Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy with an overall cure rate of merely 30%. Most patients experience recurrence within 12–24 months of cure and die of progressively chemotherapy-resistant disease. Thus, more effective anti-ovarian cancer therapies are needed. Here, we investigate the possibility of repurposing antibiotic monensin as an anti-ovarian cancer agent. We demonstrate that monensin effectively inhibits cell proliferation, migration and cell cycle progression and induces apoptosis of human ovarian cancer cells. Monensin suppresses multiple cancer-related pathways including Elk1/SRF, AP1, NFκB and STAT and reduces EGFR expression in ovarian cancer cells. Monensin acts synergistically with EGFR inhibitors and oxaliplatin to inhibit cell proliferation and induce apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells. Xenograft studies confirm that monensin effectively inhibits tumor growth by suppressing cell proliferation through targeting EGFR signaling. Our results suggest monensin may be repurposed as an anti-ovarian cancer agent although further preclinical and clinical studies are needed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Ovarian cancer is the fifth most common cancer in women in the United States and the most lethal gynecologic malignancy1,2. Efforts at early detection and new therapeutic approaches to reduce mortality have been met with limited clinical successes, in part because the origin and pathogenesis of epithelial ovarian cancer are poorly understood2. Although epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most common subtype, increasing evidence indicates that EOC itself is composed of a diverse group of tumors that can be further classified on the basis of distinctive morphologic and genetic features1,2,3,4,5. Given the absence of an effective screening strategy, a mere 20% of ovarian cancers are diagnosed while confined to the ovaries. Over the past two decades, the 5-year survival rate for ovarian cancer patients has substantially improved, largely due to improved surgical techniques and empirically optimized chemotherapy regimens of cytotoxic platinum-combination drugs. In spite of this improvement, the overall cure rate remains approximately 30%1,6. Most patients experience recurrence within 12–24 months and die of progressively chemotherapy-resistant disease1,6.
Given the heterogeneity of human ovarian cancers, significant improvements in long-term survival may hinge on translating recent insights into the molecular and cellular characteristics of ovarian cancers into personalized treatment strategies, optimizing methods of screening or early detection and developing novel therapeutics. While significant progress has recently been made in the development of novel targeted therapies for human cancers, including ovarian cancers1,3,4,5, an effective alternative to drug development is repurposing drugs. Several examples of such drugs are currently in various stages of clinical trials7,8.
In this study, we investigate the anti-cancer activity of the antibiotic monensin against human ovarian cancer cells. Monensin (aka., Rumensin) is a polyether ionophore antibiotic secreted by the bacteria Streptomyces cinnamonensis9,10. Earlier studies have demonstrated that monensin exhibits cytotoxic effects against several types of cancer cells10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18. However, it remains unclear if monensin exerts similar anticancer effects on human ovarian cancer cells. Using commonly-utilized human ovarian cancer lines HeyA8 and SKOV3, we have demonstrated that monensin effectively inhibits cell proliferation, cell migration and cell cycle progression and induces apoptosis of human ovarian cancer cells. Monensin was shown to target multiple cancer-related signaling pathways including Elk1/SRF, AP1, NFκB and STAT and suppress the expression of EGFR, but not IGF-1R, in ovarian cancer cells. Further analysis indicated that monensin acts synergistically with EGFR inhibitors and the chemotherapeutic drug oxaliplatin to inhibit cell proliferation and induce apoptosis of human ovarian cancer cells. In in vivo xenograft studies, monensin effectively inhibited xenograft tumor growth, perhaps by inhibiting cell proliferation through targeting EGFR signaling. Therefore, our results strongly suggest that monensin has potential to be repurposed as an anti-ovarian cancer agent. Future studies should be directed towards testing monensin’s anti-cancer efficacy in preclinical and clinical studies.
Results
Monensin effectively inhibits cell proliferation and migration of human ovarian cancer cells
We sought to test the effect of the antibiotic monensin on the proliferative activity of two commonly-used human ovarian cancer lines HeyA8 and SKOV3. Sub-confluent HeyA8 and SKOV3 cells were grown in increasing concentrations of monensin. Crystal violet staining results indicated that monensin effectively inhibited cell proliferation in both cell lines at concentrations as low as 1 μM and completely inhibited cell proliferation at 10 μM (Fig. 1A, panel a), especially in HeyA8 cells. This was confirmed by quantitative analysis of crystal violet staining data (p < 0.001 at all three monensin concentrations) (Fig. 1A, panel b). We also conducted direct cell counting after exponentially growing HeyA8 and SKOV3 cells were treated with varying concentrations of monensin (0 μM to 16 μM). We found that the number of viable cells decreased significantly when the concentration of monensin increased in both cell lines at both examined time points (p < 0.001) (Fig. 1B, panels a,b). Further evaluation of anti-proliferative effects was accomplished with the more sensitive and quantitative WST-1 proliferation assay, which found that statistically significant inhibition of cell proliferation occurred at concentrations as low as 0.25 μM monensin in HeyA8 (p < 0.05) and SKOV3 (p < 0.001) (Fig. 1C, panels a,b). Taken together, our results from these cell proliferation assays demonstrate that monensin can effectively inhibit the cell proliferation of ovarian cancer cells.
We next examined if monensin exerts any effect on cell migration and wound healing in ovarian cancer cells. Freshly confluent HeyA8 and SKOV3 monolayer cells were wounded and treated with 0, 2, or 4 μM monensin. The width of the wound defect, relative to the starting width, was measured at 32% and 11% for Hey8 cells at 24 h and 36 h, respectively and 27% and 8% for SKOV3 cells at 24 h and 36 h, respectively (Fig. 2A). However, in the presence of 2 and 4 μM monensin, the rate of gap closure was significantly reduced. Specifically, with 2 μM monensin, the defect was approximately 75% and 68% at 24 h and 36 h in HeyA8 cells, respectively, compared to that at 0 h. Similar percentages of gap closure were obtained in SKOV3 cells (Fig. 2A). The rate of gap closures was further decreased when cells were exposed to 4 μM monensin. Approximately 80% of the gap remained open in both cell lines (Fig. 2A). These results suggest that monensin inhibits cell migration and cell wounding healing of ovarian cancer cells in a dose-dependent fashion.
