Abstract
Coffee is a perennial (sub)tropical crop and one of the most valuable commodities globally. Coffee is grown by an estimated 25 million farmers, mostly smallholders, and provides livelihoods to about 125 million people. The Coffea genus comprises over 120 species. Two species account for nearly the entire world coffee production: C. arabica L. (Arabica coffee) and C. canephora Pierre ex A. Froehner (Canephora coffee) with the former supplying about 65% of the world’s consumption. Arabica coffee is a self-pollinated, amphidiploid species (2n = 4x = 44) whereas other Coffea species are diploid (2n = 2x = 22) and generally cross-pollinated. Induced mutagenesis using physical and chemical mutagens has been a successful strategy in producing over 3,300 mutant varieties in over 220 crop species with global impact. Spontaneous Arabica coffee mutants of significant economic importance have been found since the early 1900s, following the spread of Arabica coffee cultivation across the globe. However, Arabica coffee has so far not been improved through induced mutagenesis and studies on coffee mutagenesis are scarce. In this chapter, principles and practices of mutation-assisted breeding along with current breeding limitations of Arabica coffee are briefly reviewed, as an introduction to subsequent protocol chapters on mutation induction, advanced cell and tissue culture, Leaf Rust resistance screening and the application of novel molecular/genomics tools supporting mutation-assisted improvement and genetics research of Arabica coffee.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 General Principles of Plant Mutation Breeding
Mutations can be defined as sudden heritable changes in the DNA of living organisms, not caused by genetic recombination or segregation. Mutational events can be easily produced in the laboratory with two principal types of mutagens: physical or chemical. Among the physical methods gamma and X-rays are the most frequently used (reviewed by Spencer-Lopes et al. 2018). Alkylating agents, especially EMS, and sodium azide are the most frequently used chemical mutagens (reviewed by Ingelbrecht et al. 2018). Mutations induced through physical or chemical mutagens occur randomly throughout the genome. Induced mutagenesis has generated a vast amount of genetic variability with a significant role in plant breeding, genetics, and functional genomics. Applied mutagenesis has been particularly successful for the genetic improvement of annual seed crops such as barley, rice, wheat, and sorghum amongst many others. Records from the Joint FAO/IAEA Centre for Nuclear Applications in Food and Agriculture, Austria, maintained in the Mutant Variety Database (MVD), show that over 3,300 crop varieties with one or more traits resulting from induced mutagenesis have been released since the 1960s (IAEA 2023).
The history of plant mutation breeding has been reviewed in several publications (van Harten 1998; Forster and Shu 2012; Bado et al. 2015) and thus will only be briefly described here. In 1901, Hugo de Vries, a Dutch botanist and one of the first plant geneticists, coined the term “mutation” to describe seemingly new forms that suddenly arose in his experiments on the evening primrose. Proof of the mutation theory of de Vries was firmly established by the pioneering work of Lewis John Stadler who induced mutations in barley and maize using X-rays (Stadler 1928). Up to that time, only natural spontaneous mutations were selected to generate novel genetic diversity in plants.
Following the spread of Arabica coffee from Africa to other continents, natural spontaneous Arabica coffee mutants appeared within the widely grown plantations. Several of these mutants attracted the attention of breeders and were described as new varieties in the different regions where they were grown. The most important spontaneous mutants are those affecting plant height, fruit shape and -colour, and leaf colour. Examples include Caturra Vermelho and Caturra Amarelo, dwarf, high-yielding mutants of Bourbon Amarelo observed in the 1930s in Brazil and officially registered as varieties in 1999 (Guimarães Mendes et al. 2007); Pacas, a dwarf mutant of Bourbon found in 1949 in El Salvador; Villa Sarchi, a dwarf mutation of Bourbon found in Costa Rica and released in 1957; and, Maragogype, a large bean size mutant within the Typica variety discovered in Brazil. In addition, a few male sterile plants have been found in Brazil and in Ethiopian accessions in the CATIE collection in Costa Rica (Wintgens 2012; Arabica Coffee Varieties | Variety Catalog; (worldcoffeeresearch.org) (https://varieties.worldcoffeeresearch.org/varieties)). More recently, natural mutations conferring very low caffeine content were discovered at the Instituto Agronômico de Campinas, Brazil. Out of 3,000 coffee trees representing 300 C. arabica accessions from Ethiopia, three plants contained only 0.07% caffeine, in contrast to the normal caffeine content of 1.2% in C. arabica (Silvarolla et al. 2004). These plants have the potential of being the basis for the development of a new coffee varieties giving rise to “naturally decaffeinated” coffee.
