Erratum
The original publication [1] is missing one reference in the reference list. This reference should be also cited within the text. This error was caused during typesetting. The publisher apologizes to the readers for the inconvenience caused. The correct reference and citation can be found here:
13. Martin Bland J, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet. 1986. 327(8476):307-10. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8.
The Bland-Altman [13] analysis of agreement method was used to compare local and central measurements.
Reference
Arch BN, Blair J, McKay A, Gregory JW, Newland P, Gamble C. Measurement of HbA1c in multicentre diabetes trials – should blood samples be tested locally or sent to a central laboratory: an agreement analysis. Trials. 2016;17:517. doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1640-6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1640-6.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Cite this article
Arch, B.N., Blair, J., McKay, A. et al. Erratum to: Measurement of HbA1c in multicentre diabetes trials – should blood samples be tested locally or sent to a central laboratory: an agreement analysis. Trials 18, 164 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1914-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1914-7