Monensin induces apoptosis and inhibits cell cycle progression in human ovarian cancer cells
To understand the possible mechanisms underlying monensin-induced inhibition of cell proliferation, we investigated if monensin can induce apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells. When exponentially proliferating HeyA8 and SKOV3 cells were treated with 0 μM, 1 μM, or 2 μM monensin for 24 h and stained with Hoechst 33258, significant numbers of apoptotic cells were observed (Fig. 2B, panel a). Quantitative analysis indicated that the percentages of apoptotic cells were significantly increased in monensin treated HeyA8 and SKOV3 cells (p < 0.01) (Fig. 2B, panel b). We conducted cell cycle analysis on monensin-treated cells and found a significant increase in cells arrested in G1 phase, as well as decreased cells in S/M phase in monensin-treated HeyA8 and SKOV3 cells relative to the controls (p < 0.001) (Fig. 2C, panels a,b). These results suggest that monensin’s inhibition of ovarian cancer cell proliferation may be due in part to induction of apoptosis and inhibition of cell cycle progression.
Monensin inhibits multiple cancer-related signaling pathways, including the downstream effectors of EGFR signaling
A recent study suggests that monensin may exert anti-cancer activity in colorectal cancer by inhibiting Wnt/β-catenin activity18. To evaluate if a similar effect occurs in ovarian cancer cells, we used exogenous Wnt3A to activate the canonical Wnt pathway and assessed the effect of monensin on β-catenin signaling activity via nuclear staining. When SKOV3 cells were stimulated with Ad-Wnt3A, we observed a remarkable elevation of nuclear β-catenin staining, which was significantly inhibited by monensin in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3A). Accordingly, the Wnt3A-activated Tcf/β-catenin reporter activity in SKOV3 cells was effectively inhibited by monensin at concentrations as low as 1 μM (Fig. 3B). Similar results were obtained using HeyA8 cells (data not shown). These results confirm that monensin can inhibit the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in ovarian cancer cells as previously demonstrated in a colorectal cancer cell line.
Although it has been reported that Wnt/β-catenin signaling may play an important role in ovarian cancer development19, our initial analysis demonstrated low levels of endogenous Wnt/β-catenin activity in HeyA8 and SKOV3 cells. Subsequently, we sought to determine which, if any, cancer-associated pathways were modulated by monensin. A panel of the 11 cancer-associated pathways was used, as previously described20,21,22,23. When the Gaussia luciferase reporters for the 11 pathways and a constitutively active reporter pG2Luc were transfected into SKOV3 cells and treated with 0, 2 μM or 4 μM monensin for 48 h, it was found that Gaussia luciferase activities for the Elk1/SRF, AP1, NFκB and STAT reporters were significantly inhibited. A slight but apparent inhibition of Myc/Max reporter activity was also noted (Fig. 3C). We further tested if the inhibitory effect of monensin on Elk1/SRF, AP1, NFκB and STAT reporters was time- and/or dose-dependent. As shown in Fig. 3D, the Gaussia luciferase activities of these four reporters were effectively inhibited in SKOV3 cells in a dose and time-dependent fashion and a significant inhibition on the four reporters was achieved at 72 h post monensin treatment (Fig. 3D). Similar reporter assay results were obtained with HeyA8 cells (data not shown). Given that the reporter assays suggested that monensin may target the growth factor signaling pathways, we evaluated expression levels of the proliferation related genes following treatment with monensin. Using our recently optimized touchdown-quantitative real-time PCR or TqPCR24, we found that expression of the five examined genes, EGFR, STAT3, c-Myc, Bcl-2 and cyclin D1, was effectively inhibited by monensin at 1 μM and 2 μM, respectively (Fig. 3E). Taken together, these results strongly suggest that monensin may exert its strong anti-proliferative activity by inhibiting growth factor receptor-induced signaling pathways involving the activation of receptor tyrosine kinases, JAK/STAT, MAPK, and/or NFκB downstream signaling mediators in ovarian cancer cells.
Monensin effectively inhibits the expression of EGFR, but not IGF-1R and synergizes with EGFR inhibitors in suppressing proliferation of human ovarian cancer cells
As EGFR and IGF-1R are two of the mostly commonly activated growth factor signaling pathways in human cancers25,26,27, we examined if monensin exerts its anti-proliferative activity by targeting either of these pathways. Subconfluent SKOV3 cells were treated with varying concentrations of monensin for 36 h. Expression of IGF-1R was examined by immunofluorescence staining. No significant changes in IGF-1R expression were observed, even with 8 μM monensin (Fig. 4A). However, under the same treatment condition, we found that the expression of EGFR was significantly inhibited by monensin at concentrations as low as 2 μM (Fig. 4B). These results are in concordance with previously mentioned qPCR results, which demonstrated decreased expression of EGFR in ovarian cancer cells (Fig. 3E).
To determine the clinical relevance of our findings, we further examined EGFR expression in ten patient samples of ovarian cancer. Seven of the ten cases had strong EGFR staining in cancerous cells relative to surrounding stromal cells and IgG controls, similar to the results shown in Fig. 4C (panels a,b vs. d,e). The remaining three samples had weaker but detectable expression of EGFR in cancerous regions (Fig. 4C, panels c vs. f). Taken together, these results strongly suggest that EGFR may serve as one of the important cellular targets of monensin and may explain in part the anti-proliferative activity monensin demonstrates against ovarian cancer cells.
