Abstract
Introduction
Health literacy (HL) is correlated with the risk of mortality and readmission during cardiac rehabilitation. However, the correlation between HL and utility-based health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores has been poorly documented. Therefore, we examined the correlation between HL and utility-based HRQOL scores in participants undergoing cardiac rehabilitation.
Methods
The data of 448 participants undergoing cardiac rehabilitation from the Kobe-Cardiac Rehabilitation Project for People Around the World (K-CREW) clinical trial were analyzed. Participants were divided into low and high HL cohorts. We used the 14-item Health Literacy Scale (HLS-14) to assess HL and the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire to assess HRQOL at discharge. The utility scores of the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire were calculated. The median age was 71.0 [61.0–78.0] years, 75.7% of participants were male, and 60% had a low HL.
Results
Median utility score was 0.88 [0.75–1.00]. Regarding the dimensions of the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, more than 60% of participants responded positively to the severity level of “no problem.” In the comparative analysis, the low HL cohort had a statistically significantly lower utility score than that of the high HL cohort (p-value = 0.03). The multivariate analysis revealed that the HLS-14 scores were not statistically significantly correlated with the utility scores.
Conclusion
Participants with low HL had lower HRQOL in the comparative analysis. However, multivariate analysis revealed that HL was not statistically significantly correlated with utility-based HRQOL scores. Future studies should explore the influence of confounding or intermediate variables on the correlation between HL and HRQOL.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The Japanese Circulation Society/the Japanese Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation Joint Working Group (JCS/JACR) 2021 Guideline on Rehabilitation in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease have emphasized the importance of individual health literacy (HL) [1]. HL is defined as “the cognitive and social skills that determine the motivation and ability of individuals to gain access to, understand, and use information in ways which promote and maintain health.” [2] Patients with low HL have difficulties with complex health tasks and abilities, such as understanding health information and having limited access to healthcare; as well as expressing their concerns, emotions, and needs [3]. HL is considered to be essential when interacting with patients; however, medical staff overestimate the HL of patients in clinical practice, and only 14% of patients with low HL understand the content of patient education [4]. Low HL is correlated with poor lifestyle habits that increase the risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) during cardiac rehabilitation [3]. Furthermore, low HL increases mortality and hospitalization rates, while decreasing physical function and activities of daily living [3, 5, 6]. Increasing the level of knowledge of HL in patients results in improved HL-interventions and resultant health outcomes.
The concept of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is correlated with the health and quality of life (QOL); in addition to the physical, psychological, and social well-being of the patient [7]. QOL is an all-inclusive concept encompassing all factors affecting a patient’s life. By contrast, HRQOL includes only those factors related to the patient’s health [8]. Cardiac rehabilitation and increased physical activity have been shown to improve HRQOL [9,10,11]. Moreover, the severity of disease, such as with an increasing New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, is associated with decreasing HRQOL. Therefore, disease preventive management is essential in controlling disease severity [11]. Collecting enough information about the disease is important in the enhancement of disease management and consequent HRQOL [12] HL involves the ability and skill to collect health information.
In a previous systematic review and meta-analysis, the HL status and HRQOL were found to be positively correlated in patients with CVD [13] These studies used disease-specific HRQOL assessments and the Short Form-12 Health Survey; however, the calculation of utility scores were not included in these tools. The utility scores of HRQOL are preference values attached to the overall health status of a patient [14] Utility scores are based on a scale ranging from 0 (death) to 1 (full health) [15, 16] and are useful in the decision-making process regarding choosing an appropriate healthcare intervention or treatment [14] However, the correlation between HL and utility-based health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores has been poorly documented. In the present study, we aimed to examine the correlation between HL and utility-based HRQOL scores in study participants undergoing cardiac rehabilitation. Moreover, based on a comprehensive questionnaire, we hypothesized that study participants with low HL would have lower HRQOL.
