Abstract
Background
Investigating the spatial distribution of muscle activity would facilitate understanding the underlying mechanism of spasticity. The purpose of this study is to investigate the characteristics of spastic muscles during passive stretch and active contraction by high-density surface electromyography (HD-sEMG).
Methods
Fourteen spastic hemiparetic subjects and ten healthy subjects were recruited. The biceps brachii (BB) muscle activity of each subject was recorded by HD-sEMG during passive stretch at four stretch velocities (10, 60, 120, 180˚/s) and active contraction at three submaximal contraction levels (20, 50, 80%MVC). The intensity and spatial distribution of the BB activity were compared by the means of two-way analysis of variance, independent sample t-test, and paired sample t-test.
Results
Compared with healthy subjects, spastic hemiparetic subjects showed significantly higher intensity with velocity-dependent heterogeneous activation during passive stretch and more lateral and proximal activation distribution during active contraction. In addition, spastic hemiparetic subjects displayed almost non-overlapping activation areas during passive stretch and active contraction. The activation distribution of passive stretch was more distal when compared with the active contraction.
Conclusions
These alterations of the BB activity could be the consequence of deficits in the descending central control after stroke. The complementary spatial distribution of spastic BB activity reflected their opposite motor units (MUs) recruitment patterns between passive stretch and active contraction. This HD-sEMG study provides new neurophysiological evidence for the spatial relationship of spastic BB activity between passive stretch and active contraction, advancing our knowledge on the mechanism of spasticity.
Trial registration
ChiCTR2000032245.
Similar content being viewed by others
Background
Spasticity is one of the disabling upper motor neuron syndromes following central nervous system (CNS) lesions, which is characterized by a velocity-dependent increase in muscle tone resulting from hyperexcitability of stretch reflex [1]. Studies have shown that the incidence of spasticity is as high as 40% after stroke [2, 3]. It can severely affect the activity of daily living (ADL) and quality of life (QoL) of stroke survivors through various secondary complications [4, 5]. A clear understanding of spasticity may facilitate the development of its interventions, which is important in preventing the onset of spasticity or slowing or limiting its progression [6]. The hyperexcitability of the alpha motoneuron pool is thought to play a critical role in the mechanism of spasticity [7,8,9].
Spasticity is involuntary muscle activity due to diminished regulation of inhibitory reflex pathways [10, 11]. In fact, the loss of descending corticospinal pathways to spinal motoneurons after stroke not only affects reflex excitability but also voluntary movement [12, 13]. The relationship of abnormal muscle activity between spasticity and voluntary movement disorders in stroke survivors still remains unclear [14, 15]. However, the characteristics of spastic muscles during voluntary movement have not been fully understood in the study of spasticity to date. Although different from traditional passive methods, it is essential to assess the response of spastic muscles during voluntary movement [16].
Despite the fact that clinical scales are widely used to evaluate spasticity, several studies have demonstrated their lack of validity and reliability in quantifying the involuntary muscle activity [17, 18]. To address this challenge, the surface electromyography (sEMG) technique was used to assess the reflex muscle response to passive stretch [19,20,21]. However, the conventional sEMG technique limits the sufficient and accurate recording of neuromuscular function [22, 23]. Not restricted to the number of electrodes, the high-density sEMG (HD-sEMG) technique has the potential to explore the spatial distribution of muscle activity through a closely spaced two-dimensional electrode grid, opening new possibilities for exploring the neuromuscular function [24, 25]. Recent studies based on HD-sEMG have demonstrated that muscle activity is spatially heterogeneous, which is associated with the non-uniform distribution and recruitment of motor units (MUs) within the muscle [26, 27]. Comprehensive knowledge of neuromuscular dysfunction associated with spasticity is necessary to further understand its underlying mechanism.
In this study, the HD-sEMG technique was applied to record the biceps brachii (BB) muscle activity of healthy subjects and spastic hemiparetic subjects during passive stretch and active contraction. We hypothesized that the spastic hemiparetic subjects would exhibit heterogeneous activation caused by an excessive response to muscle stretch. We further hypothesized there would be an association between the spatial heterogeneity of spastic BB activity during passive stretch and active contraction.
