Abstract
In recent years, two-dimensional van der Waals materials have emerged as an important platform for the observation of long-range ferromagnetic order in atomically thin layers. Although heterostructures of such materials can be conceived to harness and couple a wide range of magneto-optical and magneto-electrical properties, technologically relevant applications require Curie temperatures at or above room temperature and the ability to grow films over large areas. Here we demonstrate the large-area growth of single-crystal ultrathin films of stoichiometric Fe5GeTe2 on an insulating substrate using molecular beam epitaxy. Magnetic measurements show the persistence of soft ferromagnetism up to room temperature in 12 nm-thick films, with a Curie temperature of 293 K, and a weak out-of-plane magnetocrystalline anisotropy. The ferromagnetic order is preserved in bilayer Fe5GeTe2, with Curie temperature decreasing to 229 K. Surface, chemical, and structural characterizations confirm the layer-by-layer growth, 5:1:2 Fe:Ge:Te stoichiometric elementary composition, and single-crystalline character of the films.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Until recently, long-range magnetic ordering was not thought possible in two-dimensional (2D) systems. The Mermin-Wagner theorem states that thermal fluctuations in a low-dimensionality isotropic Heisenberg model block the emergence of ferromagnetism (FM)1. In 2017, ferromagnetism was observed in exfoliated flakes of the 2D van der Waals (vdW) materials Cr2Ge2Te62 and CrI33. These materials are electrical insulators, exhibit perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA), and have Curie temperature (TC) well below room temperature (RT). The prevailing understanding is that long-range ferromagnetic order in 2D vdW systems survives due to the spin-wave excitation gap opened by the strong intrinsic magnetocrystalline anisotropy (MCA). 2D vdW materials became a rich platform to explore low-dimensionality magnetism, and in a few years, the list of 2D vdW FMs increased with the addition of FePS34, Fe3GeTe25, Fe4GeTe26, and Fe5-δGeTe27. Fe-Ge-Te (FGT) ternary compounds in particular stood out due to their itinerant ferromagnetism, which is of great interest for spintronic applications.
Among the family of 2D vdW FMs, FGT compounds host a variety of noticeable magnetic effects, namely large anomalous- and planar topological Hall effect8,9, magnetic skyrmions10,11, Kondo lattices12, and giant tunneling magnetoresistance13. To the best of our knowledge, the highest TC in pristine, bulk vdW layered materials has been observed in Fe5-δGeTe2 and CrTe2, with TC~310 K7,14,15. Fe3GeTe2 exhibits a TC of 230 K16,17 in bulk form and 130 K5 for a single layer. In these systems, the TC can be tuned via the use of extrinsic mechanisms such as ionic gating18, doping19, ion implantation20, proximity to topological insulators21, and patterning methods22. Metastable states can be stabilized via temperature quenching and temperature cycles23. From a technological standpoint, high TC is among the magnetic properties of highest interest for next-generation spintronic applications integrating 2D vdW FMs. Fe5-δGeTe2 is a Stoner-type itinerant ferromagnet, with asymmetric spin-up and spin-down density of states of the Fe 3d bands at the Fermi-level24, spin-polarized metallic ligand bands25, and near RT TC. However, the mechanisms governing its magnetic properties are still unclear, with variable magnetic properties (TC and anisotropy) being reported. Most experimental realizations have been done using Fe-deficient bulk crystals or micrometer-sized flakes exfoliated from them7,23,26,27. The properties of Fe5GeTe2 films with exact 5:1:2 stoichiometry remain unexplored. Recent studies pointed out the role played by Fe vacancies and the different Fe sublattices on the complex range of magnetic behaviors observed6,7,23. Additionally, magnetic critical exponents of bulk Fe5-δGeTe2 are close to those of a 3D Heisenberg and 3D XY systems27, remaining unclear if these models still hold in ultrathin regimes.
While many of the demonstrations of vdW FMs materials relied on bulk crystals and on exfoliated flakes in the 2D limit, growth by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) has been pursued to expand the complexity of the designed heterostructures and large-area scalability21. MBE is a well-established deposition technique for the realization of atomically thin single-crystal vdW materials and heterostructures with sharp interfaces28. Any outlook on future heterostructures and device concepts based on 2D vdW FMs requires the large-area fabrication of high-quality ultrathin films28,29,30,31,32, for which MBE is well suited.
Here we demonstrate the MBE growth of single-crystal thin films of stoichiometric Fe5GeTe2 on an insulating substrate, Al2O3(001). In situ reflection high-energy electron diffraction (RHEED) measurements demonstrate the layer-by-layer growth of single-crystalline films. Chemical and structural characterization using Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy (RBS), scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), and X-ray diffraction (XRD), confirm the 5:1:2 Fe:Ge:Te stoichiometry and rhombohedral crystal structure. Superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID), and X-ray magnetic circular dichroism measurements (XMCD) show a large magnetization saturation (MS) of 644 kA m−1 at 10 K (1.95 µB/Fe), TC of 293 K, and a magnetic critical exponent β of ~ 0.29 for 12 nm-thick films. Close to the 2D limit, bilayer Fe5GeTe2 retains the ferromagnetic order and critical exponent β ~ 0.29, and exhibits a lowering of the TC and MS to 230 K and 409 kA m−1 at 50 K (1.21 µB/Fe), respectively.
