Abstract
Low heart rate variability (HRV) has been widely reported as a predictor for increased mortality. However, the molecular mechanisms are poorly understood. Therefore, this study aimed to identify novel genetic loci associated with HRV and assess the association of phenotypic HRV and genetically predicted HRV with mortality. In a GWAS of 46,075 European ancestry individuals from UK biobank, we identified 17 independent genome-wide significant genetic variants in 16 loci associated with HRV traits. Notably, eight of these loci (RNF220, GNB4, LINCR-002, KLHL3/HNRNPA0, CHRM2, KCNJ5, MED13L, and C160rf72) have not been reported previously. In a prospective phenotypic relationship between HRV and mortality during a median follow-up of seven years, individuals with lower HRV had higher risk of dying from any cause. Genetically predicted HRV, as determined by the genetic risk scores, was not associated with mortality. To the best of our knowledge, the findings provide novel biological insights into the mechanisms underlying HRV. These results also underline the role of the cardiac autonomic nervous system, as indexed by HRV, in predicting mortality.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Heart rate variability (HRV), a result of complex interactions between intrinsic cardiovascular regulatory mechanisms and extrinsic environmental factors, is a specific marker of parasympathetic (or vagal nerve) control of the heart rhythm. This physiological phenomenon was widely reported back in the 1990s as a predictor for increased cardiovascular and all-cause mortality1,2,3. Later, Zulfiqar and colleagues4 showed that a high HRV was associated with longevity, indicating that preservation of autonomic function might be important to healthy survival into old age. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the association between low HRV, and increased mortality are unknown.
There is consistent evidence for the influence of genetic factors on HRV5 with heritability estimates ranging from 14 to 71%5,6. However, very few studies have tried to identify the genetic variants responsible for this heritability. Previous studies have attempted to associate variants in candidate genes based on current knowledge of parasympathetic nervous system biology, though the results could not be replicated7. In addition, three genome-wide association studies (GWASs) were performed to identify genetic variants associated with HRV. The first was conducted in the Framingham Heart Study that found no genome-wide significant results8. Nolte et al. conducted the second one, which detected 17 genome-wide significant genetic variants in eight loci9. While the previous two studies were conducted among European ancestries, a third GWAS of HRV in Hispanic/Latino individuals reported two genome-wide significant single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)10 It was estimated that the identified common variants explained only up to 2.6% of the phenotypic variability of HRV, leaving a large proportion of heritability unexplained.
However, large cohorts such as the UK Biobank were not included in the reported GWASs, and only a limited number of SNPs imputed against the HapMap2 reference panel were analyzed. GWASs using larger cohorts combined with higher resolution SNP arrays and more accurate imputation reference datasets are expected to explain a larger part of the missing heritability of HRV. Identification of more genetic loci and underlying functional variants could help to not only elucidate the biological pathways through which reduced HRV contributes to cardiovascular disease risk but also facilitate investigation of its potential causal role in health outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to: (1) identify novel genetic loci associated with HRV, and (2) assess the association of phenotypic HRV, and (3) genetically predicted HRV with incident mortality.
We performed a GWAS on 46,075 individuals of European ancestry participating in the UK Biobank to increase our understanding of genes that influence HRV. We additionally investigated the longitudinal association of HRV at baseline (N = 54,312) and incident mortality during a median follow-up period of seven years. We constructed genetic risk scores (GRSs) for the remaining independent sub-sample of the UK Biobank (N = 412,891) with genotype data, but not included in the GWAS, to further our understanding of molecular mechanisms linking reduced HRV with increased risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.
Results
General characteristics
Supplementary Data 1 presents the general characteristics of participants included in this study. A total of 46,075, 54,312, and 412,891 participants with a mean age of 57 years were included for the GWAS, phenotypic, and GRS association analyses, respectively. Overall, 1118 (2.4%) participants in the GWAS sample, 1548 (2.9%) in the phenotypic sample, and 17,503 (4.2%) in the GRS sample died of any cause during the follow-up periods (median: 6.99, 6.99, and 8.14 years, respectively).