Methods
Participants
Fourteen spastic hemiparetic subjects (12 male; 47.5 ± 12.1 years) and ten healthy subjects (6 male; 24.3 ± 1.7 years) volunteered to participate in the study. They were all right-handed. The hemiparetic subjects were selected based on the following criteria: (1) hemiplegia secondary to the first ischemic or hemorrhage stroke; (2) modified Ashworth scale (MAS) scored 1–2 for the elbow flexors on the affected side; (3) manual muscle test (MMT) scored greater than or equal to 3 for the elbow flexors on the affected side; (4) not on medication for spasticity; (5) ability to follow instructions and sign an informed consent. Table 1 showed the basic characteristics of all hemiparetic subjects. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University and registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000032245). All procedures were conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki. All of the subjects enrolled in this study signed the informed consent before the experiment procedures.
Experimental protocols
The subjects sat in a comfortable posture on the seat of the isokinetic dynamometer system (CSMi, HUMACNORM, USA), and the axis of motion of their elbow joint was aligned with the axis of rotation of the isokinetic dynamometer. The dominant or hemiparetic forearm and wrist of healthy or hemiparetic subjects were fixed in a neutral position on the anti-gravity customized apparatus, and the trunk was stabilized by straps. Figure 1a showed the initial position of subjects with shoulder abduction and elbow flexion at about 90 degrees. Following familiarization with the whole experimental procedure, the subjects completed the passive and active tasks on the isokinetic dynamometer system.
Passive task. In the passive task, the subjects were instructed to relax completely to perform passive movement of the elbow joint at four different velocities. The velocity sequence was 10, 60, 120, and 180°/s with a 60 s break between each velocity, and 3 trials were performed in each velocity with an interval of 10 s. A trial consisted of two consecutive back and forth movements from the onset position of elbow flexion at 90 degrees to the end position of maximum elbow extension. The process of elbow extension was defined as the passive stretch of the BB, and the data of the first extension process was extracted for subsequent analysis.
Active task. In the active task, the maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) of individual subjects was first measured when the subjects performed three maximum isometric elbow flexions at 90 degrees. Verbal encouragement was provided to ensure maximum contraction. The largest force value of the 3 trials was defined as the MVC amplitude. Then the MVC amplitude of each subject was used to define three submaximal contraction levels respectively. The subjects were instructed to perform isometric elbow flexion for 7 s at a predefined target level in the order of 20%, 50%, and 80%MVC. The real-time visual feedback of force output was displayed on the computer monitor by a green diamond cursor. 3 trials were performed for each submaximal contraction level with 60 s of rest in between to minimize fatigue.
HD-sEMG Acquisition
During both passive and active tasks, HD-sEMG signals from the BB of the dominant arm and the hemiparetic arm were collected in monopolar mode by the REFA system (TMSi, REFA, the Netherlands, sampling frequency 2,000 Hz). As shown in Fig. 1, the electrode array organized in 8 rows by 8 columns, consisting of 64 independent channels with a 2 mm single electrode diameter and a 12 mm inter-electrode distance in both directions. Before placing the electrode array, the position of the BB was determined by palpation. The columns of the electrode array were arranged along the direction of the muscle fibers, and the center of the electrode array was placed on the BB recommended by SENIAM. The reference electrode was placed on the styloid process of the ulna of the tested arm. To prevent displacement, the electrode array and reference electrode were tightly secured by an elastic bandage. Moreover, the surface of the electrodes was filled with conductive gel, and the skin over the belly of the BB was abraded with abrasive paste and cleaned with alcohol.