2 Methods
2.1 Study design and eligibility criteria
This study was a cross-sectional multicenter clinical trial named, “The Kobe-Cardiac Rehabilitation Project for People Around the World (K-CREW)”. The K-CREW involved four small- and medium-scale hospitals with 200–580 beds. The number of beds was allotted based on the independent criteria of each hospital for the implementation of cardiac rehabilitation in Japan. We included patients who were admitted to these affiliated hospitals between October 1, 2020, to March 31, 2023. The inclusion criteria were as follows: patients with various principal diagnoses who had participated in cardiac rehabilitation; had no short-term hospitalization for medical consultation, such as admission for coronary angiography (CAG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), ablation, and pacemaker battery replacement; and had been hospitalized for more than 5 days. Additionally, the exclusion criteria were as follows: patients with diagnosed, or probable dementia as determined by a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score < 24; inability to walk independently; refusal of informed consent for participation in the study, hospital mortalities; and clinical records comprising data deficits.
First, 9880 patients with CVD were hospitalized during the study period. After adjusting for the inclusion criteria, 3068 patients who participated in cardiac rehabilitation were included. Finally, 448 patients, subsequently referred to as participants after signing informed consent, were included in the statistical analysis, after the application of the exclusion criteria to the remaining patients (Fig. 1).
The participants included, in the final analysis, were divided into the following four sub-cohorts: the “heart failure (HF),” “ischemic heart disease (IHD),” “valve disease,” and “other” cohorts, “Other” referred to conditions such as aortic dissection, aortic aneurysm, and infective endocarditis.
2.2 Phase I cardiac rehabilitation
Phase I cardiac rehabilitation is an in-hospital program consisting of exercises and education [17] Cardiac rehabilitation is initiated within 3 days after admission for cardiac surgery. According to the JCS/JACR 2021 Guideline on Rehabilitation in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease [1], the exercise program includes aerobic exercise and resistance training for 20–40 min/day, 5–7 days/week. In this study, the aerobic exercise program differed slightly among the affiliated hospitals and was implemented for up to 25 min/day. We adjusted the exercise intensity according to either the Borg rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale ranging from an RPE of 11 to 13, or the anaerobic metabolism threshold of the participant [18] Resistance training targeted limb muscles for mainly 10–20 min. Participants education included lectures on disease management and lifestyle modification by a multidisciplinary team of doctors, nurses, registered dietitians, pharmacists, physical and occupational therapists, and health and fitness instructors.
2.3 Assessment of health literacy
The 14-item Health Literacy Scale (HLS-14) questionnaire [19] was used to evaluate HL. The HLS-14 questionnaire had 14 items, using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 point was indicative of the participant strongly agreeing, while 5 points indicated that the participant strongly disagrees. This questionnaire was administered to participants in Japanese. HL was divided into three subclasses: functional, communicative, and critical. Functional HL refers to basic skills in reading and writing, while communicative HL refers to the skills required to participate in everyday activities, extract information, and apply new information. Critical HL refers to more advanced skills used in the critical analysis of information. The HLS-14 questionnaire has demonstrated adequate reliability and validity (Cronbach’s α: 0.81) [19].
2.4 Assessment of HRQOL
We used the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire [20] to assess the HRQOL of the participants, which is a generic instrument for describing and evaluating health. The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is one of the most commonly used measurement systems. [21] The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire has five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression. In addition, this questionnaire has five severity levels: no, slight, moderate, severe, and extreme problems/ unable to. The participants answered each of the five dimensions according to the five severity levels on the questionnaire. The results of the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire were converted into utility scores. We used the Japanese EQ-5D-5L value set to calculate the utility scores [22] that ranged from -0.025 to 1.000 (full health).
2.5 Baseline characteristics and other variables
We extracted the following baseline characteristics from the medical records, at the time of admission: age, sex, body mass index (BMI), employment, whether the participant lived with someone else, comorbidities, and smoking and marital status. Additional variables included the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR); Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) [23]; Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) [24]; as well as the serum hemoglobin, albumin, white blood cell count, and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels. Nutritional risk categories, as determined by the GNRI, were as follows: major (GNRI < 82), moderate (82 ≤ GNRI < 92), low (92 ≤ GNRI ≤ 98), and no risk (GNRI > 98) [23] At discharge, up to three cardiac rehabilitation healthcare professionals evaluated the HLS-14, EQ-5D-5L questionnaires, and cognitive function. Furthermore, one researcher obtained the prescription data from the medical records.
2.6 Statistical analysis
We conducted a comparative analysis of the low and high HL cohorts. First, participants were divided into low and high HL cohorts, with a cutoff of 50 points in HLS-14, as per the original HLS-14 study [19] The normality of each variable was checked using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Based on the results, the Student’s t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for continuous variables. Pearson’s chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests were used for categorical variables. Figure 2 summarizes the response distribution of the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire for the low and high HL cohorts.
