Abstract
Glucocorticoids are the primary therapy for nephrotic syndrome (NS), but have serious side effects and are ineffective in ~20–50% of patients. Thiazolidinediones have recently been suggested to be renoprotective and to modulate podocyte glucocorticoid-mediated nuclear receptor signaling. We hypothesized that thiazolidinediones could enhance glucocorticoid efficacy in NS. We found that puromycin aminonucleoside-induced proteinuria in rats was significantly reduced by both high-dose glucocorticoids (79%) and pioglitazone (61%), but not low-dose glucocorticoids (25%). Remarkably, pioglitazone + low-dose glucocorticoids also reduced proteinuria (63%) comparably to high-dose glucocorticoids, whereas pioglitazone + high-dose glucocorticoids reduced proteinuria to almost control levels (97%). Molecular analysis revealed that both glucocorticoids and pioglitazone enhanced glomerular synaptopodin and nephrin expression and reduced COX-2 expression, after injury. Furthermore, the glomerular phosphorylation of glucocorticoid receptor and Akt, but not PPARγ, correlated with treatment-induced reductions in proteinuria. Notably, clinical translation of these findings to a child with refractory NS by the addition of pioglitazone to the treatment correlated with marked reductions in both proteinuria (80%) and overall immunosuppression (64%). These findings together suggest that repurposing pioglitazone could potentially enhance the proteinuria-reducing effects of glucocorticoids during NS treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Nephrotic syndrome (NS) is among the most common kidney diseases affecting both children and adults. Oral glucocorticoids (GCs) have been the primary therapy for NS in both children and adults for >60 years, although GCs have serious side effects and are clinically ineffective in ~20% of children and ~50% of adults1,2. Unfortunately most alternative agents are only partially effective and are associated with significant side effects3. Thus, there is a critical need for both more effective and less toxic treatments for NS.
In this context, the FDA-approved type II diabetes drugs, thiazolidinediones (TZDs), have been shown in large observational studies to slow the progression of diabetic nephropathy and to reduce proteinuria, potentially due to their direct renoprotective effects in addition to their known promoting effects on insulin sensitivity4. Although the mechanism of action for such protection remains unclear, recent laboratory studies have reported partial protective effects of TZDs in animal models of nephropathy5,6,7,8, as well as in direct podocyte injury in vitro9,10,11,12. Notably, both GCs and TZDs are known to act via a similar molecular mechanism by binding to their respective nuclear receptors [glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), respectively], both of which belong to the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily13,14. We recently reported direct protective effects of GCs and TZDs on podocytes, potentially due to crosstalk between the GC and TZD nuclear receptor-mediated signaling pathways, as demonstrated by the ability of TZDs to modulate the GC signaling pathway10. We thus hypothesized that nuclear receptor crosstalk between podocyte TZD and GC pathways could be exploited to enhance the proteinuria-reducing effects of GCs during NS treatment. To test this hypothesis we: 1) Determined the ability of pioglitazone to protect and enhance the efficacy of GCs in reducing proteinuria in puromycin aminonucleoside (PAN)-induced NS and 2) Analyzed the potential mechanistic pathways for protection in the glomeruli of rats with PAN-induced NS treated with combinations of GC and/or the TZD pioglitazone. and 3) Analyzed the potential of pioglitazone to enhance GC efficacy in reducing proteinuria in a child with refractory NS.
Results
Glucocorticoids and Pioglitazone Both Reduce PAN-Induced Proteinuria in Rats
Male Wistar rats developed massive proteinuria after a single IV PAN injection of 50 mg/kg, which peaked on day 11 (UPC 28.0 ± 9.0 mg/mg) (Fig. 1A,C). The control rats received IV saline and maintained baseline levels of urinary protein (UPC 2.0 ± 0.1 mg/mg). To analyze the ability of GCs to reduce PAN-induced proteinuria, 13 rats/group were also treated with intraperitoneal (IP) daily administration of low-dose GC (5 mg/kg), which did not result in a significant reduction in proteinuria (25%, P = NS vs. PAN; UPC 21.3 ± 6.0 mg/mg). In contrast, high-dose GC (15 mg/kg) reduced proteinuria significantly (79%, P < 0.05 vs. PAN; UPC 7.3 ± 2.1 mg/mg) (Fig. 1A,C). Furthermore, enteral daily administration of pioglitazone (10 mg/kg) also resulted in comparable proteinuria reduction (61%, P = <0.05 vs. PAN; UPC 12.1 ± 2.7 mg/mg) (Fig. 1A,C). The proteinuria values are also indicated in tabular form at three different time points in Table 1. In summary, GC treatment resulted in a reduction in PAN-induced proteinuria, but only at a high dose, while pioglitazone treatment alone also resulted in proteinuria reduction.