The GWAS on the four natural log-transformed HRV traits (RMSSD, RMSSDc, SDNN, and SDNNc) identified 23 genetic variants (17 independent) at a genome-wide significance level (P < 5 × 10−8). In our study, a locus was defined 2.5 Mb distance up- and downward of the sentinel SNP. Based on this, there were 16 loci. Notably, eight of these loci (RNF220, GNB4, LINCR_0002, KLHL3/HNRNPA0, CHRM2, KCNJ5, MED13L, and C160rf72) have not been previously reported for HRV (Table 1 and Fig. 1) and were not in LD (r2 < 0.005) with or within 2.5 Mb of a previously reported locus. Six previously reported loci (RGS6, PPIL1, SYT10, GNG11, LINC00477, and NDUFA11) were associated with all HRV traits (Fig. 2). In a lookup of the 23 association signals in the summary statistics of a previously published HRV GWAS9, only 16 were present and for the remaining seven genetic variants we used their proxies (r2 > 0.7). Twenty-one of the 23 variants replicated with a one-sided P < 0.05. Two genetic variants (one indel) did not reach nominal significance (one-sided P < 0.05). A further six variants (one indel) did not reach the more conservative one-sided Bonferroni-corrected threshold of 0.00294 (0.05/17) (Supplementary Data 14). The quantile–quantile and regional association plots are given in Supplementary Figs. 2, 3–19, respectively. A detailed description of what is known on biological function of genes reported in this manuscript is given in Supplementary Note 1. As sensitivity analyses, we reran the GWAS after excluding individuals who died within 1 or 2 years after the ECG recording. The result shows that the effect sizes of the significant variants in the original analyses remain virtually the same, indicating that our results were not biased by prevalent diseases (Supplementary Data 13).
From the newly reported genes, the lead variant (rs71784944: effect allele frequency 0.226) of the CHRM2 locus on chromosome 7 was an indel and associated only with RMSSD. The frequency of this variant for non-Finnish Europeans in The Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/) is 0.217. There were two lead SNPs annotated to the KCNJ5 gene, rs7609764 which was associated with both SDNN and RMSSD and rs7102584 associated with only RMSSD. The frequency of rs7102584 is relatively low both in UKB (0.017) and in gnomAD non-Finnish Europeans (0.012) (Table 1).
Of the 17 previously reported SNP associations (11 independent) for HRV by Nolte et al.9, we replicated 16 (P < 0.05/11 = 0.00455) confirming all previously reported loci (Supplementary Data 7).
Using LDSC, we estimated SNP-based heritability to be 9.45% for RMSSD and 7.86% for SDNN. The genetic correlation between RMSSD and SDNN was 98.4% (Supplementary Data 8). We also estimated genetic correlations (rg) of HRV related with cardiac, metabolic and neuropsychiatric traits using GWAS summary statistics. From the 11 traits tested (Supplementary Data 9), we found evidence of shared genetic effects of RMSSD with diastolic blood pressure (rg = −0.25, P = 1.57 × 10−9), systolic blood pressure (rg = −0.14, P = 0.0013), heart rate (rg = −0.74, P = 1.48 × 10−20), heart failure (rg = −0.23, P = 9.00 × 10−4), coronary artery disease (rg = −0.16, P = 3.00 × 10−4), and type 2 diabetes (rg = −0.48, P = 0.035).
The in silico sequencing analyses of the 23 genetic variants resulted in 1433, 452, and 39 SNPs that were in moderate (r2 > 0.5), high (r2 > 0.8), and perfect LD (r2 = 1), respectively. Annotation of these linked SNPs using the ANNOVAR software detected a missense lead SNP (rs7102584) at KCNJ5, a novel locus (Supplementary Data 6). This SNP was characterized as tolerated, with a SIFT score of 1, indicating no possible damaging effect. We also identified a missense variant in the NDUFA11 locus (rs12980262; in perfect LD [r2 = 1] with sentinel variants rs35952442 and rs12974991), which was previously associated with HRV. This SNP had a SIFT score of 0.01 and a PolyPhen score of 0.753, suggesting deleterious effects and likely functional consequences.
In silico pleiotropy analysis indicated that the lead SNPs were previously reported to be associated with HRV (rs236349, rs4963772, and rs12974991), (resting) heart rate (rs7612445 and rs17180489), heart rate increase in response to exercise, and heart rate response to recovery post exercise (rs236349, rs4963772, rs6488162, rs17180489, and rs12974991), atrial fibrillation (rs7612445 and rs76097649), pulse pressure (rs71784944 and rs4963772) and familial hyperaldosteronism (rs7102584). In addition, we found that SNPs in high LD (r2 > 0.8) with eight and 11 of the lead SNPs were previously associated with HRV and heart rate, respectively. Six of our 23 sentinel SNPs had not been identified in any previous GWASs (Supplementary Data 5).