Generalized linear mixed models for the utility scores of the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire were calculated, and sub-cohort analyses were conducted. Because the present study used cluster sampling, the institutional identifier of the affiliated hospitals was set as the random effect. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. The following independent variables were selected based on previous studies: age, sex, BMI, education, employment, the participant living with someone else, smoking and marital status, duration of admission, heart failure (HF), ischemic heart disease (IHD), valve disease, congestive cardiac failure (CCF), diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular diseases (CVD), renal disease, mild cognitive impairment (MCI); as well as the GNRI and HLS-14 scores [25,26,27] HF, IHD, and valve disease were the principal diagnoses leading to admission. Sub-cohorts were created according to sex and the principal diagnoses based on previous studies [3, 28, 29] First, models were created for the male and female sub-cohorts, with the exclusion of the variable, sex. Second, the HF and IHD sub-cohort models were calculated, with the exclusion of valve disease.
Analyses were conducted without missing data for all variables. Nonparametric, continuous data were expressed as median values and interquartile ranges. Parametric, continuous data were expressed as means ± standard deviations. We set the significance level to p < 0.05 and used R version 4.3.0 [30]
2.7 Ethics approval and informed consent
The ethics committee of Kobe University (no. 951–1) approved the K-CREW project on August 12, 2020. Furthermore, approval for the conduct of this study was obtained from the ethics committees of each affiliated hospital (Sakakibara Heart Institute of Okayama, Sanda City Hospital, Shinyukuhashi Hospital, and Yodogawa Christian Hospital). This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki [31] Written and signed informed consent was obtained from each participant deemed eligible.
3 Results
3.1 The overall trends
The median age was 71.0 [61.0–78.0] years old, and 75.7% of participants were male. The duration of hospitalization was 15 [12.0–20.0] days, and 98.9% of participants were discharged home. The principal diagnoses, HF, IHD, and valve disease, were 30.6%, 56.9%, and 5.8%, respectively. Other diseases included aortic dissection, aortic aneurysms, and infective endocarditis. The median utility measure was 0.88 [0.75–1.00]. More than 60% of participants positively responded to the severity level of “no problem” in each dimension of the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire.
3.2 Comparative analysis of the low and high HL cohorts
Of all the participants, 60.0% (n = 269) had low HL. The mean HLS-14 scores were 42.2 ± 5.6 and 55.7 ± 4.1 in the low-HL and high-HL cohorts, respectively. A comparative analysis of the low and high HL cohorts revealed statistically significant differences in the following variables: age, MCI, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor use, and utility scores (Table 1). The low HL cohort was older and had a greater frequency of MCI than that of the high HL. Furthermore, the high HL cohort was prescribed ACE inhibitors more often and had higher utility scores than that of the low HL cohort. The utility scores were 0.87 [0.74–1.00] and 0.89 [0.78–1.00] for the low and high HL cohorts, respectively (p-value = 0.03). Figure 2 shows the percentage distribution of responses for each level and dimension of the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire (Fig. 2). For approximately all dimensions of the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, both the low and high HL cohorts responded positively to the severity level of “no problem.” However, the high HL cohort was more likely to respond positively to the severity levels of “no problem” and “extreme problems/ unable to” than the low HL cohort.
3.3 Multivariable analysis of the utility scores
In the generalized linear mixed model, the statistically significant explanatory variables for the utility scores were sex, education, marital status, and duration of admission (Table 2). This analysis revealed that utility scores were higher in male participants who were married, had a greater academic degree than a college education, and had a shorter duration of admission. HLS-14 scores were not found to be statistically significant explanatory variables for the utility scores, with a regression coefficient of 0.001 (95% CI, -0.003 to 0.005). The adjusted R2 value of the model was 0.36.
Moreover, sub-cohort analyses were conducted to determine the proportion of the participants that were male or female, and whether the foremost principal condition was HF or IHD. However, the HLS-14 scores were not statistically significantly correlated with the utility scores, in any of the sub-cohort analyses (Table 3).