Results
Structural and chemical characterization
The MBE growth of Fe5GeTe2 on Al2O3(001) was carried out in a home-built UHV deposition system with a base pressure in the low 10−10 mbar (see Methods for further information). Al2O3(001) is a conventional substrate used for epitaxy, electrically insulating, and has a hexagonal crystallographic structure. The substrates were first annealed in air at 1000 °C in a tube furnace to promote the formation of a terrace-and-step smooth surface, and again annealed in the UHV chamber at 800 °C for 20 min prior to the deposition. Ge and Te were co-deposited using Knudsen effusion and thermal cracker cells, respectively, and Fe using e-beam evaporation. The substrate temperature for the growth of Fe5GeTe2 was set to 350 °C, the flux ratio of Fe:Ge was kept to the stoichiometric 5:1, and the Te flux on overpressure (approximately twice the stoichiometric flux). After the deposition, the films were annealed for 20 min at 550 °C under Te flux, and then capped with a 3 nm-thick Al film at RT. The growth of Fe5GeTe2 on Al2O3(001) was monitored in situ using RHEED. We report mainly on the characterization of 12 nm-thick Fe5GeTe2 films (1 monolayer (ML) ~0.977 nm). In Fig. 1a, the top left side panel shows well-defined RHEED patterns of the Al2O3(001) surface with the electron-beam (e-beam) aligned along [110], while the bottom left panel shows the diffraction pattern for the same direction after the growth of 12 nm of Fe5GeTe2. Similarly, the top and bottom right-side panels show the diffraction patterns of the Al2O3(001) surface before and after the growth of 12 Fe5GeTe2 layers, respectively, with the e-beam aligned along [210] (see Supplementary Fig. 1 for RHEED snapshots during the deposition and annealing of 12 and 2 nm-thick samples).
Despite the large lattice misfit with Al2O3(001) (~−15 %), the sharp streaks and anisotropic RHEED patterns demonstrate the single-crystalline character of Fe5GeTe2, with c-axis perpendicular to the surface. The two azimuths are aligned with those of the Al2O3(001) surface, showing the Al2O3(001)[100]/Fe5GeTe2(001)[100] epitaxial relationship. The real-time monitoring of the RHEED intensity of the 1st order diffraction streaks allowed for the observation of periodical intensity oscillations characteristic of a layer-by-layer growth mode (Fig. 1b). By indexing the successive oscillations as the formation of a single layer, the rate of growth was estimated at 1.69 monolayers per minute of deposition. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) scans of the surface of 12 nm-thick films not capped with Al, taken within minutes of exposing the surface to the environment, show a smooth surface with root-mean-square roughness (RMS) of 0.5 nm, without clearly defined terraces, but with atomic steps corresponding to those of one or multiple monolayers (Fig. 1c).
To gather further information on the crystallographic structure, domain size, mosaic spread, and lattice parameter distribution of the films deposited, we performed in-plane (grazing incidence) and out-of-plane XRD measurements (see Methods for further details). Fe5GeTe2 is a highly anisotropic layered vdW ferromagnet with a trigonal crystal system. Typical lattice constants reported in the literature for bulk Fe5-δGeTe2 are a ≈ 4.04 Å and c ≈ 29.19 Å7,23,33. Unit cells are typically represented with three stacked Fe5GeTe2 layers, with vdW gaps between adjacent Te planes. The complex atomic arrangement, the common presence of stacking faults and vacancy-induced disorder makes the precise determination of the crystallographic structure an open issue7,23,26,33. In Fig. 2a, we depict the unit cell and three Fe5GeTe2 layers viewed along the [100] direction, according to the crystallographic model of ref. 7. The model considers Fe deficiency via fractional occupation probabilities of the Fe sites, and includes a split Ge and Fe1 site with half-occupation probability. Figure 2b shows the out-of-plane θ/2θ diffraction scan of a 12 nm-thick film, where we index the Al2O3(00 l) and Fe5GeTe2(00 l) Bragg peaks. The determined unit cell lattice constant c ≈ 29.3 Å is in good agreement with previous reports (thickness of 1 ML = c/3)7,23,33. The fringes around the Bragg peaks of Fe5GeTe2(009) indicate low surface and interface roughness (also confirmed by the RMS of 0.5 nm measured by AFM in Fig. 1c), and allows for the estimation of a film thickness of 12.5 ± 0.3 nm, in strong agreement with the expected growth of 12 layers determined from the RHEED oscillations (See Supplementary Fig. 2 for the XRD analysis of a 2 nm-thick film). In Fig. 2c, we show in-plane radial scans θ///2θ// that were acquired along the (hh0) and (0h0) reciprocal directions, 30° apart from each other. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) is also displayed above the peaks. From these scans, we obtain an in-plane lattice parameter a = 4.068 Å, expanded by roughly 0.7% compared to the reference value of 4.04 Å. The mutually exclusive presence of the (hh0) and (0h0) peaks on each radial scan indicate the absence of domains rotated by at least 30°. This is further confirmed in Fig. 2d, which shows the azimuthal dependence of the intensity of the Bragg peaks identified in the radial scans (grey curves). The baseline of the azimuthal scans is the sum of the instrumental background and of the signal from misaligned crystallites with an isotropic distribution of orientations. The observed correspondence between the azimuthal and radial baselines implies that there is no isotropic component in the crystallites angular distribution. The film is single crystalline with the expected 60° periodicity of the basal plane of the crystal lattice. Noticeably, the FWHM for the Bragg peaks is substantially larger. From the study of the momentum transfer for each radial and azimuthal Bragg diffraction peak and its dispersion, one can estimate the domain size D, lattice parameter distribution Δa/a, and in-plane mosaic spread Δξ of the film34,35 (see Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary Fig. 3 for details on the calculations). For the 12 nm-thick film, D was determined to be 33 nm, which must be considered as a lower bound for the domain size due to the instrumental limited resolution, Δa/a ≈ 0.66 %, and Δξ ≈ 3.34 °, values that corroborate the single-crystalline character of the deposited films.