HD-sEMG analysis
Acquired HD-sEMG signals were processed offline using MATLAB software (R2020a, The MathWorks Inc., MA, USA). The signals were notch filtered at 50 Hz to remove power line interference and bandpass filtered at 20–500 Hz with a 6th-order Butterworth bandpass filter to reduce motion artifacts and noise. Through visual inspection, signals with low signal quality caused by poor electrode-skin contact were excluded and replaced by the linear interpolation of adjacent channels. Passive stretch epochs of different lengths were extracted from the signals during the passive task according to different stretch velocities, and 3 s stable active contraction epochs of all submaximal contraction levels were extracted from the signals during the active task. The epoch with the maximum number of effective channels was selected from three trials of each task to compute the root mean square (RMS) value on the 200ms non-overlapping window and averaged over all windows for each channel:
where u is an sEMG signal for each channel, N is the total number of samples in the 200ms window length, M is the total number of segments of the selected HD-sEMG epoch divided by 200ms window. To highlight the spatial distribution of activation patterns and compare muscle activity among different tasks and subjects, the maximum RMS value (\({RMS}_{max}\)) of the M segments in the three MVCs of each subject is used for their normalization respectively. Then the activation map of the BB based on the normalized RMS (nRMS) values obtained from the 8 × 8 electrode array was constructed:
where \({RMS}_{i,j}\) is the RMS value of the channel located in the i-th row and j-th column of the electrode array. The amplitude of each pixel in the map represents the normalized activation intensity of the BB, so the map can be considered as three dimensions where the altitude in the topographical map is given by \({AM}_{i,j}\). In the nRMS activation maps, blue and yellow pixels indicated low and high BB activity, respectively. For graphical representation, the cubic spline interpolation algorithm was used for the nRMS value, but only the original value was used in data and statistical analysis. The data of healthy subjects and spastic hemiparetic subjects were averaged as the healthy group and spastic group for comparison.
To quantify the global BB activity, the average intensity of the nRMS activation maps across all 64 channels was calculated. To describe the spatial distribution of the BB activity across the electrode grid, the center of gravity (CoG) of the nRMS activation maps was extracted [25]:
where \({AM}_{i,j}\) represented the nRMS activation maps while i and j are the row and column of the electrode array, respectively. Thus, obtained i- and j- coordinates of the CoG are used to represent the lateral-medial and proximal-distal directions of the muscle. Since the passive stretch of 10°/s was recorded from the resting state without inducing muscle activation [28], the nRMS activation maps used to calculate the CoG were all subtracted from it for each subject. The data was further divided into the passive stretch at three stretch velocities and the active contraction at three contraction levels.
Furthermore, the nRMS activation maps were segmented to identify the location of the activation area to calculate the area overlapping. In this study, an h-dome transform \({D}_{h}\)(AM) was applied over the image AM, and a morphological opening (γ) was applied to the resulting image \({D}_{h}\) [27]. When more than one cluster was identified, only the channels within the cluster with the highest nRMS value were considered as the relevant channels [29]. Figure 4a showed an example of segmentation with the relevant channels indicated by black dots. Afterward, the overlapping degree of the identified activation area was calculated as the intersection of the clusters, which is the number of relevant channels common to each pair of clusters. The number of identified relevant channels in the largest activation area of the two clusters was used to normalize the overlapping degree [30]. After segmenting the nRMS activation maps of individual tasks, two different overlapping degrees of the identified activation area were calculated. The first was the ‘within-task’ overlapping degree. Specifically, for a given subject, the overlapping degree was calculated between all possible stretch velocity pairs or between all possible contraction level pairs. As illustrated in Fig. 4b, the average ‘within-task’ overlapping degree identified from the nRMS activation maps of the three stretch velocities for the spastic group (82.3% ± 14.3) and the three contraction levels for the healthy group and spastic group (84.7% ± 10.0; 83.5% ± 14.6) were all higher than 80%. In order to quantitatively compare the BB activity distribution activated through the two tasks, the data of three stretch velocities and three contraction levels were averaged as the passive stretch and active contraction, respectively. The second was the ‘between-tasks’ overlapping degree, which was calculated between tasks that belonged to passive stretch and active contraction.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed in the software IBM SPSS Statistics version 21 (SPSS Inc., IL, USA). Data summarized in the text and figure are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05 for all tests. In the comparison of global BB activity, the two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures was applied to assess the effects of the group (healthy group and spastic group) and task (four stretch velocities and three contraction levels separately) on the average intensity. In all cases, significant differences revealed by two-way ANOVA were followed by the post hoc independent sample t-test to compare the differences between the two groups at the same task and one-way ANOVA to compare the differences among different tasks within the same group. Since the healthy group did not show a significant increase in reflex activity, only the data on the spatial distribution of BB activity in the spastic group were considered during passive stretch. In order to test whether the spatial distribution of the spastic BB had changed during active contraction, the independent sample t-test was conducted to analyze the i- and j- coordinates of the CoG. In the comparison of the spatial distribution of BB activity during passive stretch and active contraction within the spastic group, the paired sample t-test was conducted to analyze the i- and j- coordinates of the CoG.