4 Discussion
4.1 Summary
This novel study is the first to have found a correlation between HL and EQ-5D-5L questionnaire scores in participants undergoing cardiac rehabilitation. The overall median HRQOL was 0.88, with most participants responding positively to the severity level of "no problem" on the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. In addition, the utility scores in the high HL cohort were statistically significantly higher than those of the low HL cohort. However, the results of the sub-cohort analyses of the generalized linear mixed model by sex and principal diagnosis revealed that the HLS-14 scores were not statistically significantly correlated with the utility scores.
4.2 Comparison with previous studies
A systematic review and meta-analysis included three cross-sectional studies; two included patients with HF and one included patients with IHD [13] The included studies were published between 2011 and 2020; and were conducted in the USA, Australia, and China. The mean age was 60.7–72.0 years old; and in three studies, the rates of low HL ranged from 14.3 to 52.5%. By contrast, the present study was a cross-sectional study that included participants with HF, IHD, and valve disease. The median age was 71.0-years-old, and the rate of low HL was 60.0%. Thus, this study included patients with multiple CVD comorbidities who had targeted cardiac rehabilitation and had a higher rate of low HL than that of previous studies. Regarding regional differences, Japanese populations tend to exhibit lower health literacy compared to other regions, such as Europe. [32] Despite variations in health literacy assessment methods, our present study revealed a higher percentage (60.0%) of patients with low health literacy than the previous review. [13]
The median utility score of the present study was 0.88, and the "no problem" response rate of the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire was high. By contrast, in another systematic review and meta-analysis, the mean utility score was 0.77 [29] EQ-5D-5L questionnaires with high utility scores of 0.87–1.00 are correlated with lower mortality risks than EQ-5D-5L questionnaires with low or middle utility scores [33] Therefore, the participants of the present study who had utility scores closer to 1.00 (full health), may have had a better prognosis. This was evidenced by the rate of participants who were discharged home which was approximately 100%.
This study showed that the utility scores of patients with CCF in Asia were better than those of patients in other regions [12] Zhou et al. (2021) reported that male patients had better HRQOL as measured by the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire than female patients. The severity of the disease is reflected by the magnitude of the utility score. As the disease worsens, the utility score decreases. Furthermore, the utility score is influenced by the personal characteristics and living environment of the patient. Similarly, the multivariate analysis of the present study revealed that utility scores were higher in male participants.
Consequently, it is inadequate to consider regional differences alone. We should focus on the personal characteristics, as well as the family and cultural environments of patients to fully comprehend their HRQOL [21]
4.3 Clinical implications
HRQOL assessments involve disease-specific and comprehensive methods. Many disease-specific assessments were used in a systematic review and meta-analysis involving patients with CCF [12] Disease-specific assessments include the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) [34] and the Improving Chronic Illness Care Evaluation (ICICE) Heart Failure Symptom Scale (HFSS) [28] Disease-specific assessments have often been used in studies on patients with HF and have focused on physical and mental disorders associated with psychosomatic symptoms. In addition, the MLHFQ has been used to assess the treatment response of HF interventions [35] However, these assessments are limited in the evaluation of other diseases. Moreover, the external validity is difficult to determine.
The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is a comprehensive HRQOL assessment. These assessments are more practical, due to their higher completion rates and lower response burdens [33] The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire can be used to calculate the utility scores of several diseases. However, the limitation of comprehensive questionnaires is that they are not very discriminative or responsive [36] The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire has been reported to be affected by the ceiling effect [37] The novelty of the present study was to verify the correlation between HL and utility-based HRQOL scores using the comprehensive EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. However, the findings of this study did not show positive correlations as with the results of previous studies. Considering the advantages and disadvantages of comprehensive and disease-specific assessments, we believe that disease-specific assessments may be more sensitive to HRQOL in patients with CVD.
The systematic review and meta-analysis by Kanejima, et al. included studies showing a positive correlation between HL and HRQOL. In the current study, a comparative analysis of the low and high HL cohorts showed a statistically significant difference in the utility scores of the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. However, multivariate analyses revealed no statistically significant positive correlation between HL and HRQOL, which may have not extended to all patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation. Based on these results, confounding and intermediate variables may have influenced HL and HRQOL. Sex and the principal diagnosis substantially affect HRQOL. [3, 28, 29] Sex and the principal diagnosis were adjusted for sub-cohort analyses in this study; nonetheless, they were not valid confounding or intermediate variables affecting the correlation between HRQOL and HL. Future studies should investigate other confounding or mediating variables influencing the correlation HRQOL and HL, such as self-efficacy and self-care [38] Furthermore, there is a positive correlation between self-care and HL [39] In the current study, 75.8–79.3% of participants responded positively to the severity level of “no problem” for self-care in the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, while 60% had low HL. According to a previous study, patients with low HL experience problems with self-care. Patients with low HL may lack knowledge about their disease. Further investigations of the correlations between HL and HRQOL would assist in the prevention of incorrect interventions or identify patients for whom HL interventions are more effective.