Monensin synergizes with EGFR inhibitors in suppressing cell proliferation of human ovarian cancer cells
We analyzed if monensin exhibits any synergistic anti-proliferative effect with other tyrosine kinase inhibitors and clinically-used EGFR inhibitors. When exponentially growing SKOV3 cells were treated with various concentrations of both monensin and tyrosine kinase inhibitor genestein, cell proliferation rates significantly decreased with increasing concentrations of either monensin (0 to 40 μM) or genestein (0 to 100 μM) (Fig. 5A, panel a). Although similar results were obtained when tyrosine kinase inhibitor AG-490 (0 to 100 μM) was used with monensin, the magnitude of reduction in cell proliferation rate was slightly less than that obtained with equivalent concentrations of genestein (Fig. 5A, panel b). Furthermore, low concentrations of the clinically-used EGFR inhibitor erlotinib (0 to 15 μM) caused significant decreases in cell proliferation in the presence of varied concentrations of monensin (Fig. 5A, panel c). Quantitative calculations of the combination index (CI) using the Chou-Talalay method28 reveal that the CI values for monensin/genestein (Fig. 5B, panel a), monensin/AG-490 (Fig. 5B, panel b) and monensin/erlotinib (Fig. 5B, panel c) are all less than 1.0, indicating that monensin exhibits strong synergistic effects with these agents to inhibit proliferation of ovarian cancer cells.
We further analyzed possible synergistic effects between monensin and these inhibitors on cell cycle progression and found that while monensin and genestein alone induce G1 arrest in ovarian cancer cells, the combination of these two agents significantly increased the percentage of cells arrested in G1 phase (Fig. 5C, panels a & b). Similarly, AG-490 was shown to potentiate monensin-induced inhibition of cell cycle progression, although the maximal inhibition rate was less than that of equivalent concentrations of genestein (Fig. 5C panel c). These results demonstrate that monensin works synergistically with EGFR inhibitors to suppress ovarian cancer cell proliferation.
Monensin synergizes with the chemotherapeutic drug oxaliplatin to inhibit cell proliferation and induce apoptosis of human ovarian cancer cells
If monensin can be repurposed as an anti-ovarian cancer agent, it would be of significant if monensin can synergize with currently-used chemotherapeutic drugs such as oxaliplatin to inhibit cancer cell proliferation. When exponentially-proliferating SKOV3 cells were treated with varying concentrations of monensin or oxaliplatin, significant inhibition of cell proliferation was observed in a dose-dependent fashion (Fig. 6A, panel a). However, oxalipatin was shown to also potentiate monensin-induced inhibition of cell proliferation (Fig. 6A, panel a). Based on WST-1 assays, the calculated combination index using the Chou-Talalay method28 indicates that monensin demonstrates synergism with oxaliplatin (i.e., CI < 1) (Fig. 6A, panel b). This synergism was further confirmed via crystal violet staining assay qualitatively and quantitatively (Fig. 6B, panels a,b). Additionally, Annexin-V based apoptosis assay demonstrated that a combination of 2 μM monensin and 20 μM oxaliplatin reduces the viable cell population to 84.4% from 96% (no drug control), 90.8% (2 μM monensin only) and 92.4% (20 μM oxaliplatin only) (Fig. 6C, panel a). At a higher concentration of monensin (4 μM) oxaliplatin was shown to increase apoptosis even more effectively (Fig. 6C, panel b). Thus, these results indicate that monensin can synergize with oxaliplatin by inhibiting proliferation and inducing apoptosis of human ovarian cancer cells.
Monensin inhibits xenograft tumor growth through inhibiting cell proliferation by possibly targeting EGFR signaling
We tested the in vivo anti-cancer activity of monensin in the xenograft tumor model of human ovarian cancers. Exponentially growing firefly luciferase-tagged HeyA8 ovarian cancer cells were injected subcutaneously into the flanks of athymic nude mice. At three days post-injection, the animals were treated with two doses of monensin (8 mg/kg body weight and 16 mg/kg body weight) or vehicle control. Tumor growth was monitored by using Xenogen bioluminescence imaging for up to 20 days post-treatment (Fig. 7A panel a). Quantitative analysis of Xenogen imaging data indicated that monensin effectively inhibited tumor growth at 15 and 20 days after treatment at both doses when compared with the vehicle control group (Fig. 7A panel b). At the study endpoint, the tumor masses were retrieved and the control group had significantly larger individual tumors (Fig. 7B panel a), a larger bulk tumor volume (Fig. 7B panel b) and higher average tumor volume (Fig. 7B panel c) when compared to treatment groups. These results were consistent with the results obtained from Xenogen imaging analysis.
Histologic evaluation was also carried out on the retrieved tumor samples. H&E staining revealed that monensin-treated tumor samples exhibited extensive necrosis relative to samples of the control group (Fig. 7C panels a vs. b,c). Immunohistochemical staining with the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) antibody demonstrated a significant decrease in the number of PCNA positive cells in monensin treatment groups, especially with higher monensin dose (16 mg/kg bw), relative to the control group (Fig. 7C panels d vs. e,f). We further examined the EGFR expression status in the retrieved tumor samples and found that monensin treatment groups exhibited drastically diminished EGFR expression relative to the control group (Fig. 7C panels g vs. h,i), consistent with earlier findings (Fig. 4B,C) and strengthening the proposition that EGFR may serve as a key cellular target explaining anti-proliferative effects of monensin in human ovarian cancer cells.
Discussion
Monensin may be repurposed as an effective anticancer agent for human ovarian cancer
Although the 5-year survival rate for ovarian cancer patients has improved over the past two decades with improvements in surgical technique and empiric advances in cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens, the overall cure rate remains approximately 30%1,6. Ultimately, most patients experience recurrence within 12–24 months and expire secondary to progressively treatment-resistant disease. Thus, there is a critical need to develop more effective and novel therapies to treat ovarian cancers. Our results have demonstrated that monensin acts synergistically with tyrosine kinase and EGFR inhibitors, as well as currently-utilized agents such as oxaliplatin, to suppress proliferation of ovarian cancer cells. Our results are encouraging and suggest a utility for repurposing monensin as a part of combination chemotherapy strategy for the clinical management of ovarian cancer.