Results
Spastic group VS. healthy group
Figure 2 presents the nRMS activation maps (Fig. 2a), and the average intensity of the nRMS activation maps (Fig. 2b) of the healthy group and spastic group at four stretch velocities during the passive task. As the velocity increased, the spastic BB exhibited heterogeneous activation while the healthy BB had no obvious activation. The two-way ANOVA analysis showed that the group (F = 44.112, p = 0.000) and task (F = 3.249, p = 0.026) had a significant effect on the average intensity. The post hoc analysis of the independent sample t-test indicated that the average intensity of the spastic group was significantly higher than the healthy group at 10˚/s, 60˚/s, 120˚/s, and 180˚/s (p = 0.013, p = 0.002, p = 0.001, p = 0.000). The post hoc analysis of the one-way ANOVA in the spastic group showed that the average intensity of 120˚/s and 180˚/s was significantly higher than that of 10˚/s (p = 0.015, p = 0.002), as shown in Table 2.
Figure 3 presents the average nRMS activation maps (Fig. 3a), and the average intensity of the nRMS activation maps (Fig. 3b) of the healthy group and spastic group at three contraction levels during the active task. It could be seen that the higher nRMS values of the healthy group were scattered in the proximal and distal directions, while those of the spastic group were mainly clustered in the proximal direction. Specifically, there were two EMG peaks for the healthy group, whereas only one EMG peak was observed in the spastic group. The two-way ANOVA analysis showed a significant effect of the group (F = 14.564, p = 0.000) and task (F = 52.844, p = 0.000) on the average intensity. The post hoc analysis of the independent sample t-test indicated that the average intensity of the spastic group was significantly higher than the healthy group at 20%MVC and 50%MVC (p = 0.000, p = 0.004). The post hoc analysis of the one-way ANOVA of both the healthy and spastic groups showed that the average intensity of 50%MVC and 80%MVC was significantly higher than that of 20%MVC (p = 0.000, p = 0.000; p = 0.003, p = 0.000), and the average intensity of 80%MVC was also significantly higher than that of 50%MVC (p = 0.000; p = 0.034). For the spatial distribution of BB activity during active contraction, the independent sample t-test showed that the i- and j- coordinates of the CoG in the spastic group were smaller than the healthy group (4.51 ± 0.29 vs. 4.74 ± 0.30, p = 0.001; 4.45 ± 0.11 vs. 4.51 ± 0.12, p = 0.037), which suggested a lateral and proximal shift of its CoG (Fig. 4b).
Passive stretch VS. active contraction
Figure 4 illustrates the average nRMS activation maps and their segmentation examples (Fig. 4a), and the overlapping degree of the identified areas (Fig. 4b), and the mean CoG position of the nRMS activation maps (Fig. 4c) during passive stretch and active contraction in the spastic group and healthy group. The red dotted lines indicate the area where the mean CoGs are plotted. It could be observed that in the spastic group, most of the activation area of the passive stretch did not overlap with the active contraction. Figure 4b confirmed the result: the area overlapping between passive stretch and active contraction in the spastic group was only 14.1% ± 13.4. Comparison of the CoG in the spastic group by the paired sample t-test also showed that the passive stretch and active contraction resulted in significantly different EMG distribution in the proximal-distal direction (4.58 ± 0.24 vs. 4.45 ± 0.11, p = 0.005). The j- coordinate of the CoG during passive stretch was larger when compared with the active contraction, which indicated a more distal location of its CoG.
Discussion
There were three main findings drawn from this HD-sEMG study: (1) the spastic group showed velocity-dependent heterogeneous activation during passive stretch; (2) the spastic group showed higher activation intensity as well as more lateral and proximal location of the activation center than the healthy group during active contraction; (3) the activation center of passive stretch was situated at a more distal location than the activation center of active contraction in the spastic group, and most of their activation areas did not overlap. The comprehensive knowledge of neuromuscular dysfunction associated with spasticity not only helps to understand its mechanism but also assists in adjusting targeted intervention and formulating personalized rehabilitation.
