Abstract
The global energy sector is currently undergoing a transformative shift mainly driven by the ongoing and increasing demand for clean, sustainable, and reliable energy solutions. However, integrating renewable energy sources (RES), such as wind, solar, and hydropower, introduces major challenges due to the intermittent and variable nature of RES, affecting grid stability and reliability. Hybrid energy storage systems (HESS), which combine multiple energy storage devices (ESDs), present a promising solution by leveraging the complementary strengths of each technology involved. This comprehensive review examines recent advancements in grid-connected HESS, focusing on their components, design considerations, control strategies, and applications. It provides a detailed analysis of technological progress in various ESDs and the critical role of power conversion, control, energy management, and cooling systems in optimizing HESS performance. Highlighting case studies of some notable and successful HESS implementations across the globe, we illustrate practical applications and identify the benefits and challenges encountered. By addressing these challenges, HESS can significantly enhance the efficiency and reliability of RES, supporting the shift towards a sustainable and resilient energy infrastructure. The paper concludes by identifying future research directions, highlighting the development of intelligent control systems, sustainable materials, and efficient recycling processes to ensure the widespread adoption and long-term viability of HESS.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Introduction
The global energy sector is facing critical challenges due to increasing energy demand and the need to combat climate change (Adediji et al., 2023; Adeyinka et al., 2023; Mbelu et al., 2024). Traditional fossil fuel-based energy infrastructure is increasingly recognized as unsustainable due to its significant environmental impact (Cowell & De Laurentis, 2022). The combustion of coal, oil, and natural gas for energy is a leading cause of global warming and air pollution, contributing to health issues and environmental degradation (Jiang et al., 2023). The release of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases (GHGs) from fossil fuel combustion increases the greenhouse effect, leading to higher global temperatures and more frequent extreme weather events (Singh et al., 2023). These environmental changes endanger ecosystems, human health, water resources, and agriculture, necessitating urgent action to mitigate their impacts (Weiskopf et al., 2020). The urgency to transition to cleaner energy systems is driven by international agreements such as the Paris Agreement and Sustainable Development Goals, which call for substantial reductions in GHG emissions to reduce global temperature rise (McCollum et al., 2018). These agreements highlight the global consensus on the need to limit temperature rise to significantly less than 2 °C above pre-industrial levels, with efforts to limit the increase to 1.5 °C to avoid the most catastrophic impacts of climate change (Gao et al., 2017; Warren et al., 2022). Achieving these targets necessitates a shift away from fossil fuels towards RES, which are abundant, sustainable, and environmentally benign (Sharma et al., 2023).
The global push for renewable energy has been driven by both environmental concerns and the economic potential of green technologies. Renewable energy sources have emerged as crucial alternatives to fossil fuels because they contribute to energy security by diversifying the energy supply, reducing reliance on fossil fuels, lowering GHG emissions, and mitigating the impacts of climate change (Chen et al., 2023). In recent years, the installation of renewable energy systems has accelerated dramatically. According to the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), the total capacity for renewable energy reached 2813 gigawatts (GW) by the end of 2020, with solar and wind power experiencing the most significant growth (IRENA, 2023) and estimated to reach 7 300 GW by 2028 (IEA, 2023), further highlighting the momentum behind the global energy transition.
Solar power has seen remarkable growth, contributing to three-quarters of renewable capacity installations globally (IEA, 2023). The rapid decline in the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) of photovoltaic (PV) technology has made solar energy increasingly competitive with traditional energy sources (G. He et al., 2020). Innovations in PV materials, manufacturing processes, and installation techniques have improved efficiency and reduced costs, enabling widespread adoption (Schmela et al., 2023). Similarly, wind power continues to expand, with a global capacity of around 1000 GW at the end of 2023. Technological advancements in materials, turbine design, and control systems have significantly improved the cost-effectiveness and efficiency of wind energy (Alex, 2024).
Despite these advancements, integrating RES into the existing power grid presents challenges due to their intermittent and variable nature (Ayamolowo et al., 2020; Purkait et al., 2024). Unlike traditional fossil fuel plants, which can provide a reliable and controllable power output, renewable energy generation fluctuates with the weather and time of day, leading to periods when energy production is either insufficient or excessively high compared to demand (Deguenon et al., 2023). This variability can cause instability and reliability issues in the power grid, which has traditionally been designed for the steady output of fossil fuel plants (Benzohra et al., 2020). The intermittency of power generated from RES can lead to challenges for grid integration due to mismatches between energy supply and demand (Mlilo et al., 2021). These often require grid operators to balance these fluctuations in real time to avoid frequency deviations, voltage drops, and power outages (Khalid, 2024).
Energy storage devices (ESDs) are essential in addressing these challenges by saving excess energy generated during periods of high production and making it available during periods of low production (Kebede et al., 2022). ESD, such as batteries, pumped hydro storage, and flywheels, provides various benefits, including load leveling, frequency regulation, and backup power during outages, enhancing grid stability and reliability (Chong et al., 2016; Tan et al., 2021). However, no single storage technology can effectively address all grid stability and reliability requirements. This is where the hybrid energy storage systems come into play. HESS combines different energy storage technologies to provide short-term high power output and long-term energy storage solutions (Y. Wang et al., 2020). By buffering the intermittency of RES, HESS enhances grid stability, improves energy reliability, and reduces the dependence on auxiliary fossil fuel power plants, thereby facilitating a smoother transition to a renewable energy-dominated grid.
Furthermore, HESS is particularly crucial for non-interconnected power systems, such as those found on isolated islands. Fotopoulou et al. (2024) emphasize the importance of HESS in these environments, highlighting their role in mitigating power quality issues and providing essential ancillary services like frequency regulation, voltage control, and black start capabilities. The versatility and reliability of HESS make them an indispensable component for enhancing the sustainability and operational efficiency of isolated grids, which face unique challenges compared to interconnected systems (Fotopoulou et al., 2024).
Table 1 provides an overview of review studies on HESS. Even though few reviews on some important HESS concepts have been published (Abo-Khalil et al., 2023; Arsad et al., 2022; Chatzigeorgiou et al., 2024; Emrani & Berrada, 2024; Lei et al., 2023a, 2023b; Lin & Zamora, 2022; Modu et al., 2023; Rezaei et al., 2022; Wali et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2022), a detailed understanding of the advances in HESS and their role in enhancing renewable energy integration into the power grid and case studies of successful installation of grid-connected HESS were not considered. Consequently, a timely and contemporary review of grid-connected HESS is vital for information and knowledge updates.
By examining the current state of HESS, its applications, benefits, and challenges, this paper will provide a comprehensive overview of how these systems can support the transition to a sustainable energy infrastructure. The organization structure of this article is as follows: the overview of the technology, components, design considerations, types of hybrid systems, control systems, topologies, and applications of HESS are reviewed in Sect. "An overview of hybrid energy storage systems". The recent technological development focusing on advanced control strategies for enhancing renewable energy integration are discussed in Sect. "Technological advancements in HESS control strategies for enhancing renewable energy integration". Sect. "Case studies of successful implementation of HESS" explores the case studies of the successful implementation of HESS around the world. Finally, the challenges and future directions for research and development are discussed in Chapter 5.
An overview of hybrid energy storage systems
Hybrid energy storage systems are advanced energy storage solutions that provide a more versatile and efficient approach to managing energy storage and distribution, addressing the varying demands of the power grid more effectively than single-technology systems. HESS has transformed from conceptual frameworks into advanced systems integrating multiple energy storage technologies, evolving through continuous advancements and innovations. The development trend of HESS results from the growing demand for efficient and reliable energy storage solutions to tackle the challenges posed by modern energy systems. Figure 1 provides an overview of the technological development of HESS. The technological roadmap illustrates the evolution and future directions of hybrid energy storage technologies. It provides a visual representation of milestones, advancements, trends and projects for future advancements in the development of HESS.
Components of HESS
Each component in a HESS has distinct functions that enhance the reliability and efficiency of the system. Figure 2 provides an overview of the interconnectivity between the components of HESS. The primary elements of HESS and their functions are:
Energy storage devices (ESD)
Energy storage devices are the core components of HESS, responsible for saving excess energy generated during periods of high production and supplying it during periods of high demand (Hassan et al., 2023a, 2023b). This ensures a stable and reliable energy supply, meeting load balancing, grid stabilization, and energy management needs. Different types of ESD are integrated into HESS to leverage their unique strengths and mitigate their weaknesses. These include batteries, supercapacitors, flywheels, pumped hydro, super magnets, compressed air, and hydrogen, which are used to store energy in various forms (Gusain et al., 2021; Worku et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2021a, 2021b). Table 2 provides a comparison of different ESDs reviewed in this study, focusing on metrics such as energy density, power density, efficiency, cost, and the times required for charging and discharging.
Power conversion system
The power conversion system (PCS) converts energy between different forms to ensure compatibility and efficient integration with the power grid (Atawi et al., 2023). The PCS includes bidirectional inverters, rectifiers, and converters that convert direct current from energy storage devices to alternating current for grid supply and vice versa. This bidirectional capability enables seamless energy flow management and allows the charging and discharging of ESDs. The PCS is essential for maintaining voltage stability and regulating the frequency of the electricity supplied to the grid (Jarosz, 2024). By interfacing with the ESDs, the control system and the energy management system (EMS), the PCS ensures that energy is efficiently converted and delivered to meet real-time demand.
Control system
The control system is a critical component of HESS, responsible for managing and regulating the operation of the ESDs and ensuring their optimal performance (Lin & Zamora, 2022). The control system uses advanced control algorithms and safety protocols to continuously monitor the status of the energy storage devices, including state of charge, health, and operating conditions. It uses this information to make real-time decisions about when to charge or discharge the storage devices to prevent overcharging, deep discharging, and overheating issues (Hajiaghasi et al., 2019). Furthermore, the control system coordinates the operation of the power conversion system (PCS) and the energy management system (EMS) to ensure a balanced and stable energy supply. For instance, the control system can rapidly respond to short-term power fluctuations by adjusting the output of the storage devices, helping to stabilize the grid and prevent outages or frequency deviations. The control system also interfaces with the cooling system to manage the thermal conditions of the storage devices, ensuring they operate within safe temperature limits.