Associations of HRV traits with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality
In Cox-regression analyses using the phenotypic HRV data in 54,312 individuals, we found that lower HRV values were associated with more considerable hazards of all-cause mortality. For each unit of natural log-transformed RMSSD and SDNN decrease, individuals had 19% (HR: 1.19, 95% CI 1.10–1.28; P = 1.48 × 10−05) and 32% (HR: 1.32, 95% CI 1.23–1.43; P = 9.30 × 10−12) higher risk of dying from any cause during the follow-up period, respectively (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Data 2). These associations were similar for the heart rate-corrected HRV measures. Only SDNN was significantly associated with cardiovascular mortality (HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.06–1.52; P = 6.86 × 10−3), but this association was no longer significant when SDNN was corrected for the mean IBI (HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 0.98–1.45; P = 7.21 × 10−2) (Fig. 3). We performed Kaplan–Meier analyses to compare the risk of death for quartiles of HRV traits (considering the 4th quartile with the highest HRV values as a reference) (Figs. 4 and 5 and Supplementary Data 3). Participants in the 1st (lowest) quartile at baseline for RMSSD and SDNN had 1.31 (95% CI: 1.15–1.51; P = 9.29 × 10−5) and 1.46 (95% CI: 1.27–1.68; P = 1.16 × 10−7) times higher risk of death from any cause compared to participants in the highest quartile. Our sensitivity analyses show that even after excluding individuals who died within 1 and 2 years after ECG measurement, lower HRV values were associated with a significant hazard of all-cause mortality (Supplementary Data 12). We did not find significant differences in the risk of death from cardiovascular causes for participants with the lowest and highest quartile of RMSSD and SDNN (HR: 1.34, 95% CI: 0.98–1.82; P = 0.062 and HR: 1.15, 95% CI: 0.85–1.57; P = 0.360). For our sub-analyses for death from cancer causes, like the all-cause mortality, participants in the lowest quartile for RMSSD and SDNN had 1.43 (95% CI: 1.16–1.76; P = 8.05 × 10−4) and 1.64 (95% CI: 1.32–2.05; P = 8.94 × 10−6) times higher risk of death from cancer compared to participants in the highest quartile (Supplementary Data 11).
Associations of genetically determined HRV traits with all-cause, cancer and cardiovascular mortality
We constructed weighted GRSs of HRV-decreasing alleles to evaluate the associations between genetically determined HRV with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. None of them were significantly associated with all-cause or cardiovascular mortality (Supplementary Data 4 and 5 and Supplementary Figs. 20 and 21). Similarly, genetically determined HRV was not significantly associated with cancer mortality (Supplementary Data 4 and 5 and Supplementary Fig. 22).
Discussion
In this study, a GWAS of 46,075 individuals of European ancestry, we identified 23 genome-wide significant genetic variants in 16 loci associated with HRV of which 8 of these loci have not been reported previously. In phenotypic analyses investigating the association of HRV and mortality, we found that lower HRV values at baseline were associated with a higher risk of all-cause and cancer mortality but not consistently with cardiovascular mortality. Furthermore, the genetic variants associated with low HRV combined in a GRS were not associated with mortality.
Our study confirms previously reported genetic loci (RGS6, NEO1, PPIL1, SYT10, GNG11, LINC00477, NDUFA11) in a meta-analysis of GWAS for HRV9. Many of the HRV loci harbor causal candidates that are involved in cardiac development (RNF220, NDUFA11), neural development (SYT10), electrophysiological processes (RGS6, GNG11), and muscarinic cholinergic receptor function (CHRM2). The NDUFA11 gene harbors a likely deleterious variant, which may have functional consequences. NDUFA11 is an accessory subunit of the mitochondrial membrane respiratory chain NADH dehydrogenase complex I. In humans, a splice‐site mutation in this gene is known to cause mitochondrial complex I deficiency. A recent study on mice11 has shown that downregulation of NDUFA11 reduced ATP production and increased mitochondria reactive oxygen species production in cardiac mitochondria. A detailed description of the known biological function of genes reported in this manuscript is given in Supplementary Note 1.
Three of the loci that have not been reported previously, CHRM2, GNB4, and KCNJ5, perfectly fit in previously depicted pathways of cardiac vagal effects on the sinoatrial node and the potential roles of HRV loci9.
Interestingly, we found, CHRM2, a previously investigated candidate gene with functions in the acetylcholine pathway7, to be associated with HRV. CHRM2 encodes the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2, which is located both pre-and post-synaptically. This receptor is known for its negative chronotropic and inotropic effects after binding with acetylcholine released by postganglionic parasympathetic nerves. Posokhova et al.12 showed that the muscarinic receptor affects HRV by acetylcholine-dependent inward-rectifier potassium current (IKACh) in mice. CHRM2 is found in the sinoatrial node of the heart among the different tissues involving in both heart rate and cardiac function. This gene has been previously reported to be associated with resting heart rate13,14, heart rate response to post exercise recovery15,16, and pulse pressure measurement17,18.
Heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins) are involved as a modulator or transducer in various transmembrane signaling systems, including vagal-muscarinergic signaling underlying HRV, with an alpha, a beta, and a gamma subunit. GNB4 gene encodes beta subunits which are important regulators of alpha subunits, as well as of certain signal transduction receptors and effectors like the G protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channel. A genome-wide identification of Expression Quantitative Trait Loci (eQTLs) in cardiac tissue by Koopmann et al.19 reported that GNB4 is a left ventricular myocardium eQTL. In addition, GNB4 has been previously reported for resting heart rate13.