Monensin is a polyether ionophore antibiotic secreted by the bacteria Streptomyces cinnamonensis9,10. Monensin can freely pass across the lipid bilayer of the cytoplasmic membrane or cellular organelles transporting ions along by passive diffusion9,10. Monensin has been shown to have a positive safety profile in veterinary medicine; it has been used in cattle and poultry feed for nearly 50 years9,10. Several earlier studies indicate that monensin exhibited cytotoxic effects on several types of cancer cells, including renal cancer, colon cancer, myeloma, lymphoma and prostate cancer cell lines10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18. A recent study showed that malignant cell lines are more than 20-fold more sensitive to monensin than their nonmalignant counterparts12, indicating that monensin may target cancer cells more preferentially than most conventionally-used cytotoxic chemotherapy drugs.
Monensin may exert anticancer activity by targeting multiple signaling pathways
Given that monensin has a favorable safety profile and acts effectively at low micromolar concentrations, further investigation of the detailed mechanism underlying its mode of action is warranted. As a carboxylic Na+/H+ ionophore, monensin has been noted to exert significant effects on function and activity of the Golgi apparatus and the intracellular trafficking and processing of endocytosis29. Earlier studies in fact utilized monensin conjugates or liposomes to deliver therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, immunotoxins, or chemotherapy drugs30,31,32,33,34,35. Mechanistically, earlier studies indicate that monensin was shown to decrease levels of CDK6, cyclin D1 and cyclin A and to induce apoptosis-associated changes in Bax, caspase-3, caspase-8 and mitochondria transmembrane potential in several human cancer cell lines13,14,15,16,17. It has been reported that mitochondrial damage is an early event of monensin-induced cell injury in cultured fibroblasts L92936. Monensin was shown to be a potent inducer of oxidative stress and inhibitor of androgen signaling leading to apoptosis in prostate cancer cells12. More recently, monensin was shown to inhibit canonical Wnt signaling in human colorectal cancer cells and to suppress tumor growth in multiple intestinal neoplasia mice18. Collectively, these reports strongly suggest that monensin may target cancer cells through a diverse set of mechanisms.
We analyzed the effect of monensin on 11 cancer-associated pathways and found that monensin inhibits the reporter activities for the Elk1/SRF, AP1, NFκB and STAT pathways and to a lesser extent the Myc/Max reporter activity. Furthermore, the expression of the five examined genes, EGFR, STAT3, c-Myc, Bcl-2 and cyclin D1, was effectively inhibited by monensin. Thus, our results strongly suggest that monensin may exert its strong anti-proliferative activity by inhibiting growth factor receptor-induced signaling pathways, which involve the activation of receptor tyrosine kinases, JAK/STAT, MAPK, and/or NFκB downstream signaling mediators in ovarian cancer cells. Interestingly, EGFR mutations have rarely been reported thus far in ovarian cancer, but the receptor expression is readily detectable. EGFR inhibitors gefitinib and erlotinib were shown to stabilize disease in up to 44% of patients with ovarian cancer37,38, although the inhibitory activity of these inhibitors may be mitigated by the remarkably activated downstream mediators such as PI3K and MAPK signaling1. Nonetheless, two recent studies indicate that monensin affects the endocytic recycling pathway for EGFR10,39. Our immunostaining results also revealed that EGFR level was significantly suppressed upon monensin treatment. The reported findings and our results may at least partially explain the synergistic effects between monensin and EGFR inhibitors in suppressing cell proliferation of ovarian cancer cells. Nonetheless, further investigations into the molecular mechanisms through which monensin exerts its anti-cancer activity are warranted.
Monensin (or Rumensin) is FDA approved for veterinary use (beef cattle, chickens, dairy cattle, turkeys, veal) and is the most potent feed ingredient available that kills coccidia parasites. For the prevention and control of coccidiosis, the animals are fed at a rate to provide 0.14 to 0.42 mg/lb of body weight/d of monensin up to a maximum of 200 mg/herd/day. The in vivo use of monensin for its anticancer activity has been reported and dose ranges were similar to that we used in this study. Nonetheless, a full scale of pre-clinical pharmacokinetics and toxicology for monensin remains to be carried out so that monensin can be moved forward as a clinically repurposed anticancer agent.
In summary, we investigated the potential of repurposing monensin as an anti-cancer agent for human ovarian cancer. Our results revealed that monensin effectively inhibits cell proliferation, cell migration and cell cycle progression and induces apoptosis of human ovarian cancer cells. Monensin was shown to target multiple cancer-related signaling pathways such as Elk1/SRF, AP1, NFκB and STAT and suppresses EGFR expression in ovarian cancer cells. Monensin was further shown to act synergistically with EGFR inhibitors and the chemotherapeutic drug oxaliplatin to inhibit cell proliferation and induce apoptosis of human ovarian cancer cells. The in vivo xenograft studies further confirm that monensin effectively inhibits xenograft tumor growth by inhibiting cell proliferation through targeting EGFR signaling. Thus, our results strongly suggest that monensin may be repurposed as an anti-ovarian cancer agent. Future studies should be directed towards testing monensin’s anti-cancer efficacy in preclinical and clinical studies.
Materials and Methods
Cell culture and chemicals
Human ovarian cancer cell lines SKOV3 and HeyA8 were generously provided by Dr. Ernest Lengyel. HEK-293 cells were purchased from ATCC (Manassas, VA). The cells were maintained in complete Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), 100 units of penicillin and 100 μg of streptomycin at 37 °C in 5% CO2 as described40,41,42,43,44,45. Chemicals monensin (aka, rumensin), genestein (aka, CI 75610, genistein, genisteol, or genisterin), AG-490 (aka, Tyrphostin AG-490), or erlotinib (aka, Tarceva), were purchased from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI). Unless indicated otherwise, all chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) or Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA).
Crystal violet cell viability assay
Crystal violet staining assay was conducted as described40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51. Briefly, subconfluent HeyA8 and SKOV3 cells were treated with varied concentrations of monensin or ethanol control. At 72 h after treatment, cells were washed with PBS and stained with 0.5% crystal violet/formalin solution at room temperature for 20–30 min. The stained cells were washed with tape water and air dried for taking macrographic images42. For quantitative measurement, the stained cells were dissolved in 10% acetic acid at room temperature for 20 min with shaking, followed by measuring absorbance at 570–590 nm22,41,42.