Protective effects of GCs and pioglitazone were also demonstrated in cultured podocytes by restoring the actin cytoskeletal arrangement and cell viability (see Supplementary Figure S1).
Pioglitazone Enhances the Efficacy of Glucocorticoids in Reducing PAN-Induced Proteinuria
Administration of pioglitazone combined with low-dose GC to PAN-injected rats resulted in further reduction in proteinuria at day 11 (63%, P < 0.05 vs. PAN; UPC 11.5 ± 4.9 mg/mg) than with pioglitazone alone (Fig. 1B,C). This proteinuria reduction was also statistically similar to the proteinuria reduction induced by high-dose GC (79%; P = NS, pioglitazone + low-dose GC vs. high-dose GC), despite a 67% reduction in GC dosing (15 mg/kg vs. 5 mg/kg). In addition, treatment with pioglitazone combined with high-dose GC reduced proteinuria even more, achieving proteinuria reductions that were statistically similar to control levels (97%, P = NS vs. control; UPC 2.7 ± 0.7 mg/mg) (Fig. 1B,C). The proteinuria values are also indicated in tabular form at three different time points in Table 1. Moreover, the addition of pioglitazone to either low-dose or high-dose GC did not induce changes in body weight or kidney weight (that might be suggestive of edema, a known side effect) compared to treatment with GC alone, (see Supplementary Table S1). In summary, pioglitazone enhanced the efficacy of low-dose GC in reducing proteinuria, enabling comparable reductions in proteinuria to that of high-dose GC despite a 67% reduction in GC dosing. Moreover, the addition of pioglitazone to high-dose GC was able to further enhance the efficacy of high-dose GC (97% vs. 79% with high dose-GCs alone), thereby enabling enhanced proteinuria reduction to essentially normal control levels.
Pioglitazone and Glucocorticoids Both Restore Synaptopodin Expression in PAN-Injured Glomeruli
Evaluation of glomeruli by immunofluorescence microscopy revealed that PAN-induced injury resulted in marked reductions in glomerular synaptopodin protein expression, which was restored after treatment with high-dose GC, pioglitazone and pioglitazone + low-dose GC (Fig. 2). These results thus revealed that glomerular synaptopodin expression correlated inversely with proteinuria (see Figs 1 and 2 and Table 1).
Pioglitazone and Glucocorticoids Both Enhance the Glomerular Expression of Podocyte Markers and Reduce COX-2 Expression
Glomerular mRNA expression of Synpo (encoding for synaptopodin) and Nphs1 (encoding for nephrin) were both reduced after PAN-induced injury, but were restored after treatment with high-dose GC, pioglitazone and pioglitazone + low-dose GC (Fig. 3A,B). In contrast, glomerular mRNA expression of Ptgs2 (encoding for COX-2) was increased by PAN injury but also restored to normal levels after treatment with high-dose GC, pioglitazone and pioglitazone + low-dose GC (Fig. 3C).
Phosphorylation of Glomerular Glucocorticoid Receptor and Akt, but not PPARγ, Correlate with Glucocorticoid- and Pioglitazone-Induced Reductions in Proteinuria
Glomerular activation of the GR, as indicated by phosphorylation (p-GR) at Ser 211, was induced by treatment with high-dose GC, pioglitazone and pioglitazone + low-dose GC, but not with low-dose GC alone (Fig. 4A). Moreover, the levels of glomerular GR activation/phosphorylation correlated inversely with proteinuria in PAN-injected and treated rats (P = 0.005; Fig. 4D). On the contrary, neither GCs nor pioglitazone blocked the phosphorylation of PPARγ at Ser 273, it’s known phosphorylation site (Fig. 4B). Moreover, the level of PPARγ phosphorylation (p-PPARγ at Ser 273) did not show any correlation with proteinuria (Fig. 4E). Furthermore, evaluation of Akt activity as measured by phosphorylation (p-Akt) at Ser 473 was increased in all the treatment groups and the level of phosphorylation correlated inversely with proteinuria in PAN-injected and treated rats (P = 0.018; Fig. 4C,F). In summary, p-GR and p-Akt, but not p-PPARγ levels inversely correlate with proteinuria in PAN-injected and treated rats.