In order to take a closer look at the disorder and stacking of the Fe5GeTe2 ultrathin films, we recorded atomic-resolution real-space images by STEM (see Methods for further information). Figure 3a shows a high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) cross-section image along [100]. The atomically flat Al2O3 promoted the epitaxy of well-oriented layers that are uniform over large areas, parallel to each other, and with no perceivable rotated domains. At the interface between the two materials, there is a thin amorphized gap of 6 Å, after which the first Fe5GeTe2 layer develops. The lattice parameters determined from Fourier transform analysis of the HAADF image, a = 4.07 ± 0.02 Å and c = 29.4 ± 0.3 Å, are in strong agreement with the ones obtained from XRD.
Chemical analysis using RBS spectroscopy confirms the nominal 5:1:2 stoichiometry of the Fe:Ge:Te elementary composition of the film (inset of Fig. 3a). Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) shows a homogenous distribution of each element in the film (Fig. 3b). In Fig. 3c, Z-contrast-enhanced HAADF over a smaller section of the film yields a site distribution with a clear indication of the presence of heavier atoms at the edges of the layers. Element resolved EDX over two layers shows the clear presence of Fe and Ge in between Te sites. Fe shows a broader dependence on position than Ge, as expected from its distribution in the cell. The presence of the Fe1 atom is not clearly resolved in our measurements, but the symmetry of the images points to a 50 % occupation probability in the two possible sites, as in the model of ref. 26. In order to confirm it, we performed simulations of Z-contrast HAADF images for several occupation probabilities (Fig. 3d). For a 100 % occupation probability, the simulation indicates that an STEM scan should be able to clearly resolve the site occupied by the Fe1 atom, while at 0 % the background strongly contrasts with the atomic sites. At 50 %, we observe a tail connecting the inner Fe2 atoms to Te. This reproduces well the experimental result, and strongly suggests that a crystallographic model with a Fe1 half-split site applies to our epitaxial films.
Characterization of the magnetic properties
The magnetic properties of the films were characterized using SQUID and XMCD (see Methods for further information). In Fig. 4a and Fig. 4b we plot isothermal magnetic hysteresis loops at different temperatures with the magnetic field applied in the ab basal plane, and along the c-axis of the layers, respectively, for 12 nm-thick films (12 ML). The data have been corrected by subtracting the magnetic background observed at temperatures well above TC, and a residual slope due to a paramagnetic contribution from the substrate below 50 K. The same slope was subtracted from the in-plane and out-of-plane field dependences. The subtraction of the magnetic background signal was justified from the comparative study of the XMCD and SQUID measurements, in which the latter had a systematic shift equivalent in magnitude to the parasitic magnetic background observed above TC, indicating that the SQUID was capturing a signal not related to the film. The insets show the raw magnetization curves and the considered background in gray. The in-plane hysteresis loops show low coercivity (~ 4 mT at 50 K) and saturation field (~ 200 mT at 50 K) (see Supplementary Fig. 4 for a zoom-in over a narrower field range of the in-plane magnetic hysteresis loops). The saturation magnetization averaged over in-plane and out-of-plane measurements amount to MS = (644 ± 54) kA m−1 at 10 K, corresponding to a magnetic moment m = (1.95 ± 0.12) µB/Fe. These values are in-line with those previously reported for Fe-deficient Fe5-δGeTe2 (δ = 0.1–0.3) films exfoliated from bulk crystals23,25. Perpendicular to the surface, the saturation field largely increases, indicating an easy-plane magnetic anisotropy. We confirmed the consistency of the SQUID magnetic field dependences with polar magneto-optical Kerr effect and XMCD field dependences (see Supplementary Fig. 5).