The Joint FAO/IAEA Centre of Nuclear Applications in Food and Agriculture has been promoting and disseminating the efficient use of mutation techniques as a tool for crop improvement since the 1960s. Several authors have documented the global impact of induced mutant varieties (Ahloowalia et al. 2004; Kharkwal and Shu 2009). From the 1980s onwards plant mutagenesis has become increasingly integrated into a range of enabling biotechnology and genomics/bioinformatics tools to fast-track the breeding process, mutant selection or mutant trait discovery (Mokry et al. 2011; Schneeberger and Weigel 2011; Ghosh et al. 2018; Knudsen et al. 2022).
Merits of induced mutagenesis as a complementary tool for crop improvement are:
-
Different plant propagules can be subjected to mutagenesis treatments, including seed, entire plants and vegetative propagules, regenerable tissues or single cells
-
It can be (much) faster than conventional breeding
-
Mutation induction is simple and can rapidly produce novel variation (e.g., gamma and X-ray mutagenesis, EMS treatments)
-
Desired traits are introduced directly into well adapted, elite lines/varieties
-
Track record of success for numerous crops and traits, including morphological and physiological traits, yield, disease resistance
-
A public domain, non-GMO technology greatly facilitating adoption of end products.
Limitations of plant mutation breeding include:
-
Not all types of useful variation can be induced as mutations
-
Mutations are random and the desired mutation is rare thus large mutant populations are required to recover the desired mutation or trait
-
Mutant selection mostly relies on phenotyping starting at the M2 generation though recent developments could provide more efficient, early selection systems
-
The space and labour required to grow out large mutant populations, particularly in case of horticultural crops and trees
-
The length of time required to develop mutant varieties in crops with a long reproductive cycle as in perennial crops.
Mutation breeding has been especially successful with annual, inbreeding, diploid crops that are seed-propagated, because it is relatively quick to advance populations from the initial mutant population (M1) to advanced mutant lines. However, vegetatively propagated crops and perennial species—including Arabica coffee—have lagged, due to the limitations listed above. Recent advances in in vitro cell culture offer new opportunities and strategies for vegetative crops and trees through single-cell mutagenesis as described further in this protocol book for Arabica coffee. Likewise, new genomic, bioinformatics and genotyping tools enable screening mutant populations in early generations and can provide a means for short-cutting generations and fast-tracking mutation breeding. This is especially relevant for perennial crops and trees with long juvenile periods.
2 Breeding Limitations in Arabica Coffee
Arabica coffee production is facing multiple threats including the interrelated challenges of climate change and transboundary pests and diseases such as Coffee Leaf Rust (CRL) and Coffee Berry Disease (CBD) (Bunn et al. 2015; Läderach et al. 2017; Solymosi and Techel 2019). Pests and diseases affecting Arabica coffee cultivation with special reference to CLR are reviewed in Chapter “Coffee Leaf Rust Resistance: An Overview”. Protocols for Leaf Rust screening and molecular diagnostics are presented in Chapters “Screening for Resistance to Coffee Leaf Rust”, “Inoculation and Evaluation of Hemileia vastatrix Under Laboratory Conditions”, “Evaluation of Coffee (Coffea arabica L. var. Catuaí) Tolerance to Leaf Rust (Hemileia vastatrix) Using Inoculation of Leaf Discs Under Controlled Conditions” and “A PCR-Based Assay for Early Diagnosis of the Coffee Leaf Rust Pathogen Hemileia vastatrix”.
Nearly all coffee is grown between the Tropics of Cancer and Capricorn where conditions for coffee cultivation are ideal. This band of latitudes is known as the coffee belt. Arabica coffee is usually cultivated in relatively cool mountain climates at 400–2800 m asl. Arabica coffee is sensitive to environmental factors such as exposure to direct sunlight, temperature, and rainfall (Muschler 2001). It is within the coffee belt that the most drastic changes in climate have occurred in recent years. The implications of these changes in coffee production can range from physiological and phenological disorders of plants, to the reduced adaptability of plants to areas with limiting conditions. In addition, pests and diseases also see their physiology and phenology altered, sometimes promoted favorably which implies greater pressure on the production systems. Overall, climate change is impacting coffee production both through changes in weather patterns, viz. rising temperatures, excessive rainfall, or longer droughts, and through changed/expanded habitats of important coffee diseases such as CLR (Avelino et al. 2015; van der Vossen et al. 2015). Coffee Berry Disease, still limited to the African continent, is a latent threat for the Americas in view of the favorable agroecological conditions offered by Latin America for this fungus.
Plant breeding requires genetic variation of useful traits to improve crops. However, the genetic diversity within the primary gene pool of C. arabica is very narrow (Scalabrin et al. 2020) so the required genetic variability to address abovementioned constraints is lacking. Most of the genetic diversity is found in Ethiopia and South Sudan, the centres of origin of C. arabica (Sylvain 1958; Thomas 1942). Since the 1960s coffee yields have stagnated in all coffee producing countries except Brazil, Colombia and Vietnam (Montagnon et al. 2019). Other challenges of Arabica coffee breeding are inherent to the perennial nature of this crop. The generation time factor—3–5 years from seed to seed—remains a major issue for coffee breeding programs.