Energy management system
The energy management system (EMS) uses advanced algorithms and forecasting techniques to predict energy demand and supply, enabling it to dynamically adjust the charging and discharging schedules of ESD (Meliani et al., 2021). One of the primary functions of the EMS is load forecasting. By analyzing historical data, weather conditions, and usage patterns, the EMS can predict future energy demand accurately. This allows it to optimize the charging and discharging cycles of the ESDs (Wazirali et al., 2023). By working in conjunction with the control system, the EMS monitors the status of the ESDs, making real-time adjustments to maintain optimal performance and prevent issues such as overcharging, deep discharging, and overheating.
Cooling system
The cooling system maintains the optimal operating temperature of the ESDs, PCS, and control system to ensure efficiency and longevity. Effective thermal management is needed to prevent overheating, which can degrade performance, reduce efficiency, and shorten the lifespan of ESDs (Nadjahi et al., 2018). The cooling system utilizes various methods, such as air cooling, liquid cooling, and heat sinks, to dissipate excess heat produced during charging and discharging cycles. By keeping the temperature within safe limits, the cooling system ensures that the ESDs operate efficiently and reliably (Zhang et al., 2021a, 2021b). Furthermore, the cooling system is integrated with the control system to dynamically adjust cooling efforts based on real-time temperature data and operational conditions.
Key design considerations for HESS
Designing HESS requires careful consideration of several key factors to ensure optimal performance, efficiency, and reliability. The following are critical design considerations.
Technology compatibility
HESS should be designed for seamless compatibility with existing power systems, renewable generation units, and grid interfaces (R. & Kowsalya, 2024). Ensuring effective communication and adaptation with current grid management tools and demand response systems is critical. The selected combination of storage technologies should complement each other to optimize performance (see Fig. 3 for suggested compatibility and effectiveness of various ESDs for potential HESS configuration). For example, batteries with high energy capacity but limited cycle life can be paired with supercapacitors with high power output and rapid cycling capability. This synergistic approach should be adapted to the specific energy profiles and operational demands of the application, enhancing the overall efficiency and reliability of the HESS.
Capacity sizing
Capacity sizing involves a detailed analysis of energy requirements (kWh) and power demand (kW) over specific periods based on historical data, anticipated growth, and the variability in energy production from renewable sources (Colak & Ahmed, 2021). Recent progress has been made in software-based capacity sizing for hybrid systems, which leverages advanced computational tools and algorithms to optimize system performance and cost-effectiveness (Lian et al., 2019). Tools like RETScreen, Hybrid Optimization by Genetic Algorithms (iHOGA), and Integrated Simulation Environment Language (INSEL) provide comprehensive energy management, efficiency analysis, and scenario simulations to handle the complexities of renewable energy integration and storage management (Adeyinka & Kareem, 2018; Canada, 2021; Hoarcă et al., 2023; Sinha & Chandel, 2014). Artificial Intelligence capacity sizing approaches utilizing advanced techniques such as genetic algorithms, neural networks, and fuzzy logic have been increasingly adopted to optimize HESS (Bajpai & Dash, 2012; Zahraee et al., 2016). These AI methods are adept at handling complex, nonlinear relationships in energy systems and can adapt to dynamic conditions, ensuring precise and flexible optimization of storage capacity (Tang et al., 2021). Proper capacity sizing ensures that the HESS can handle peak loads and maintain supply during periods of low energy generation.
System reliability and safety
Designing HESS for reliability and safety involves integrating redundancy to enhance system resilience against failures or unexpected demand spikes and implementing robust safety protocols to manage risks associated with high-energy systems (Reveles-Miranda et al., 2024). This includes measures to prevent thermal runaway in batteries, such as integrating advanced thermal management systems, fail-safe mechanisms, and robust containment strategies to prevent overheating and mitigate failures (A. M. Adeyinka & Olaleke, 2020). Continuous monitoring systems are critical for maintaining the reliability and safety of HESS by using sensors and real-time data analytics to detect and diagnose potential issues, enabling predictive maintenance that extends the life of ESDs and avoids unexpected failures.
Environmental impact
Considering the environmental impact throughout the system’s lifecycle is crucial when designing HESS (Hassan et al., 2023a, 2023b). This involves evaluating the materials used in batteries and other components, focusing on their manufacturability, recyclability, and disposal (Ijaola et al., 2022). Selecting environmentally friendly materials and technologies is essential to minimize the ecological footprint of HESS. Lifecycle assessments should be conducted to assess the environmental impact from production to disposal, ensuring that the design choices contribute to sustainability. These assessments consider factors such as the extraction of raw materials, manufacturing processes, operational efficiency, and end-of-life disposal or recycling. Additionally, integrating recycling strategies that recover valuable materials from used components can reduce the demand for new raw materials and mitigate environmental degradation.
Cost factors
When designing HESS, it is crucial to consider the cost factors, which include upfront capital costs, operational and maintenance costs, and potential replacement costs, which vary significantly based on the technology used (Abo-Khalil et al., 2023). Scalability and potential for future upgrades to adapt to evolving energy demands and integrate new technological advancements, ensuring long-term cost-effectiveness, should be considered (Lei et al., 2023a, 2023b). Furthermore, assessing the economic viability includes considering financial incentives and revenue generation opportunities through mechanisms like energy arbitrage and demand response programs, which can significantly offset the initial and operating costs (Gudlaugsson et al., 2023).
Types of hybrid systems
Hybrid systems integrate the strengths of various storage devices to address specific energy storage needs and enhance the overall functionality of energy systems. The heatmap in Fig. 3 illustrates the applications and effectiveness of various combinations of energy storage devices (ESDs) in HESS. The colors indicate the relevance and performance of each combination, with “High”, “Moderate”, and “Low” representing the effectiveness of each pairing.
The heatmap shows that certain combinations, such as lithium-ion with supercapacitors or CAES with flow batteries, exhibit high performance in terms of efficiency and reliability, as indicated by the red areas. These high-performing combinations leverage the unique strengths of each technology to deliver superior results in specific applications, such as grid stabilization, renewable energy integration, and quick response scenarios. However, it is important to consider other factors beyond performance when designing and selecting HESS configurations. The availability of RES, cost, maintenance requirements, and environmental impact are critical factors that influence the overall feasibility and sustainability of HESS. Hence, a comprehensive economic, environmental, and resource availability analysis should be conducted to make informed decisions about deploying HESS.
Recent technological advancements have significantly enhanced the performance, safety, and scalability of various energy storage solutions. These innovations are critical for integrating RES into the grid, mitigating intermittency issues, and ensuring a stable, reliable power supply.
Pumped hydro storage
Pumped hydro storage remains one of the most mature and widely used energy storage technologies. Recent advancements focus on increasing efficiency and reducing environmental impact. Innovations include variable-speed pump-turbine units, which offer greater flexibility and efficiency in energy conversion (Zhao et al., 2022). Additionally, closed-loop systems that do not rely on natural water bodies have been introduced, reducing environmental impacts and expanding the potential for PHS deployment in various geographic locations (Nikolaos et al., 2023). Research into underground pumped hydro storage, using abandoned mines and other subterranean spaces (Lyu et al., 2022) is also underway, offering new possibilities for PHS implementation in regions lacking suitable surface topography. These innovations continue to make PHS a critical component in supporting renewable energy integration and ensuring grid stability.
Compressed air energy storage (CAES)
Recent developments in CAES focus on increasing efficiency and reducing environmental impact. Innovations include adiabatic CAES, which captures and stores the heat generated during compression, improving overall system efficiency (Sarmast et al., 2024). Advanced thermodynamic modeling has also been explored to optimize the design and operation of CAES systems (Zhang et al., 2024). Additionally, developments in cavern storage and the use of abandoned mines for CAES have expanded the potential sites for implementation, addressing geographical limitations and reducing environmental impacts.
Flywheel energy storage systems (FESS)
Flywheels have benefitted from advancements in high-strength materials and magnetic bearing technology (Li & Palazzolo, 2022). Developing composite materials for the flywheel rotor has improved energy storage capacity and efficiency by allowing higher rotational speeds. Additionally, magnetic bearings reduce friction and wear, enhancing overall durability and reducing maintenance requirements (Hiroshima et al., 2015). These improvements make flywheels viable for stabilizing grid frequency and providing short-term energy storage.
Battery energy storage system (BESS)
One of the most promising progresses in this area is the development of solid-state batteries. These batteries use solid electrolytes instead of the liquid ones found in conventional lithium-ion batteries, enhancing safety by reducing the likelihood of leakage and thermal runaway (Janek & Zeier, 2023). They offer higher energy densities, so they can store more energy in a smaller space, making them ideal for stationary and mobile applications. Their improved safety profiles and energy densities make solid-state batteries a key component in the next generation of HESS.
Flow batteries are also gaining significant attention for their potential in grid-scale applications. These batteries store energy in liquid electrolytes in external tanks, allowing for scalable energy storage capacities (Zhang et al., 2022). The modular nature of flow batteries enables easy scaling by increasing the electrolyte tanks, making them highly adaptable for large-scale energy storage needs. Moreover, flow batteries can maintain their capacity and efficiency over many charge–discharge cycles, which is crucial for long-term, reliable operation in renewable energy systems. Their ability to provide long-duration energy storage is essential for balancing intermittent RES, ensuring a stable and reliable power supply.
Superconducting magnetic energy storage (SMES)
SMES systems have improved with advancements in high-temperature superconductors (HTS) and cryogenic technologies. The development of HTS materials that operate at higher temperatures reduces the cooling requirements and operational costs of SMES systems (Rong & Barnes, 2017). Additionally, improvements in cryogenic cooling systems and magnetic field containment have enhanced the efficiency and safety of SMES (Mitali et al., 2022). These advancements have made SMES a promising option for applications requiring rapid response times and high power density, such as grid stabilization, frequency regulation, and uninterruptible power supplies.