In Fig. 4c, the temperature dependence of the remanent magnetization (Mr) closely follows the scaling behavior of an ordered ferromagnetic system, \(M_{{{\mathrm{r}}}} \propto \left( {\frac{{T_{{{\mathrm{C}}}} - T}}{{T_{{{\mathrm{C}}}}}}} \right)^\beta\), yielding TC = (292.6 ± 2.6) K and β = 0.29 ± 0.05. This behavior is in striking contrast to the complex temperature dependences observed in bulk and Fe-deficient Fe5-δGeTe2 films7,23, suggesting that MBE-grown films present a higher structural and chemical homogeneity. The Mr can be reasonably fitted with 3D models (see Supplementary Fig. 6). Our determined β significantly deviates from the one observed in bulk crystals β ≈ 0.34627. While the reduction in the magnitude of β might point towards an approach to the window of magnetic critical exponents of 2D systems, the analysis of the residuals of the fittings to different magnetic critical exponent models suggests that a 3D model is better suited to describe the magnetic behavior of the films (Supplementary Fig. 6). Figure 4d shows the normalized in-plane and out-of-plane isothermal magnetic loops at 50, 100, 200, and 300 K. We determine the effective anisotropy Keff from the area enclosed between the curves. The uniaxial anisotropy Ku is deduced from Keff and the measured MS, with the relation \(K_{{{{\mathrm{eff}}}}} = K_{{{\mathrm{u}}}} + K_{{{\mathrm{d}}}} = K_{{{\mathrm{u}}}} - \left( {\mu _0/2} \right)M_{{{\mathrm{S}}}}^2\), where Kd is the shape anisotropy and µ0 the vacuum permeability. The temperature dependence of Keff, Ku, and Kd is displayed in Fig. 4e. We estimate a small positive uniaxial anisotropy Ku ≈ 0.09 J cm−3 that favors an easy c-axis, but remains weaker than shape anisotropy at all temperatures. Figure 4f shows the magnetic moments of this sample (S1) determined by SQUID and compares it to the magnetic moment of a second sample (S2) measured by both SQUID and XMCD. Sample S2 was capped with 5 nm of Te instead of Al. For sample S2, the excellent agreement between SQUID and XMCD confirms the validity of the background correction of SQUID measurements. The smaller magnetic moment of sample S2 compared to that of sample S1 (whose 5:1:2 Fe:Ge:Te composition was ascertained by RBS, in Fig. 3a) might originate from Fe deficiency. In Fig. 4g,h we detail the XMCD characterization of sample S2, and show the XMCD spectra at the Fe and Ge L2,3 edges at 4 K (see Methods for further details). The measurements were performed in total electron yield mode, with X-ray incidence normal to the surface (α = 90°), and the ±5 T magnetic field parallel to the beam direction. Additional measurements were carried out at α = 30° (not shown). We applied the conventional sum rules analysis36,37 to the Fe absorption signal in order to determine the effective spin (\(m_S^{{{{\mathrm{eff}}}},\alpha } = m_S + m_D^\alpha\)) and orbital (\(m_L^\alpha\)) moments (see Supplementary Note 2 for further details on the determination of the Fe magnetic moments with XMCD sum rules). From those, we derive the isotropic spin (mS) and orbital (mL) moments, as well as the intra-atomic dipole moment anisotropy \({{\Delta }}m_D = m_D^ \bot - m_D^\parallel\) and the orbital moment anisotropy \({{\Delta }}m_L = m_L^ \bot - m_L^\parallel\) (⊥ and ∥ denote the out-of-plane and in-plane components, respectively). We obtained mS = 1.54 µB, mL = 0.08 µB, ΔmD = 0.21 µB, and ΔmL = −0.01 µB. The total magnetic moment amounts to mS + mL = 1.62 µB, in excellent agreement with the theoretical value determined from the first principles reported in Table 1 (see Methods for further details).
The small mL and ΔmL are consistent with the weak out-of-plane uniaxial magnetic anisotropy deduced by SQUID measurements. We also observed a small polarization of Ge atoms, in agreement with ref. 25. and with our ab initio results (Table 1). As depicted in Fig. 4h, both 2p → 4d (ΔL = +1) and 2p → 4s (ΔL = −1) transitions present a finite XMCD signal. The sign of the XMCD for 4d (4s) final states is equal (opposite) to the one of Fe. Given the opposite sign of ΔL for these transitions, we deduce that the magnetic moment of both 4d and 4s bands is opposite to the Fe one. In ref. 25, a sizeable magnetic moment was also observed on Te atoms, but we could not confirm it in our film due to the use of a Te capping layer. Note that we neglected the Ge and Te contributions to determine the Fe magnetic moment by SQUID. According to Table 1, these assumptions lead to an underestimation of the Fe magnetic moment by only 2%.