Currently, two main approaches are followed for the genetic improvement of Arabica coffee. Since the 1950s the traditional varieties formed the basis for pedigree breeding mainly with the ‘Timor Hybrid’ (an interspecific hybrid of C. arabica and C. canephora resulting from a natural cross) that has resistance to CLR (Bettencourt 1973; Silva et al. 2018). However, pedigree breeding is a long process requiring 30 years or more to release a stable, homogeneous and distinguishable variety. To date, most Arabica coffee plantations around the world are established with the varieties resulting from breeding efforts initiated some 50 years ago. However, these varieties are susceptible to disease outbreaks, especially CLR, and are poorly adapted to the changing climatic conditions observed in many coffee growing regions during the past decade. Obtaining CLR resistant varieties will allow to produce coffee with reduced pesticide use or in organic farming systems (Arrieta 2014). Since the 1990s, F1 hybrids are being developed as an alternative breeding strategy in view of their improved performance over traditional varieties in terms of yield and disease resistance, and because of the reduced timeframe of 10–20 years from breeding to commercial release (Frédérick et al. 2019). However, unlike the traditional varieties, F1 hybrids are not true breeding and thus require a different mechanism for mass production, typically via clonal propagation (World Coffee Research | F1 Hybrid Trials (https://worldcoffeeresearch.org/programs/next-generation-f1-hybrid-varieties)). More recently, male sterility has been used for F1 hybrid seed production in Arabica coffee (Frédérick et al. 2019).
3 Mutation Breeding in Arabica Coffee
3.1 Background
Arabica coffee production is threatened by disease outbreaks and climate change while conventional breeding is hampered by the very narrow genetic base within its primary gene pool, as summarized above. Induced mutagenesis may have significant value for Arabica coffee by increasing genetic variability for genetic studies and breeding purposes. The plant Mutant Variety Database (MVD) lists over 3300 released mutant varieties in a wide range of crop plants. Over 80% of these resulted from exposure to physical mutagens. Ionizing radiation such as gamma rays and X-rays have been the most widely used techniques for mutation induction. Example successes in mutation breeding of woody plants reported in the MVD are shown in Table 1. Note that Arabica coffee is not listed in the MVD. To our knowledge no Arabica mutant variety has been released following induced mutagenesis. Thus, Arabica coffee remains a major crop that has not been improved by mutation breeding, though Arabica coffee varieties resulting from natural, spontaneous mutations are being grown commercially.
According to the MVD, induced mutagenesis has been successful for inducing resistance to fungal diseases in 334 cases (Fig. 1). These include tree crops such as pear (Sanada et al. 1993; Saito 2016) and crops with polyploid genomes such as wheat (Sigurbjörnsson and Micke 1974) and sugarcane (IAEA 2023).
So far, there has been limited research on induced mutagenesis of Arabica coffee. The first attempt to induce new mutations in C. arabica was reported by Carvalho et al. (1954) using X-ray irradiation of seeds with doses up to 1,500 Gray (Gy, see below Sect.3.2). Main effects established were early termination of seedling growth if treatment was higher than 125 Gy and a general slow growth of mutagenized seedlings as compared to controls. Among the surviving seedlings, variation in the form of abnormal leaves was also observed. Moh and Orbegosos (1960) used thermal neutrons, X-rays and gamma-rays for induced mutagenesis in C. arabica and frequently obtained angustifolia (ag) mutants characterized by long and narrow leaves. Appearance of this phenotype already in the M1 generation was explained by possible chromosomal aberrations. Interestingly, the mutant leaf type was similar for the entire plant and not sectorial, which excludes the presence of chimerism. Recently, similar observations were made in M1 mutant coffee plants derived from gamma-ray irradiation at the FAO/IAEA Plant Breeding and Genetics Laboratory, Seibersdorf, Austria (Fig. 2). Moh (1961) speculates that the lack of chimerism in the M1 plants indicates that the coffee plant originates from only one initial cell in the embryo shoot apex. This would, however, be one of very rare cases among the angiosperms. It is also conceivable that the uniform mutant leaf phenotype is the result of diplontic selection between cells of the meristem or that only one initial cell survived after irradiation. A final answer to the question of M1 uniformity is yet to be given. In later induced mutation breeding experiments, analysis of traits of economic importance such as yield were put forward and monitored over several mutant generations. However, apart from the occurrence of leaf mutations, no correlation between varying yield and radiation dose could be established (Carvalho et al. 1984). These early experiments in coffee mutation breeding however, do suffer from the relatively small number of plants analyzed. A protocol for phenotypic characterization of an M1 Arabica coffee greenhouse-based mutant population is presented in Chapter “Use of Open-Source Tools for Imaging and Recording Phenotypic Traits of a Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) Mutant Population”.