4.4 Study limitations
The present study had several limitations. First, the patients had multiple CVD comorbidities. While there was value in providing an overview of cardiac rehabilitation, we may not have captured the characteristic of each comorbidity. Second, only the data of participants with MCI were analyzed in the study; therefore, the results of the questionnaires might have low reliability. Third, the HLS-14 and EQ-5D-5L questionnaire used were assessments with less objectivity and may have had ceiling effects. Fourth, this study did not include variables associated with HL, such as economic status. Finally, this study may have had selection bias. The eligibility criteria excluded many patients with short-term hospitalizations. Moreover, the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire included mobility as one of the dimensions. The exclusion criterion in this study was the inability to walk independently; therefore, only participants who could walk independently were included. Thus, the number of mobile participants who responded positively to the severity level of "no problem" was higher. The criteria, not found in previous studies may have been strict, leading to higher utility scores owing to selection bias.
5 Conclusion
This study investigated the correlation between HL and utility-based HRQOL scores in participants undergoing phase I cardiac rehabilitation. We hypothesized that the utility-based HRQOL scores would be substantially lower in the low HL cohort than in the high HL cohort. Overall, the median HRQOL score was 0.88, and many participants responded positively to the severity level of "no problem" on the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. The results of the comparative analysis of the low and high HL cohorts supported the research hypothesis. However, multivariate analysis revealed that the HLS-14 scores were not statistically significantly correlated with the utility scores. Confounding or intermediate variables may lead to increased HL and utility-based HRQOL scores; however, sub-cohort analyses according to sex and the principal diagnosis did not reveal any statistically significant results. Although this study used the EQ-5D-5L as a comprehensive questionnaire, disease-specific questionnaires may better capture the correlation between HL and HRQOL. Future studies should be conducted that further explore the confounding or intermediate variables of HL and HRQOL.
Data availability
The data that support the results of this study are available on request from the corresponding author (Kazuhiro P. Izawa). The data are not published to the public due to preventing to spread patient identifiable information.
References
Makita S, Yasu T, Akashi YJ, Adachi H, Izawa H, Ishihara S. JCS/JACR 2021 guideline on rehabilitation in patients with cardiovascular disease. Circ J. 2022;87(1):155–235. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-22-0234.
Nutbeam D. The evolving concept of health literacy. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67(12):2072–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.050PMID-18952344.
Jayasinghe UW, Harris MF, Parker SM, Litt J, van Driel M, Mazza D. The impact of health literacy and life style risk factors on health-related quality of life of Australian patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016;14:68. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0471-1.
Safeer RS, Cooke CE, Keenan J. The impact of health literacy on cardiovascular disease. Vascular Health Risk Manag. 2006;2(4):457–64. https://doi.org/10.2147/vhrm.2006.2.4.457.
Kanejima Y, Izawa KP, Kitamura M, Ishihara K, Ogura A, Kubo I, Shimizu I. Health literacy is associated with activities of daily living of patients participating in cardiac rehabilitation: a multicenter clinical study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416550.
Kanejima Y, Izawa KP, Kitamura M, Ishihara K, Ogura A, Kubo I, Shimizu I. Relationship between health literacy and physical function of patients participating in phase I cardiac rehabilitation: a multicenter clinical study. Heart Vessels. 2023;38(8):1065–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-023-02255-8.
Karimi M, Brazier J. Health, health-related quality of life, and quality of life: what is the difference? Pharmacoeconomics. 2016;34(7):645–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-016-0389-9.
Torrance GW. Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(6):593–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90019-1.
Izawa KP, Watanabe S, Oka K, Hiraki K, Morio Y, Kasahara Y, Iijima S. Age-related differences in physiologic and psychosocial outcomes after cardiac rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehab / Assoc Academ Phys. 2010;89(1):24–33. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181c5607d.