Supercapacitors
Supercapacitors have seen significant advancements in electrode materials and fabrication methods. Incorporating graphene and carbon nanotubes has significantly increased their energy density and lifespan (Pandya et al., 2023). Researchers are also exploring hybrid supercapacitors that combine the high power density of capacitors with the high energy density of batteries, providing an efficient solution for applications requiring quick energy bursts and frequent cycling (Chatterjee & Nandi, 2021).
Hydrogen storage systems
Recent advancements in hydrogen storage systems have significantly improved their efficiency and capacity. Enhanced electrolysis technologies, such as proton exchange membrane (PEM) and solid oxide electrolyzers, have boosted hydrogen production efficiency (Sebastian et al., 2023). Innovations in storage materials, including metal hydrides and porous materials, have increased storage capacity and safety by enabling higher-density storage at lower pressures (Firuznia et al., 2023). Additionally, the development of high-strength composite materials for storage tanks has allowed safer and more efficient high-pressure hydrogen storage.
Thermal energy storage (TES)
Recent advancements in TES have significantly improved efficiency and application potential. Key developments include the use of advanced phase change materials (PCMs) with higher thermal conductivity and stability, enabling more efficient heat storage and retrieval (Wong et al., 2023). Innovations in molten salt storage for concentrated solar power (CSP) plants have enhanced thermal capacity and operational reliability (Ali et al., 2024). Compact thermal energy storage systems have been developed for residential and industrial applications, optimizing space and energy use. Additionally, advancements in thermochemical storage methods, which store energy through reversible chemical reactions, have shown promise for long-term energy storage with high energy density (De Rosa et al., 2021).
HESS topology
HESS topology can be categorized into several structural configurations, each with unique characteristics and operational principles. These configurations are:
Passive structure
In a passive structure, the ESDs are connected directly to the load without active control. Since the terminal voltage of the ESDs is not controlled, the power distribution between different ESDs is governed by their inherent electrical characteristics (Babu et al., 2020). Passive structures are simple and cost-effective, but they may not fully optimize the performance of each storage technology, as there is no active management of power flow or state-of-charge (SOC) balancing.
Semi-active structure
Semi-active structures incorporate a PCS connected to one of the ESDs while the other is connected directly to the direct current (DC) bus (Song et al., 2015). Semi-active structures improve the overall system performance by providing some level of control over the power distribution without the complexity and cost of fully active systems.
Series active topology
In a series active structure, the energy storage devices are connected in series with active control elements, such as converters or inverters, which manage the power flow and ensure optimal operation of each ESD. This structure allows accurate control over the energy distribution and SOC balancing, improving efficiency, and performance.
Parallel active topology
Parallel active structures use active control elements to manage the power flow between parallel-connected storage devices. Each ESD is connected to the DC bus through a converter or inverter, allowing independent control of each component (Ju et al., 2016). This configuration provides high flexibility and efficiency, as each ESD can be operated at its optimal point.
Cascaded active topology
Cascaded active structures connect multiple ESDs in a cascade configuration, with each device managed by its active control element. This setup allows for hierarchical control and energy flow optimization, improving overall system performance and reliability.
Multi-level active topology
Multi-level active structures combine several storage devices in a multi-level configuration, with each level managed by active control elements, as shown in Fig. 4f. This structure provides high efficiency and flexibility, enhancing the overall system reliability and performance of each ESD (Bharadwaj & Maiti, 2017). Each level in the configuration can operate independently or in coordination with others, allowing for accurate control over energy distribution and state of charge (SOC) balancing across the entire system.
Table 3 presents a detailed comparison of various HESS topologies, highlighting their control mechanisms, complexity, cost, performance, reliability, and applications.
Ancillary services offered by grid-connected HESS
HESS offers numerous benefits that significantly enhance energy storage and distribution performance, reliability, and efficiency. By combining multiple ESDs, HESS can address various challenges associated with renewable energy integration, grid stability, enhanced reliability and improving energy efficiency. Some of the ancillary services offered by implementing HESS in modern energy systems are summarized as follows:
-
Energy arbitrage: By buying electricity during off-peak times and selling it during high-peak times, HESS can effectively manage and reduce energy costs (Gbadegesin et al., 2020).
-
Load leveling: Balances out the load on the power grid by storing excess energy during low demand and releasing it during high demand periods (Danish et al., 2020; Londák et al., 2023).
-
Transient stability: HESS enhances transient stability by rapidly responding to sudden changes in load or generation, thereby maintaining system stability and preventing outages (Khan & Khalid, 2021).
-
Frequency regulation: HESS facilitates rapid response to changes in grid frequency, either by absorbing excess power or by injecting power into the grid, making them highly effective in maintaining the grid’s frequency within the desired range (Swapna & Gayatri, 2021).
-
Voltage support: HESS manages the reactive power to maintain the voltage levels within specified limits across the power system, thereby ensuring the quality and reliability of power supply (Abo-Khalil et al., 2023).
Technological advancements in HESS control strategies for enhancing renewable energy integration
Technological advancements in HESS involve optimizing energy management systems, enhancing the efficiency of energy storage devices, and developing advanced control strategies. The primary aim of control strategies in HESS is to enhance system performance, reliability, and efficiency by preventing battery deep discharge, reducing peak power demand, managing charge/discharge cycles, minimizing operational and maintenance costs, maintaining stable DC voltage, and ensuring effective frequency regulation. Figure 5 summarizes the control techniques used in HESS.
Classical control
Droop control
Droop control is a widely used decentralized control strategy for power-sharing and voltage or frequency regulation in HESS and microgrids. It functions by adjusting the output power of individual ESDs based on their respective droop characteristics, which are predefined relationships between the output power and either voltage or frequency (Lu et al., 2014). The purpose of the droop function is to stabilize voltage or frequency within the HESS during load variations or power supply interruptions (Abo-Khalil et al., 2023). Droop control is advantageous due to its simplicity, robustness, and scalability. It allows for plug-and-play operation, where additional storage units can be integrated into the system with minimal configuration, enhancing the flexibility and modularity of the energy storage network (Cingoz et al., 2015; Tayab et al., 2017). However, droop control also has some limitations. It may not accurately share power among units with different characteristics, such as varying capacities or states of charge, and its fixed settings can lead to suboptimal performance under varying conditions. To address this, intelligent droop control strategies, such as adaptive droop control or virtual impedance techniques (Jin et al., 2022), have been developed to enhance the performance and accuracy of power sharing.
Dead beat control (DBC)
Dead beat control (DBC) is used in HESS to rapidly and precisely control power distribution and voltage regulation. Researchers have employed DBC in HESS to manage the dynamic interactions between different storage components, ensuring fast response to fluctuating load demand and renewable energy inputs (Wang et al., 2019). The advantages of DBC include its fast transient response, high accuracy, and ability to eliminate steady-state error. Wang et al. (Wang et al., 2019) developed a deadbeat control strategy for battery–supercapacitor HESS combination in a DC microgrid. Their result showed that the DBC responds faster to sudden power demand than PI controllers. It reduces battery stress and strictly maintains bus voltage with high precision while minimizing hardware costs by requiring fewer current sensors. However, DBC is limited by its sensitivity to model inaccuracies and noise, requiring precise system modeling and noise filtering to maintain performance (De Carolis et al., 2017). Despite these challenges, DBC remains a powerful tool for optimizing the performance and reliability of HESS, particularly in applications requiring fast and accurate control.
Filtration-based control (FBC)
FBCs are commonly used in HESS due to their simplicity and minimal computational requirement (Chong et al., 2016). (Gee et al., 2013) presented a low-pass filter (LPF) method to extend battery life in a small-scale wind-power system using a battery/supercapacitor HESS. Song et al. (Song et al., 2013) proposed an energy management system for HESS based on wavelet transform FBC and neural networks. The hybrid power system comprises solar and wind power subsystems with lithium-ion battery banks and supercapacitors. Their controller maintained the DC voltage and kept the SOC of batteries within the safe range, thus protecting against overcharge and deep discharge. FBC strategies are suitable for a single HESS but require additional power distribution controllers for effective and adaptable multi-HESS operations. This is because FBC cannot distribute proportional power between multiple HESS systems and potential communication delays. Advances in this field focus on developing adaptive and real-time filtering techniques to enhance the robustness and efficiency of FBC.
Sliding mode control (SMC)
Sliding mode control (SMC) is an adaptive control technique for handling nonlinear systems, external disturbances, and system uncertainties (Liu et al., 2020). It operates by driving system states toward a predefined sliding surface and maintaining them there for all subsequent times using high-frequency switching control (Shtessel et al., 2023). SMC has been applied in HESS to manage interactions between different storage components and the power grid, including state of charge regulation, power distribution control, and overall stability and performance (Abo-Khalil et al., 2023). Morstyn et al. (Morstyn et al., 2018) developed a novel use of multi-agent SMC for SOC balancing of battery ESD distributed in a DC microgrid. Their model was able to eliminate circulating current and reach faster SOC balancing, thereby avoiding overloading the battery ESD during periods of high load. Armghan et al. (Armghan et al., 2020) designed SMC for a hybrid AC/DC microgrid to maintain the bus voltages by controlling the frequency during islanding and grid-connected mode. Despite the strength of SMC, challenges like chattering and the need for accurate system modeling remain (Oliveira et al., 2022), prompting future research directions such as developing advanced algorithms to minimize chattering, integrating SMC with AI techniques for adaptive tuning, and expanding its application in distributed energy management (DER) systems.