KCNJ5 gene, also known as GIRK4, is involved in the transmembrane transfer of potassium ions by a voltage-gated channel through the plasma membrane of atrial cardiomyocytes, contributing to the repolarization phase of the action potential. The lead SNP at the KCNJ5 locus, rs7102584, is a missense variant, which is not indicated as deleterious. KCNJ5 has been previously reported for resting heart rate14, atrial fibrillation20,21, and diastolic blood pressure18.
One of the major findings of the present study was that individuals with lower HRV values at inclusion had a higher risk of dying from any cause during the follow-up period. This finding is consistent across the different HRV traits studied and remains significant even after adjusting for heart rate. We find that associations between uncorrected HRV and morbidities/mortalities remain after correction for heart rate in the corrected HRV measures showing these associations are largely driven by HRV (mainly reflecting parasympathetic influences on the heart) rather than just heart rate (mainly reflecting the influence of the sympathetic nervous system). Consistent with our results, the Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities (ARIC) Study also reported that low HRV was predictive of increased mortality rates22. In addition to our study which was based on the general population, several previous studies among patient populations showed similar results with reduced HRV as a significant predictor of all-cause mortality. For instance, Arildsen et al. reported baseline HRV could be used to predict all-cause mortality after five years of follow-up in a diabetic population23. In addition, the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) study reported HRV, as measured by RMSSD, was associated with all-cause mortality. In this report, both low and high RMSSD was associated with increased risk for all-cause mortality. The latter might be due to sinoatrial node dysfunction24 rather than autonomic dysfunction. Similarly, our results show individuals with lower HRV values had a higher risk of dying from cancer during the follow-up consistent with a systematic review by Kloter et al.25 that concluded that individuals with higher HRV and advanced coping mechanisms seem to have a better prognosis in cancer progression. The possible explanations might include a lower HRV is associated with tumor growth through inflammation, oxidative stress, and sympathetic nerve activation.
Likewise, participants with lower SDNN values showed a higher risk to develop cardiovascular mortality. In agreement with this, a meta-analysis by Hillebrand et al.26 reported that a low SDNN was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death. The effect, however, disappeared when heart rate was added as an additional predictor, possibly because high heart rate and low HRV reflect lower cardiac vagal drive, but the alternative explanation is that higher heart rate is the primary risk factor for cardiovascular death, while simultaneously reducing HRV27.
In this study, we also showed that genetic variants associated with low HRV were not associated with a change in all-cause or cardiovascular mortality risk. Nonetheless, the prospective association in our phenotypic analyses and prior studies clearly show a strong relationship between low HRV and a higher risk of all-cause mortality. This leaves two likely possibilities: either the genetic instruments used in our analyses were not strong enough, or the association between HRV and all-cause mortality is not causal, but reflects confounding environmental effects (e.g., chronic stress) that can independently reduce HRV as well as increase all-cause mortality. The latter is more likely to be accurate as the large sample size in our study was well-powered to detect a potential genetic association for our GRSs. Power calculations using mRnd28 also showed that the power was optimal (100%) for both RMSSD and SDNN for both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality based on realistic effect size assumptions (Supplementary Data 10). Thus, weak instrument bias for our GRSs was not a concern. Further research is therefore needed to explore the driving mechanisms behind the phenotypic association found in both our and previous analyses.
We conducted the largest discovery GWAS to date for HRV in a European sample. In addition, although the associations between HRV and mortality have been studied previously, our study provide long-term follow-up data in a very large sample. Nonetheless, our study has some limitations. First, some of the genome-wide significant genetic variants could not be found in the replication dataset. However, we used their proxies (r2 > 0.7) to evaluate the replication, but these are obviously suboptimal. Second, our analyses were restricted to European ancestry, and this may reduce the generalizability of the results to other ethnicities. A third limitation is that the ultrashort nature of the ECG recording in the UKB limited us to assess only the time-domain HRV indices. This was because at least a one-minute ECG recording is recommended to estimate frequency-domain values29. We speculate that future inclusion of diverse ethnic populations and HRV measures may give additional insights into the genetic architecture of HRV and will further contribute to test causal hypotheses on the association of HRV and health outcomes. Finally, the limited number of cardiovascular events in our study might have resulted in an underestimation of the (genetic) association between HRV and cardiovascular mortality.