3.2 The Need for Radiosensitivity Testing
Treatment of a plant or plant part with a mutagen affects its vigour, growth rate, germination, and fertility. Mutation rates vary with mutagen dosage. The higher the dosage of a mutagen, the more frequent the mutations and hence also, the greater the chance of undesired damage and lethality. The optimal dose is the one that, on the one hand, limits adverse effects that prevent the creation of a sufficiently large and vigorous mutant population, and, on the other hand, produces sufficient mutations to have a reasonable chance of recovering the desired mutation or mutant trait in the population, while preserving the (elite) genetic background. Hence, dose optimization is typically the first step in experimental or applied mutagenesis. Here, key principles and considerations for optimizing physical mutagenesis relevant to Arabica coffee will be briefly described. General principles and protocols for dose optimization using physical (Spencer-Lopes et al. 2018) and chemical mutagens (Ingelbrecht et al. 2018; Jankowicz-Cieslak and Till 2016) and subsequent mutant population development (Ghanim et al. 2018) have been published.
Common units in physical mutagenesis include Gray (Gy), used to quantify the dose of radiation absorbed by the plant material and Gy/s or Gy/min, which is the unit for absorbed dose rate, a characteristic of the radiation source and irradiator used for mutagenesis. Radiosensitivity is a property of the target material, e.g., seed versus vegetative tissues, and of the species/variety. In addition, radiosensitivity is subject to external factors, such as, for example, the water content of the target material. Depending on the explant, the water content can be regulated. For example, the water content of seed can be adjusted to ca 12–14% through equilibration in a desiccator containing a 60% glycerol solution prior to irradiation, which is standard procedure at the FAO/IAEA PBG Laboratory, Seibersdorf, Austria.
Radiosensitivity testing refers to the determination of the optimum dose(s) of radiation of a particular plant propagule to be used as a basis for selecting the dose levels for bulk irradiation. In practice, radiosensitivity testing is performed across a series of mutagen doses in the lab or greenhouse over a short period of time. Growth responses or lethality is measured compared to a non-radiated control, to determine the GR30 (30% Growth Reduction) and GR50 (50% Growth Reduction) or LD30 (30% Lethal Dose) and LD50 (50% Lethal Dose) values respectively. These ranges have been observed to preserve the fitness of the M1 plants (first mutant generation ) while inducing sufficient stable, genetic variability for genetic studies or breeding purposes. In case of radiosensitivity testing of seed, the GR value is usually determined from the reduction of seedling height or leaf growth of the M1 plants compared to untreated M0 controls. In case of radiosensitivity testing of lethality of seed, seedling survival is measured over a range of doses compared to untreated controls. Importantly, the biological effects observed at the M1 stage are the result of transient physiological effects and from genetic effects that are passed on to the next M2 generation. Mutations are single cell events and thus mutagenic treatment of seed or other multicellular tissues may carry one or several mutations, each occupying a small part of the resulting M1 plant. Such M1 plants are therefore chimeras. Plant scientists or breeders need to be aware of the complications caused by chimerism and apply techniques to resolve them. Mutagenic treatment of single cells followed by plant regeneration does in principle result in chimera-free plants.
The doses chosen for bulk irradiation and development of the M1 population, depend on different factors, such as the available resources to grow out and screen the mutant populations. The breeding system of the species under study plays a key role (van Harten 1998). For example, for annual diploid, self-fertile crops such as barley or sorghum, background mutations can be relatively easily removed through backcrossing. This is much more challenging or impossible for (obligately) vegetatively propagated crops or trees as in the case of Arabica coffee due to their long juvenile phase. Ideally up to three different doses are applied for bulk irradiation, including doses lower than LD50 or GR50, to ensure that at least one level will yield a sufficient number of the required mutant types. The frequency of induced mutations depends on the type of mutagen, the applied dose and the target materials. The plant species or variety, ploidy level, developmental stage, physiological state, etc. may all result in differences in response to radiation. Therefore, standardization of the target material and keeping records of all relevant information about the radiation source and treatment conditions is critical.
3.3 Choice of Material for Mutation Induction
Since Arabica coffee is self-fertilizing, the cheapest and most appropriate propagation system, especially in a commercial setting, is through seeding. However, for research and experimentation purposes, other plant propagules such as seedlings, cuttings or grafts can also be applied. In vitro cells and tissues are another attractive target in case of Arabica coffee given the availability of methods for de novo regeneration through somatic embryogenesis. Different plant propagules that can be used as targets for mutation induction in Arabica coffee with their advantages and limitations are summarized in Fig. 3.