Viable cell counting assay
Viable cells were counted with Trypan blue exclusion staining assay as described52. Briefly, subconfluent SKOV3 and HeyA8 cells were treated with monensin at the indicated concentrations or vehicle control. At 48 h and 72 h, cella were collected by trypsin dissociation and stained with Trypan blue (final concentration at 0.1% Trypan blue). Unstained viable cells were counted under a bright field microscope. Each assay condition was done in triplicate.
WST-1 cell proliferation assay
Cell proliferation was assessed by using Premixed WST-1 Reagent (Clontech, Mountain View, CA) as described42. Briefly, subconfluent SKOV3 and HeyA8 cells seeded in 96-well plates were treated with monensin and/or other drugs at the varied concentrations for 24 h or 48 h. The Premixed WST-1 Reagent was added to each well, followed by an incubation at 37 °C for 30 to 60 min and reading at 440 nm using the microplate reader (BioTek EL800, Winooski, VT). Each assay condition was done in triplicate.
Cell wounding/migration assay
Cell wounding/migration assay was performed as described45,53. Briefly, exponentially growing ovarian cancer cells were seeded in 6-well cell culture plates and allowed to reach approximately 90% confluence. Then, the monolayer cells were wounded with sterile micro-pipette tips. At various time points, the wound healing status at the approximately same locations was recorded under bright field microscopy. Each assay condition was done in triplicate.
Apoptosis analysis (Hoechst 33258 staining)
As previously described22,23,45,53, exponentially growing HeyA8 and SKOV3 cells were treated with varied concentrations of monensin or ethanol control. At 24 h post treatment, cells were collected, fixed and stained with the Magic Solution (10× stock: 0.5% NP-40, 3.4% formaldehyde, 10 μg/ml Hoechst 33258, in PBS). Apoptotic cells were examined and recorded under a fluorescence microscope. Each assay condition was done in triplicate. The results were repeated at least in three independent batches of experiments. The average numbers of apoptotic cells were calculated by counting apparent apoptotic cells in at least ten random fields at 100× magnification for each assay condition.
Apoptosis analysis (Annexin V-FITC flow cytometry
The annexin V staining apoptosis assay was performed as previously described22,45,53. Briefly, exponentially growing SKOV3 cells were seeded in 6-well plates and treated with monensin and/or other drugs at the indicated concentrations. At 24 h post treatment, cells were trypsinized, washed with PBS, resuspended in Annexin V Binding Buffer at a density of 106 cells/ml and stained with Annexin V-FITC (BD Pharmingen, San Jose, CA) and propidium iodide for 15 min at room temperature under a light-proof condition. The stained cells were subjected to flow cytometry analysis using the BD FACSCalibur-HTS. The acquired flow cytometry data were analyzed by using the FlowJo v10.0 software. Each assay condition was done in triplicate.
Cell cycle analysis
The exponentially growing HeyA8 and SKOV3 cells were seeded in 6-well plates at sub-confluence and treated with varied concentrations of monensin or ethanol control. At 24 h or 48 h post treatment, cells were collected, fixed and stained with the Magic Solution for 30 min. The stained cells were subjected to flow cytometry analysis using the BD FACSCalibur-HTS. The acquired flow cytometry data were analyzed with the FlowJo v10.0 software. Each assay condition was done in triplicate.
Construction and amplification of recombinant adenovirus expressing Wnt3A or GFP
Recombinant adenovirus expressing Wnt3A was constructed by using the AdEasy system as described54,55,56,57. Briefly, the mouse Wnt3A coding region was PCR amplified and subcloned into an adenoviral shuttle vector and used to generate and amplify recombinant adenovirus in HEK-293 or 293pTP cells58. The resulting adenovirus was designated as AdWnt3A, which also expresses GFP59,60,61,62. An analogous adenovirus expressing only GFP (AdGFP) was used as a control63,64. For all adenoviral infections, polybrene (4-8μg/ml) was added to enhance infection efficiency as previously reported44.
Immunofluorescence staining
The immunofluorescence staining assays were carried out as previously described23,45. Briefly, for β-catenin staining the cells were first infected with AdWnt3A or AdGFP for 16 h, replated into 24-well plates and then treated with monensin at varied concentrations or vehicle control. For IGF-1R and EGFR staining assays, subconfluent SKOV3 cells were treated with monensin at varied concentrations or vehicle control. At 36 h post treatment, the cells were fixed and subjected to immunofluorescence staining with antibody against β-catenin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), IGF-1R (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), or EGFR (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Control IgG and minus primary antibodies were used as negative controls.
Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining
The use of human ovarian cancer tissue samples was approved by the Institutional Ethic Committee of Chongqing Medical University. The archived ovarian cancer samples were delinked from the patients’ private information and approved for IHC use with the waived informed consent according to the United States National Institutes of Health’s guidelines involving human subjects. Ten cases of human ovarian cancer samples were obtained from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China. The IHC staining was performed as described45,46,52,65. Briefly, sections of the paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were deparaffinized, rehydrated and subjected to immunohistochemical staining with anti-EGFR or anti-PCNA (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) antibody. Control IgG and minus primary antibodies were used as negative controls.
Cell transfection and luciferase reporter assay
For the TOP-Luc firefly luciferase (FLuc) reporter assay21,53,66,67, the subconfluent SKOV3 cells were first transfected with TOP-Luc reporter plasmid using Lipofectamine (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). At the end of transfection, the cells were infected with Ad-Wnt3A or AdGFP for 16 h, followed by addition of monensin with varied concentrations for another 48 h. Cells were lysed and subjected to luciferase activity assays using Promega’s firefly Luciferase Assay System. Each assay condition was done in triplicate.