In conclusion, this study identified new variations that are genome-wide significant for HRV in genes involved in cardiac development and electrophysiology function and it underscores that HRV is a complex trait controlled by multiple genes. To the best of our knowledge, the findings provide novel biological insights into the mechanisms underlying HRV. The present study clearly demonstrates that reduced HRV had a strong association with a higher risk of all-cause mortality in an adult population. These results also emphasize the role of the cardiac autonomic nervous system, as indexed by HRV, in predicting mortality. No evidence was found for an association between genetic predictors of HRV with mortality.
Methods
Study setting and population
This study uses data from the UK Biobank, a prospective cohort study of 503,325 individuals from the United Kingdom with an age range of 40–69 who were recruited between 2006 and 2010. The Northwest Multi‐Centre Research Ethics Committee approved the UK Biobank study, and all participants provided written informed consent to participate in the study. A detailed description of the methods used by UK Biobank is available elsewhere30.
During the baseline and follow-up visit, a sub-sample of the UK Biobank participants (Supplementary Fig. 1) underwent a cardio assessment using a stationary bicycle with a 4-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) device to record ECGs at pre-test (15 s), during activity (6 min) and recovery (1 min). We used the pre-test recording (i.e., resting) ECG assessments at first visit with a full disclosure to use the recordings (n = 63, 924) to calculate HRV indices for this paper (Supplementary Fig. 1). Participants were asked to sit still on a chair, relaxed and quiet. They were allowed to remove their jacket or loosen clothing before placing the ECG electrodes. The cardio assessment involved a three lead (lead I, II, and III) ECG recording (AM-USB 6.5, Cardiosoft v6.51) using four electrodes placed on the antecubital fossa (right and left) and wrist (right and left). Participants fitted with a pacemaker did not complete the resting ECG procedure. We used in-house software, described elsewhere31, to detect R-peaks and calculate HRV indices. HRV could not be calculated in 4260 participants due to excessive noise and ectopic (non-sinus node) beats (Supplementary Fig. 1).
We calculated the root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) and the standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN) as indices of HRV. Heart rate has a strong relationship with HRV, which includes a mathematical dependency of the variance on the mean inter-beat interval (IBI) that is difficult to separate from the joint vagal effects on IBI and HRV32. Van Roon et al. reintroduced an approach recommended by Akselrod et al.33 to correct HRV for its dependency on the mean IBI of consecutive R-peaks using coefficients of variation34. The coefficient of variation detects the amount of IBI variability relative to the mean IBI of each participant. We applied this method to additionally calculate HRV values that were corrected for the influence of mean IBI, that is the RMSSDc and SDNNc.
Non-Europeans (n = 5352) were excluded to get a homogeneous population of 54,312 participants for the phenotypic association analysis between HRV and mortality. European ancestry was defined based on self-reported ethnicity by participants. For the GWAS sample, participants were also excluded if they had missing or poor-quality genotype data, missing covariates, a diagnosis of angina, myocardial infarction, heart failure, or used anti-depressant medication, digoxin, atropine, or acetylcholinesterase (Supplementary Fig. 1).
Mortality
All-cause mortality included all deaths that occurred after inclusion and before Jan 31, 2018, for participants from England or Wales and before Nov 30, 2016, for participants from Scotland. Data on deceased UK Biobank participants have been received from the National Health Service (NHS) Digital for participants in England and Wales and the NHS Central Register (NHSCR), part of the National Records of Scotland, for participants in Scotland. Cardiovascular and cancer mortality was defined based on the data UK Biobank received from the death registry, including the date of death and the primary and contributory causes of death, coded using the ICD-10 system. Details of mortality data linkage to death registries are available on http://biobank.ctsu.ox.ac.uk/crystal/crystal/docs/DeathLinkage.pdf.
Covariates
Age and sex were included as covariates for the GWAS and phenotypic analyses. In addition, diseases that are known to influence HRV were included as covariates for the phenotypic analysis. Information on these diseases, such as hypertension, type 2 diabetes, angina, myocardial infarction, and heart failure, was obtained from self-reports (touch screen questionnaire and verbal interview) and/or captured through the Hospital Episode Statistics records35 using the following International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes: I10–I15 for hypertension; E10–E14 for diabetes; I21–I22 for myocardial infarction and I42, I150 for heart failure.
Genotyping and imputation
Genotyping, quality control, and imputation of the UK Biobank have been described elsewhere36. In brief, 488,377 participants have been genotyped using the custom UK Biobank Axiom array (n = 438,427) or UK Biobank Lung Exome Variant Evaluation (UK BiLEVE) Axiom array (n = 49,950). These arrays have >95% common variant content. In addition, Haplotype Reference Consortium, 1000 Genomes Project phase 3 release, and UK10K reference panels were used for imputation resulting in 93,095,623 autosomal SNPs, short insertion/deletions (indels), and large structural variants in 487,442 individuals and an additional 3,963,705 markers on the X chromosome.