Rule-based control (RBC)
Rule-based control is a straightforward and intuitive control strategy that operates based on predefined rules and logical conditions to manage the operation of systems. In HESS, rule-based control employs a set of if–then-else rules to determine the actions of different ESDs (Nejabatkhah et al., 2012) based on real-time data like SOC, power demand, and grid conditions. For example, a rule might dictate that if the SOC of a battery falls below a certain threshold, the system should switch to discharging a supercapacitor to maintain power supply. Researchers have utilized rule-based control in HESS for its simplicity, ease of implementation, and ability to integrate expert knowledge into the control process. (Aktaş & Kırçiçek, 2020) presented a novel RBC for battery–supercapacitor HESS in nine modes of operations for off-grid applications. (Thomas & Mishra, 2019) proposed a power management strategy (PMS) for a standalone DC microgrid with PV and wind sources combined with a battery–supercapacitor HESS to regulate the DC bus voltage under varying irradiations and wind power conditions.
The primary advantage of RBC is its simplicity, making it easy to design, understand, and modify. It allows for quick decision-making without complex computations, making it suitable for real-time applications (Liu et al., 2010). Additionally, it is flexible and can be designed for specific system requirements and operational scenarios. However, rule-based control has limitations, including its lack of adaptability and inability to handle unforeseen situations or dynamic changes in the system environment. It relies heavily on the accuracy of the predefined rules, which may not cover all possible scenarios, potentially leading to suboptimal performance or system instability.
Intelligent-based control
Model predictive control (MPC)
Model predictive control (MPC) is an advanced control strategy that uses a dynamic model of the system to forecast future system behavior and optimize control actions within a set time horizon. MPC is employed in HESS to manage the charging and discharging cycles of various storage units, optimize power flow, and enhance overall system efficiency (R. & Kowsalya, 2024). By solving an optimization problem at each control step, MPC can account for system constraints, forecasted energy demand, and renewable energy generation, ensuring optimal performance under varying conditions (Schwenzer et al., 2021). Researchers have successfully applied MPC in HESS for tasks such as state of charge (SOC) balancing (Liu et al., 2023), peak load shaving (Zhang et al., 2018), and energy cost minimization, demonstrating significant improvements in system reliability and operational efficiency. The advantages of MPC include its ability to handle multivariable systems, incorporate constraints directly into the control process, and provide predictive capabilities for proactive decision-making (Darby & Nikolaou, 2012). However, MPC is computationally complex and demanding for real-time applications.
Optimization-based control (OBC)
Optimization-based control (OBC) is an advanced control strategy that formulates the control problem as an optimization problem, aiming to find the best control actions that maximize or minimize a defined objective function under given constraints. OBC uses mathematical algorithms and optimization techniques like dynamic programming, linear programming, nonlinear programming, and metaheuristic approaches to determine the optimal control actions (Babu et al., 2020). In HESS, OBC is employed to optimize power distribution, minimize energy costs, maximize efficiency, balance the state of charge, and enhance the lifespan of ESDs (Shao et al., 2023). For example, an optimization objective might be to minimize the total operating cost by determining the best times to charge and discharge batteries based on electricity price signals. Tetuko et al. (Tetuko et al., 2022) proposed optimal scheduling using nonlinear programming for battery-flywheel HESS for off-grid power generation with renewable energy sources comprising PV and wind turbines. Their approach was to perform power-sharing for each ESD based on minimizing the total project cost, operation and maintenance cost, and life cycle of each ESD. OBC offers a systematic approach to achieving optimal performance of complex, multivariable systems and can adjust to changing conditions and constraints. However, OBC is limited by its high computational complexity, making real-time implementation challenging. It requires accurate models of the system and the environment, and its performance can be sensitive to the quality of these models and the accuracy of the input data.
Fuzzy logic control (FLC)
Fuzzy logic control (FLC) is a powerful and flexible control strategy that uses fuzzy logic to handle the uncertainties and nonlinearities in complex systems (Arcos-Aviles et al., 2019). FLC is used in HESS to manage the charging and discharging processes, balance the SOC across different storage units, and maintain overall system stability (García et al., 2014). An FLC algorithm was implemented to operate the battery and supercapacitor-based HESS optimally (Gamage et al., 2018). Their fuzzy inference system determines the HESS’s optimal charging and discharging rate based on the SOC constraints of the battery and supercapacitor. Zahedi and Ardehali (Zahedi & Ardehali, 2020) developed multiple optimally designed FLCs to manage the power of ESD by minimizing the operational cost of a battery/supercapacitor/fuel cell/wind turbines/photovoltaic collectors HESS system. Vivas et al. (Vivas et al., 2022) proposed a multivariable and multistage fuzzy logic energy management system for grid-connected residential DC microgrids with HESS aimed at optimizing power management and extending the lifespan and performance of the system components. FLC is particularly suitable for a single HESS. However, additional power distribution controllers are required to enhance the effectiveness and adaptability of multiple HESS. Despite its benefits, FLC has limitations, such as the complexity of designing and tuning the fuzzy rules and membership functions, which can become cumbersome for large-scale systems. It may also require extensive simulation and testing to ensure optimal performance across different operating scenarios (Sadollah, 2018).
Artificial neural network (ANN)
ANNs are valuable in HESS because they can learn complex and nonlinear relationships from data, making them effective for SOC estimation, fault detection, and predictive maintenance tasks. An efficient power sharing and management system was developed for battery/supercapacitor PV systems using ANN to balance demand, maintain SOC, and manage DC bus voltage (Singh & Lather, 2020). An ANN energy management controller was developed for a HESS with a multi-source inverter (MSI) to manage the current distribution between a lithium-ion battery and an ultracapacitor by actively controlling the MSI’s operating modes (Ramoul et al., 2018). (Faria et al., 2019) developed a novel ANN-based HESS power management scheme to reduce lithium-ion battery stress under dynamic power exchange conditions. Their proposed power management strategy was able to manage the power flow of the ESDs and charge or discharge power based on their SOC. Despite the advantages of ANN-based control, these systems have limitations, such as requiring substantial computational resources for training, the risk of overfitting, and the need for large amounts of labeled training data.
Reinforcement learning (RL)
Reinforcement learning (RL) is an advanced AI-based technique that enables systems to learn optimal control policies through trial and error by interacting with their environment (Buşoniu et al., 2018; Sutton & Barto, 2018). RL operates by using an agent that makes decisions based on a reward signal, which evaluates the performance of its actions in achieving specific goals (Khan et al., 2012), such as minimizing energy costs, balancing SOC, or maximizing the lifespan of storage units. Researchers have employed RL in HESS to tackle challenges such as managing fluctuating renewable energy inputs, responding to varying load demands, and enhancing overall system efficiency (Perera & Kamalaruban, 2021). (Xiong et al., 2018) proposed a real-time energy management using RL for HESS in plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEV). By learning current driving power information, their algorithm updates the strategy to reduce the energy loss of the HESS.
RL algorithms, like Q-learning and Deep Q-Networks (DQN), are effective in these applications as they can handle high-dimensional state and action spaces and adapt to changing system dynamics in real-time (Kofinas et al., 2018). The main advantages of RL in HESS include its ability to learn and improve control policies over time, adapt to new and unforeseen scenarios, and optimize performance without requiring explicit models of the system (Khan et al., 2012). However, RL is limited by its need for extensive training data, computational resources, and susceptibility to the choice of hyperparameter values (Henderson et al., 2018).
Case studies of successful implementation of HESS
Numerous HESS projects have been successfully deployed, demonstrating their viability and effectiveness in transitioning towards a more sustainable and resilient energy infrastructure. Table 4 presents an overview of successful HESS implementations in different parts of the world, illustrating the various applications and configurations employed. By leveraging advanced storage technologies and smart grid integration, these projects have successfully reduced greenhouse gas emissions, enhanced grid stability, improved energy efficiency, and ensured a reliable power supply.
Challenges and future directions
Figure 6 presents an overview of the current challenges, progress, and future direction of HESS. Advancements in HESS have been rising in recent years, driven mainly by the development of renewable energy sources, advanced energy storage devices, advanced control strategies, and microgrid infrastructure. However, to advance the development of HESS, the following challenges must be addressed:
-
Effective strategies for integrating HESS with existing grid infrastructure: Integrating HESS with existing grid infrastructure is challenging. It requires the development of standardized protocols for communication and control. The bidirectional flow of energy and information between the grid and storage systems needs to be managed in real-time to ensure synchronization and efficient energy dispatch.
-
Improving energy density and efficiency of storage technologies: The energy density and efficiency of storage technologies need significant improvement. Current materials and technologies often fall short of the desired performance, and advancements in these areas are crucial for developing more effective HESS.
-
Compatibility between different ESDs: Compatibility between different ESDs within a hybrid system is complex due to the varying operational principles, management systems, and performance characteristics of each ESD. These differences can lead to inefficiencies and operational difficulties, making seamless integration and efficient management challenging.
-
High initial cost of HESS: The high initial cost of HESS is a significant barrier to widespread adoption. Advanced storage technologies, such as Hydrogen Storage systems, require substantial investment in infrastructure and technology, making them less viable for widespread use without significant financial support.
-
Sizing of HESS: Accurately sizing HESS based on application requirements, cost, and performance constraints is critical. Improper sizing can lead to inefficiencies, either by over-sizing, which increases costs, or under-sizing, which fails to meet energy demands.
-
Safety and reliable operation: Ensuring the safe and reliable operation of HESS, particularly when integrating different chemistries and technologies, is a critical challenge. Different components may have varying maintenance schedules and reliability concerns, such as mechanical wear in flywheels and battery degradation, requiring robust monitoring and predictive maintenance.
-
Developing sustainable materials and recycling processes: Developing sustainable materials and recycling processes is essential to mitigate the environmental impact of HESS. Current technologies often rely on materials that are not environmentally friendly or are difficult to recycle, posing significant challenges.
-
Developing efficient control strategies and power management systems: This is crucial for the optimal operation and coordination of HESS. These strategies and algorithms are needed to balance load, predict demand, and optimize the charge–discharge cycles of the ESDs.
