Skip to main content
Account

Table 4 Validity & reliability of somatization outcome measures

From: A scoping review of somatization: characteristics and implications among health profession students

Somatization measures and study(ies) which used them

Validity

Reliability

APSQ: Anxiety and Preoccupation about Sleep Questionnaire [76]

The APSQ and the two subscales demonstrated discriminant validity between three sleep status groups (normal sleep, poor sleep, and insomnia disorder; R 2 = 0.33–0.41) and convergent validity with measures on cognitive arousal, sleep-related beliefs, anxiety, and depression [90]

A two-factor solution accounted for 70.7% of the variance; one six-item factor evaluated worries about outcomes of poor sleep (α = 0.91); the second factor, the other four-item factor evaluated worries about the uncontrollability of sleep (α = 0.86). The two factors were significantly intercorrelated (ρ = 0.65) and significantly associated with the total APSQ (ρs = 0.97 and 0.76, respectively) [90]

BSI: Brief Symptom Inventory [88]

Evidence of criterion-related validity through predicting DSM-IV-TR depression, generalized anxiety, phobic, and somatization disorders [91]

Test-retest reliability for all dimensions ranged from 0.68 (Somatization) to

0.91 (Phobic Anxiety) [91]

ESS: Enugu Somatization Scale [35]

Intrinsic validity: 0.9654 [35]

Cronbach’s α: 0.932, internal

consistency: 0.936 [35]

FTAS: Framingham Type A Behavior Pattern Scale [73]

NR

Cronbach’s α: 0.68 [92]

GHQ-28: Global Health Questionnaire [42, 45, 60]

Demonstrates convergent validity by correlating significantly and negatively with mental health, (MHC-SF) and it is discriminant between risk and non-risk

cases [93]

Configuration of a general factor and four specifics factors explain the items of the GHQ-28 have high integral reliability, χ2 = 694.95, p < 0.001

[93]

HSCL: Hopkins Symptom Check List [52]

High longitudinal validity, i.e., responsiveness [94]

Cronbach’s α = 0.859 [94]

NMQ: Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire [62]

Strong construct validity comparing NMQ responses with disability-related musculoskeletal questionnaires: the Neck Disability Index (NDI), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Quick- Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick-DASH), and Reduced Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index

(ArWOMAC) [95]

Cronbach’s α = 0.85 [95]

PHQ-15: Patient Health Questionnaire- 15 [20, 32, 34, 53, 69, 71, 75]

PHQ–15 scores were significantly correlated with BDI scores (r = 0.559; p

< 0.01) and GHQ–12 scores (r = 0.435; p < 0.01) [96]

Cronbach α = 0.87 (p < 0.001), and the test–retest reliability 0.65 (p < 0.001); item/total correlation (r) was 0.48 [96]

PCQ: Psychosomatic Complaints Questionnaire [37]

Convergent validity demonstrated as somatic symptoms, anxiety, dysfunction in social action and function, and depression had direct and significant relationships with psychosomatic

problems [97]

Cronbach α = 0.957 [97]

PPS: Psychosomatic Problems Scale [39]

Multidimensionality: 0.80% at 0.01 alpha [98]

Person Separation Index: 0.83 [98]

PSC: Psychosomatic Symptom checklist [40]

One factor, “general psychosomatic distress,” accounted for 67.1% of the total variance and 93.2% of the common variance [99]

Test-retest reliability r > 0.80, p <

0.0001; inter-item correlations r > 0.50 [99]

SA-45: Symptom Assessment Questionnaire [36]

Convergent validity was supported for 7 of the 11 SA-45 scales as these scales had their strongest correlation with their matched Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) scale [100]

Adequate test–retest reliabilities at three-month follow-up: r = 0.56

and r = 0.57 for SA-45 DEP and GSI subscales respectively [100]

SAD: Diagnostic criteria for somatoform autonomic dysfunction [61]

Prevalence of somatization: 0.8–5.9% with strict DSM/ICD criteria application. Estimates higher with less strict application [101]

Diagnoses from the DSM vs. ICD varied significantly. Data from questionnaire vs. clinical interviews also varied [101]

Somatisation Scale [47]

NR

NR

SOMS-2: Screening for Somatoform Disorders-2 [19]

Sensitivity: 86.0%; specificity: 95.5% [102]

Cronbach’s α: 0.83 [102]

SSS-8: Somatic Symptom Scale-8 [55, 83]

Mental health-related somatic symptoms were correlated with anxiety (r = 0.55 [95% ci, 0.52–0.58]),

depression (r = 0.57 [95% ci, 0.54 to

0.60]), health (r = − 0.24 [95% ci, − 0.28

to − 0.20]), and health care utilization (incidence rate ratio, 1.12 [95% ci, 1.10

to 1.14]) [103]

Cronbach’s α: 0.81 [103]

SCL-90-R: Symptoms Checklist 90 – Revised [35, 66]

Comparative Fit Index: 0.967–0.995 [104]

Cronbach’s α: 0.89–0.93 [104]

Self-developed somatization scale [18]

NR

NR

VASQ: Veins Autonomic Symptoms Questionnaire [46]

NR

NR

WPSI: Wahler Physical Symptoms Inventory [56]

F = 48.75 (p < 0.001) difference in means [103]

Test-retest reliability: 0.81 [103]

  1. KEY: NR Not reported