Abstract
Poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PDNEC), are a subtype of pancreatic cancer encompassing both small cell and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma subtypes, and are characterized as distinct in terms of biology and prognosis compared to the more common pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Until recently, there has been a paucity of data on the genomic features of this cancer type. We describe a male patient diagnosed with PDNEC and extensive metastatic disease in the liver at diagnosis. Genomic analysis demonstrated a germline pathogenic variant in BRCA2 with somatic loss-of-heterozygosity of the BRCA2 wild-type allele. Following a favorable response to platinum-based chemotherapy (and the addition of immunotherapy), the patient received maintenance therapy with olaparib, which resulted in a further reduction on follow-up imaging (Fig. 1). After seventeen months of systemic control with olaparib, the patient developed symptomatic central nervous system metastases, which harboured a BRCA2 reversion mutation. No other sites of disease progression were observed. Herein, we report an exceptional outcome through the incorporation of a personalized management approach for a patient with a pancreatic PDNEC, guided by comprehensive genomic sequencing.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have an incidence of 1.8 per 1,000,000 in females and 2.6 per 1,000,000 in males, based on the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program data1. The World Health Organization (WHO) characterizes PDNECs by a high mitotic count (>20 mitoses/2 mm2), and a high Ki-67 index (typically >55%)2. PDNECs are aggressive cancers, ofttimes diagnosed at advanced stage and portending poor outcome3. In this case, we highlight the value of a precision oncology approach to the management of patients with this rare cancer type, resulting in a uniquely favorable outcome for this patient.
Results
Case report
A 66-year-old male presented with a short history of escalating abdominal pain, distension, nausea, and fatigue. Physical examination was notable for an ill-appearing man with scleral icterus and hepatomegaly. Laboratory investigations demonstrated marked hepatic dysfunction, notably alanine aminotransferase 193 (<55 U/L), aspartate aminotransferase 123 (<37 U/L), alkaline phosphatase 238 (<130 U/L), total bilirubin 5.5 (<1.2 mg/dL), and lactate dehydrogenase 570 (130–250 U/L). His past medical history was unremarkable. Family history included carcinoma of unknown primary in his mother at age 60, prostate cancer in his father at age 85, and lung cancer in his brother at age 68. He was hospitalized for expedited evaluation and management.
Computed tomography (CT) demonstrated a mass in the head of the pancreas with invasion of the superior mesenteric vein, enlarged aortocaval adenopathy (Fig. 1A), bi-lobar liver metastases, intrahepatic biliary duct dilatation and portal vein bland thrombus (Fig. 1B). An endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was performed, and common bile duct and pancreatic stents were inserted. A liver biopsy demonstrated a poorly differentiated carcinoma, with tumor cells positive for cytokeratin (CK) 7, synaptophysin and chromogranin, aberrant loss of P53 and RB protein expression, and a Ki67 proliferation index of 90%, consistent with a diagnosis of PDNEC carcinoma of pancreas origin, with no adenocarcinoma component (Fig. 2A–C).
The patient initiated chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide, administered day 1–3 every 21 days. Within two weeks of receiving the first cycle, he had experienced marked symptomatic improvement. Liver function tests improved. Given the patient’s diagnosis at age 66, and a family history including a cancer diagnosis in his mother at age 60, he consented to undergo germline testing for the presence of a pathogenic variant. A germline pathogenic variant in BRCA2 was identified, and loss-of-heterozygosity (LOH) of the BRCA2 wild-type allele was detected on somatic sequencing of the liver metastasis. A restaging computerized tomography (CT) scan performed after three cycles of treatment demonstrated a dramatic response to chemotherapy in all disease sites (Fig. 1A, B). The patient continued platinum/etoposide chemotherapy for three additional cycles, and while not routine in extrapulmonary PDNEC, extrapolating from data in small cell lung cancer demonstrating a survival benefit with the addition of immune checkpoint blockade to platinum-based chemotherapy, atezolizumab was added for three cycles (a total of six cycles of cisplatin and etoposide, with the addition of atezolizumab for the latter three cycles), following which further radiologic responses in both the pancreas primary and the liver metastases, were observed.