The Gaussia luciferase (GLuc) reporter assay was carried out as described20,44,67,68. The tested 11 cancer-relate signaling pathway reporters were homemade and previously described 20, including NFAT, HIF-1, E2F/DP1, Elk1/SRF, AP1, NFκB, Smad, STAT1/2, RBP-Jκ, CREB, Myc/Max reporters. A constitutively active reporter pG2Luc was used as a control. Experimentally, subconfluent SKOV3 cells were seeded in 25 cm2 culture flasks and transfected with 3.0 μg per flask of the 12 reporter plasmids using Lipofectamine (Invitrogen). At 16 h post transfection, cells were replated in 12-well plates and treated with various concentrations of monensin or ethanol control. At 24 h, 48 h or 72 h post treatment, culture media were taken and subjected to Gaussia luciferase assays using the BioLux Gaussia Luciferase Assay Kit (New England Biolabs). Each assay condition was done in triplicate. Luciferase activity was normalized by total cellular protein concentrations among the samples.
Total RNA isolation and touchdown-quantitative real-time PCR (TqPCR) analysis
Subconfluent ovarian cancer cells were treated with varied concentrations of monesin for 48 h. Total RNA was isolated from the treated cells by using TRIZOL Reagents (Invitrogen) and subjected to reverse transcription reactions with hexamer and M-MuLV reverse transcriptase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA). Such cDNA products were used as PCR templates. The qPCR primers were designed by using Primer3 program69 and used to amplify the genes of interest (Supplemental Table 1). The TqPCR were carried out by using the SYBR Green-based qPCR analysis on a CFX-Connect unit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA), as described24. The qPCR reactions were done in triplicate. GAPDH was used as a reference gene.
Chou–Talalay drug combination index analysis
The combination effects between monensin and the EGFR inhibitors (Genestein, AG-490, or Erlotinib), or oxaliplatin were calculated with the Chou–Talalay method28. The dose effect curves of each drug alone and in combination, were generated by WST-1 assay. These data were analyzed with the CompuSyn software (ComboSyn, Inc.). The calculated combination index (CI) theorem of Chou-Talalay offers quantitative definition for additive effect (CI = 1), synergism (CI < 1) and antagonism (CI > 1) in drug combinations28.
Xenogratft tumors of human ovarian cancer cells
The use and care of animals were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at The University of Chicago. All experimental procedures were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines. Briefly, HeyA8 stably labeled with firefly luciferase (HeyA8-FLuc) was constructed with piggyBac system41,43,70. Exponentially growing HeyA8-FLuc cells were collected, resuspended at 107 cells/ml and injected subcutaneously into the flanks of athymic nude mice (Harlan Laboratories, 6–8 week old, male, 106 cells per injection and 4 sites per mouse). The mice were divided into three groups (n = 5 per group). At three days post injection, the animals were treated with various doses of monensin (8 mg or 16 mg/kg body weight) or vehicle control (ethanol) intraperitoneally once every two days. Tumor growth was monitored by whole body bioluminescence imaging using Xenogen IVIS 200 Imaging System at days 3, 7, 15 and 20 after treatment. The mice were sacrificed at 3 weeks and subcutaneous tumor masses were retrieved for histologic evaluation and immunohistochemistry.
Statistical analysis
The quantitative assays were performed in triplicate and/or repeated three times. Data were expressed as mean ± D. Statistical significances were determined by one-way analysis of variance and the student’s t test. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Deng, Y. et al. Antibiotic monensin synergizes with EGFR inhibitors and oxaliplatin to suppress the proliferation of human ovarian cancer cells. Sci. Rep. 5, 17523; doi: 10.1038/srep17523 (2015).
References
Bast, R. C., Jr., Hennessy, B. & Mills, G. B. The biology of ovarian cancer: new opportunities for translation. Nat Rev Cancer 9, 415–428 (2009).
Kurman, R. J. & Shih, Ie M. The origin and pathogenesis of epithelial ovarian cancer: a proposed unifying theory. Am J Surg Pathol 34, 433–443 (2010).
McCluggage, W. G. Morphological subtypes of ovarian carcinoma: a review with emphasis on new developments and pathogenesis. Pathology 43, 420–432 (2011).
Lim, D. & Oliva, E. Precursors and pathogenesis of ovarian carcinoma. Pathology 45, 229–242 (2013).
Ince, T. A. et al. Characterization of twenty-five ovarian tumour cell lines that phenocopy primary tumours. Nat Commun 6, 7419 (2015).
Raja, F. A., Chopra, N. & Ledermann, J. A. Optimal first-line treatment in ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol 23, Suppl 10, x118–127 (2012).
Gupta, S. C., Sung, B., Prasad, S., Webb, L. J. & Aggarwal, B. B. Cancer drug discovery by repurposing: teaching new tricks to old dogs. Trends Pharmacol Sci 34, 508–517 (2013).
Wang, Z. Y., Quan, Y. & Zhang, H. Y. Medical genetic inspirations for anticancer drug repurposing. Trends Pharmacol Sci 35, 1–3 (2014).
Pressman, B. C. Ionophorous antibiotics as models for biological transport. Fed Proc 27, 1283–1288 (1968).
Dayekh, K. et al. Monensin inhibits epidermal growth factor receptor trafficking and activation: synergistic cytotoxicity in combination with EGFR inhibitors. Mol Cancer Ther 13, 2559–2571 (2014).
Choi, H. S. et al. Autophagy Inhibition with Monensin Enhances Cell Cycle Arrest and Apoptosis Induced by mTOR or Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors in Lung Cancer Cells. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul) 75, 9–17 (2013).
Ketola, K., Vainio, P., Fey, V., Kallioniemi, O. & Iljin, K. Monensin is a potent inducer of oxidative stress and inhibitor of androgen signaling leading to apoptosis in prostate cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther 9, 3175–3185 (2010).
Park, W. H. et al. Monensin inhibits the growth of renal cell carcinoma cells via cell cycle arrest or apoptosis. Int J Oncol 22, 855–860 (2003).
Park, W. H., Kim, E. S., Jung, C. W., Kim, B. K. & Lee, Y. Y. Monensin-mediated growth inhibition of SNU-C1 colon cancer cells via cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Int J Oncol 22, 377–382 (2003).
Park, W. H., Kim, E. S., Kim, B. K. & Lee, Y. Y. Monensin-mediated growth inhibition in NCI-H929 myeloma cells via cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Int J Oncol 23, 197–204 (2003).