Izawa K, Hirano Y, Yamada S, Oka K, Omiya K, Iijima S. Improvement in physiological outcomes and health-related quality of life following cardiac rehabilitation in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circ J. 2004;68(4):315–20. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.68.315.
Izawa KP, Kasahara Y, Watanabe S, Oka K, Brubaker PH, Kida K, Akashi YJ. Association of objectively measured daily physical activity and health utility to disease severity in chronic heart failure patients: a cross-sectional study. Am Heart J Plus. 2021;10: 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahjo.2021.100051.
Moradi M, Daneshi F, Behzadmehr R, Rafiemanesh H, Bouya S, Raeisi M. Quality of life of chronic heart failure patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Fail Rev. 2020;25(6):993–1006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-019-09890-2.
Kanejima Y, Shimogai T, Kitamura M, Ishihara K, Izawa KP. Impact of health literacy in patients with cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Patient Educ Couns. 2022;105(7):1793–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2021.11.021.
Bakker C, van der Linden S. Health related utility measurement: an introduction. J Rheumatol. 1995;22(6):1197–9.
Shiroiwa T, Ikeda S, Noto S, Igarashi A, Fukuda T, Saito S, Shimozuma K. Comparison of value set based on DCE and/or TTO data: scoring for EQ-5D-5L health states in Japan. Value Health. 2016;19(5):648–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2016.03.1834.
Shiroiwa T, Fukuda T, Ikeda S, Igarashi A, Noto S, Saito S, Shimozuma K. Japanese population norms for preference-based measures: EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, and SF-6D. Qual Life Res. 2016;25(3):707–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1108-2.
Bjarnason-Wehrens B, McGee H, Zwisler A-D, Piepoli MF, Benzer W, Schmid J-P. Cardiac rehabilitation in Europe: results from the European cardiac rehabilitation inventory survey. Euro J Cardiovas Prev Rehab. 2010;17(4):410–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJR.0b013e328334f42d.
Kitamura M, Izawa KP, Ishihara K, Yaekura M, Nagashima H, Yoshizawa T, Okamoto N. Predictors of activities of daily living at discharge in elderly patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Heart Vessels. 2021;36(4):509–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-020-01718-6.
Suka M, Odajima T, Kasai M, Igarashi A, Ishikawa H, Kusama M, Sugimori H. The 14-item health literacy scale for Japanese adults (HLS-14). Environ Health Prev Med. 2013;18(5):407–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12199-013-0340-z.
Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Badia X. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20(10):1727–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x.
Romero M, Vivas-Consuelo D, Alvis-Guzman N. Is Health related quality of life (HRQoL) a valid indicator for health systems evaluation? Springerplus. 2013;2(1):664. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-664.
Ikeda S, Shiroiwa T, Igarashi A, Noto S, Fukuda T, Saito S, Shimozuma K. Developing a Japanese version of the EQ-5D-5L value set. J Nat Inst Public Health. 2015. https://doi.org/10.5555/20153215590.
Bouillanne O, Morineau G, Dupont C, Coulombel I, Vincent J-P, Nicolis I, Aussel C. Geriatric nutritional risk index: a new index for evaluating at-risk elderly medical patients. Am J Clin Nutri. 2005;82(4):777–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/82.4.777.
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.
Cajita MI, Cajita TR, Han H-R. Health literacy and heart failure: a systematic review. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016;31(2):121–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0000000000000229.
Ghisi Melo de GL, Chaves Silva da GS, Britto RR, Oh P. Health literacy and coronary artery disease: a systematic review. Patient Educ Counsel. 2018;101(2):177–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2017.09.002.
Magnani JW, Mujahid MS, Aronow HD, Cené CW, Dickson VV, Havranek E. American heart association council on epidemiology and prevention; council on cardiovascular disease in the young; council on cardiovascular and stroke nursing; council on peripheral vascular disease; council on quality of care and outcomes research; and stroke council. (2018). health literacy and cardiovascular disease: fundamental relevance to primary and secondary prevention: a scientific statement from the American heart association. Circulation. 2018;138(2):e48–74. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000579.
Macabasco-O’Connell A, DeWalt DA, Broucksou KA, Hawk V, Baker DW, Schillinger D, Pignone M. Relationship between literacy, knowledge, self-care behaviors, and heart failure-related quality of life among patients with heart failure. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(9):979–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1668-y.
Zhou T, Guan H, Wang L, Zhang Y, Rui M, Ma A. Health-related quality of life in patients with different diseases measured with the EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review. Front Public Health. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.675523.