Owing to cumulative toxicity with fatigue and emerging peripheral neuropathy, chemotherapy and immunotherapy were discontinued. The poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) olaparib was commenced based on the BRCA2 mutation, extrapolating directly from the data supporting the use of PARPis in the post-platinum, maintenance setting for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma4, ovarian cancer5, breast cancer6,7, and prostate cancer8 harbouring germline BRCA pathogenic variants. Follow-up CT scans indicated further tumor response and ongoing disease control with olaparib (Fig. 1A, B), and the patient maintained an excellent quality of life (QoL). After 17 months, he developed left upper extremity weakness, poor co-ordination and falls. A right parietal lobe enhancing lesion with surrounding vasogenic edema was identified on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), consistent with a metastasis (Supplementary Fig. 1). No extracranial disease progression was identified on restaging imaging. Following multidisciplinary discussion, the patient underwent resection of this lesion, and histology was consistent with a metastasis from the PDNEC. He received post-operative stereotactic radiation to the tumor bed. Within eight weeks of completion of radiation, he developed new neurologic symptoms and dural-based parietal metastases were identified on MR imaging. He underwent a second craniotomy, followed by radiotherapy, but despite these interventions intracranial disease progression continued, without systemic relapse (Fig. 1A, B). The patient passed away 26 months after initial diagnosis.
Genomic analysis
Germline and somatic genomic testing were carried out utilizing the FDA-authorized Memorial Sloan Kettering Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT), at baseline for this patient, prior to institution of systemic therapy. In addition to BRCA2 biallelic loss-of-function and consistent with a diagnosis of PDNEC, the tumor harboured biallelic loss-of-function alterations affecting TP53 and RB1, a CDKN1B homozygous deletion, and a G12R KRAS hotspot mutation (Fig. 3). Although KRAS and TP53 alterations can be associated with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, collectively the genomic profile, as well as the histopathologic findings (Fig. 2) were consistent with a bona fide high grade PDNEC harboring homologous recombination deficiency.
Comprehensive tumor sequencing of both resected CNS metastases were compared with the sequencing results from the baseline diagnostic liver biopsy (Fig. 3). Both brain metastasis specimens demonstrated the presence of a BRCA2 structural rearrangement spanning the locus of the BRCA2 germline pathogenic alteration, which was not identified in the pre-treatment specimen. This rearrangement removed the stop codon caused by this pathogenic germline mutation (Fig. 4), and likely resulted in restoration of homologous recombination DNA repair and resistance to olaparib. Although a similar spectrum of genomic alterations was observed in the two resected CNS specimens, the apparent emergence of different clones was noted, although these specimens were only 12 weeks apart (Fig. 5).
Cell free DNA (ctDNA) was assessed at the time of second intracranial disease recurrence, identifying an ATM p.L695Wfs*s alteration not detectable in the tumor specimens and with a low variant allele fraction of 0.28%, consistent with clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential9.
Discussion
The first-line treatment of PDNECs has traditionally followed that of small cell lung cancer, with best evidence supporting the use of cisplatin and etoposide10,11. A diagnosis of PDNEC portends a poor prognosis, with a median survival of 5.7 months12. The incorporation of a maintenance phase of therapy into treatment paradigms is a subject of investigation across cancer types and is aimed to maintain and/or induce disease regression, while typically allowing de-escalation or removal of cytotoxic therapy to reduce toxicity and maximize QoL. Notable, relevant examples pertinent to this case are in the setting of extensive stage small cell lung cancer, where international guidelines incorporate immune checkpoint inhibitors, atezolizumab or durvalumab, in combination with chemotherapy, followed by maintenance checkpoint blockade without cytotoxic therapy until disease progression, based on two FDA approvals13. Additionally, the phase III Pancreas Olaparib Ongoing (POLO) trial elucidated a biomarker driven approach to the treatment of advanced pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and marked a potential new era of precision medicine for this disease4 with a progression free survival advantage over placebo observed for maintenance olaparib in patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutated PDAC and platinum-sensitive disease. Benefits have been observed across tumor types, including ovarian5, breast6,7 and prostate cancer8, leading to regulatory approvals of PARPis in these diseases.