Figure 5 shows the magnetic properties of 2 nm-thick films (2 ML of Fe5GeTe2) measured by SQUID. Figure 5a and Fig. 5b show isothermal magnetic hysteresis loops at different temperatures with the external magnetic field applied in the ab basal plane, and along the c-axis of the layers, respectively. Compared to the 12 nm-thick films, MS decreases by roughly 40%, with MS = (409 ± 5) kA m−1 at 10 K (averaged over in-plane and out-of-plane measurements), corresponding to a magnetic moment m = (1.21 ± 0.01) µB/Fe. In Fig. 5c we plot the temperature dependence of Mr and fit the results to \(M_{{{\mathrm{r}}}} \propto \left( {\frac{{T_{{{\mathrm{C}}}} - T}}{{T_{{{\mathrm{C}}}}}}} \right)^\beta .\) The fitting yields TC = (229.4 ± 0.3) K and β = 0.29 ± 0.01.
Discussion
The magnetic properties of the films (MS, Ku, and TC) are in good general agreement with those reported for bulk crystals synthesized using chemical vapor transport (CVT). Nonetheless, some differences are noticed. More complex magnetic properties were reported in CVT Fe5-δGeTe2, which are not observed in our MBE-grown films. In particular, we do not observe PMA nor anomalies in the temperature dependence of Mr.
Weak PMA has been reported in mono to few-layer flakes7,38,39, while bulk crystals show in-plane magnetic anisotropy27,40,41,42 or no magnetic anisotropy23. When shape anisotropy is taken into account, all reports so far agree on the presence of a weak uniaxial anisotropy. We confirm the weak uniaxial anisotropy, but in our films it never overcomes shape anisotropy. It is possible that both Ku and MS are affected by the 2% larger volume of the unit cell in our crystals (a = 4.07 Å, c = 29.30 Å) when compared to those of works reporting PMA (a ~ 4.04 Å, c ~ 29.1 − 29.2 Å)7,38,39. Fe deficiency might also play a role. It is likewise possible that AlOx and Te capping layers induce a negative interface anisotropy that reduces the overall Ku.
Concerning the temperature dependence of Mr, complex variations have been reported for CVT crystals7,23. Quenched crystals produced by this method stabilize metastable states with higher TC and exhibit a first-order phase transition at T ~ 110 K originating from irreversible changes in the crystalline structure7,23,26. In our case, it appears that the different growth method and thermal history prevents the formation of such metastable states. An additional anomaly around 100 K has been related to the ordering temperature and fluctuations of the Fe1 magnetic moments that are possibly sensitive to the Fe deficiency7,26. An alternative interpretation involved the formation of “glassy clusters”40, which are unlikely in our layers given the high crystalline quality. Since the body of literature points towards a high sensitivity of the magnetic properties on local inhomogeneities, we believe that the anomalies are of extrinsic origin and connected to the non-uniformity and disorder of the films. We speculate that our films simply do not show such complex behavior because of the higher homogeneity, uniformity and negligible Fe deficiency, as supported by our comprehensive characterization.
A striking result is the apparent 3D magnetic behavior of the films, even in the 2D limit. The β ~ 0.29 exponent hardly varies with the thickness (12 ML and 2 ML) and the TC remains surprisingly large (229 K) in bilayers. This may be related to the atomic coordination of Fe5GeTe2. Actually, a monolayer is composed of 6 atomic slabs of Fe stacked onto each other (4 fully occupied layers + 2 layers with 50% occupation). On top of that, the Te terminations also mediate the ferromagnetism in the system25. Therefore, in contrast to 2D ferromagnets like CrI3, where all magnetic atoms lie in the same plane, Fe5GeTe2 contains a 3D-like network of magnetic elements. This atomic configuration implies a 3D-like exchange interaction, which results in the observed 3D magnetic behavior. This corroborates the idea developed in Ref. 6. that the large number of spin-pairs in Fe5GeTe2 enhances the exchange interaction and results in a large TC in spite of the weak magnetocrystalline anisotropy. The weak thickness dependences of TC and β therefore point to sizable intralayer out-of-plane exchange interactions and suggest comparatively weak interlayer interactions, in consistency with the layered nature of Fe5GeTe2. Concerning the exact critical behavior of Fe5GeTe2 thin films, a further study of the γ and δ critical exponents would be needed to unambiguously characterize the magnetic interactions.
In summary, we demonstrated the large-scale growth of few-layer, single-crystal Fe5GeTe2 on Al2O3(001) using molecular beam epitaxy, and provided a thorough structural and magnetic characterization. We showed that the MBE technique yields Fe5GeTe2 layers with high structural quality, layer-by-layer growth, virtually no Fe deficiency, and room-temperature ferromagnetism. STEM images and simulations clearly indicate a crystallographic structure with half-split occupation probability of the Fe1 atomic site. The 12 ML ultrathin films exhibit soft ferromagnetism, a large magnetization of about 644 kA m−1 at 10 K, easy-plane magnetization, with a weak c-axis magnetocrystalline anisotropy Ku ~ 0.09 J cm−3. Bilayer Fe5GeTe2 retains the ferromagnetic order, with a lower magnetization of 409 kA m−1 at 10 K, and a significant TC of 229 K. Analysis of the β critical exponent indicates a thickness-independent 3D magnetic behavior, attributed to the 3D-like coordination between Fe sublattices inside vdW monolayers, and responsible for the high TC.