In choosing the target material for dose optimization and mutagenesis treatments, it is important to consider the life cycle of a coffee tree, the seed and germination process. The coffee plant takes approximately three years from seed germination to produce the first fruit. It takes 6–9 months from flowering to mature cherries ready for harvest. The coffee cherry is the whole fruit, and has a skin, pulp, and parchment that cover the seed of the coffee. Inside the fruit are usually two seeds. Protocols for the establishment of in vitro tissue culture systems for Arabica coffee and methods for mutation induction using in vitro tissues and cells are described in Chapters “In Vitro Plantlet Establishment of Coffea arabica from Cut Seed Explants”, “Somatic Embryogenesis and Temporary Immersion for Mass Propagation of Chimera-Free Mutant Arabica Coffee Plantlets”, “Protocol on Mutation Induction in Coffee Using In Vitro Tissue Cultures”, “Mutation Induction Using Gamma-Ray Irradiation and High Frequency Embryogenic Callus from Coffee (Coffea arabica L.)”, “Chemical Mutagenesis of Embryogenic Cell Suspensions of Coffea arabica L. var. Catuaí Using EMS and NaN3”, “Chemical Mutagenesis of Coffea arabica L. var. Venecia Cell Suspensions Using EMS” and “Chemical Mutagenesis of Zygotic Embryos of Coffea arabica L. var. Catuaí Using EMS and NaN3”. Protocols for mutation induction of seed and ex vitro vegetative propagules are described in Chapters “Physical Mutagenesis of Arabica Coffee Seeds and Seedlings”, “Mutation Induction in Coffea arabica L. Using In Vivo Grafting and Cuttings”, “Chemical Mutagenesis of Mature Seed of Coffea arabica L. var. Venecia Using EMS” and “Chemical Mutagenesis of Coffee Seeds (Coffea arabica L. var. Catuaí) Using NaN3”.
3.4 Enabling Biotechnology and Genomics Tools
In vitro plant cell and tissue culture techniques offer the possibility of rapid true-to-type multiplication. Somatic embryogenesis (SE) is an in vitro vegetative propagation technique that can produce clones of plants in large quantities. Research on in vitro tissue culture of Arabica coffee began in the 1970s. Since then, protocols for in vitro regeneration of Arabica coffee through SE have been developed, both direct and indirect methods have been reported (Barry-Etienne et al. 2002; Murvanidze et al. 2021). Somatic embryos can be produced from leaves of trees as starting material. Two innovations aimed at developing commercial scale multiplication systems include the use of bioreactors and direct sowing of somatic embryos in nurseries (Barry-Etienne et al. 1999; de Rezende Maciel et al. 2016; Etienne and Berthouly 2002; Etienne et al. 2013, 2018; Menendez-Yuffa et al. 2010). These micropropagation techniques are intended to enable mass propagation of elite Arabica coffee materials, such as F1 hybrids which cannot be propagated by seeding. The availability of protocols for in vitro regeneration of Arabica coffee offers exciting opportunities to integrate advanced cell culture techniques with induced mutagenesis to produce chimera-free mutant plants, a major bottleneck in induced mutagenesis of perennial crops with a long juvenile phase such as coffee. Some horticultural techniques, such as cuttings, can also enable cloning and multiplication of coffee plants.
The analysis of segregating molecular markers has confirmed earlier genetic and cytogenetic evidence that C. arabica is a functional diploid (Lashermes et al. 2008). Alkimim et al. (2017) and Saavedra et al. (2023) reported the use of marker-assisted selection for pyramiding multiple CLR and CBD resistance alleles. Genomic tools and large-scale sequencing enable a better understanding and characterization of the diversity and function of the Coffea genetic resources. This knowledge can then be utilised by breeders to select the best parental materials for incorporation into breeding programmes. Genomic selection (GS) allows breeders to select traits that are influenced by large numbers of small-effect alleles in a wide range of genotypes. Using GS in the context of resistance breeding for perennial crops increases the efficiency of breeding programs by shortening the breeding cycles (Alves et al. 2015). The release of reference genomes of C. canephora and C. arabica broadened the possibilities and facilitated significant progress for C. arabica genomic analysis (Denoeud et al. 2014; Dereeper et al. 2015; https://worldcoffeeresearch.org/resources/coffea-arabica-genome; Scalabrin et al. 2020). Sant’Ana et al. (2018) used the C. canephora reference genome to find SNP markers in the C. arabica genome associated with lipids and di-terpenes composition in a GWAS study of 107 diverse C. arabica genotypes. Knowledge of the molecular genetic structure of genes of interest to coffee breeders can then be applied for molecular breeding of Arabica coffee, including for example, for gene-based selection in mutation breeding programs. Protocols on the development and use of a Coffee Exome Capture kit, the application of High-Resolution Melt analysis, and the use of molecular cytogenetics for the detection of induced mutations in coffee are described in Chapters “Targeted Sequencing in Coffee with the Daicel Arbor Biosciences Exome Capture Kit”, “High Resolution Melt (HRM) Genotyping for Detection of Induced Mutations in Coffee (Coffea arabica L var. Catuaí)” and “Protocols for Chromosome Preparations: Molecular Cytogenetics and Studying Genome Organization in Coffee”, respectively.