Somatic BRCA2 LOH was detected in the tumor samples from this patient. Previous work from our group has indicated that in PDAC, patients with biallelic alterations affecting homologous recombination DNA repair-related genes (e.g., BRCA1/2) are the most likely to benefit from platinum-based therapy14,15 and PARPi therapy14, with often durable responses. Those with biallelic status, such as described herein, are associated with a higher TMB, and display a COSMIC Signature 3, which are indicators of greater genomic instability, and postulated to be more likely to benefit from immunotherapy16,17 in the context of BRCA2 alterations18. In view of the excellent response to platinum-based chemotherapy, and extrapolating from the above data with a goal to personalize treatment recommendations, we opted to proceed with maintenance PARPi therapy, which resulted in a prolonged period of systemic disease control. Given the initial dramatic response to platinum-based chemotherapy (and immunotherapy) observed, it is possible that the disease responses identified on subsequent imaging were due entirely to ongoing, exceptional response to chemotherapy, and not secondary to olaparib. A recent series from Symonds et al.19 demonstrated remarkable disease control with olaparib in a patient with de novo PDNEC of the prostate with BRCA2 loss, again in the post-platinum chemotherapy setting. In our case, as in most scenarios, the commencement of PARPi was the setting of disease response to platinum-based therapy, thus definitively determining which agent has resulted in disease response and control, can prove challenging.
The case herein demonstrates significant benefits arising from results of genomic testing for this patient. Current international guidelines including the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, recommend that genetic counseling and testing for inherited genetic conditions should be considered, but do not recommend universal genomic testing for all patients with neuroendocrine tumors, including PDNEC17. While data pertaining to comprehensive genomic sequencing in pancreatic NECs has traditionally been sparse, a number of recent series have demonstrated enrichment for alterations in TP53, RB1, APC, KRAS, BRAF18,19, copy number losses in ARID1A, ATM and ESR1, in addition to amplifications/gains in MYC and KDM5A19. Recent studies in both pancreatic and non-pancreatic gastrointestinal NECs have demonstrated the presence of potentially actionable alterations19,20. Specific to BRCA alterations, one series demonstrated that 25% of patients with neuroendocrine cancer of the prostate had detectable biallelic BRCA2 alterations16, underpinning a critical need to recommend genomic testing to detect potentially actionable targets and is applicable across solid tumor types. Given this data, as well as data in BRCA mutated pancreatic adenocarcinoma demonstrating the predictive implications of biallelic status14, in the setting of the identification of a somatic BRCA alteration we would suggest consideration of both reflexive germline testing as well as adjudication of biallelic/monoallelic status. The potential of comprehensive genomic testing to offer meaningful therapeutic benefits to patients may be underappreciated in the context of rare cancer types, where a paucity of genomic characterization has been conducted.
While the initial rationale behind the use of atezolizumab in this case was based on extrapolation from the survival data in small cell lung cancer8, the presence of the BRCA2 alteration further supported its use. In our previous series of patients with PDAC and mutations in genes associated with homologous recombination deficiency (HRd) e.g. BRCA 1/2, those with biallelic status such as described herein, were associated with a higher TMB compared with patients with monoallelic status, or HRd wildtype status, and additionally display a COSMIC Signature 3, indicating greater genomic instability, and postulated to be more likely to benefit from immunotherapy21,22 in the context of BRCA2 alterations23. In this instance, due to the limited genomic area covered in MSK-IMPACT targeted panel sequencing there were an insufficient number single nucleotide variants to compute single base substitution COSMIC mutational signatures. The optimal TMB at which immune checkpoint blockade is of benefit in neuroendocrine tumors remains an open question in the absence of randomized data, however FDA approval for the use pembrolizumab for tumors with TMB > 10 mutations per megabase (Muts/Mb) based on KEYNOTE-158 did include patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors24. In the case described herein, a TMB of 6.2 Muts/Mb was observed.