Statistics and reproducibility
Association of HRV phenotypes with mortality
We assessed the association between HRV phenotypes (RMSSD, RMSSDc, SDNN, SDNNc) and time to death using Cox-regression analyses adjusted for age, age2, sex, and diseases (angina, myocardial infarction, heart failure, type 2 diabetes, and hypertension). We also constructed Kaplan–Meier curves for quartiles of HRV traits (considering the 4th quartile as a reference). Similar analyses were performed for cardiovascular mortality.
Genome-wide association study
We performed GWAS analyses for four natural log-transformed HRV traits (RMSSD, RMSSDc, SDNN, and SDNNc) in 46,075 European participants using BOLT-LMM37, which employs a conjugate gradient-based iterative framework for fast mixed-model computations to account for population structure and relatedness accurately. Additive genetic effects were assumed. Analyses were adjusted for age at inclusion, age2, sex, genotyping chip (UK Biobank Axiom or UK BiLEVE), the first 30 genetic principal components provided by the UK Biobank, and the Townsend deprivation index as a proxy for socioeconomic status. Genetic variants with minor allele frequencies <0.005 or INFO scores <0.05 were excluded from the analyses. We used the GWASinspector package38 to perform quality control of GWAS results. SNPs that passed the genome-wide significance threshold of P < 5 × 10−8 were clumped together using the clumping procedure in PLINK 1.9, with linkage disequilibrium (LD) r2 > 0.005 and 2.5 Mb distance. The genetic variant with the smallest P value within a locus was designated the sentinel genetic variant.
A lookup of the identified genome-wide significant genetic variants was performed in meta-analyzed GWAS data of 20 cohorts of European ancestry in up to 28,700 participants9. This dataset used HapMap2 as a reference panel and was therefore imputed using a 1000 Genome reference panel before the lookup using FiZi39. An association was considered replicated if the direction of effect was consistent and the one-sided replication P value was <0.05. We also evaluated replication for a more conservative Bonferroni-corrected one-sided threshold (P < 0.00294) corrected for the total number of 17 independent SNPs (0.05/17).
Heritability and genetic correlation estimation
LD Score Regression (LDSC)40 was used to estimate the SNP-based heritability explained by common variants, and bivariate genetic correlations of HRV with a range of cardiac, metabolic, and neuropsychiatric outcomes: blood pressure, heart rate, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, PR interval, coronary artery disease, type 2 diabetes, depressive symptoms, Alzheimer’s disease, and Parkinson’s disease.
Genetic risk score
We constructed weighted GRSs of HRV-decreasing alleles to evaluate the associations between genetically determined lower HRV with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. These weighted GRSs were constructed for each HRV phenotype by multiplying the effect sizes of all associated genetic variants (see Table 1) with their allele dosages (range 0–2) and then summing all variants together. All European UK Biobank participants who were not part of the discovery GWAS, but did have genotype information (n = 412,891, Supplementary Fig. 1), were included to assess the association of the GRS with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. We performed Cox-regression analyses adjusted for age at inclusion, age2, sex, body mass index (BMI), genotyping chip, and the first ten principal components provided by the UK Biobank. We also constructed Kaplan–Meier curves for quartiles of the GRS (considering the 4th quartile as a reference). To ensure the strength of GRSs as instrumental variables (IVs), we generated an F-statistic for each outcome. We used variance in lnRMSSD and lnSDNN explained by each set of HRV SNPs (conservatively estimated at 2.4% and 1.4%, respectively, based on ref. 9) to calculate the F-statistic using the formula F-statistic = [R2 × (n − 1 − K)]/[(1 − R2) × K], where R2 represents the proportion of variability in RMSSD and SDNN level that is explained by the GRS, n represents sample size, and K represents the number of IVs included in model (i.e., for this study K = 1)41. As a rule of thumb, an F-value above ten indicates that a causal estimate is unlikely to be biased due to weak instruments. Based on these calculations, the F-statistics for RMSSD and SDNN were 237 and 80, respectively, confirming the strength of our GRS IVs.
Functional variants and candidate causal genes
In silico sequencing of the significant genetic loci from the GWAS defined by 1 Mb regions on either side of the independent top SNPs was done using the European data of the 1000 Genomes project phase 3 as a reference panel. A cut-off value for LD was set at r2 > 0.50 to identify potentially functional missense variants in LD with the sentinel SNP. Annotation of the significant genetic variants together with their linked SNPs was carried out using the ANNOVAR software42. We used the Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant (SIFT)43 and Polymorphism Phenotyping (PolyPhen)44 scoring tools to predict the possible damaging effects of non-synonymous (ns) SNPs on protein structure and function.