These challenges should be addressed to fully realize the potential of HESS in enhancing energy storage solutions. Overcoming these obstacles will require collaborative efforts in technological innovation, investment, and policy support to ensure HESS can effectively contribute to more widespread adoption and successful integration of HESS in various applications.
Several promising directions can drive the future of HESS. More efficient and safe HESS will become available by exploring new and emerging energy storage devices, such as solid-state batteries. Solid-state batteries offer benefits such as higher energy densities, improved safety, and longer lifespans compared to traditional batteries. Also, focusing on recycling and sustainable practices will help reduce the environmental impact of HESS. The advancement in vehicle-to-grid (V2G) technologies can enhance the flexibility and storage capacity of HESS. The development of intelligent control and optimization based on artificial intelligence will improve system performance, and increasing the integration of digital technologies and Internet-of-Things (IoT) will facilitate real-time monitoring and control. Establishing standardized testing and performance evaluation protocols will promote widespread adoption by ensuring consistency, reliability, and compatibility across different HESS technologies.
Concluding remarks
HESS has emerged as a promising solution to address the challenges of integrating renewable energy sources into the grid and ensuring a reliable and sustainable energy supply. By leveraging the strengths of various ESDs and employing advanced control strategies, HESS contributes to a more resilient and efficient energy infrastructure. This paper has critically reviewed HESS, highlighting its components, design considerations, topologies, control strategies, and practical applications. A comprehensive analysis of different energy storage technologies has been conducted, evaluating their features, design considerations, and performance characteristics. Significant progress in developing advanced control and optimization strategies for HESS integrated with RES has been discussed. Ongoing research and development efforts in advanced energy storage technologies, control strategies, and system optimization will further enhance the performance and cost-effectiveness of HESS, paving the way for widespread adoption and a more sustainable energy landscape.
Data availability
No data was used for the research described in the article.
Abbreviations
- RES:
-
Renewable energy source
- PV:
-
Photovoltaics
- HESS:
-
Hybrid energy storage system
- ESD:
-
Energy storage device
- GHG:
-
Greenhouse gas
- BESS:
-
Battery energy storage system
- SC:
-
Supercapacitor
- FC:
-
Fuel cell
- SMES:
-
Superconducting magnetic energy storage
- UC:
-
Ultracapacitor
- CAES:
-
Compressed air energy storage
- TES:
-
Thermal energy storage
- PCS:
-
Power Conversion system:
- EMS:
-
Energy management system
- DC:
-
Direct current
- SOC:
-
State of charge
- DBC:
-
Dead beat control
- FBC:
-
Filtration-based control
- SMC:
-
Sliding mode control
- RBC:
-
Rule-based control
- MPC:
-
Model predictive control
- OPC:
-
Optimization-based control
- FLC:
-
Fuzzy logic control
- ANN:
-
Artificial neural network
- RL:
-
Reinforcement learning
References
Abo-Khalil, A. G., Sobhy, A., Abdelkareem, M. A., & Olabi, A. G. (2023). Advancements and challenges in hybrid energy storage systems: Components, control strategies, and future directions. International Journal of Thermofluids, 20, 100477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijft.2023.100477
Adediji, Y. B., Adeyinka, A. M., Yahya, D. I., & Mbelu, O. V. (2023). A review of energy storage applications of lead-free BaTiO3-based dielectric ceramic capacitors. Energy, Ecology and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40974-023-00286-5
Adetokun, B. B., Oghorada, O., & Abubakar, S. J. (2022). Superconducting magnetic energy storage systems: Prospects and challenges for renewable energy applications. Journal of Energy Storage, 55, 105663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.105663
Adeyinka, A., & Kareem, B. (2018). The application of queuing theory in solving automobile assembly line problem. International Journal of Engineering Research And, V7. https://doi.org/10.17577/IJERTV7IS060206
Adeyinka, A. M., & Olaleke, M. O. (2020). Predictive model for thermal response during dry machining of Al 6082-T6 using Fem. Article in International Journal of Engineering and Technical Research, 9(6). https://www.academia.edu/download/64120116/predictive-model-for-thermal-response-during-IJERTV9IS060885.pdf
Adeyinka, A., Mbelu, O., & Adediji, Y. (2023). A-review-of-current-trends-in-thin-film-solar-cell-technologies. International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering, 17, 1.
Aktaş, A., & Kırçiçek, Y. (2020). A novel optimal energy management strategy for offshore wind/marine current/battery/ultracapacitor hybrid renewable energy system. Energy, 199, 117425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117425
Alex. (2024). Global wind report 2024. https://gwec.net/global-wind-report-2024/
Ali, H. M., Rehman, T., Arıcı, M., Said, Z., Duraković, B., Mohammed, H. I., Kumar, R., Rathod, M. K., Buyukdagli, O., & Teggar, M. (2024). Advances in thermal energy storage: Fundamentals and applications. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 100, 101109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2023.101109
Arcos-Aviles, D., Guinjoan, F., Pascual, J., Marroyo, L., Sanchis, P., Gordillo, R., Ayala, P., & Marietta, M. P. (2019). A review of fuzzy-based residential grid-connected microgrid energy management strategies for grid power profile smoothing. In E. Motoasca, A. K. Agarwal, & H. Breesch (Eds.), Energy sustainability in built and urban environments (pp. 165–199). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3284-5_8
ARENA. (2020). Flinders island hybrid energy hub. https://arena.gov.au/knowledge-bank/flinders-island-hybrid-energy-hub/
Armghan, H., Yang, M., Armghan, A., Ali, N., Wang, M. Q., & Ahmad, I. (2020). Design of integral terminal sliding mode controller for the hybrid AC/DC microgrids involving renewables and energy storage systems. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 119, 105857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.105857
Arsad, A. Z., Hannan, M. A., Al-Shetwi, A. Q., Mansur, M., Muttaqi, K. M., Dong, Z. Y., & Blaabjerg, F. (2022). Hydrogen energy storage integrated hybrid renewable energy systems: A review analysis for future research directions. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47(39), 17285–17312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.208
Atawi, I. E., Al-Shetwi, A. Q., Magableh, A. M., & Albalawi, O. H. (2023). Recent advances in hybrid energy storage system integrated renewable power generation: configuration, control, applications, and future directions. Batteries, 9(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries9010029
Ayamolowo, O. J., Manditereza, P. T., & Kusakana, K. (2020). Exploring the gaps in renewable energy integration to grid. Energy Reports, 6, 992–999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.11.086
Babu, T. S., Vasudevan, K. R., Ramachandaramurthy, V. K., Sani, S. B., Chemud, S., & Lajim, R. M. (2020). A Comprehensive review of hybrid energy storage systems: Converter topologies, control strategies and future prospects. IEEE Access, 8, 148702–148721. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3015919
Bajpai, P., & Dash, V. (2012). Hybrid renewable energy systems for power generation in stand-alone applications: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(5), 2926–2939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.009
Benzohra, O., Echcharqaouy, S. S., Fraija, F., & Saifaoui, D. (2020). Integrating wind energy into the power grid: Impact and solutions. Materials Today: Proceedings, 30, 987–992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.363
Bharadwaj, Ch. A., & Maiti, S. (2017). Modular multilevel converter based hybrid energy storage system. IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC), 2017, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/APPEEC.2017.8308983
Buşoniu, L., de Bruin, T., Tolić, D., Kober, J., & Palunko, I. (2018). Reinforcement learning for control: Performance, stability, and deep approximators. Annual Reviews in Control, 46, 8–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2018.09.005
Cabeza, L. F., Martorell, I., Miró, L., Fernández, A. I., & Barreneche, C. (2015). 1—Introduction to thermal energy storage (TES) systems. In L. F. Cabeza (Ed.), Advances in thermal energy storage systems (pp. 1–28). Woodhead Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781782420965.1
Canada, N. R. (2021). RETScreen Innovation Lab. Natural Resources Canada. https://natural-resources.canada.ca/energy/energy-offices-and-labs/canmetenergy/canmetenergy-varennes/retscreen-innovation-lab/23359
Carmen. (2021a). Rokkasho Village Wind Farm—BESS, Japan. Power Technology. https://www.power-technology.com/marketdata/rokkasho-village-wind-farm-bess-japan/
Carmen. (2021b, August 31). Zhangbei National Wind and Solar Energy Storage and Transmission Demonstration Project I - BESS, China. Power Technology. https://www.power-technology.com/marketdata/zhangbei-national-wind-and-solar-energy-storage-and-transmission-demonstration-project-i-bess-china/
Chatterjee, D. P., & Nandi, A. K. (2021). A review on the recent advances in hybrid supercapacitors. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 9(29), 15880–15918. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TA02505H
Chatzigeorgiou, N. G., Theocharides, S., Makrides, G., & Georghiou, G. E. (2024). A review on battery energy storage systems: Applications, developments, and research trends of hybrid installations in the end-user sector. Journal of Energy Storage, 86, 111192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2024.111192
Chen, Y., Chen, Y., Zhang, L., & Li, Z. (2023). Revealing the role of renewable energy consumption and digitalization in energy-related greenhouse gas emissions—evidence from the G7. Frontiers in Energy Research. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2023.1197030
Chong, L. W., Wong, Y. W., Rajkumar, R. K., Rajkumar, R. K., & Isa, D. (2016). Hybrid energy storage systems and control strategies for stand-alone renewable energy power systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 66, 174–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.07.059
Cingoz, F., Elrayyah, A., & Sozer, Y. (2015). Optimized droop control parameters for effective load sharing and voltage regulation in DC microgrids. Electric Power Components and Systems, 43(8–10), 879–889. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325008.2015.1021220
Colak, A., & Ahmed, K. (2021). A Brief Review on Capacity Sizing, Control and Energy Management in Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems. 2021 10th International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Application (ICRERA), 453–458. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRERA52334.2021.9598654
Cowell, R., & De Laurentis, C. (2022). Investigating energy infrastructure through the low carbon challenge: Technologies, governance and socio-spatial effects. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 24(4), 367–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2022.2084054
D’Ambrosio, K. (2011, October 27). AES Wind Generation and AES Energy Storage Announce Commercial Operation of Laurel Mountain Wind Facility Combining Energy Storage and Wind Generation. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20111027006259/en/AES-Wind-Generation-and-AES-Energy-Storage-Announce-Commercial-Operation-of-Laurel-Mountain-Wind-Facility-Combining-Energy-Storage-and-Wind-Generation