At 22 months from diagnosis, our patient developed symptomatic intracranial disease involvement, and despite best efforts with multi-modality approaches, intracranial disease control was not achieved. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is not routinely recommended in major international guidelines for extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas, in contrast to extensive stage small cell lung cancer, where PCI is considered based on an EORTC trial which demonstrated a survival advantage25. Our case is reflective of the challenge of intracranial disease progression, which can limit survival in patients with otherwise excellent systemic disease control. In the absence of randomized data, our case raises the question of whether PCI should be considered in select patients in whom systemic disease control is maintained.
Multiple potential causative factors may have led to the development of CNS metastases in this case, and merit pause for consideration. First, in this case a baseline imaging study of the central nervous system to assess for the presence of brain metastases was not performed, thus it is possible that occult brain metastases were present at the time of diagnosis, although no intracranial abnormality was noted on MRI Brain six months following diagnosis. Second, the presence of BRCA mutations is associated with a higher prevalence of CNS metastases in breast and ovarian cancers26, although this may be accounted for by several potential factors, including enrichment of triple-negative subtype in BRCA-driven breast cancers, as well as favorable survival in these subgroups. Data pertaining to whether a biological predisposition to CNS pattern of metastasis in BRCA-mutated pancreatic cancer is lacking. Third, while PARPi have resulted in CNS activity in some pre-clinical models27, other studies have shown suboptimal ability of the PARPis rucaparib and talazoparib to cross the blood brain barrier28,29. This is thought to be in part due to presence of P-glycoprotein (P-GP/ABCB1) and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP) which function as efflux pumps at the blood brain barrier and limit CNS penetration. Olaparib is also a substrate of these proteins30 and therefore the CNS may represent a sanctuary site in this setting. Fourth, and perhaps the most parsimonious conclusion for this patient, the development of a CNS metastasis after 22 months of sustained disease control is best accounted for by the development of a reversion mutation (BRCA2 rearrangement: c.316 + 1367 c.717del, Figs. 3 and 4).
The development of reversion mutations to targeted therapy, including specifically in BRCA1/2, leading to resistance to the PARPi, have been described31,32, albeit not, to our knowledge, in the setting of isolated CNS disease with ongoing excellent systemic control33,34,35,36,37. Overcoming resistance to targeted therapy remains a formidable challenge. The addition of immunotherapy to PARPi therapy is under investigation in several malignancies (NCT04548752, NCT04493060, NCT0466740), with benefit observed, as a potential combination to address resistance38,39. In addition, the combination PARPis with DNA polymerase θ (Polθ, also known as POLQ) inhibitors40 and ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) inhibitors41 may constitute a strategy to overcome resistance caused by reversion mutations.
In conclusion, here we report a unique case of a patient with a PDNEC and a BRCA2 germline mutation who had a dramatic response to platinum-based chemotherapy, followed by a period of deep, durable disease control with a PARPi, and complicated ultimately by a late intracranial relapse owing to a reversion mutation. We describe how extensive tumor sequencing uncovered that the intracranial relapse likely resulted from the development of a reversion mutation in the setting of prolonged PARPi use. This case highlights the value of a precision therapy approach which can lead to uniquely favorable outcomes for select patients, and in this regard supports the consideration of comprehensive genomic profiling, including in the management of patients with rare tumor types, where guidelines do not necessarily recommend universal genomic testing. It also re-enforces that in rare malignancies, where there is a dearth of randomized data, extrapolating from treatment paradigms for other malignancies with shared genomic features, should be entertained. Baseline CNS imaging to assess for the presence of intracranial metastases, as well as PCI should be considered in the setting of systemic disease control for PDNEC. Finally, this case provides direct evidence for the value of sequential genomic analyses at the time of disease progression on targeted therapies, to evaluate mechanisms of resistance.
Methods
Patient approval
Verbal consent for the publication of this report was provided by the patient and his family, and it is documented in the medical record.
Ethics approval
This Case Report was reviewed by the Memorial Sloan Kettering IRB & Privacy Board Leadership (EM O’Reilly recused) on 10/19/2022 and the work was deemed non-human subjects research and hence does not require IRB oversight.