Pleiotropy analyses
In silico pleiotropic effects of HRV-associated genetic variants and their linked variants with r2 > 0.50 with other traits or diseases reported in previous GWAS studies available in the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)45 (accessed on October 1, 2020) were assessed using the GWAS Catalog database (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/).
Sensitivity analyses
To minimize the influence of bias introduced by prevalent diseases, we excluded participants who died soon after the ECG recording. We repeated the phenotypic and GWAS analyses after excluding individuals who died within 1 and 2 years after the ECG measurements separately. In addition to all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality, we assessed the association between HRV phenotypes and GRSs with cancer mortality since cancer was one of the most common causes of death.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
Access of raw data is restricted to protect the privacy of participants, but it can be requested via UK Biobank (www.ukbiobank.ac.uk). The GWAS summary statistics are publicly available in the NHGRI-EBI GWAS catalog at https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/ (accession IDs: GCST90281263, GCST90281264, GCST90281265, and GCST90281266). The source data used to plot Fig. 3 are provided in Supplementary Data 2. The source data used to generate Figs. 4 and 5 are provided in Supplementary Data 3.
References
Nolan, J. et al. Prospective study of heart rate variability and mortality in chronic heart failure. Circulation 98, 1510–1516 (1998).
Tsuji, H. et al. Reduced heart rate variability and mortality risk in an elderly cohort. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 90, 878–883 (1994).
Dekker, J. M. et al. Heart rate variability from short electrocardiographic recordings predicts mortality from all causes in middle-aged and elderly men. The Zutphen Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 145, 899–908 (1997).
Zulfiqar, U., Jurivich, D. A., Gao, W. & Singer, D. H. Relation of high heart rate variability to healthy longevity. Am. J. Cardiol. 105, 1181–1185 (2010).
de Geus, E., van Lien, R., Neijts, M. & Willemsen, G. Genetics of Autonomic Nervous System Activity. Vol. 1 (Oxford University Press, 2013).
Muñoz, M. L. et al. Heritability and genetic correlations of heart rate variability at rest and during stress in the Oman Family Study. J. Hypertens. 36, 1477–1485 (2018).
Riese, H. et al. Identifying genetic variants for heart rate variability in the acetylcholine pathway. PLoS ONE 9, e112476 (2014).
Newton-Cheh, C. et al. Genome-wide association study of electrocardiographic and heart rate variability traits: the Framingham Heart Study. BMC Med. Genet. 8, S7 (2007).
Nolte, I. M. et al. Genetic loci associated with heart rate variability and their effects on cardiac disease risk. Nat. Commun. 8, 15805 (2017).
Kerr, K. F. et al. Genome-wide association study of heart rate and its variability in Hispanic/Latino cohorts. Heart Rhythm. 14, 1675–1684 (2017).
Jang, S. & Javadov, S. Elucidating the contribution of ETC complexes I and II to the respirasome formation in cardiac mitochondria. Sci. Rep. 8, 17732 (2018).
Posokhova, E. et al. Essential role of the m2R-RGS6-IKACh pathway in controlling intrinsic heart rate variability. PLoS ONE 8, e76973 (2013).
den Hoed, M. et al. Identification of heart rate-associated loci and their effects on cardiac conduction and rhythm disorders. Nat. Genet. 45, 621–631 (2013).
Eppinga, R. N. et al. Identification of genomic loci associated with resting heart rate and shared genetic predictors with all-cause mortality. Nat. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3708 (2016).
Ramírez, J. et al. Thirty loci identified for heart rate response to exercise and recovery implicate autonomic nervous system. Nat. Commun. 9, 1947 (2018).
Verweij, N., van de Vegte, Y. J. & van der Harst, P. Genetic study links components of the autonomous nervous system to heart-rate profile during exercise. Nat. Commun. 9, 898 (2018).
Evangelou, E. et al. Genetic analysis of over 1 million people identifies 535 new loci associated with blood pressure traits. Nat. Genet. 50, 1412–1425 (2018).
Warren, H. R. et al. Genome-wide association analysis identifies novel blood pressure loci and offers biological insights into cardiovascular risk. Nat. Genet. 49, 403–415 (2017).
Koopmann, T. T. et al. Genome-wide identification of expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) in human heart. PLoS ONE 9, e97380 (2014).
Roselli, C. et al. Multi-ethnic genome-wide association study for atrial fibrillation. Nat. Genet. 50, 1225–1233 (2018).
Nielsen, J. B. et al. Biobank-driven genomic discovery yields new insight into atrial fibrillation biology. Nat. Genet. 50, 1234–1239 (2018).
Dekker, J. M. et al. Low heart rate variability in a 2-minute rhythm strip predicts risk of coronary heart disease and mortality from several causes. Circulation 102, 1239–1244 (2000).
May, O. & Arildsen, H. Long-term predictive power of heart rate variability on all-cause mortality in the diabetic population. Acta Diabetol. 48, 55–59 (2011).