Discussion
These studies were designed to test the hypothesis that crosstalk between podocyte TZD and GC signaling pathways can be exploited to enhance the proteinuria-reducing effects of GCs during NS treatment. Our results revealed that pioglitazone alone reduced proteinuria during experimental NS in rats and also enhanced the efficacy of GC in reducing proteinuria. Furthermore, combining pioglitazone treatment with low-dose GC enabled a 67% reduction in GC dosing without any loss of efficacy in reducing proteinuria. In addition, combining pioglitazone with high-dose GC notably enhanced the proteinuria-reducing effects of GC to almost normal control levels. From a mechanistic perspective, these protective effects were associated with enhancements in podocyte markers (Synaptopodin and Nephrin) and a reduction in COX-2 expression in glomeruli. Moreover, glomerular phosphorylation of the GR and Akt, but not PPARγ, correlated inversely with proteinuria in both PAN-injured and treatment groups. Finally, translation of these findings to a child with refractory NS revealed that the addition of pioglitazone to the treatment regimen was associated with marked reductions in both proteinuria (80%) and overall immunosuppression (64%) (see Supplementary Figures S2 and S3). These findings together suggest that repurposing pioglitazone could potentially enhance the proteinuria-reducing effects of GCs during NS treatment.
Although GCs have been used as the primary therapy for NS for the past 60 years, it was not until 20–30 years after their introduction that GCs were first reported to reduce proteinuria in animal disease models15. A few recent reports have also noted renoprotective effects for pioglitazone alone in NS models6,7. However, our study attempted to significantly extend these findings to compare the in vivo proteinuria-reducing effects of pioglitazone alone to that of GC alone, as well as to pioglitazone + low- and high-dose GC combinations. Notably, these findings suggest that the addition of pioglitazone may enable a 67% reduction in GC dosing (and thus reduced toxicity) without any loss in clinical efficacy in proteinuria reduction. Moreover, the addition of pioglitazone might also potentially be able to enhance the clinical efficacy of higher doses of GCs and could thus also have utility in patients with steroid resistant NS. Importantly, in contrast to other TZD members like rosiglitazone in the anti-diabetic class of drugs, meta-analysis studies have revealed no increased cardiovascular risk due to pioglitazone and it continues to be widely used in the treatment of diabetes13.
Synaptopodin is an actin-associated protein in podocyte foot processes and its expression is known to inversely correlate with glomerular injury during NS16,17. In addition, the expression of another podocyte marker Nephrin (Nphs1) is also known to be altered during the development of proteinuria18. In the present study, we observed restored and increased glomerular expression of both synaptopodin and nephrin upon treatment with pioglitazone and GC after injury. Notably, nephrin expression was increased robustly upon treatment with both GC and pioglitazone, which is possibly due to the direct effects of these drugs on the transcription of nephrin mRNA via the GC response elements (GRE) and peroxisome proliferator response elements (PPRE), respectively, in the promoter region of nephrin gene19,20. We have also extended our previously-reported correlation between podocyte Ptgs2 (COX-2) expression and in vitro podocyte injury and recovery seen after treatment with pioglitazone and GC to an in vivo model of NS in glomeruli of rats injured with PAN and treated with pioglitazone and GC21. Since COX-2 has been widely reported to be involved in glomerular injury and is known to be regulated by trans-repression activities of both GR and PPARγ22, our results provide additional mechanistic insight into the protective pathways induced in podocytes by pioglitazone and GC treatment during NS.
Upon ligand binding, GR undergoes rapid phosphorylation at Ser 211 which is associated with its activation23. We have previously reported the ability of pioglitazone, like GCs (although to a lower degree), to modulate GR phosphorylation in podocytes10. Extension of these findings in the current study to glomeruli in an in vivo model of NS treated with GC and pioglitazone revealed that the proteinuria reductions are directly correlated with GR phosphorylation at this site. Furthermore, since PPARγ is the canonical receptor of pioglitazone, we also studied the status of its phosphorylation at Ser 273 upon treatment with GC and pioglitazone. Phosphorylation at this site is believed to be mediated by Cdk5, which has been shown to be blocked by PPARγ agonists, leading to their obesity-related effects24. In the current study, we did not find any correlation between phosphorylation levels of PPARγ at Ser 273 and proteinuria. This however, does not rule out the role of PPARγ in mediating protective effects during NS or renal injury, as has been reported by others8,25. Finally, the crucial role of Akt2 activation by mammalian target of rapamycin complex 2 (mTORC2) in podocyte survival has been recently emphasized in a mouse model of podocyte-specific deletion of Akt, as well as in human chronic kidney disease26. Therefore, we analyzed the relevance of this pathway in PAN-induced NS and treatment by pioglitazone and GC by measuring the activation of Akt, as indicated by its phosphorylation at Ser 473 by mTORC2. We not only found that the treatment groups had increased glomerular p-Akt compared to the PAN-injured group, but also that glomerular p-Akt levels correlated inversely with proteinuria, thus further underscoring the apparent role of this pathway in glomerular disease.