Stroke-induced changes in activation intensity and distribution of BB
When compared to the healthy group, the spastic group exhibited a significant increase in the reflex EMG response to the rapid passive stretch, which reflected the presence of a hyperexcitable stretch reflex. Consistent with previous studies on inducing spasticity [20, 28, 31], the observed global BB activity in the current study was positively correlated with stretch velocity in spastic hemiparetic subjects. It can be explained by that the velocity-dependent increase in reflex excitability is mediated by deficient inhibitory input directed to the spinal cord after CNS lesions [17]. Although the selected velocity of 10˚/s was not deemed to have elicited the stretch reflex response, the spastic group also displayed a higher baseline EMG intensity than the healthy group, presumably due to the increased background activity at rest [32, 33]. The activation pattern of the muscle can be revealed by activation distribution [34], while the spatial distribution of spastic muscles during passive stretch has been rarely investigated. These findings serve to support our hypothesis that the involuntary muscle activity induced by spasticity is spatially heterogeneous, indicating the non-uniform recruitment of MUs in the presence of spasticity. The global BB activity analysis also showed that the activation intensity of the spastic group was significantly higher than that of the healthy group when performing 20%MVC and 50%MVC active contraction. This is attributable to the requirement that hemiparetic subjects need to recruit more high-threshold MUs to produce a given level of contraction due to the reduced firing rate of MUs [13, 35]. This difference was not observed in the high-level contraction of 80%MVC, which may be related to the inability of hemiparetic subjects to effectively recruit more high-threshold MUs. In our spatial distribution analysis of BB activity during active activation, we found that the healthy group had two EMG peaks, while the spastic group had only one EMG peak. Studies have confirmed that the innervation zone (IZ) located at a midway point between the origin and insertion of the BB has the smallest EMG intensity [13, 36, 37], which may be involved in the separation between EMG peaks in the healthy group. We also found that the center of spastic BB activity was positioned more lateral and proximal than that of healthy BB activity. Recent evidence from the HD-sEMG study shows that the spatial heterogeneity of muscle activity is related to the spatial dependency of MUs control [38,39,40], and the healthy subjects mainly activate the short head of the BB during active contraction at 90˚ elbow flexion [41]. Therefore, these results suggested that the spatial recruitment pattern of MUs had changed in spastic hemiparetic subjects.
Relationship between activation distribution of spastic BB during passive stretch and active contraction
Given that spasticity is related to voluntary movement, we compared the spatial distribution of spastic BB activity during passive stretch and active contraction in hemiparetic subjects. Our results revealed a low degree of overlapping (14.1% ± 13.4) between identified activation areas of the spastic BB during passive stretch and active contraction, while their respective area overlapping between different stretch velocities of passive stretch and between different contraction levels of active contraction were all above 80%. These results suggested that the MUs recruitment patterns of spastic BB were similar within the subtasks of passive stretch or active contraction, whereas the patterns were different between the passive stretch and active contraction. Previous studies have shown that upper limb function can predict upper limb spasticity and patients with poor motor recovery may exhibit increased muscle tone [3, 32]. This may be due to complex interactions between pathological neuromuscular activation resulting from loss of descending corticospinal pathways to spinal motoneurons, yet remains poorly understood. Spasticity is an excessive spinal reflex response during passive stretch, and the motoneuron recruitment is also compressed during active contraction due to altered cortical activation [12, 40]. In our study, we aim to explore the spatial relationship between involuntary and voluntary muscle activity affected by descending pathway damage after stroke. We provide new spatial evidence for an inverse relationship between muscle tone and motor function, consistent with earlier studies. Davidowitz et al. and Turpin et al. also found that the modulation of the stretch reflex was associated with the degree of functional impairment caused by stroke [14, 15]. Therefore, it can be speculated that the affected MUs may not be inhibited during involuntary spastic BB activity and may not be recruited during voluntary spastic BB activity, resulting in opposite MU recruitment patterns. Since the number of MUs is certain, the more MUs are affected, the fewer MUs can be recruited voluntarily, and vice versa. The relationship between passive stretch and active activation is not only manifested in the spatial complementarity of activation areas, but also in the more distal distribution of passive stretch than active activation. It has been reported that the distal muscles of stroke survivors are more severely injured than the proximal muscles [42,43,44], and the proximal and distal regions within a muscle have different activation patterns [45, 46]. Muscles are innervated by neural signals from the motoneuron pool [24], and studies have shown that there are some maladaptive changes in the spinal cord after CNS lesion [47, 48]. Therefore, the neural drive to some regions of the spastic BB may be cortical-independent during passive stretch, leading to unwanted recruitment of distal MUs.