Danish, S. M. S., Ahmadi, M., Danish, M. S. S., Mandal, P., Yona, A., & Senjyu, T. (2020). A coherent strategy for peak load shaving using energy storage systems. Journal of Energy Storage, 32, 101823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2020.101823
Darby, M. L., & Nikolaou, M. (2012). MPC: Current practice and challenges. Control Engineering Practice, 20(4), 328–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2011.12.004
De Carolis, G., Galeani, S., & Sassano, M. (2017). Data-driven deadbeat control with application to output regulation. 2017 IEEE 56th Annual Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), 6271–6276. https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2017.8264604
De Rosa, M., Afanaseva, O., Fedyukhin, A. V., & Bianco, V. (2021). Prospects and characteristics of thermal and electrochemical energy storage systems. Journal of Energy Storage, 44, 103443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2021.103443
Deguenon, L., Yamegueu, D., & Gomna, A. (2023). Overcoming the challenges of integrating variable renewable energy to the grid: A comprehensive review of electrochemical battery storage systems. Journal of Power Sources, 580, 233343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233343
Duke Energy, D. (2013). Duke Energy Renewables completes Notrees Battery Storage Project in Texas; North America’s largest battery storage project at a wind farm. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/duke-energy-renewables-completes-notrees-battery-storage-project-in-texas-north-americas-largest-battery-storage-project-at-a-wind-farm-188030671.html
EDL. (2024). Coober Pedy Hybrid (Solar & Wind) Renewable Power Station, South Australia | Projects. EDL. https://edlenergy.com/project/coober-pedy/
Emrani, A., & Berrada, A. (2024). A comprehensive review on techno-economic assessment of hybrid energy storage systems integrated with renewable energy. Journal of Energy Storage, 84, 111010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2024.111010
Esan, O. C., Shi, X., Pan, Z., Huo, X., An, L., & Zhao, T. S. (2020). Modeling and simulation of flow batteries. Advanced Energy Materials, 10(31), 2000758. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202000758
Faria, J., Pombo, J., Calado, M. D., & Mariano, S. (2019). Power management control strategy based on artificial neural networks for standalone PV applications with a hybrid energy storage system. Energies, 12(5), 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12050902
Firuznia, R., Abutalib, A., Hakimian, A., Nazifi, S., Huang, Z., Lee, T. R., Rimer, J. D., & Ghasemi, H. (2023). High-capacity hydrogen storage through molecularly restructured and confined hydrogen hydrates. Materials Today Physics, 38, 101248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtphys.2023.101248
Fotopoulou, M., Pediaditis, P., Skopetou, N., Rakopoulos, D., Christopoulos, S., & Kartalidis, A. (2024). A review of the energy storage systems of non-interconnected European islands. Sustainability, 16(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041572
Gamage, D., Zhang, X., & Ukil, A. (2018). Fuzzy Logic Controller for Efficient Energy Management of a PV System with HESS. IECON 2018—44th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, 3556–3561. https://doi.org/10.1109/IECON.2018.8592823
Gano, E. (2022). Saying Goodbye to Tehachapi’s Groundbreaking Clean Energy Storage Facility. Energized by Edison. https://energized.edison.com/stories/saying-goodbye-to-tehachapi-s-groundbreaking-clean-energy-storage-facility
Gao, Y., Gao, X., & Zhang, X. (2017). The 2 °C global temperature target and the evolution of the long-term goal of addressing climate change—from the United Nations framework convention on climate change to the Paris agreement. Engineering, 3(2), 272–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2017.01.022
García, P., García, C. A., Fernández, L. M., Llorens, F., & Jurado, F. (2014). ANFIS-based control of a grid-connected hybrid system integrating renewable energies, hydrogen and batteries. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 10(2), 1107–1117. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2013.2290069
Gbadegesin, A. O., Sun, Y., & Nwulu, N. (2020). Cost analysis of hybrid energy storage system benefits to distribution network operators. In S. S. Emamian, M. Awang, & F. Yusof (Eds.), Advances in manufacturing engineering (pp. 661–672). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5753-8_61
Gee, A. M., Robinson, F. V. P., & Dunn, R. W. (2013). Analysis of battery lifetime extension in a small-scale wind-energy system using supercapacitors. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 28(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEC.2012.2228195
GeoEnergy, T. (2021). Stillwater, NV—triple hybrid geothermal and solar plant. https://www.thinkgeoenergy.com/stillwater-nv-triple-hybrid-geothermal-and-solar-plant/
Goodenough, J. B., & Kim, Y. (2010). Challenges for rechargeable li batteries. Chemistry of Materials, 22(3), 587–603. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm901452z
Gudlaugsson, B., Ahmed, T. G., Dawood, H., Ogwumike, C., Short, M., & Dawood, N. (2023). Cost and environmental benefit analysis: An assessment of renewable energy integration and smart solution technologies in the InteGRIDy project. Cleaner Energy Systems, 5, 100071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cles.2023.100071
Guelpa, E., & Verda, V. (2019). Thermal energy storage in district heating and cooling systems: A review. Applied Energy, 252, 113474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113474
Gusain, M., Singh, P., & Zhan, Y. (2021). Energy storage devices (supercapacitors and batteries). In S. Shahabuddin, A. K. Pandey, M. Khalid, & P. Jagadish (Eds.), Advances in hybrid conducting polymer technology (pp. 53–75). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62090-5_3
Hajiaghasi, S., Salemnia, A., & Hamzeh, M. (2019). Hybrid energy storage system for microgrids applications: A review. Journal of Energy Storage, 21, 543–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2018.12.017
Hassan, Q., Algburi, S., Sameen, A. Z., Salman, H. M., & Jaszczur, M. (2023a). A review of hybrid renewable energy systems: Solar and wind-powered solutions: Challenges, opportunities, and policy implications. Results in Engineering, 20, 101621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101621
Hassan, Q., Sameen, A. Z., Salman, H. M., Jaszczur, M., & Al-Jiboory, A. K. (2023b). Hydrogen energy future: Advancements in storage technologies and implications for sustainability. Journal of Energy Storage, 72, 108404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.108404
He, G., Lin, J., Sifuentes, F., Liu, X., Abhyankar, N., & Phadke, A. (2020). Rapid cost decrease of renewables and storage accelerates the decarbonization of China’s power system. Nature Communications, 11(1), 2486. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16184-x
He, X., & Zhang, X. (2022). A comprehensive review of supercapacitors: Properties, electrodes, electrolytes and thermal management systems based on phase change materials. Journal of Energy Storage, 56, 106023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.106023
Henderson, P., Islam, R., Bachman, P., Pineau, J., Precup, D., & Meger, D. (2018). Deep reinforcement learning that matters. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 32(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11694
Hiroshima, N., Hatta, H., Koyama, M., Goto, K., & Kogo, Y. (2015). Optimization of flywheel rotor made of three-dimensional composites. Composite Structures, 131, 304–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.04.041
Hoarcă, I. C., Bizon, N., Șorlei, I. S., & Thounthong, P. (2023). Sizing design for a hybrid renewable power system using HOMER and iHOGA simulators. Energies, 16(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16041926
Hoffstaedt, J. P., Truijen, D. P. K., Fahlbeck, J., Gans, L. H. A., Qudaih, M., Laguna, A. J., De Kooning, J. D. M., Stockman, K., Nilsson, H., Storli, P.-T., Engel, B., Marence, M., & Bricker, J. D. (2022). Low-head pumped hydro storage: A review of applicable technologies for design, grid integration, control and modelling. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 158, 112119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112119
IEA. (2023). Executive summary—Renewables 2023–analysis. https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-2023/executive-summary
Ijaola, A. O., Akamo, D. O., Adekanmi, A. M., Saberi, Q., Koken, D., & Asmatulu, E. (2022). Superhydrophobic and self-cleaning electrospun microfibers from recycled styrofoam. Results in Surfaces and Interfaces, 9, 100086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsurfi.2022.100086
IRENA. (2023). World Energy Transitions Outlook 2023. https://www.irena.org/Digital-Report/World-Energy-Transitions-Outlook-2023#page-2
Janek, J., & Zeier, W. G. (2023). Challenges in speeding up solid-state battery development. Nature Energy, 8(3), 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-023-01208-9
Jarosz, A. (2024). Achieving grid resilience through energy storage and model reference adaptive control for effective active power voltage regulation. Energy Conversion and Management: X, 22, 100533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2024.100533
Ji, W., Hong, F., Zhao, Y., Liang, L., Du, H., Hao, J., Fang, F., & Liu, J. (2024). Applications of flywheel energy storage system on load frequency regulation combined with various power generations: A review. Renewable Energy, 223, 119975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.119975
Jiang, K., Men, Y., Xing, R., Fu, B., Shen, G., Li, B., & Tao, S. (2023). Divergent energy-climate nexus in the global fuel combustion processes. Environmental Science & Technology, 57(6), 2506–2515. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c08958
Jin, X., Shen, Y., & Zhou, Q. (2022). A systematic review of robust control strategies in DC microgrids. The Electricity Journal, 35(5), 107125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2022.107125
Ju, F., Zhang, Q., Deng, W., & Li, J. (2016). Review of structures and control of battery-supercapacitor hybrid energy storage system for electric vehicles. In J. Li, S. Zhou, & Y. Han (Eds.), Advances in battery manufacturing, service, and management systems (1st ed., pp. 303–318). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119060741.ch13
Kebede, A. A., Kalogiannis, T., Van Mierlo, J., & Berecibar, M. (2022). A comprehensive review of stationary energy storage devices for large scale renewable energy sources grid integration. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 159, 112213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112213
Khalid, M. (2024). Smart grids and renewable energy systems: Perspectives and grid integration challenges. Energy Strategy Reviews, 51, 101299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2024.101299
Khan, K. A., & Khalid, M. (2021). Improving the transient response of hybrid energy storage system for voltage stability in dc microgrids using an autonomous control strategy. IEEE Access, 9, 10460–10472. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3051144
Khan, S. G., Herrmann, G., Lewis, F. L., Pipe, T., & Melhuish, C. (2012). Reinforcement learning and optimal adaptive control: An overview and implementation examples. Annual Reviews in Control, 36(1), 42–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2012.03.004
Kofinas, P., Dounis, A. I., & Vouros, G. A. (2018). Fuzzy Q-Learning for multi-agent decentralized energy management in microgrids. Applied Energy, 219, 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.017
Lei, H., Li, K., & Chong, B. (2023a). A review of hybrid energy storage system for heavy-duty electric vehicle. Transportation Research Procedia, 70, 234–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2023.11.024