Materials
The liver metastasis sample was obtained by CT guided core biopsy, and both CNS metastases were resected specimens taken at the time of surgery. All tumor samples were reviewed by a histopathologist with expertise in pancreatic cancers at MSK, confirming the presence of tumor cellularity sufficient for analysis by hematoxylin and eosin staining from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks. For somatic genomic analysis of all samples, DNA was extracted and purified, and tumor and normal comprehensive multi-gene panel sequencing was conducted using the FDA-authorized and New York State Department of Health approved Memorial Sloan Kettering–Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT), which we have previously described42. Patient consent was taken for completion of both somatic and germline genomic analyses under institutional protocol IRB 12-245. Somatic single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), short insertions and deletions (Indels) and genomic re-arrangements were retrieved from the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics (http://cbioportal.org)43. Binary and alignment mapped (BAM) files were retrieved and copy number alterations (CNAs) including loss of heterozygosity (LOH) was computed using FACETs44. BAM files were manually inspected using Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV)45 to show the BRCA2 locus affected by the germline mutation and re-arrangement. A mutation was classified as biallelic if there was a mutation concurrent with LOH of the wild-type allele. The cancer cell fraction (CCF) of each alteration was inferred using ABSOLUTE (v1.0.6), with the ABSOLUTE solutions manually reviewed. Alterations were classified as clonal if the probability of the alteration being clonal was >0.5 or if the lower confidence interval (CI) was >0.9 as calculated by ABSOLUTE46.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
The datasets supporting findings described in this study are available within the manuscript. Any additional information required can be made available upon request to the corresponding author.
References
Halfdanarson, T., Rabe, K., Rubin, J. & Petersen, G. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs): incidence, prognosis and recent trend toward improved survival. Ann. Oncol. 19, 1727–1733 (2008).
Rindi, G. et al. Overview of the 2022 who classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms. Endocr. Pathol. 33, 115–154 (2022).
Basturk, O. et al. Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas of the pancreas. Am. J. Surgical Pathol. 38, 437–447 (2014).
Golan, T. et al. Maintenance olaparib for germline BRCA-mutated metastatic pancreatic cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 381, 317–327 (2019).
Moore, K. et al. Maintenance olaparib in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 379, 2495–2505 (2018).
Robson, M. et al. Olaparib for metastatic breast cancer in patients with a germline BRCA mutation. N. Engl. J. Med. 377, 523–533 (2017).
Litton, J. et al. Talazoparib in patients with advanced breast cancer and a germline BRCA mutation. N. Engl. J. Med. 379, 753–763 (2018).
Kaufman, B. et al. Olaparib monotherapy in patients with advanced cancer and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation. J. Clin. Oncol. 33, 244–250 (2015).
Kar, S. et al. Genome-wide analyses of 200,453 individuals yield new insights into the causes and consequences of clonal hematopoiesis. Nat. Genet. 54, 1155–1166 (2022).
Iwasa, S. et al. Cisplatin and etoposide as first-line chemotherapy for poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma of the hepatobiliary tract and pancreas. Jpn J. Clin. Oncol. 40, 313–318 (2010).
Zhang, P. et al. Etoposide and cisplatin versus irinotecan and cisplatin as the first‐line therapy for patients with advanced, poorly differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: a randomized phase 2 study. Cancer 126, 2086–2092 (2020).
Dasari, A., Mehta, K., Byers, L., Sorbye, H. & Yao, J. Comparative study of lung and extrapulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas: a SEER database analysis of 162,983 cases. Cancer 124, 807–815 (2017).
Mathieu, L. et al. FDA approval summary: atezolizumab and durvalumab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy in extensive stage small cell lung cancer. Oncologist 26, 433–438 (2021).
Momtaz, P. et al. Pancreas cancer and BRCA: a critical subset of patients with improving therapeutic outcomes. Cancer 127, 4393–4402 (2021).
Park, W. et al. Genomic methods identify homologous recombination deficiency in pancreas adenocarcinoma and optimize treatment selection. Clin. Cancer Res. 26, 3239–3247 (2020).
Symonds, L. et al. BRCA2 alterations in neuroendocrine/small-cell carcinoma prostate cancer: a case series. JCO Precis. Oncol. 6, e2200091 (2022).