Several limitations of this study need to be acknowledged. Firstly, this study includes a relatively small sample size. Secondly, the age distribution between the healthy group and the spastic group is not exactly matched. Our findings revealed that only the spastic group showed heterogeneous activation induced by spasticity during passive stretch, supporting that this age difference did not significantly impact the results. Since the different ages may have different motor control capabilities, the impact of age might exist in the active contraction. However, the impact of age is likely minimal given that the comparison between passive stretch and active contraction is performed within the spastic group. These findings demonstrate significant changes in the neuromuscular characteristics of spastic hemiparetic subjects. More age-matched subjects should be recruited for further investigation to confirm the significance of our findings. Thirdly, the HD-EMG decomposition technique would help to provide direct evidence regarding the underlying mechanism of spasticity on the MU level. From this perspective, the findings in our current work can provide guidance for HD-EMG decomposition, and more in-depth discussions should be conducted in conjunction with the decomposition technique in the future. Finally, a cross-sectional study could not dynamically reflect the adaptive changes of the spinal cord during recovery after stroke. Recording from the longitudinal study could have provided additional information on the different responses of spastic muscles during passive stretch and active contraction.
Conclusions
This study explored the neuromuscular changes in spastic hemiparetic subjects using the HD-sEMG technique and found a velocity-dependent heterogeneous activation response to passive stretch. Furthermore, our findings add to new evidence implicating a spatial relationship of spastic BB activity between passive stretch and active contraction, which has important implications for understanding the mechanism of spasticity.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- %HD-sEMG:
-
high-density surface electromyography
- BB:
-
biceps brachii
- MUs:
-
motor units
- CNS:
-
central nervous system
- ADL:
-
activity of daily living
- QoL:
-
quality of life
- MAS:
-
modified Ashworth scale
- MMT:
-
manual muscle test
- MVC:
-
maximum voluntary contraction
- RMS:
-
root mean square
- CoG:
-
root mean square
- ANOVA:
-
root mean square
- IZ:
-
innervation zone
References
Lance JW. The control of muscle tone, reflexes, and movement: Robert Wartenbeg Lecture. Neurology. 1980;12:1303–1303.
Zorowitz RD, Gillard PJ, Brainin M. Poststroke spasticity: sequelae and burden on stroke survivors and caregivers. Neurology. 2013;80(3 SUPPL2):S45–52.
Opheim A, Danielsson A, Alt Murphy M, Persson HC, Sunnerhagen KS. Early prediction of long-term upper limb spasticity after stroke: part of the SAL GOT study. Neurology. 2015;85(10):873–80.
Sunnerhagen KS, Olver J, Francisco GE. Assessing and treating functional impairment in poststroke spasticity. Neurology. 2013;80(3 SUPPL2):S35.
Brainin M. Poststroke spasticity: treating to the disability. Neurology. 2013;80(3 SUPPL2):S1.
Ward AB. A literature review of the pathophysiology and onset of post-stroke spasticity. Eur J Neurol. 2012;19(1):21–7.
Lee., Toda T, Kiyama H, Yamashita T. Weakened rate-dependent depression of Hoffmann’s reflex and increased motoneuron hyperactivity after motor cortical infarction in mice. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5(1):e1007–9.
Brocard C, Plantier V, Boulenguez P, et al. Cleavage of na + channels by calpain increases persistent na + current and promotes spasticity after spinal cord injury. Nat Med. 2016;22(4):404–11.
Boulenguez P, Liabeuf S, Bos R, et al. Down-regulation of the potassium-chloride cotransporter KCC2 contributes to spasticity after spinal cord injury. Nat Med. 2010;16(3):302–7.