Park, W. H. et al. Monensin-mediated growth inhibition in acute myelogenous leukemia cells via cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Int J Cancer 101, 235–242 (2002).
Park, W. H. et al. Monensin-mediated growth inhibition in human lymphoma cells through cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Br J Haematol 119, 400–407 (2002).
Tumova, L. et al. Monensin inhibits canonical Wnt signaling in human colorectal cancer cells and suppresses tumor growth in multiple intestinal neoplasia mice. Mol Cancer Ther 13, 812–822 (2014).
Arend, R. C., Londono-Joshi, A. I., Straughn, J. M., Jr. & Buchsbaum, D. J. The Wnt/beta-catenin pathway in ovarian cancer: a review. Gynecol Oncol 131, 772–779 (2013).
Gao, J. L. et al. Ginseng saponin metabolite 20(S)-protopanaxadiol inhibits tumor growth by targeting multiple cancer signaling pathways. Oncol Rep 30, 292–298 (2013).
He, B. C. et al. Ginsenoside Rg3 inhibits colorectal tumor growth through the down-regulation of Wnt/ss-catenin signaling. Int J Oncol 38, 437–445 (2011).
He, B. C. et al. Tetrandrine inhibits Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and suppresses tumor growth of human colorectal cancer. Mol Pharmacol 79, 211–219 (2011).
Liao, Z. et al. The Anthelmintic Drug Niclosamide Inhibits the Proliferative Activity of Human Osteosarcoma Cells by Targeting Multiple Signal Pathways. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 15, 726–738 (2015).
Zhang, Q. et al. TqPCR: A Touchdown qPCR Assay with Significantly Improved Detection Sensitivity and Amplification Efficiency of SYBR Green qPCR. PLoS One 10, e0132666 (2015).
Arteaga, C. L. & Engelman, J. A. ERBB receptors: from oncogene discovery to basic science to mechanism-based cancer therapeutics. Cancer Cell 25, 282–303 (2014).
Pollak, M. The insulin and insulin-like growth factor receptor family in neoplasia: an update. Nat Rev Cancer 12, 159–169 (2012).
Denduluri, S. K. et al. Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) signaling in tumorigenesis and the development of cancer drug resistance. Genes Dis 2, 13–25 (2015).
Chou, T. C. Drug combination studies and their synergy quantification using the Chou-Talalay method. Cancer Res 70, 440–446 (2010).
Liteplo, R. G. Transformed rodent cells exhibit increased resistance to the carboxylic ionophores monensin and nigericin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 174, 483–488 (1991).
Candiani, C. et al. Blocking effect of human serum but not of cerebrospinal fluid on ricin A chain immunotoxin potentiation by monensin or carrier protein-monensin conjugates. Cancer Res 52, 623–630 (1992).
Griffin, T., Rybak, M. E., Recht, L., Singh, M., Salimi, A. & Raso, V. Potentiation of antitumor immunotoxins by liposomal monensin. J Natl Cancer Inst 85, 292–298 (1993).
Ippoliti, R. et al. The effect of monensin and chloroquine on the endocytosis and toxicity of chimeric toxins. Cell Mol Life Sci 54, 866–875 (1998).
Singh, M., Ferdous, A. J. & Jackson, T. L. Stealth monensin liposomes as a potentiator of adriamycin in cancer treatment. J Control Release 59, 43–53 (1999).
Shaik, M. S., Jackson, T. L. & Singh, M. Effect of monensin liposomes on the cytotoxicity of anti-My9-bR immunotoxin. J Pharm Pharmacol 55, 819–825 (2003).
Tyagi, N., Rathore, S. S. & Ghosh, P. C. Enhanced killing of human epidermoid carcinoma (KB) cells by treatment with ricin encapsulated into sterically stabilized liposomes in combination with monensin. Drug Deliv 18, 394–404 (2011).
Souza, A. C. et al. Mitochondrial damage as an early event of monensin-induced cell injury in cultured fibroblasts L929. J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med 52, 230–237 (2005).
Gordon, A. N. et al. Efficacy and safety of erlotinib HCl, an epidermal growth factor receptor (HER1/EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma: results from a phase II multicenter study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 15, 785–792 (2005).
Schilder, R. J. et al. Phase II study of gefitinib in patients with relapsed or persistent ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma and evaluation of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and immunohistochemical expression: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Clin Cancer Res 11, 5539–5548 (2005).
Chung, B. M. et al. Aberrant trafficking of NSCLC-associated EGFR mutants through the endocytic recycling pathway promotes interaction with Src. BMC Cell Biol 10, 84 (2009).
Wang, N. et al. Adenovirus-mediated efficient gene transfer into cultured three-dimensional organoids. PLoS One 9, e93608 (2014).
Wang, N. et al. The piggyBac Transposon-Mediated Expression of SV40 T Antigen Efficiently Immortalizes Mouse Embryonic Fibroblasts (MEFs). PLoS One 9, e97316 (2014).
Lamplot, J. D. et al. Reversibly Immortalized Mouse Articular Chondrocytes Acquire Long-Term Proliferative Capability while Retaining Chondrogenic Phenotype. Cell Transplant 24, 1053–1066 (2015).
Wen, S. et al. Characterization of constitutive promoters for piggyBac transposon-mediated stable transgene expression in mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). PLoS One 9, e94397 (2014).
Zhao, C. et al. Adenovirus-mediated gene transfer in mesenchymal stem cells can be significantly enhanced by the cationic polymer polybrene. PLoS One 9, e92908 (2014).
Li, R. et al. Targeting BMP9-Promoted Human Osteosarcoma Growth by Inactivation of Notch Signaling. Curr Cancer Drug Targets, 14, 274–285 (2014).
Haydon, R. C. et al. Cytoplasmic and/or nuclear accumulation of the beta-catenin protein is a frequent event in human osteosarcoma. Int J Cancer 102, 338–342 (2002).
Luu, H. H. et al. An orthotopic model of human osteosarcoma growth and spontaneous pulmonary metastasis. Clin Exp Metastasis 22, 319–329 (2005).