References
Ahloowalia BS, Maluszynski M, Nichterlein K (2004) Global impact of mutation-derived varieties. Euphytica 135:187–204
Alkimim ER, Caixeta ET, Sousa TV, Pereira AA, Baião de Oliveira AC, Zambolim L, Sakiyama NS (2017) Marker-assisted selection provides arabica coffee with genes from other Coffea species targeting on multiple resistance to rust and coffee berry disease. Mol Breed 37:6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-016-0609-1
Alves AA, Laviola BG, Formighieri EF, Carels N (2015) Perennial plants for biofuel production: bridging genomics and field research. Biotechnol J 10:505–507
Arrieta EN (2014) Resistencia genética en café: Estrategia de manejo no quimíco de la Roya del Cafeto. In: FAO Memorias del Seminario Científico Internacional Manejo Agroecológico de la Roya del Café. Panamá
Avelino J, Cristancho M, Georgiou S, Imbach P, Aguilar L, Bornemann G, Läderach P, Anzueto F, Hruska AJ, Morales C (2015) The coffee rust crises in Colombia and Central America (2008–2013): impacts, plausible causes and proposed solutions. Food Secur 7:303–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-015-0446-9
Bado S, Forster BP, Nielen S, Ali AM, Lagoda PJL, Till BJ, Laimer M (2015) Plant mutation breeding: current progress and future assessment, chap 2. In: Janick J (ed) Plant breeding reviews. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ, pp 23–88
Barry-Etienne D, Bertrand B, Vásquez N & Etienne H (1999) Direct sowing of Coffea arabica somatic embryos mass-produced in a bioreactor and regeneration of plants. Plant Cell Rep. 19:111–117
Barry-Etienne D, Bertrand B, Vasquez N, Etienne H (2002) Comparison of somatic embryogenesis-derived coffee (Coffea arabica L.) plantlets regenerated in vitro or ex vitro conditions: morphological, mineral and water characteristics. Ann Bot 90:77–85
Bettencourt AJ (1973) Considerações gerais sobre o ‘Híbrido de Timor’. Instituto Agronômico de Campinas, Circular nº 23, p 20
Bunn C, Läderach P, Jimenez JGP, Montagnon C, Schilling T (2015) Multiclass classification of agro-ecological zones for Arabica coffee: an improved understanding of the impacts of climate change. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140490
Carvalho A, Antunes Filho H, Nogueira RK (1954) Genética de coffea. XX. Resultados preliminares do tratamento de sementes de café com raios-X. Bragantia, Campinas, 13 XVII–XX (Nota, 7)
Carvalho A, Fazuoli LC, Medina Filho HP (1984) Efeitos de raios X na indução de mutações em Coffea arábica. Bragantia, Campinas 43:553–567
Denoeud F, Carretero-Paulet L, Dereeper A, Droc G, Guyot R, Pietrella M, Zheng C, Alberti A, Anthony F, Aprea G, Aury JM, Bento P, Bernard M, Bocs S, Campa C, Cenci A, Combes MC, Crouzillat D, Da Silva C, Daddiego L, De Bellis F, Dussert S, Garsmeur O, Gayraud T, Guignon V, Jahn K, Jamilloux V, Joët T, Labadie K, Lan T, Leclercq J, Lepelley M, Leroy T, Li LT, Librado P, Lopez L, Muñoz A, Noel B, Pallavicini A, Perrotta G, Poncet V, Pot D, Priyono, Rigoreau M, Rouard M, Rozas J, Tranchant-Dubreuil C, VanBuren R, Zhang Q, Andrade AC, Argout X, Bertrand B, de Kochko A, Graziosi G, Henry RJ, Jayarama, Ming R, Nagai C, Rounsley S, Sankoff D, Giuliano G, Albert VA, Wincker P, Lashermes P (2014) The coffee genome provides insight into the convergent evolution of caffeine biosynthesis. Science 345:1181–1184
Dereeper A, Bocs S, Rouard M, Guignon V, Ravel S, Tranchant-Dubreuil C, Poncet V, Garsmeur O, Lashermes P, Droc G (2015) The coffee genome hub: a resource for coffee genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 43:D1028–D1035
de Rezende Maciel AL, Almendagna Rodrigues F, Pasqual M, Siqueira de Carvalho CH (2016) Large-scale, high-efficiency production of coffee somatic embryos. Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol 16:102–107
Etienne H, Berthouly M (2002) Temporary immersion systems in plant micropropagation. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 69:215–231. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015668610465
Etienne H, Bertrand B, Georget F, Lartaud M, Montes F, Dechamp E, Verdeil JL, Barry-Etienne D (2013) Development of coffee somatic and zygotic embryos to plants differs in the morphological, histochemical and hydration aspects. Tree Physiol 33(6):640–653. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpt034