Charles PD, Gill CE, Taylor HM, et al. Spasticity treatment facilitates direct care delivery for adults with profound intellectual disability. Mov Disord. 2010;25(4):466–73.
Sangari S, Perez MA. Imbalanced corticospinal and reticulospinal contributions to spasticity in humans with spinal cord injury. J Neurosci. 2019;39(40):7872–81.
Shin H, Suresh NL, Rymer WZ, Hu X. Relative contribution of different altered motor unit control to muscle weakness in stroke: a simulation study. J Neural Eng. 2018;15(1).
Bhadane M, Liu J, Rymer WZ, Zhou P, Li S. Re-evaluation of EMG-torque relation in chronic stroke using linear electrode array EMG recordings. Sci Rep. 2016;6(February):1–10.
Davidowitz I, Parmet Y, Frenkel-Toledo S, et al. Relationship between spasticity and Upper-Limb Movement Disorders in individuals with Subacute Stroke using Stochastic Spatiotemporal modeling. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2019;33(2):141–52.
Turpin NA, Feldman AG, Levin MF. Stretch-reflex threshold modulation during active elbow movements in post-stroke survivors with spasticity. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017;128(10):1891–7.
Wang H, Huang P, Li X, Samuel OW, Xiang Y, Li G. Spasticity assessment based on the maximum isometrics voluntary contraction of upper limb muscles in post-stroke hemiplegia. Front Neurol. 2019;10(MAY):1–10.
Malhotra S, Cousins E, Ward A, et al. An investigation into the agreement between clinical, biomechanical and neurophysiological measures of spasticity. Clin Rehabil. 2008;22(12):1105–15.
Noort JCva. den, Bar-On L, Aertbeliën E et al. European consensus on the concepts and measurement of the pathophysiological neuromuscular responses to passive muscle stretch. Eur J Neurol. 2017;24(7):981-e38.
Wood DE, Burridge JH, van Wijck FM, et al. Biomechanical approaches applied to the lower and upper limb for the measurement of spasticity: a systematic review of the literature. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(1–2):19–33.
Sorinola IO, White CM, Rushton DN, Newham DJ. Electromyographic response to manual passive stretch of the hemiplegic wrist: accuracy, reliability, and correlation with clinical spasticity assessment and function. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23(3):287–94.
Voerman GE, Gregorič M, Hermens HJ. Neurophysiological methods for the assessment of spasticity: the Hoffman reflex, the tendon reflex, and the stretch reflex. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(1–2):33–68.
Huang C, Chen X, Cao S, Qiu B, Zhang X. An isometric muscle force estimation framework based on a high-density surface EMG array and an NMF algorithm. J Neural Eng. 2017;14(4).
Staudenmann D, Stegeman DF, van Dieën JH. Redundancy or heterogeneity in the electric activity of the biceps brachii muscle? Added value of PCA-processed multi-channel EMG muscle activation estimates in a parallel-fibered muscle. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2013;23(4):892–8.
Farina D, Castronovo AM, Vujaklija I, et al. Common synaptic input to motor neurons and neural drive to targeted reinnervated muscles. J Neurosci. 2017;37(46):11285–92.
Jordanić M, Rojas-Martínez M, Mañanas MA, Alonso JF. Prediction of isometric motor tasks and effort levels based on high-density EMG in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury. J Neural Eng. 2016;13(4).
Jordanic M, Rojas-Martínez M, Mañanas MA, Alonso JF. Spatial distribution of HD-EMG improves identification of task and force in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016;13(1):1–11.
Rojas-Martínez M, Mañanas MA, Alonso JF. High-density surface EMG maps from upper-arm and forearm muscles. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012;9(1):1–17.
Lee HM, Huang YZ, Chen JJJ, Hwang IS. Quantitative analysis of the velocity related pathophysiology of spasticity and rigidity in the elbow flexors. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;72(5):621–9.
Gallina A, Botter A. Spatial localization of electromyographic amplitude distributions associated to the activation of dorsal forearm muscles. Front Physiol. 2013;4 DEC(December):1–8.
Gazzoni M, Celadon N, Mastrapasqua D, Paleari M, Margaria V, Ariano P. Quantifying forearm muscle activity during wrist and finger movements by means of multi-channel electromyography. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(10).