R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 3 Sept 2023.
Rickham PP. Human experimentation: code of ethics of W.M.A. British Med J. 1964;2(5402):177. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.5402.177.
Nakayama K, Osaka W, Togari T, Ishikawa H, Yonekura Y, Sekido A, Matsumoto M. Comprehensive health literacy in Japan is lower than in Europe: a validated Japanese-language assessment of health literacy. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:505. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1835-x.
Seo M, Watanabe T, Yamada T, Yano M, Hayashi T, Nakagawa A. The clinical relevance of quality of life in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction. ESC Heart Failure. 2023;10(2):995–1002. https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14270.
Zhang J, Gilmour S, Liu Y, Ota E. Effect of health literacy on quality of life among patients with chronic heart failure in China. Qual Life Res. 2020;29(2):453–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02332-4.
Rector TS, Cohn JN. Assessment of patient outcome with the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire: Reliability and validity during a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pimobendan. Am Heart J. 1992;124(4):1017–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(92)90986-6.
Oga T. The concept and evaluation of health-related quality of life-Let’s measure quality of life! J Jp Soc Resp Care Rehab. 2021;29(3):377–80.
Murasawa H, Sugiyama T, Matsuoka Y, Okabe T, Wakumoto Y, Tanaka N, Shimozuma K. Factors contributing to the ceiling effect of the EQ-5D-5L: an analysis of patients with prostate cancer judged “no-problems.” Qual Life Res. 2020;29(3):755–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02316-4.
Wolf MS, Davis TC, Osborn CY, Skripkauskas S, Bennett CL, Makoul G. Literacy, self-efficacy, and HIV medication adherence. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;65(2):253–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2006.08.006.
Zaben K, Khalil A. Health literacy, self-care behavior and quality of life in acute coronary syndrome patients: an integrative review. Open J Nursing. 2019;09(04):383–95. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojn.2019.94035.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the following people for providing support for this study: Yuichi Matsuda, Ryohei Yoshikawa, Yuta Muranaka, Mitsuyo Okada, Toshimi Doi, Shinichi Shimada, Masashi Kanai, Masato Ogawa, Ayano Makihara, Ryo Yoshihara, and Ayami Osumi.
Funding
This work was supported by grants from JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Numbers JP22K11392), the Hyogo Physical Therapy Association (2022), and the Japanese Circulation Society (2022).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: Yuji Kanejima, Kazuhiro P. Izawa, Masahiro Kitamura, Kodai Ishihara, Asami Ogura, and Ikko Kubo; Methodology: Yuji Kanejima and Kazuhiro P. Izawa; Validation: Yuji Kanejima and Kazuhiro P. Izawa; Formal analysis: Yuji Kanejima; Investigation: Masahiro Kitamura, Kodai Ishihara, Asami Ogura, and Ikko Kubo; Resources: Hitomi Nagashima, Hideto Tawa, Daisuke Matsumoto, and Ikki Shimizu; Writing—original draft preparation: Yuji Kanejima; Writing—review and editing: Kazuhiro P. Izawa, Masahiro Kitamura, Kodai Ishihara, Asami Ogura, Ikko Kubo, Shinichi Noto, Hitomi Nagashima, Hideto Tawa, Daisuke Matsumoto, and Ikki Shimizu; Visualization: Yuji Kanejima; Supervision: Kazuhiro P. Izawa; Funding acquisition: Yuji Kanejima and Kazuhiro P. Izawa. The publication of this manuscript has been approved by all co-authors, as well as by the responsible authorities, tacitly or explicitly, at the institute where the work has been carried out.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The ethics committee of Kobe University (no. 951-1) approved the K-CREW project on August 12, 2020. Furthermore, approval for the conduct of this study was obtained from the ethics committees of each affiliated hospital. This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki [31]. Written and signed informed consent was obtained from each participant deemed eligible. The present study was consisted of Sakakibara Heart Institute of Okayama, Sanda City Hospital, Yodogawa Christian Hospital and Shinyukuhashi Hospital.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kanejima, Y., Izawa, K.P., Kitamura, M. et al. Correlation between health literacy and utility-based health-related quality of life scores in patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation: a multicenter clinical study. Discov Public Health 21, 67 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12982-024-00188-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12982-024-00188-9