995).
Durocher, Y. et al. A reporter gene assay for high-throughput screening of G-protein-coupled receptors stably or transiently expressed in HEK293 EBNA cells grown in suspension culture. Anal Biochem. 284, 316–326. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.2000.4698 (2000).
Jiang, X. et al. Agonist-mediated activation of Bombyx mori diapause hormone receptor signals to extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 through Gq-PLC-PKC-dependent cascade. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 75, 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2016.06.005 (2016).
Carr, R. 3rd. et al. Interdicting Gq activation in airway disease by receptor-dependent and receptor-independent mechanisms. Mol. Pharmacol. 89, 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.115.100339 (2016).
Schrage, R. et al. The experimental power of FR900359 to study Gq-regulated biological processes. Nat. Commun. 6, 10156. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10156 (2015).
Inamdar, V., Patel, A., Manne, B. K., Dangelmaier, C. & Kunapuli, S. P. Characterization of UBO-QIC as a Galphaq inhibitor in platelets. Platelets 26, 771–778. https://doi.org/10.3109/09537104.2014.998993 (2015).
Yang, H. et al. Activation of cAMP-response element-binding protein is positively regulated by PKA and calcium-sensitive calcineurin and negatively by PKC in insect. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 43, 1028–1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2013.08.011 (2013).
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31502017, 32070771).
Author information
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Lan, J., Wu, Q., Huang, N. et al. Identification of sulfakinin receptor regulating feeding behavior and hemolymph trehalose homeostasis in the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Sci Rep 14, 14191 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65177-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65177-z
- Springer Nature Limited