Shah, M. et al. NCCN guidelines® updates: neuroendocrine and adrenal tumors. J. Natl Compr. Cancer Netw. 19, 839–868 (2022).
Yachida, S. et al. Comprehensive genomic profiling of neuroendocrine carcinomas of the gastrointestinal system. Cancer Discov. 12, 692–711 (2022).
Venizelos, A. et al. The molecular characteristics of high-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Endocr.-Relat. Cancer 29, 1–14 (2022).
Wu, H. et al. Genomic characterization reveals distinct mutation landscapes and therapeutic implications in neuroendocrine carcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract. Cancer Commun. 42, 1367–1386 (2022).
Connor, A. et al. Association of distinct mutational signatures with correlates of increased immune activity in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. JAMA Oncol. 3, 774 (2017).
Seeber, A. et al. Molecular characteristics of BRCA1/2 and PALB2 mutations in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. ESMO Open 5, e000942 (2020).
Samstein, R. et al. Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 differentially affect the tumor microenvironment and response to checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. Nat. Cancer 1, 1188–1203 (2020).
Marabelle, A. et al. Association of tumour mutational burden with outcomes in patients with advanced solid tumours treated with pembrolizumab: prospective biomarker analysis of the multicohort, open-label, phase 2 keynote-158 study. Lancet Oncol. 21, 1353–1365, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30445-9 (2020).
Slotman, B. et al. Prophylactic cranial irradiation in extensive small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 357, 664–672 (2007).
Szarszewska, M. et al. Significance of BRCA1 expression in breast and ovarian cancer patients with brain metastasis: a multicentre study. Adv. Med. Sci. 64, 235–240 (2019).
McEllin, B. et al. PTEN loss compromises homologous recombination repair in astrocytes: implications for glioblastoma therapy with temozolomide or Poly(ADP-Ribose) polymerase inhibitors. Cancer Res. 70, 5457–5464 (2010).
Durmus, S. et al. Breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) and P-glycoprotein (P-GP/ABCB1) restrict oral availability and brain accumulation of the PARP inhibitor rucaparib (AG-014699). Pharm. Res. 32, 37–46 (2014).
Kizilbash, S. et al. Restricted delivery of talazoparib across the blood–brain barrier limits the sensitizing effects of parp inhibition on temozolomide therapy in glioblastoma. Mol. Cancer Therapeutics 16, 2735–2746 (2017).
Sun, K. et al. A comparative pharmacokinetic study of PARP inhibitors demonstrates favorable properties for niraparib efficacy in preclinical tumor models. Oncotarget 9, 37080–37096 (2018).
Edwards, S. et al. Resistance to therapy caused by intragenic deletion in BRCA2. Nature 451, 1111–1115 (2008).
Sakai, W. et al. Secondary mutations as a mechanism of cisplatin resistance in BRCA2-mutated cancers. Nature 451, 1116–1120 (2008).
Ganesan, S. Tumor suppressor tolerance: reversion mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 and resistance to PARP inhibitors and platinum. JCO Precis. Oncol. 1–4 https://doi.org/10.1200/po.18.00001 (2018).
Banda, K., Swisher, E., Wu, D., Pritchard, C. & Gadi, V. Somatic reversion of germline BRCA2 mutation confers resistance to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor therapy. JCO Precis. Oncol. 1–6 https://doi.org/10.1200/po.17.00044 (2018).
Carneiro, B. et al. Acquired resistance to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in BRCA2-associated prostate cancer resulting from biallelic BRCA2 reversion mutations restores both germline and somatic loss-of-function mutations. JCO Precis. Oncol. 1–8 https://doi.org/10.1200/po.17.00176 (2018).
Cheng, H., Salipante, S., Nelson, P., Montgomery, B. & Pritchard, C. Polyclonal BRCA2 Reversion Mutations Detected in Circulating Tumor DNA After Platinum Chemotherapy in a Patient With Metastatic Prostate Cancer. JCO Precision Oncology 1–5 https://doi.org/10.1200/po.17.00169 (2018).