Luu, H. H. et al. Increased expression of S100A6 is associated with decreased metastasis and inhibition of cell migration and anchorage independent growth in human osteosarcoma. Cancer Lett 229, 135–148 (2005).
Luo, X. et al. Osteogenic BMPs promote tumor growth of human osteosarcomas that harbor differentiation defects. Lab Invest 88, 1264–1277 (2008).
Su, Y. et al. Establishment and characterization of a new highly metastatic human osteosarcoma cell line. Clin Exp Metastasis 26, 599–610 (2009).
Su, Y. et al. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 5 suppresses tumor growth and metastasis of human osteosarcoma. Oncogene 30, 3907–3917 (2011).
Haydon, R. C. et al. Nuclear receptor agonists as potential differentiation therapy agents for human osteosarcoma. Clin Cancer Res 8, 1288–1294 (2002).
He, B. C. et al. Synergistic antitumor effect of the activated PPARgamma and retinoid receptors on human osteosarcoma. Clin Cancer Res 16, 2235–2245 (2010).
Cheng, H. et al. Osteogenic activity of the fourteen types of human bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs). J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A, 1544–1552 (2003).
Kang, Q. et al. A comprehensive analysis of the dual roles of BMPs in regulating adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal progenitor cells. Stem Cells Dev 18, 545–559 (2009).
Kang, Q. et al. Characterization of the distinct orthotopic bone-forming activity of 14 BMPs using recombinant adenovirus-mediated gene delivery. Gene Ther 11, 1312–1320 (2004).
Luo, J. et al. A protocol for rapid generation of recombinant adenoviruses using the AdEasy system. Nat Protoc 2, 1236–1247 (2007).
Wu, N. et al. Overexpression of Ad5 precursor terminal protein accelerates recombinant adenovirus packaging and amplification in HEK-293 packaging cells. Gene Ther 21, 629–637 (2014).
Kong, Y. et al. Destabilization of Heterologous Proteins Mediated by the GSK3beta Phosphorylation Domain of the beta-Catenin Protein. Cell Physiol Biochem 32, 1187–1199 (2013).
Liu, X. et al. Cross-talk between EGF and BMP9 signalling pathways regulates the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. J Cell Mol Med 17, 1160–1172 (2013).
Wang, Y. et al. Noggin resistance contributes to the potent osteogenic capability of BMP9 in mesenchymal stem cells. J Orthop Res 31, 1796–1803 (2013).
Gao, Y. et al. Crosstalk between Wnt/beta-Catenin and Estrogen Receptor Signaling Synergistically Promotes Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Progenitor Cells. PLoS One 8, e82436 (2013).
Tang, N. et al. BMP9-induced osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal progenitors requires functional canonical Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. J Cell Mol Med 13, 2448–2464 (2009).
Chen, X. et al. The E.-F., Hand Calcium-Binding Protein S100A4 Regulates the Proliferation, Survival and Differentiation Potential of Human Osteosarcoma Cells. Cell Physiol Biochem 32, 1083–1096 (2013).
Luther, G. A. et al. IGFBP5 Domains Exert Distinct Inhibitory Effects on the Tumorigenicity and Metastasis of Human Osteosarcoma. Cancer Lett 336, 222–230 (2013).
Deng, F. et al. A Simplified and Versatile System for the Simultaneous Expression of Multiple siRNAs in Mammalian Cells Using Gibson DNA Assembly. PLoS One 9, e113064 (2014).
Zhang, H. et al. Canonical Wnt signaling acts synergistically on BMP9-induced osteo/odontoblastic differentiation of stem cells of dental apical papilla (SCAPs). Biomaterials 39, 145–154 (2015).
Li, M. et al. Establishment and characterization of the reversibly immortalized mouse fetal heart progenitors. Int J Med Sci 10, 1035–1046 (2013).
Untergasser, A. et al. Primer3–new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res 40, e115 (2012).
Chen, X. et al. Sustained high level transgene expression in mammalian cells mediated by the optimized piggyBac transposon system. Genes Dis 2, 96–105 (2015).
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Ernest Lengyel of The University of Chicago Medical Center for the generous provision of ovarian cancer lines. The reported work was supported in part by research grants from the National Institutes of Health (AT004418, AR50142 to TCH and RCH), the 973 Program of Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) of China (#2011CB707900 to TCH) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (#81372800 to LT and #81100399 to YD). MKM was a recipient of Howard Hughes Medical Institute Medical Research Fellowship. This work was also supported in part by The University of Chicago Core Facility Subsidy grant from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) of the National Institutes of Health through Grant UL1 TR000430. Funding sources were not involved in the study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T.C.H., L.T., H.H.L., H.Q., R.C.H. and Y.D. conceived and designed the project and wrote the manuscript. Y.D., J.Z. and Z.W. performed most of the experiments. Z.Y., M.Q., J.Y., Q.W., J.W., X.W., L.Z., S.L. and S.T. provided assistances in some experiments and helped on data collections and analyses. M.K.M., H.L., J.F., F.Z., Y.Z. and J.L. provided materials/reagents for the project and assisted some of the experiments. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Deng, Y., Zhang, J., Wang, Z. et al. Antibiotic monensin synergizes with EGFR inhibitors and oxaliplatin to suppress the proliferation of human ovarian cancer cells. Sci Rep 5, 17523 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17523
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17523
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Endosomal recycling inhibitors downregulate estrogen receptor-alpha and synergise with endocrine therapies
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (2024)
-
Endosomal recycling inhibitors downregulate the androgen receptor and synergise with enzalutamide
Investigational New Drugs (2024)
-
Boosting intracellular sodium selectively kills hepatocarcinoma cells and induces hepatocellular carcinoma tumor shrinkage in mice
Communications Biology (2023)
-
Silencing Smad7 potentiates BMP2-induced chondrogenic differentiation and inhibits endochondral ossification in human synovial-derived mesenchymal stromal cells
Stem Cell Research & Therapy (2021)
-
Integrated bioinformatics analysis for the screening of hub genes and therapeutic drugs in ovarian cancer
Journal of Ovarian Research (2020)