Lei, S., He, Y., Zhang, J., & Deng, K. (2023). Optimal configuration of hybrid energy storage capacity in a microgrid based on variational mode decomposition. Energies, 16(11), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16114307
Li, X., & Palazzolo, A. (2022). A review of flywheel energy storage systems: State of the art and opportunities. Journal of Energy Storage, 46, 103576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2021.103576
Lian, J., Zhang, Y., Ma, C., Yang, Y., & Chaima, E. (2019). A review on recent sizing methodologies of hybrid renewable energy systems. Energy Conversion and Management, 199, 112027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112027
Lin, X., & Zamora, R. (2022). Controls of hybrid energy storage systems in microgrids: Critical review, case study and future trends. Journal of Energy Storage, 47, 103884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2021.103884
Liu, H., Zabinsky, Z. B., & Kohn, W. (2010). Rule-based control system design for smart grids. IEEE PES General Meeting, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/PES.2010.5589410
Liu, J. (2023). World’s First 300-MW Advanced Compressed Air Energy Storage System Expander Completes Integration Testing—Chinese Academy of Sciences. https://english.cas.cn/newsroom/research_news/tech/202308/t20230822_335197.shtml
Liu, J., Gao, Y., Yin, Y., Wang, J., Luo, W., & Sun, G. (2020). Basic theory of sliding mode control. In J. Liu, Y. Gao, Y. Yin, J. Wang, W. Luo, & G. Sun (Eds.), Sliding mode control methodology in the applications of industrial power systems (pp. 11–25). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30655-7_2
Liu, X., Suo, Y., Zhang, Z., Song, X., & Zhou, J. (2023). A new model predictive current control strategy for hybrid energy storage system considering the SOC of the supercapacitor. IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, 11(1), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1109/JESTPE.2022.3159665
Londák, J., Vargic, R., & Podhradský, P. (2023). Peak shaving in microgrids using hybrid storage. In X.-S. Yang, S. Sherratt, N. Dey, & A. Joshi (Eds.), Proceedings of seventh international congress on information and communication technology (pp. 63–73). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1610-6_6
Lopes, P. P., & Stamenkovic, V. R. (2020). Past, present, and future of lead–acid batteries. Science, 369(6506), 923–924. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abd3352
Lu, X., Guerrero, J. M., Sun, K., & Vasquez, J. C. (2014). An Improved droop control method for DC microgrids based on low bandwidth communication with DC bus voltage restoration and enhanced current sharing accuracy. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 29(4), 1800–1812. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2013.2266419
Lyu, X., Zhang, T., Yuan, L., Yang, K., Fang, J., Li, S., & Liu, S. (2022). Pumped storage hydropower in abandoned mine shafts: key concerns and research directions. Sustainability, 14(23), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316012
Mbelu, O. V., Adeyinka, A. M., Yahya, D. I., Adediji, Y. B., & Njoku, H. (2024). Advances in solar pond technology and prospects of efficiency improvement methods. Sustainable Energy Research, 11(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40807-024-00111-5
McCollum, D. L., Zhou, W., Bertram, C., de Boer, H.-S., Bosetti, V., Busch, S., Després, J., Drouet, L., Emmerling, J., Fay, M., Fricko, O., Fujimori, S., Gidden, M., Harmsen, M., Huppmann, D., Iyer, G., Krey, V., Kriegler, E., Nicolas, C., & Riahi, K. (2018). Energy investment needs for fulfilling the Paris agreement and achieving the sustainable development goals. Nature Energy, 3(7), 589–599. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0179-z
Meliani, M., Barkany, A. E., Abbassi, I. E., Darcherif, A. M., & Mahmoudi, M. (2021). Energy management in the smart grid: State-of-the-art and future trends. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 13, 18479790211032920. https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790211032920
Mitali, J., Dhinakaran, S., & Mohamad, A. A. (2022). Energy storage systems: A review. Energy Storage and Saving, 1(3), 166–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enss.2022.07.002
Mlilo, N., Brown, J., & Ahfock, T. (2021). Impact of intermittent renewable energy generation penetration on the power system networks—a review. Technology and Economics of Smart Grids and Sustainable Energy, 6(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40866-021-00123-w
Modu, B., Abdullah, M. P., Bukar, A. L., & Hamza, M. F. (2023). A systematic review of hybrid renewable energy systems with hydrogen storage: Sizing, optimization, and energy management strategy. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 48(97), 38354–38373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.06.126
Morstyn, T., Savkin, A. V., Hredzak, B., & Agelidis, V. G. (2018). Multi-agent sliding mode control for state of charge balancing between battery energy storage systems distributed in a DC microgrid. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 9(5), 4735–4743. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2017.2668767
Nadjahi, C., Louahlia, H., & Lemasson, S. (2018). A review of thermal management and innovative cooling strategies for data center. Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, 19, 14–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suscom.2018.05.002
Nejabatkhah, F., Danyali, S., Hosseini, S. H., Sabahi, M., & Niapour, S. M. (2012). Modeling and control of a new three-input DC–DC boost converter for hybrid PV/FC/battery power system. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 27(5), 2309–2324. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2011.2172465
Nikolaos, P. C., Marios, F., & Dimitris, K. (2023). A review of pumped hydro storage systems. Energies, 16(11), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16114516
Olabi, A. G., Wilberforce, T., Ramadan, M., Abdelkareem, M. A., & Alami, A. H. (2021). Compressed air energy storage systems: Components and operating parameters—a review. Journal of Energy Storage, 34, 102000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2020.102000
Oliveira, T. R., Hsu, L., & Nunes, E. V. L. (2022). Smooth sliding control to overcome chattering arising in classical SMC and super-twisting algorithm in the presence of unmodeled dynamics. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 359(2), 1235–1256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2021.11.005
Pandya, D. J., Muthu Pandian, P., Kumar, I., Parmar, A., Sravanthi, Singh, N., Abd Al-saheb, A. J., & Arun, V. (2023). Supercapacitors: Review of materials and fabrication methods. Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.10.148
Perera, A. T. D., & Kamalaruban, P. (2021). Applications of reinforcement learning in energy systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 137, 110618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110618
PressCenter.com. (2014, May 27). Bosch: double battery for energy storage facility in Braderup. PressCenter.Com—Free Press release distribution platform. https://presscenter.com/bosch-double-battery-for-energy-storage-facility-in-braderup/
Purkait, P., Basu, M., & Nath, S. R. (2024). Renewable energy integration to electric power grid: opportunities, challenges, and solutions. In S. De, A. K. Agarwal, & P. Kalita (Eds.), Challenges and opportunities of distributed renewable power (pp. 37–100). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1406-3_3
Shyni, R., & Kowsalya, M. (2024). HESS-based microgrid control techniques empowered by artificial intelligence: A systematic review of grid-connected and standalone systems. Journal of Energy Storage, 84, 111012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2024.111012
Rahman, M. M., Gemechu, E., Oni, A. O., & Kumar, A. (2021). Energy and environmental footprints of flywheels for utility-scale energy storage applications. E-Prime—Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy, 1, 100020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prime.2021.100020
Ramoul, J., Chemali, E., Dorn-Gomba, L., & Emadi, A. (2018). A neural network energy management controller applied to a hybrid energy storage system using multi-source inverter. IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), 2018, 2741–2747. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE.2018.8558326
Rehman, S., Al-Hadhrami, L. M., & Alam, Md. M. (2015). Pumped hydro energy storage system: A technological review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 44, 586–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.12.040
Reveles-Miranda, M., Ramirez-Rivera, V., & Pacheco-Catalán, D. (2024). Hybrid energy storage: Features, applications, and ancillary benefits. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 192, 114196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.114196
Rezaei, H., Abdollahi, S. E., Abdollahi, S., & Filizadeh, S. (2022). Energy management strategies of battery-ultracapacitor hybrid storage systems for electric vehicles: Review, challenges, and future trends. Journal of Energy Storage, 53, 105045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.105045
Rong, C. C., & Barnes, P. N. (2017). Developmental challenges of SMES technology for applications. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 279(1), 012013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/279/1/012013
Sadollah, A. (2018). Introductory chapter: which membership function is appropriate in fuzzy system? In A. Sadollah (Ed.), Fuzzy logic based in optimization methods and control systems and its applications. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.79552
Sarmast, S., Rouindej, K., Fraser, R. A., & Dusseault, M. B. (2024). Optimizing near-adiabatic compressed air energy storage (NA-CAES) systems: Sizing and design considerations. Applied Energy, 357, 122465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122465
Schmela, M., Rossi, R., Lits, C., Chunduri, S. K., Shah, A., Muthyal, R., Moghe, P., Kalam, S., Jamkhedkar, A., Goel, S., & Saratchandra, P. (2023). Advancements in solar technology, markets, and investments—a summary of the 2022 ISA World Solar Reports. Solar Compass, 6, 100045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solcom.2023.100045
Schwenzer, M., Ay, M., Bergs, T., & Abel, D. (2021). Review on model predictive control: An engineering perspective. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 117(5), 1327–1349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07682-3
Sebastian, S., Wijewardane, S., & Srinivasan, S. (2023). Recent advances in hydrogen production, storage, and fuel cell technologies with an emphasis on inventions, innovations, and commercialization. Solar Compass, 8, 100065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solcom.2023.100065
Shao, Y., Zhang, H., Gao, Y., & Jin, B. (2023). Dynamic power distribution strategy using multi-objective collaborative optimization for hybrid energy storage systems. Journal of Power Electronics, 23(10), 1517–1528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43236-023-00649-5
Sharma, S., Singh, J., Bishal, B., & Rahul, J. (2023). Review and Outlook on Energy Transition. 2023 9th International Conference on Electrical Energy Systems (ICEES), 258–263. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEES57979.2023.10110097
Shtessel, Y., Plestan, F., Edwards, C., & Levant, A. (2023). Adaptive sliding mode and higher order sliding-mode control techniques with applications: a survey. In T. R. Oliveira, L. Fridman, & L. Hsu (Eds.), Sliding-Mode Control and Variable-Structure Systems: The State of the Art. Sing: Springer International Publishing.