Weigelt, B. et al. Diverse BRCA1 and BRCA2 Reversion Mutations in Circulating Cell-Free DNA of Therapy-Resistant Breast or Ovarian Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 23, 6708–6720 (2017).
Domchek, S. et al. Olaparib and durvalumab in patients with germline BRCA-mutated metastatic breast cancer (MEDIOLA): an open-label, multicentre, phase 1/2, basket study. Lancet Oncol. 21, 1155–1164 (2020).
Drew, Y. et al. Phase II study of olaparib + durvalumab (MEDIOLA): Updated results in germline BRCA-mutated platinum-sensitive relapsed (PSR) ovarian cancer (OC). Ann. Oncol. 30, v485–v486 (2019).
Zatreanu, D. et al. Polθ inhibitors elicit BRCA-gene synthetic lethality and target PARP inhibitor resistance. Nat. Commun. 12, 3636 (2021).
Kim, H. et al. Combining PARP with ATR inhibition overcomes PARP inhibitor and platinum resistance in ovarian cancer models. Nat. Commun. 11, 3726 (2020).
Cheng, D. et al. Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT). J. Mol. Diagnostics 17, 251–264 (2015).
Gao, J. et al. Integrative Analysis of Complex Cancer Genomics and Clinical Profiles Using the cBioPortal. Sci. Signal. 6, pl1 (2013).
Shen, R. & Seshan, V. FACETS: allele-specific copy number and clonal heterogeneity analysis tool for high-throughput DNA sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, e131–e131 (2016).
Robinson, J. et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 24–26 (2011).
Carter, S. L. et al. Absolute quantification of somatic DNA alterations in human cancer. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 413–421 (2012).
Acknowledgements
We were supported by the following sources; Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748, NIH K12 Paul Calabresi Award (K12 CA184746), Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy Pilot Award,the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, by Susan G. Komen through a Komen Scholar Leadership grant, and by an NIH/NCI P50 CA247749 01 grant and the David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Assisted with study design and concept: F.K., P.S., W.P., M.R., J.R.F., D.M., E.O.R. Data analysis, interpretation: F.K., R.B., P.S., W.P., M.R., J.R.F., D.M., E.O.R. Manuscript preparation and critical revision: F.K., R.B., P.S., W.P., M.R., J.R.F., D.M., E.O.R.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
F.K.: No conflicts of interest to declare. R.B.: No conflicts of interest to declare. W.P.: Research Funding to MSK: Astellas, Merck (AWD-GC-260082), Gossamerbio, Miracogen. Consulting: Onconics, Aegle, Cerner Enviza. PS: No conflicts of interest to declare. J.S.R.-F.: J.S.R.-F. reports receiving personal/consultancy fees from Goldman Sachs, Bain Capital, REPARE Therapeutics and Paige.AI, membership of the scientific advisory boards of VolitionRx, REPARE Therapeutics and Paige.AI, membership of the Board of Directors of Grupo Oncoclinicas, and ad hoc membership of the scientific advisory boards of Astrazeneca, Merck, Daiichi Sankyo, Roche Tissue Diagnostics and Personalis, outside the scope of this study. M.R.: No conflicts of interest to declare. D.M.: No conflicts of interest to declare. E.O.R.: Research Funding to MSK: Genentech/Roche, Celgene/BMS, BioNTech, AstraZeneca, Arcus, Elicio, Parker Institute. Consulting/DSMB: Cytomx Therapeutics (DSMB), Rafael Therapeutics (DSMB), Seagen, Boehringer Ingelheim, BioNTech, Ipsen, Merck, IDEAYA, Silenseed, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Noxxon, BioSapien, Cend Therapeutics, Thetis, Autem, ZielBio, Tempus, Agios (spouse), Genentech-Roche (spouse), Eisai (spouse).
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Keane, F., Bajwa, R., Selenica, P. et al. Dramatic, durable response to therapy in gBRCA2-mutated pancreas neuroendocrine carcinoma: opportunity and challenge. npj Precis. Onc. 7, 40 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-023-00376-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-023-00376-x
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Antineoplastics
Reactions Weekly (2024)