In addition to NS, GCs are the first line of therapy for many other diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, asthma and many inflammatory conditions27,28. Similarly, there is an emerging role for pioglitazone and other TZDs as novel therapeutic agents for cancer, inflammatory diseases and arthritis29,30. Our data now identify clear beneficial effects from combining pioglitazone with GCs in treating glomerular disease, which may be due to crosstalk between TZD- and GC-mediated pathways in podocytes. Others have also recently reported protective effects of combinations of pioglitazone and GCs in other disease models such as inflammation, arthritis and lung cancer27,28,31. Indeed, combination drug therapy is a common practice in medicine and often results in improved therapeutic effects compared to monotherapy.
Finally, the translation of the results detailed above for the first time to a child with refractory NS is provocative, albeit anecdotal (see Supplementary Figures S2 and S3). While a single case report certainly cannot imply cause and effect, the addition of pioglitazone to the treatment regimen of the child with refractory NS was associated with clinically important improvements in his condition. After experiencing eight hospitalizations and twenty five IV albumin infusions and treatment with five relatively toxic immunosuppressive medications over two years, initiation of pioglitazone was associated with a subsequent 80% decrease in proteinuria over the ensuing months (without a decrease in eGFR), completely eliminating the need for any subsequent hospitalizations or albumin infusions. Moreover, this improvement enabled his treatment team to reduce his overall immunosuppression by 64%, thereby markedly reducing his ongoing exposure to potentially toxic medications and reducing his risk for infection (see Supplementary Tables S2A and S2B). While he did not enter into complete remission, the combination of elimination of hospitalizations with the marked reduction in overall immunosuppression has greatly enhanced his quality of life, reduced his healthcare utilization and expenses and potentially reduced his risk for progression to end-stage kidney disease. Furthermore, the model used in this study for the calculation of overall immunosuppression (Total ISS) could easily be personalized for other patients or diseases based on the specific immunosuppressive medications prescribed.
These studies had a few notable limitations. First, the experiments were designed to determine if pioglitazone is able to enhance the ability of GC to protect against proteinuria and not specifically to analyze its ability to enhance resolution of existing proteinuria. In addition, the studies were only designed to analyze short term effects of pioglitazone and GC on proteinuria reduction and not their ability to induce prolonged reductions in proteinuria.
In summary, the protective effects of pioglitazone and GC reported here in an in vivo model of NS, combined with the clinical improvements seen in the above child, suggest two intriguing possibilities: 1) That pioglitazone could potentially be used to enable reduced dosing (and toxicity) of GC without a reduction in clinical efficacy and 2) That pioglitazone could potentially be used to enhance the clinical efficacy of GCs in the setting of clinical steroid resistance. Hopefully, a future prospective clinical trial will enable validation of the potential repurposing of pioglitazone as a GC supplement for NS and possibly other diseases treated with GCs.
Methods
Animal Study Design
The performed studies were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Nationwide Children’s Hospital and all the experiments were performed in accordance with the approved guidelines. Proteinuria was induced in male Wistar rats weighing ~150–200 g by single intravenous (IV) PAN (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) injection (50 mg/kg) on Day 0, while the control group received IV saline injections (n = 13). A group of PAN injected rats (n = 13) were left untreated and received sham oral gavage vehicle solution (0.5% methylcellulose, 0.025% Tween-20), while the treatment groups (n = 13/group) also received: (i) Low-dose GC (Methylprednisolone; 5 mg/kg; n = 13; Solu-Medrol, Pfizer Inc., New York, NY) by intraperitoneal (IP) injection daily, (ii) High-dose GC (15 mg/kg; n = 13), (iii) Pioglitazone (Pio; 10 mg/kg; n = 13; Actos; Takeda, Deerfield, IL) by oral gavage daily, (iv) Combined low-dose GC + pioglitazone [(Pio + low-dose GC; n = 13) and (v) Combined high-dose GC + pioglitazone (Pio + high-dose GC; n = 4)] starting at Day 0. Two control rats also received pioglitazone alone (10 mg/kg) by oral gavage daily with no PAN injection. Urine samples were collected at baseline (prior to injury) and daily during the study for analysis. The rats were weighed daily and sacrificed on Day 11 at the point of expected peak proteinuria and the kidneys harvested, weighed and processed for paraffin sectioning and glomerular isolation.