Singh, N., Farina, I., Petrillo, A., Colangelo, F., & De Felice, F. (2023). Carbon capture, sequestration, and usage for clean and green environment: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 16(1), 248–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2023.2256379
Singh, P., & Lather, J. S. (2020). Accurate power-sharing, voltage regulation, and SOC regulation for LVDC microgrid with hybrid energy storage system using artificial neural network. International Journal of Green Energy, 17(12), 756–769. https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2020.1798767
Sinha, S., & Chandel, S. S. (2014). Review of software tools for hybrid renewable energy systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 32, 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.035
Song, Y. D., Cao, Q., Du, X., & Karimi, H. R. (2013). Control strategy based on wavelet transform and neural network for hybrid power system. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2013, e375840. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/375840
Song, Z., Hofmann, H., Li, J., Han, X., Zhang, X., & Ouyang, M. (2015). A comparison study of different semi-active hybrid energy storage system topologies for electric vehicles. Journal of Power Sources, 274, 400–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.061
Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (2018). Reinforcement Learning (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
Swapna, V., & Gayatri, M. T. L. (2021). Power quality enhancement using hybrid energy storage based dynamic voltage restorer for grid integrated distributed generation. IEEE Bombay Section Signature Conference (IBSSC), 2021, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/IBSSC53889.2021.9673473
Tan, K. M., Babu, T. S., Ramachandaramurthy, V. K., Kasinathan, P., Solanki, S. G., & Raveendran, S. K. (2021). Empowering smart grid: A comprehensive review of energy storage technology and application with renewable energy integration. Journal of Energy Storage, 39, 102591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2021.102591
Tang, S., Huang, X., Li, Q., Yang, N., Liao, Q., & Sun, K. (2021). Optimal sizing and energy management of hybrid energy storage system for high-speed railway traction substation. Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology, 16(3), 1743–1754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-021-00702-y
Tayab, U. B., Roslan, M. A. B., Hwai, L. J., & Kashif, M. (2017). A review of droop control techniques for microgrid. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 76, 717–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.028
Terlouw, T., Bauer, C., McKenna, R., & Mazzotti, M. (2022). Large-scale hydrogen production via water electrolysis: A techno-economic and environmental assessment. Energy & Environmental Science, 15(9), 3583–3602. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EE01023B
Tetuko, R., Lystianingrum, V., & Wibowo, R. S. (2022). Optimal Scheduling of Battery-Flywheel Hybrid Energy Storage System for Off-Grid Power System with Renewable Energy. 2022 International Conference on Technology and Policy in Energy and Electric Power (ICT-PEP), 220–225. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICT-PEP57242.2022.9988817
Thomas, T., & Mishra, M. K. (2019). Control strategy for a PV-wind based standalone DC microgrid with hybrid energy storage system. 2019 IEEE 1st International Conference on Energy, Systems and Information Processing (ICESIP), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICESIP46348.2019.8938310
Vivas, F. J., Segura, F., & Andújar, J. M. (2022). Fuzzy logic-based energy management system for grid-connected residential DC microgrids with multi-stack fuel cell systems: A multi-objective approach. Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, 32, 100909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.segan.2022.100909
Wali, S. B., Hannan, M. A., Abd Rahman, M. S., Alghamdi, H. A., Mansor, M., Ker, P. J., Tiong, S. K., & Mahlia, T. M. I. (2023). Usage count of hydrogen-based hybrid energy storage systems: An analytical review, challenges and future research potentials. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 48(89), 34836–34861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.05.298
Wang, B., Manandhar, U., Zhang, X., Gooi, H. B., & Ukil, A. (2019). Deadbeat control for hybrid energy storage systems in DC microgrids. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 10(4), 1867–1877. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2018.2873801
Wang, J., Wang, B., Zhang, L., Wang, J., Shchurov, N. I., & Malozyomov, B. V. (2022). Review of bidirectional DC–DC converter topologies for hybrid energy storage system of new energy vehicles. Green Energy and Intelligent Transportation, 1(2), 100010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geits.2022.100010
Wang, Y., Song, F., Ma, Y., Zhang, Y., Yang, J., Liu, Y., Zhang, F., & Zhu, J. (2020). Research on capacity planning and optimization of regional integrated energy system based on hybrid energy storage system. Applied Thermal Engineering, 180, 115834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115834
Warren, R., Andrews, O., Brown, S., Colón-González, F. J., Forstenhäusler, N., Gernaat, D. E. H. J., Goodwin, P., Harris, I., He, Y., Hope, C., Manful, D., Osborn, T. J., Price, J., Van Vuuren, D., & Wright, R. M. (2022). Quantifying risks avoided by limiting global warming to 15 or 2 °C above pre-industrial levels. Climatic Change, 172(3), 39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03277-9
Wazirali, R., Yaghoubi, E., Abujazar, M. S. S., Ahmad, R., & Vakili, A. H. (2023). State-of-the-art review on energy and load forecasting in microgrids using artificial neural networks, machine learning, and deep learning techniques. Electric Power Systems Research, 225, 109792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2023.109792
Weiskopf, S. R., Rubenstein, M. A., Crozier, L. G., Gaichas, S., Griffis, R., Halofsky, J. E., Hyde, K. J. W., Morelli, T. L., Morisette, J. T., Muñoz, R. C., Pershing, A. J., Peterson, D. L., Poudel, R., Staudinger, M. D., Sutton-Grier, A. E., Thompson, L., Vose, J., Weltzin, J. F., & Whyte, K. P. (2020). Climate change effects on biodiversity, ecosystems, ecosystem services, and natural resource management in the United States. Science of the Total Environment, 733, 137782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137782
Wong, W. P., Kagalkar, A., Patel, R., Patel, P., Dharaskar, S., Walvekar, R., Khalid, M., & Gedam, V. V. (2023). Nano-enhanced phase change materials for thermal energy storage: A comprehensive review of recent advancements, applications, and future challenges. Journal of Energy Storage, 74, 109265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.109265
Worku, A. K., Ayele, D. W., Habtu, N. G., Admasu, B. T., Alemayehu, G., Taye, B. Z., & Yemata, T. A. (2022). Energy storage technologies; recent advances, challenges, and prospectives. In A. K. Bohre, P. Chaturvedi, M. L. Kolhe, & S. N. Singh (Eds.), Planning of hybrid renewable energy systems, electric vehicles and microgrid: modeling, control and optimization (pp. 125–150). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0979-5_7
Xiong, R., Cao, J., & Yu, Q. (2018). Reinforcement learning-based real-time power management for hybrid energy storage system in the plug-in hybrid electric vehicle. Applied Energy, 211, 538–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.11.072
Zahedi, R., & Ardehali, M. M. (2020). Power management for storage mechanisms including battery, supercapacitor, and hydrogen of autonomous hybrid green power system utilizing multiple optimally-designed fuzzy logic controllers. Energy, 204, 117935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117935
Zahraee, S. M., Khalaji Assadi, M., & Saidur, R. (2016). Application of artificial intelligence methods for hybrid energy system optimization. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 66, 617–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.028
Zhang, L., Feng, R., Wang, W., & Yu, G. (2022). Emerging chemistries and molecular designs for flow batteries. Nature Reviews Chemistry, 6(8), 524–543. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-022-00394-6
Zhang, X., Gao, Z., Zhou, B., Guo, H., Xu, Y., Ding, Y., & Chen, H. (2024). Advanced compressed air energy storage systems: Fundamentals and applications. Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2023.12.008
Zhang, Y., Fu, L., Zhu, W., Bao, X., & Liu, C. (2018). Robust model predictive control for optimal energy management of island microgrids with uncertainties. Energy, 164, 1229–1241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.08.200
Zhang, Z., Ding, T., Zhou, Q., Sun, Y., Qu, M., Zeng, Z., Ju, Y., Li, L., Wang, K., & Chi, F. (2021a). A review of technologies and applications on versatile energy storage systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 148, 111263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111263
Zhang, Z., Wang, X., & Yan, Y. (2021b). A review of the state-of-the-art in electronic cooling. E-Prime Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy, 1, 100009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prime.2021.100009
Zhao, J.-F., Oh, U.-J., Park, J.-C., Park, E. S., Im, H.-B., Lee, K. Y., & Choi, J.-S. (2022). A review of world-wide advanced pumped storage hydropower technologies. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 55(9), 170–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.07.030
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge all the editors and reviewers for their constructive comments, which greatly improved the work.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed equally in study conception and design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of results, and final draft manuscript preparation. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Adeyinka, A.M., Esan, O.C., Ijaola, A.O. et al. Advancements in hybrid energy storage systems for enhancing renewable energy-to-grid integration. Sustainable Energy res. 11, 26 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40807-024-00120-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40807-024-00120-4