Our work highlights the role of MBE as a key tool for the fine tailoring of 2D vdW FMs single crystals. In the particular case of Fe5GeTe2, we have grown a benchmark material with exact stoichiometry and well-defined crystalline structure to well-establish the magnetic properties of this vdW ferromagnetic material. It will serve as a platform to further unveil the complex dependence of the magnetic properties on the film composition and crystal structure, and as a stepping stone towards the integration in large-scale vdW multilayers for spintronics.
Methods
MBE
1 × 1 cm2 Al2O3(001) substrates were cleaned prior to the tube furnace annealing with a standard isopropanol/acetone ultrasonic bath. For the growth of Fe5GeTe2, high-purity Ge (99.999%) was evaporated at 1060 °C, while high-purity Te (99.999%) was evaporated at 330 °C and cracked at 1000 °C. Fe (99.99%) was evaporated following standard e-beam procedures. Fe and Te deposition rates were calibrated by AFM on pre-patterned samples. The Ge deposition rate was calibrated with homoepitaxial RHEED oscillations on Ge(111). The Fe flux rate was monitored during the deposition using a quartz microbalance, while the Ge and Te flux rates were monitored before and after the depositions with a UHV pressure gauge.
XRD
In-plane XRD measurements were performed with a SmartLab Rigaku diffractometer operating at 45 kV and 200 mA. Collimators with a resolution of 0.5° were used both in the source and the detector. The measurements were done with a copper rotating anode beam tube (Kα = 1.54 Å) at a grazing incident angle of 0.4°. The out-of-plane XRD measurements were performed using a Panalytical Empyrean diffractometer operated at 35 kV and 50 mA, with a cobalt source, (Kα = 1.79 Å). A PIXcel-3D detector allowed a resolution of 0.02° per pixel, in combination with a divergence slit of 0.125°.
AFM
The film topography was characterized with a Bruker Dimension-Icon microscope using a scanasyst-air cantilever, operated in ScanAsyst mode, and under ambient conditions. The root-mean-square roughness was evaluated on 1×1 µm2 areas.
STEM
STEM measurements were performed using a Cs-corrected FEI Themis at 200 keV. HAADF-STEM images were acquired using a convergence semi-angle of 20 mrad and collecting scattering from >60 mrad. EDX was performed for elemental mapping using a Bruker EDX system consisting of four silicon drift detectors in the Themis microscope. STEM specimens were prepared by the focused ion-beam lift-out technique using a Zeiss DualBeam Cross Beam uSTE750 at 30 kV.
HAADF-STEM simulations were carried out using multislice simulation software, namely JEMS43, and µSTEM44 including the experimental conditions used for the image acquisition. The model structures were constructed based on the crystal information given in refs. 26,33.
RBS
Rutherford backscattering was done using an ion-beam of 4He+ ions with 2 MeV, at a chamber pressure of 10−6 mbar, with a 160° angle between the incident beam and the detector, and an angle of incidence of 75°.
SQUID
SQUID measurements were performed using a Quantum Design magnetic property measurement system MPMS®3 following standard procedures. Magnetic field sweeps were made in no-overshoot, persistent mode. The temperature sweeps were made at a rate of 5 K per minute. The estimated magnetic moments were determined from an average of two scans. For remanent magnetization measurements, the films were field-cooled from RT to 10 K with an external field of 2 T applied in-plane, and the superconducting magnet quenched before starting the temperature dependence.
XMCD
The XMCD measurements were performed on the DEIMOS beamline45 of synchrotron SOLEIL. A XAS spectrum is obtained by continuously moving the energy of the monochromator over the energy range of interest while synchronizing the energy and polarization of the undulator to the energy of the monochromator46. The XMCD spectrum is obtained from four measurements, where both the circular helicity and the direction of the applied magnetic field are flipped.
Ab initio calculations
First-principle calculations were performed using the Vienna Ab-initio Simulation Package (VASP)47,48, employing projector augmented wave (PAW)49,50 for potentials with the plane wave energy cutoff in all the calculations set to 550 eV, and the generalized gradient approximation (GGA)51 for the exchange-correlation energy. As a first step, ionic relaxation of Fe5GeTe2 bulk structure was performed with k-point grids of 7 × 7 × 1 and 0.01 eV Å−1 force tolerance during optimization of the atomic positions. The in-plane (out-of-plane) lattice parameter was fixed to 4.07 (29.3) Å. Next, a self-consistent calculation with 21 × 21 × 3 k-point grids was realized to obtain the charge density wave and the atomic spin moments. Finally, the orbital moments were obtained by performing a non-self-consistent calculation with spin-orbit coupling included with the quantization axis set along [001].
Data availability
All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the authors.