Kim DY, Park C, Il, Chon JS, Ohn SH, Park TH, Bang IK. Biomechanical assessment with electromyography of post-stroke ankle plantar flexor spasticity. Yonsei Med J. 2005;46(4):546–54.
Andringa A, Meskers C, van de Port I, van Wegen E, Kwakkel G. Time course of wrist hyper-resistance in relation to Upper Limb Motor Recovery Early Post Stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2020;34(8):690–701.
Chang SH, Francisco Ge, Zhou P, Rymer WZ, Li S. Spasticity, weakness, force variability, and sustained spontaneous motor unit discharges of resting spastic-paretic biceps brachii muscles in chronic stroke. Muscle Nerve. 2013;48(1):85–92.
Zheng Y, Hu X. Elicited finger and wrist extension through Transcutaneous Radial nerve stimulation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2019;27(9):1875–82.
Tang A, Rymer WZ. Abnormal force EMG relations in paretic limbs of hemiparetic human subjects. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1981;44(8):690–8.
Farina D, Merletti R, Nazzaro M, Caruso I. Effect of joint angle on EMG variables in leg and thigh muscles. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2001;20(6):62–71.
Segal RL. Neuromuscular compartments in the human biceps brachii muscle. Neurosci Lett. 1992;140(1):98–102.
Falla D, Gizzi L, Tschapek M, Erlenwein J, Petzke F. Reduced task-induced variations in the distribution of activity across back muscle regions in individuals with low back pain. Pain. 2014;155(5):944–53.
Yao B, Zhang X, Li S, et al. Analysis of linear electrode array emg for assessment of hemiparetic biceps brachii muscles. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015;9(OCTOBER):1–9.
Li X, Holobar A, Gazzoni M, Merletti R, Rymer WZ, Zhou P. Examination of poststroke alteration in motor unit firing behavior using high-density surface EMG decomposition. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2015;62(5):1242–52.
Jarrett CD, Weir DM, Stuffmann ES, Jain S, Miller MC, Schmidt CC. Anatomic and biomechanical analysis of the short and long head components of the distal biceps tendon. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2012;21(7):942–8.
Beebe JA, Lang CE. Absence of a proximal to distal gradient of motor deficits in the upper extremity early after stroke. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119(9):2074–85.
Mima T, Toma K, Koshy B, Hallett M. Coherence between cortical and muscular activities after subcortical stroke. Stroke. 2001;32(11):2597–601.
Tang, Zhang X, Tang X, Cao S, Gao X, Chen X. Surface electromyographic examination of poststroke neuromuscular changes in proximal and distal muscles using clustering index analysis. Front Neurol. 2018;8(JAN):1–9.
Eng JJ, Hoffer JA. Regional variability of stretch reflex amplitude in the cat medial gastrocnemius muscle during a postural task. J Neurophysiol. 1997;78(2):1150–4.
Vieira TMM, Merletti R, Mesin L. Automatic segmentation of surface EMG images: improving the estimation of neuromuscular activity. J Biomech. 2010;43(11):2149–58.
Trompetto C, Marinelli L, Mori L et al. Pathophysiology of spasticity: implications for neurorehabilitation. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014.
Afzal T, Chardon MK, Rymer WZ, Suresh NL. Stretch reflex excitability in contralateral limbs of stroke survivors is higher than in matched controls. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019;16(1):1–10.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank all participants for their time and commitment to this study.
Funding
This work was supported by the Guangdong Science and Technology Plan Project (No. 2020B1212060077), the Shenzhen Science and Technology Research Program (No. JCYJ20220818101602005, SGDX20210823103405040) the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32071316, 32211530049, 82202786).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T.X., L.L., and R.S. contributed to the conception and design of the study. T.X., Y.L., P.X and R.S. acquired and analyzed data. T.X. drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to editing the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of this manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University and registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000032245). All of the subjects enrolled in this study signed the informed consent before the experiment procedures.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no financial or other conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Xie, T., Leng, Y., Xu, P. et al. Mapping of spastic muscle activity after stroke: difference between passive stretch and active contraction. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil 21, 102 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-024-01376-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-024-01376-z