Etienne H, Breton D, Breitler J-C, Bertrand B, Déchamp E, Awada R, Marraccini P, Léran S, Alpizar E, Campa C, Courtel P, Georget F, Ducos J-P (2018) Coffee somatic embryogenesis: how did research, experience gained and innovations promote the commercial propagation of elite clones from the two cultivated species? Front Plant Sci 9:1630
Forster BP, Shu QY (2012) Plant mutagenesis in crop improvement basic terms and applications, chap 1. In: Shu QY, Kakagawa H, Forster BP (eds) Plant mutation breeding and biotechnology. CAB International and FAO, Wallingford, UK, pp 9–20
Frédérick G, Lison M, Alpizar E, Courtel P, Bordeaux M, Hidalgo JM, Marraccini P, Breitler J-C, Déchamp E, Poncon C, Etienne H, Bertrand B (2019) Starmaya: the first Arabica F1 coffee hybrid produced using genetic male sterility. Front Plant Sci 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01344
Ghosh S, Watson A, Gonzalez-Navarro OE et al (2018) Speed breeding in growth chambers and glasshouses for crop breeding and model plant research. Nat Protoc 13:2944–2963. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-018-0072-z
Guimarães Mendes NA, Carvalho GR, Botelho CE, Fazuoli LC, Silvarolla MB (2007) História das primeiras cultivares de café plantadas no Brasil. In: Carvalho CHS (ed) Cultivares de café. EMBRAPA, Brasília
IAEA (2023) The joint FAO/IAEA mutant variety database. Available at: https://nucleus.iaea.org/sites/mvd. Accessed 27 Jan 2023
Ingelbrecht I, Jankowicz-Cieslak, J, Szurman M, Till BJ, Szarejko I (2018) Chemical mutagenesis. In: Spencer-Lopes MM, Forster BP, Jankuloski L (eds) Manual on mutation breeding, 3rd edn. FAO/IAEA Publication, FAO, Rome, Italy
Jankowicz-Cieslak J, Till BJ (2016) Chemical mutagenesis of seed and vegetatively propagated plants using EMS. Curr Protoc Plant Biol 1:617–635. https://doi.org/10.1002/cppb.20040
Kharkwal MC, Shu QY (2009) The role of induced mutations in world food security. In: Shu QY (ed) Induced plant mutations in the genomics era. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, pp 33–38
Knudsen S, Wendt T, Dockter C, Thomsen HC, Rasmussen M, Egevang Jørgensen M, Lu Q, Voss C, Murozuka E, Østerberg JT, Harholt J, Braumann I, Cuesta-Seijo JA, Kale SM, Bodevin S, Tang Petersen L, Carciofi M, Pedas PR, Opstrup Husum J, Nielsen MTS, Nielsen K, Jensen MK, Møller LA, Gojkovic Z, Striebeck A, Lengeler K, Fennessy RT, Katz M, Garcia Sanchez R, Solodovnikova N, Förster J, Olsen O, Møller BL, Fincher GB, Skadhauge B (2022) FIND-IT: accelerated trait development for a green evolution. Sci Adv 8(34):26. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abq2266
Läderach P, Ramirez–Villegas J, Navarro-Racines C, Zelaya C, Martinez–Valle A, Jarvis A (2017) Climate change adaptation of coffee production in space and time. Clim Change 141:47–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1788-9
Lashermes P, Carvalho Andrade A, Etienne H (2008) Genomics of coffee, one of the world’s largest traded commodities. In: Moore PH, Ming R (eds) Genomics of tropical crop plants. Springer
Menendez-Yuffa A, Barry-Etienne D, Bertrand B, Georget F, Etienne H (2010) A comparative analysis of the development and quality of nursery plants derived from somatic embryogenesis and from seedlings for large-scale propagation of coffee (Coffea arabica L.). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 102(3):297–307
Moh CC (1961) Does a coffee plant develop from one initial cell in the shoot apex of an embryo? Radiat Bot 1:97–99
Moh CC, Orbegoso G (1960) The induction of angustifolia mutants in coffee in the R1 generation by ionizing radiations. Genetics 45:1000 (Abstract)
Mokry M, Nijman IJ, van Dijken A, Benjamins R, Heidstra R, Sheres B, Cuppen E (2011) Identification of factors required for meristem function in Arabidopsis using a novel next generation sequencing fast forward genetics approach. BMC Genomics 12:256. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-256
Montagnon C, Marraccini P, Bertrand B (2019) Breeding for coffee quality. In: Oberthur et al (eds) Specialty coffee managing quality. Cropster Innsbruck, Austria, pp 109–143
Mukhtar Ali Ghanim A, Spencer-Lopes MM, Thomas W (2018) In: Spencer-Lopes MM, Forster BP, Jankuloski L (eds) Manual on mutation breeding, 3rd edn. FAO/IAEA Publication, FAO, Rome, Italy