Sosnowski, M. & Petelenz, T. Heart rate variability. Is it influenced by disturbed sinoatrial node function? J. Electrocardiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0736(05)80263-8 (1995).
Kloter, E., Barrueto, K., Klein, S. D., Scholkmann, F. & Wolf, U. Heart rate variability as a prognostic factor for cancer survival—a systematic review. Front. Physiol. 9 https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00623 (2018).
Hillebrand, S. et al. Heart rate variability and first cardiovascular event in populations without known cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis and dose-response meta-regression. Europace 15, 742–749 (2013).
Monfredi, O. et al. Biophysical characterization of the underappreciated and important relationship between heart rate variability and heart rate. Hypertension https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03782 (2014).
Brion, M.-J. A., Shakhbazov, K. & Visscher, P. M. Calculating statistical power in Mendelian randomization studies. Int. J. Epidemiol. 42, 1497–1501 (2013).
Shaffer, F. & Ginsberg, J. P. An overview of heart rate variability metrics and norms. Front. Public Health 5, 258 (2017).
Sudlow, C. et al. UK Biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLoS Med. 12, e1001779 (2015).
Tegegne, B. S., Man, T., van Roon, A. M., Riese, H. & Snieder, H. Determinants of heart rate variability in the general population: the Lifelines Cohort Study. Heart Rhythm. 15, 1552–1558 (2018).
de Geus, E. J. C., Gianaros, P. J., Brindle, R. C., Jennings, J. R. & Berntson, G. G. Should heart rate variability be ‘corrected’ for heart rate? Biological, quantitative, and interpretive considerations. Psychophysiology 56, e13287 (2019).
Akselrod, S. et al. Hemodynamic regulation: investigation by spectral analysis. Am. J. Physiol. 249, H867–H875 (1985).
Van Roon, A. M., Snieder, H., Lefrandt, J. D., De Geus, E. J. C. & Riese, H. Parsimonious correction of heart rate variability for its dependency on heart rate. Hypertension 68, e63–e65 https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.08053 (2016).
Verweij, N., Eppinga, R. N., Hagemeijer, Y. & van der Harst, P. Identification of 15 novel risk loci for coronary artery disease and genetic risk of recurrent events, atrial fibrillation and heart failure. Sci. Rep. 7, 2761 (2017).
Bycroft, C. et al. The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data. Nature 562, 203–209 (2018).
Loh, P.-R. et al. Efficient Bayesian mixed-model analysis increases association power in large cohorts. Nat. Genet. 47, 284–290 (2015).
Ani, A., van der Most, P. J., Snieder, H., Vaez, A. & Nolte, I. M. GWASinspector: comprehensive quality control of genome-wide association study results. Bioinformatics 37, 129–130 (2021).
Pasaniuc, B. et al. Fast and accurate imputation of summary statistics enhances evidence of functional enrichment. Bioinformatics https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu416 (2013).
Bulik-Sullivan, B. et al. LD score regression distinguishes confounding from polygenicity in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3211 (2015).
Rice, J. A. Mathematical statistics and data analysis. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 90, 398 (1995).
Wang, K., Li, M. & Hakonarson, H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, e164–e164 (2010).
Sim, N.-L. et al. SIFT web server: predicting effects of amino acid substitutions on proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, W452–W457 (2012).
Adzhubei, I. A. et al. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat. Methods 7, 248–249 (2010).
Buniello, A. et al. The NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog of published genome-wide association studies, targeted arrays and summary statistics 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D1005–D1012 (2019).
Acknowledgements
The study was carried out using the UK Biobank Resource under Application Number 12006. We thank the Center for Information Technology of the University of Groningen for their support and for providing access to the Peregrine high-performance computing cluster. B.S. Tegegne is supported by a scholarship from the Graduate School of Medical Science, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
B.S.T., I.M.N., and H.S. conceptualized and designed the study. B.S.T., M.A.S., and A.M.v.R. generated the data. B.S.T., I.M.N., A.A., and M.A.S. analyzed the data. H.S., H.R., I.M.N., E.J.C.d.G., A.M.v.R., and P.v.d.H. provided critical oversight to data collection and study coordination. B.S.T., H.S., H.R., I.M.N., E.J.C.d.G., S.S., and M.A.S. wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to interpreting the results, critical editing of the manuscript and have approved the final submission.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Communications Biology thanks Marcel den Hoed and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Kaoru Ito, Karli Montague-Cardoso and George Inglis. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tegegne, B.S., Said, M.A., Ani, A. et al. Phenotypic but not genetically predicted heart rate variability associated with all-cause mortality. Commun Biol 6, 1013 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-05376-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-05376-y
- Springer Nature Limited