Urine Analyses
Albuminuria was monitored by analyzing 4 μl urine samples taken at Days 0, 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 for the presence of albumin by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining. Urine protein:creatinine ratios (UPC) were measured by Antech Diagnostics GLP (Morrisville, NC), which is fully compliant with Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) regulations.
Glomerular Isolation
Glomeruli were isolated using a standard sequential sieving method, as described previously21,32 and the resulting preparations were washed with PBS and assessed under a light microscope, which confirmed ~95% glomeruli. One half of the glomerular preparation was suspended in RLT buffer (Qiagen, Germantown, MD) containing β-Mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich) and homogenized with a 21 gauge needle for RNA isolation as described below. Protein extracts were prepared from the other half of the glomerular preparation in Tissue Protein Extraction Reagent (TPER; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA).
RNA Extraction and Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Total RNA from isolated glomeruli was isolated using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The purity and yield of RNA was determined by measuring the absorbance at 260 and 280 nm and used for quantitative reverse transcribed-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), as described previously10. Briefly, 1 μg of RNA was subjected to DNase (Ambion, Thermo Fisher Scientific) digestion at 37 °C for 30 min followed by DNase inactivation with 5 mM EDTA at 75 °C for 10 min. cDNA was then synthesized from 1 μg DNase-treated RNA in a 20 μl reaction using iScript reverse transcriptase (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), according to manufacturer’s protocol. The Synpo, Nphs1, Ptgs2 and Gapdh mRNAs were quantified by qRT-PCR using the SYBR green method on an iQ5 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad) using forward and reverse primers (Table 2). The PCR conditions were as follows: 1 cycle at 95 °C for 3 min, 40 cycles at 95 °C for 10 sec and 55 °C for 10 sec, followed by a melt curve analysis. The amplification efficiency of each primer pair was then measured by plotting the efficiency curve of serial dilutions of selected cDNA samples. Values were normalized to the housekeeping gene Gapdh and plotted as fold changes relative to vehicle control treatments.
Western Blotting
Protein extracts (10–20 μg) were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad). Membranes were blocked for 1 hour with 5% milk in PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 followed by incubation in primary antibody overnight [anti-phospho-GR (Ser211), anti-PPARγ, anti-phospho Akt (Ser 473) and anti-Akt (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA); anti-GR (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX); anti-phospho-PPARγ (Ser 273) (Bioss Inc., Woburn, MA); and anti-β-Actin (Sigma-Aldrich)]. Following four washes, blots were incubated in horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies against mouse or rabbit IgG (Jackson Immuno Research Laboratories, West Grove, PA) for 2 hours at room temperature. Protein bands were detected on X-ray film using the ECL chemiluminescence reagent (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA). X-ray films were scanned using a calibrated ArtixScan M1 transillumination scanner (Microtek Lab Inc., Cerritos, CA) controlled by the ScanWizard Pro program (version 7.042) and densitometric analysis of the integrated band density was performed using ImageJ (version 1.39, standard settings; http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/).
Immunofluorescence Staining
Kidneys were examined by indirect immunofluorescence on 4-micron thick paraffin sections. The sections were deparaffinized with xylene and rehydrated in graded ethanol. Antigen retrieval was performed by boiling the slides in 10 mM sodium citrate followed by PBS-Tween (0.5% Tween-20) wash. Blocking was done with Super Block (Scytek Labs Inc., Logan, UT) for 6 min at 37 °C, followed by incubation with anti-synaptopodin primary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) in 5% super-block at 4 °C overnight at 1:100 dilution. Sections were washed three times for 10 min each with 2.5% Super Block in PBS-Tween (0.5% Tween-20) and incubated with fluorescent secondary antibody (Alexa Flour, 2 ug/ml; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) in 5% Super Block in PBS for 1 hour at room temperature. Sections were then washed three times for 10 min each with 2.5% Super Block in PBS-Tween (0.5% Tween-20), mounted with Prolong Gold Antifade Reagent (Invitrogen). Kidney sections from the groups were viewed and imaged with exposures within 250–600 ms with an Axio Scope fluorescent microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Jena, Germany).