Murvanidze N, Nisler J, Lerou O, Werbrouck SPO (2021) Cytokinin oxidase/dehydrogenase inhibitors stimulate 2iP to induce direct somatic embryogenesis in Coffea arabica. Plant Growth Regul 94:195–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-021-00708-6
Muschler RG (2001) Shade improves coffee quality in a sub-optimal coffee-zone of Costa Rica. Agrofor Syst 85:131–139
Saavedra LM, Caixeta ET, Barka GD, Borém A, Zambolim L, Nascimento M, Cruz CD, de Oliveira ACB, Pereira AA (2023) Marker-assisted recurrent selection for pyramiding leaf rust and coffee berry disease resistance alleles in Coffea arabica L. Genes 14:189. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14010189
Saito T (2016) Advances in Japanese pear breeding in Japan. Breeding Science 66: 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.66.46
Sanada T, Kotobuki K, Nishida T, Fujita H, Ikeda F (1993) A new Japanese pear cultivar ‘Gold Nijisseiki’ resistant mutant to black spot disease of Japanese pear. Jpn J Breed 43(3):455–461. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs1951.43.455
Sant’Ana GC, Pereira LFP, Pot D, Ivamoto ST, Domingues DS, Ferreira RV, Pagiatto NF, da Silva BSR, Nogueira LM, Kitzberger CSG, Scholz MBS, de Oliveira FF, Sera GH, Padilha L, Labouisse J-P, Guyot R, Charmetant P, Leroy T (2018) Genome-wide association study reveals candidate genes influencing lipids and diterpenes contents in Coffea arabica L. Sci Rep 8:465
Scalabrin S, Toniutti L, Di Gaspero G et al (2020) A single polyploidization event at the origin of the tetraploid genome of Coffea arabica is responsible for the extremely low genetic variation in wild and cultivated germplasm. Sci Rep 10:4642. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61216-7
Schneeberger K, Weigel D (2011) Fast-forward genetics enabled by new sequencing technologies. Trends Plant Sci 16(5):282–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2011.02.006
Sigurbjörnsson B, Micke A (1974) Philosophy and accomplishments of mutation breeding. In: Polyploidy and induced mutations in plant breeding. IAEA, Vienna, pp 303–343
Silva RA, Zambolim L, Castro ISL et al (2018) The Híbrido de Timor germplasm: identification of molecular diversity and resistance sources to coffee berry disease and leaf rust. Euphytica 214:153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-018-2231-2
Silvarolla MB, Mazzafera P, Fazuoli LC (2004) A naturally decaffeinated arabica coffee. Nature 429:826
Solymosi K, Techel G (2019) Brewing up climate resilience in the coffee sector: adaptation strategies for farmers, plantations, and producers. Available at: https://www.idhsustainabletrade.com/uploaded/2019/06/Brewing-up-climate-resilience-in-the-coffee-sector-1.pdf
Spencer-Lopes MM, Jankuloski L, Mukhtar Ali Ghanim A, Matijevic M, Kodym A (2018) Physical mutagenesis. In: Spencer-Lopes MM, Forster BP, Jankuloski L (eds) Manual on mutation breeding, 3rd edn. FAO/IAEA Publication, FAO, Rome, Italy
Stadler LJ (1928) Mutations in barley induced by X-rays and radium. Science 68:186. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.68.1756.186
Sylvain PG (1958) Ethiopian coffee—its significance for the world coffee problems. Econ Bot 12:111–139
Thomas AS (1942) The wild Arabica coffee on the Boma Plateau of Anglo-Egyptian Sudan. Emp J Exp Agric 10:207–212
van der Vossen H, Bertrand B, Charrier A (2015) Next generation variety development for sustainable production of arabica coffee (Coffea arabica L.): a review. Euphytica 204(2):244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-015-1398-z. S2CID 17384126
van Harten AM (1998) Mutation breeding: theory and practical applications. Cambridge University Press
Wintgens JN (2012) Coffee: Growing, Processing, Sustainable Production. A Guidebook for Growers, Processors, Traders, and Researchers. (2nd ed.), Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ingelbrecht, I.L.W., Espinoza, N.A., Nielen, S., Jankowicz-Cieslak, J. (2023). Mutation Breeding in Arabica Coffee. In: Ingelbrecht, I.L., Silva, M.d.C.L.d., Jankowicz-Cieslak, J. (eds) Mutation Breeding in Coffee with Special Reference to Leaf Rust. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-67273-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-67273-0_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-67272-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-67273-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)