References
Mermin, N. D. & Wagner, H. Absence of ferromagnetism or antiferromagnetism in one- or two-dimensional isotropic Heisenberg models. Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 1133–1136 (1966).
Gong, C. et al. Discovery of intrinsic ferromagnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals crystals. Nature 546, 265–269 (2017).
Huang, B. et al. Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der Waals crystal down to the monolayer limit. Nature 546, 270–273 (2017).
Wang, X. et al. Raman spectroscopy of atomically thin two-dimensional magnetic iron phosphorus trisulfide (FePS3) crystals. 2D Mater. 3, 031009 (2016).
Fei, Z. et al. Two-dimensional itinerant ferromagnetism in atomically thin Fe3GeTe2. Nat. Mater. 17, 778–782 (2018).
Seo, J. et al. Nearly room temperature ferromagnetism in a magnetic metal-rich van der Waals metal. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay8912 (2020).
May, A. F. et al. Ferromagnetism near room temperature in the cleavable van der Waals crystal Fe5GeTe2. ACS Nano 13, 4436–4442 (2019).
Kim, K. et al. Large anomalous Hall current induced by topological nodal lines in a ferromagnetic van der Waals semimetal. Nat. Mater. 17, 794–799 (2018).
You, Y. et al. Angular dependence of the topological Hall effect in the uniaxial van der Waals ferromagnet Fe3GeTe2. Phys. Rev. B 100, 134441 (2019).
Ding, B. et al. Observation of magnetic skyrmion bubbles in a van der Waals ferromagnet Fe3GeTe2. Nano Lett. 20, 868–873 (2020).
Park, T.-E. et al. Neel-type skyrmions and their current-induced motion in van der Waals ferromagnet-based heterostructures. Phys. Rev. B 103, 104410 (2021).
Zhang, Y. et al. Emergence of Kondo lattice behavior in a van der Waals itinerant ferromagnet, Fe3GeTe2. Sci. Adv. 4, eaao6791 (2018).
Wang, Z. et al. Tunneling spin valves based on Fe3GeTe2/hBN/Fe3GeTe2 van der Waals heterostructures. Nano Lett. 18, 4303–4308 (2018).
Freitas, D. C. et al. Ferromagnetism in layered metastable 1T-CrTe2. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 27, 176002 (2015).
Zhang, X. et al. Room-temperature intrinsic ferromagnetism in epitaxial CrTe2 ultrathin films. Nat. Commun. 12, 2492 (2021).
Deiseroth, H.-J., Aleksandrov, K., Reiner, C., Kienle, L. & Kremer, R. K. Fe3GeTe2 and Ni3GeTe2—-two new layered transition-metal compounds: crystal structures, HRTEM investigations, and magnetic and electrical properties. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 1561–1567 (2006).
Chen, B. et al. Magnetic properties of layered itinerant electron ferromagnet Fe3GeTe2. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 82, 124711 (2013).
Deng, Y. et al. Gate-tunable room-temperature ferromagnetism in two-dimensional Fe3GeTe2. Nature 563, 94–99 (2018).
Tian, C. et al. Tunable magnetic properties in van der Waals crystals (Fe1−xCox)5GeTe2. Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 202402 (2020).
Yang, M. et al. Highly enhanced Curie temperature in Ga-implanted Fe3GeTe2 van der Waals material. Adv. Quantum Technol. 3, 2000017 (2020).
Wang, H. et al. Above room-temperature ferromagnetism in Wafer-Scale two-dimensional van der Waals Fe3GeTe2 tailored by a topological insulator. ACS Nano 14, 10045–10053 (2020).
Li, Q. et al. Patterning-induced ferromagnetism of Fe3GeTe2 van der Waals materials beyond room temperature. Nano Lett. 18, 5974–5980 (2018).
May, A. F., Bridges, C. A. & McGuire, M. A. Physical properties and thermal stability of Fe5GeTe2 single crystals. Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 104401 (2019).
Joe, M., Yang, U. & Lee, C. First-principles study of ferromagnetic metal Fe5GeTe2. Nano Mater. Sci. 1, 299–303 (2019).
Yamagami, K. et al. Itinerant ferromagnetism mediated by giant spin polarization of the metallic ligand band in the van der Waals magnet Fe5GeTe2. Phys. Rev. B 103, L060403 (2021).
May, A. F., Du, M.-H., Cooper, V. R. & McGuire, M. A. Tuning magnetic order in the van der Waals metal Fe5GeTe2 by cobalt substitution. Phys. Rev. Mater. 4, 074008 (2020).
Li, Z. et al. Magnetic critical behavior of the van der Waals Fe5GeTe2 crystal with near room temperature ferromagnetism. Sci. Rep. 10, 15345 (2020).
Liu, S. et al. Wafer-scale two-dimensional ferromagnetic Fe 3 GeTe 2 thin films grown by molecular beam epitaxy. npj 2D Mater. Appl. 1, 1–7 (2017).
Burch, K. S., Mandrus, D. & Park, J.-G. Magnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals materials. Nature 563, 47–52 (2018).