Statistical Analyses
Statistical differences were determined by the unpaired Student’s t-test for single comparisons and two-way ANOVA for multiple comparisons, using the GraphPad Prism software version 6.00 for Windows. P-values < 0.05 were considered to be significant and all data are presented as mean ± SEM.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Agrawal, S. et al. Pioglitazone Enhances the Beneficial Effects of Glucocorticoids in Experimental Nephrotic Syndrome. Sci. Rep. 6, 24392; doi: 10.1038/srep24392 (2016).
References
MacHardy, N. et al. Management patterns of childhood-onset nephrotic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol. 24, 2193–2201 (2009).
Ponticelli, C. et al. Can prolonged treatment improve the prognosis in adults with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis? Am J Kidney Dis. 34, 618–625 (1999).
Greenbaum, L. A., Benndorf, R. & Smoyer, W. E. Childhood nephrotic syndrome–current and future therapies. Nat Rev Nephrol. 8, 445–458 (2012).
Sarafidis, P. A., Stafylas, P. C., Georgianos, P. I., Saratzis, A. N. & Lasaridis, A. N. Effect of thiazolidinediones on albuminuria and proteinuria in diabetes: a meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 55, 835–847 (2010).
Liu, H. F. et al. Thiazolidinedione attenuate proteinuria and glomerulosclerosis in Adriamycin-induced nephropathy rats via slit diaphragm protection. Nephrology (Carlton). 15, 75–83 (2010).
Zuo, Y. et al. Protective effects of PPARgamma agonist in acute nephrotic syndrome. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 27, 174–181 (2012).
Yang, H. C., Ma, L. J., Ma, J. & Fogo, A. B. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist is protective in podocyte injury-associated sclerosis. Kidney Int. 69, 1756–1764 (2006).
Henique, C. et al. Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-Related Factor 2 Drives Podocyte-Specific Expression of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor gamma Essential for Resistance to Crescentic GN. J Am Soc Nephrol. 27, 172–188 (2016).
Kanjanabuch, T. et al. PPAR-gamma agonist protects podocytes from injury. Kidney Int. 71, 1232–1239 (2007).
Agrawal, S., Guess, A. J., Benndorf, R. & Smoyer, W. E. Comparison of direct action of thiazolidinediones and glucocorticoids on renal podocytes: protection from injury and molecular effects. Mol Pharmacol. 80, 389–399 (2011).
Guan, Y. & Breyer, M. D. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs): novel therapeutic targets in renal disease. Kidney Int. 60, 14–30 (2001).
Miglio, G. et al. Protective effects of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists on human podocytes: proposed mechanisms of action. Br J Pharmacol. 167, 641–653 (2012).
Soccio, R. E., Chen, E. R. & Lazar, M. A. Thiazolidinediones and the promise of insulin sensitization in type 2 diabetes. Cell Metab. 20, 573–591 (2014).
Beck, I. M. et al. Crosstalk in inflammation: the interplay of glucocorticoid receptor-based mechanisms and kinases and phosphatases. Endocr Rev. 30, 830–882 (2009).
Kawamura, T., Yoshioka, T., Bills, T., Fogo, A. & Ichikawa, I. Glucocorticoid activates glomerular antioxidant enzymes and protects glomeruli from oxidant injuries. Kidney Int. 40, 291–301 (1991).
Srivastava, T., Garola, R. E., Whiting, J. M. & Alon, U. S. Synaptopodin expression in idiopathic nephrotic syndrome of childhood. Kidney Int. 59, 118–125 (2001).
Barisoni, L., Kriz, W., Mundel, P. & D’Agati, V. The dysregulated podocyte phenotype: a novel concept in the pathogenesis of collapsing idiopathic focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and HIV-associated nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 10, 51–61 (1999).
Guan, N., Ding, J., Deng, J., Zhang, J. & Yang, J. Key molecular events in puromycin aminonucleoside nephrosis rats. Pathol Int. 54, 703–711 (2004).
Benigni, A. et al. Transcriptional regulation of nephrin gene by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist: molecular mechanism of the antiproteinuric effect of pioglitazone. J Am Soc Nephrol. 17, 1624–1632 (2006).
Yamauchi, K. et al. Screening and identification of substances that regulate nephrin gene expression using engineered reporter podocytes. Kidney Int. 70, 892–900 (2006).
Agrawal, S., Guess, A. J., Chanley, M. A. & Smoyer, W. E. Albumin-induced podocyte injury and protection are associated with regulation of COX-2. Kidney Int. 86, 1150–1160 (2014).
Li, M. D. & Yang, X. A Retrospective on Nuclear Receptor Regulation of Inflammation: Lessons from GR and PPARs. PPAR Res. 2011, 742785 (2011).
Tasker, J. G., Di, S. & Malcher-Lopes, R. Minireview: rapid glucocorticoid signaling via membrane-associated receptors. Endocrinology. 147, 5549–5556 (2006).
Choi, J. H. et al. Antidiabetic actions of a non-agonist PPARgamma ligand blocking Cdk5-mediated phosphorylation. Nature. 477, 477–481 (2011).
Miglio, G. et al. The subtypes of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors expressed by human podocytes and their role in decreasing podocyte injury. Br J Pharmacol. 162, 111–125 (2011).
Canaud, G. et al. AKT2 is essential to maintain podocyte viability and function during chronic kidney disease. Nat Med. 19, 1288–1296 (2013).
Yamamoto, A., Kakuta, H. & Sugimoto, Y. Involvement of glucocorticoid receptor activation on anti-inflammatory effect induced by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonist in mice. Int Immunopharmacol. 22, 204–208 (2014).
Suke, S. G., Negi, H., Mediratta, P. K., Banerjee, B. D. & Sharma, K. K. Anti-arthritic and anti-inflammatory activity of combined pioglitazone and prednisolone on adjuvant-induced arthritis. Eur J Pharmacol. 718, 57–62 (2013).
Koeffler, H. P. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 9, 1–9 (2003).
Ialenti, A. et al. Mechanism of the anti-inflammatory effect of thiazolidinediones: relationship with the glucocorticoid pathway. Mol Pharmacol. 67, 1620–1628 (2005).
Fu, H. et al. Chemoprevention of lung carcinogenesis by the combination of aerosolized budesonide and oral pioglitazone in A/J mice. Mol Carcinog. 50, 913–921 (2011).
Smoyer, W. E., Gupta, A., Mundel, P., Ballew, J. D. & Welsh, M. J. Altered expression of glomerular heat shock protein 27 in experimental nephrotic syndrome. J Clin Invest. 97, 2697–2704 (1996).
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Bryce A. Kerlin, Amanda Waller, Terri Shaffer, Chelsea Bittler and Ruma Pengal for their valuable contributions to the in vivo studies. The present study was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Health NIDDK R01 (DK 095059) to WES.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.A. conceived and designed the study, performed experiments, analyzed and interpreted the data, drafted the manuscript and prepared the figures and tables. M.A.C. performed the in vivo animal experiments and collected the data. D.W. collated the patient data, analyzed it and participated in the preparation of the case report and associated figure and tables. X.N. participated in performing immunofluorescence experiments. T.K. participated in performing western blotting experiments. A.J.G. participated in the experiments with glomerular isolation. R.B. participated in the experiments with glomerular isolation and in in vivo study design. G.H. treated his patient with pioglitazone and participated in clinical data collection and writing the case report. W.E.S. designed the study, interpreted the data and participated in writing and editing the manuscript. All the authors approve of the final version of the manuscript.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Agrawal, S., Chanley, M., Westbrook, D. et al. Pioglitazone Enhances the Beneficial Effects of Glucocorticoids in Experimental Nephrotic Syndrome. Sci Rep 6, 24392 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24392
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24392
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Pioglitazone, a PPAR-y agonist, as one of the new therapeutic candidates for C3 glomerulopathy
Pediatric Nephrology (2024)
-
Pioglitazone enhances proteinuria reduction in complicated pediatric nephrotic syndrome
Pediatric Nephrology (2023)
-
The risk of sudden cardiac arrest and ventricular arrhythmia with rosiglitazone versus pioglitazone: real-world evidence on thiazolidinedione safety
Cardiovascular Diabetology (2020)
-
Pioglitazone attenuates kidney injury in an experimental model of gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity in rats
Scientific Reports (2019)
-
Loss of the podocyte glucocorticoid receptor exacerbates proteinuria after injury
Scientific Reports (2017)