Li, P. et al. Single-layer CrI3 grown by molecular beam epitaxy. Sci. Bull. 65, 1064–1071 (2020).
Bedoya-Pinto, A. et al. Intrinsic 2D-XY ferromagnetism in a van der Waals monolayer. Science 374, 616–620 (2021).
Li, B. et al. Van der Waals epitaxial growth of air-stable CrSe2 nanosheets with thickness-tunable magnetic order. Nat. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-021-00927-2 (2021).
Stahl, J., Shlaen, E. & Johrendt, D. The van der Waals ferromagnets Fe5–δGeTe2 and Fe5–δ–xNixGeTe2 – crystal structure, stacking faults, and magnetic properties. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 644, 1923–1929 (2018).
Renaud, G., Barbier, A. & Robach, O. Growth, structure, and morphology of the Pd/MgO(001) interface: Epitaxial site and interfacial distance. Phys. Rev. B 60, 5872–5882 (1999).
Guillet, T. et al. Magnetotransport in Bi2Se3 thin films epitaxially grown on Ge(111). AIP Adv. 8, 115125 (2018).
Chen, C. T. et al. Experimental confirmation of the X-ray magnetic circular dichroism sum rules for iron and cobalt. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 152–155 (1995).
Stöhr, J. Exploring the microscopic origin of magnetic anisotropies with X-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) spectroscopy. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 200, 470–497 (1999).
Tan, C. et al. Gate-controlled magnetic phase transition in a van der Waals magnet Fe5GeTe2. Nano Lett. 21, 5599–5605 (2021).
Ohta, T. et al. Enhancement of coercive field in atomically-thin quenched Fe5GeTe2. Appl. Phys. Express 13, 043005 (2020).
Zhang, H. et al. Itinerant ferromagnetism in van der Waals Fe5GeTe2 crystals above room temperature. Phys. Rev. B 102, 064417 (2020).
Zhao, B. et al. Van der Waals Magnet based Spin-Valve Devices at Room Temperature. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.00310 (2021).
Alahmed, L. et al. Magnetism and spin dynamics in room-temperature van der Waals magnet Fe5GeTe2. 2D Mater. 8, 045030 (2021).
Stadelmann, P. Image analysis and simulation software in transmission electron microscopy. Microsc. Microanal. 9, 60–61 (2003).
Allen, L. J., D׳Alfonso, A. J. & Findlay, S. D. Modelling the inelastic scattering of fast electrons. Ultramicroscopy 151, 11–22 (2015).
Ohresser, P. et al. DEIMOS: A beamline dedicated to dichroism measurements in the 350–2500 eV energy range. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85, 013106 (2014).
Joly, L. et al. Fast continuous energy scan with dynamic coupling of the monochromator and undulator at the DEIMOS beamline. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 21, 502–506 (2014).
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).
Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).
Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).
Momma, K. & Izumi, F. VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data. J. Appl. Cryst. 44, 1272–1276 (2011).
Acknowledgements
The MBE reactors were funded by the project Minatec LABS 2018 N°2018 AURA P3 and the project EPI2D of the University Grenoble Alpes IDEX. We acknowledge the financial support from the UGA IDEX IRS/EVASPIN, the ANR projects ELMAX (ANR-20-CE24-0015) and MAGICVALLEY (ANR-18-CE24-0007), and the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology under grant number OSR-2018-CRG7-3717, the DARPA TEE program through Grant MIPR# HR0011831554 from the DOI, European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation Programme under grant agreement 881603 (Graphene Flagship), and the LANEF framework (ANR-10-LABX-51-01) for its support with mutualized infrastructure.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The sample preparation, growth, and the SQUID measurements were done by M.R., G.G., and F.B. XRD was performed by A.M. The AFM scans were made by G.G. The STEM cross-sections and simulations were done by H.O. and D.D. XMCD was done by F.B., G.G., D.L., and P.O. RBS was perform by C.V., J.-F.J., and D.J. A.H. and M.C. performed the ab initio simulations. The study was supervised by F.B., O.B., and M.J. M.R. and F.B. wrote the paper, and all authors contributed to the discussion of the results.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ribeiro, M., Gentile, G., Marty, A. et al. Large-scale epitaxy of two-dimensional van der Waals room-temperature ferromagnet Fe5GeTe2. npj 2D Mater Appl 6, 10 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41699-022-00285-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41699-022-00285-w
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Atomic sawtooth-like metal films for vdW-layered single-crystal growth
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Reversible non-volatile electronic switching in a near-room-temperature van der Waals ferromagnet
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Interfacial engineering of ferromagnetism in wafer-scale van der Waals Fe4GeTe2 far above room temperature
Nature Communications (2023)
-
Unraveling effects of electron correlation in two-dimensional FenGeTe2 (n = 3, 4, 5) by dynamical mean field theory
npj Computational Materials (2023)
-
Recent progress in synthesis and properties of 2D room-temperature ferromagnetic materials
Science China Chemistry (2023)