Abstract
Jatropha variegata and Jatropha spinosa (family: Euphorbiaceae) are utilized in Yemeni traditional medicine to treat respiratory tract infection and in different skin conditions such as wound healing, as antibacterial and hemostatic. In this study, we evaluated the cytotoxicity and the antiviral activities of the methanolic J. variegata (leaves: Ext-1, stems: Ext-2, and roots: Ext-3), and J. spinosa extracts (aerial parts: Ext-4 and roots: Ext-5), in addition to their methylene chloride fractions of roots extracts (F-6 and F-7, respectively). All samples were tested against three human cancer cell lines in vitro (MCF-7, HepG2, and A549) and two viruses (HSV-2 and H1N1). Both plants showed significant cytotoxicity, among them, the methylene chloride fractions of roots of J. variegata (F-6) and J. spinosa roots (F-7) showed the highest activity on MCF-7 (IC50 = 1.4 and 1 μg/mL), HepG2 (IC50 = 0.64 and 0.24 μg/mL), and A549 (IC50 = 0.7 and 0.5 μg/mL), respectively, whereas the IC50 values of the standard doxorubicin were (3.83, 4.73, and 4.57 μg/mL) against MCF-7, HepG2, and A549, respectively. These results revealed that the roots of both plants are potential targets for cytotoxic activities. The in vitro results revealed potential antiviral activity for each of Ext-3, Ext-5, F-6, and F-7 against HVS-2 with IC50 of 101.23, 68.83, 4.88, 3.24 μg/mL and against H1N1 with IC50 of 51.29, 27.92, 4.24, and 3.06 μg/mL respectively, whereas the IC50 value of the standard acyclovir against HVS-2 was 83.19 μg/mL and IC50 value of the standard ribavirin against H1N1 was 52.40 μg/mL .The methanol extracts of the roots (Ext-3 and Ext-5) of both plants were characterized using UPLC/MS. A total of 73 metabolites were annotated, including fourteen diterpenoids, eleven flavonoids, ten phenolic acid conjugates, twelve fatty acids and their conjugates, five triterpenes and steroids, two sesquiterpenes, and six coumarins. The cytotoxicity and antiviral activities determined in the present work are explained by the existence of flavonoids, coumarins and diterpenes with commonly known cytotoxicity and antiviral activities.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
One of the biggest plant families in the world is the Euphorbiaceae family, encompassing around 300 genera, 8000 species, and five subfamilies across the globe. These genera are primarily found in tropical and subtropical regions and are recognized as a significant source of poisons and medications1,2. In Yemen, there are 17 genera in the Euphorbiaceae family. (Andrachne L., Cephalocroton Del., Flueggea Willd, Phyllanthus L., Clutia L., Chrozophora Del., Ricinus L., Meineckia L., Erythrococca L., Micrococca Benth., Acalypha L., Tragia L., Dalechampia L., Jatropha L., Bridelia Muell-Arg ., Croton L. and Euphorbia L3.
Jatropha is a member of the Euphorbiaceae family and contains approximately 175 species, which are commonly used in traditional medicine in Africa, Asia, and Latin America to treat a variety of clinical ailments. Jatropha species are known to be a significant source of secondary metabolites with a wide range of biological processes4,5. In reality, the term "Jatropha" comes from the Greek language "jatros," which implies "doctor," and "trophe," which could be related to its widespread therapeutic usage5. Various species in this genus, including Jatropha gossypiifolia, Jatropha mollissima, Jatropha curcas, and Jatropha elliptica, have been studied for their medicinal uses, chemical constituents, and biological activities5,6,7,8,9. Jatropha species have been used in traditional medicine in many parts of Yemen to treat respiratory tract infections (RTI), as an antiseptic of wounds, as a hemostatic to stop bleeding, and for many other purposes10.
Jatropha spinosa and J. variegata are two mountainous plants that are indigenous to Yemen, J. variegata is native in Yemen, while Jatropha spinosa is indigenous to Yemen and other regions in Saudi Arabia, Somalia, and Djibouti. Jatropha species are represented in Yemen by seven species which are J. curcus L, J. glauca Vahl., J. spinosa (Forssk.)Vahl, J. pelargoniifolia Courb., J. unicostata Balf., J. dhofarica R.Sm and J. variegata (Forssk.)Vahl.3.
However, there is no adequate chemical and biological research on these two species. Nonetheless, there is a significant amount of research on other Jatropha species. J. variegata (Forsk.) Vahl has traditionally been utilized for antimicrobial and hemostatic actions in Yemeni folk medicine, as well as wound management11. Previous research has shown that J. variegata has antibacterial and antioxidant properties, most likely because of the existence of bioactive steroids and flavonoids12. Five flavonoids, namely kaempferol 3-O-L-rhamnopyranoside, 3-O-L-arabinopyranoside, 3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside, 3-O-β-D-galactopyranoside, and kaempferol, had previously been isolated from the stem of J. variegata13. Kaempferol and its glycosides have been demonstrated to have antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, antibacterial, antimicrobial, neuroprotective, and hepatoprotective activities14, implying that flavonoids may contribute to the plant's medicinal potential.
Previous investigations of biological activities revealed that J. variegata exhibited high antibacterial, antioxidant, antifertility, and wound healing activities15,16,17. Meanwhile, J. spinosa has potent antimicrobial activity18. Jatropha plants have been widely studied in vitro to assess their cytotoxic effect rate against human cancer cell lines such as J. gossypifolia19, J. curcas20, J. ribifolia21, J. multifida22, and J. podagrica23. Furthermore, some Jatropha species, such as J. curcas, J. gossypiifolia, J. multifida, J. unicostata, and J. podagrica were found to have antiviral properties24,25,26,27,28.
In this research, the metabolites of both J. spinosa and J. variegata species were explored using ultra high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry to highlight similarities and differences in the chemical profile of both species. In light of these differences, the cytotoxicity and antiviral effects of both species were comparatively evaluated using numbers of cell lines.
Materials and methods
Chemicals
El Gomhouria for Drugs Co. (Cairo, Egypt) supplied the analytical-grade solvents required for the extraction and chromatographic separation processes. Silica gel F254 and RP silica gel were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich chemicals (Darmstadt, Germany), along with precoated TLC plates (20x20 cm). Doxorubicin and sulforhodamine-B (SRB) were bought from Sigma Chemical Co. in St. Louis, Missouri, in the United States. Methanol, formic acid, and acetonitrile were purchased from Fisher Scientific in Waltham, Massachusetts, USA. A Milli-Q system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) was used to purify the water.
Plant material
Jatropha variegata (leaves, stems, and roots) and J. spinosa (aerial parts and roots) were collected in January and February 2020 from Taiz government, Yemen and the collection procedure was in compliance with the national and international guidelines and legislation. The plants were identified by Agricultural Engineer Abd Alhabib Al-ghadasi in the Agriculture Research Institute of Yemen. Voucher specimens were maintained in the herbarium of Cairo University's Faculty of Pharmacy (PN-2–11-2022Ì and 2–11-2022ÌÌ).
Extraction and fractionation of the crude extract
The air- dried powdered (1.5 kg) of J. variegata roots and (1.5 kg) of J. spinosa roots were exhaustively extracted with MeOH (3 × 3 L) using homogenizer (3 times each), and another amount (50g) of both of the leaves and stems of J. variegata and (50g) of stems of J. spinosa were extracted with MeOH (3X 300 mL) by cold maceration. The extracts were filtered and concentrated using a rotary evaporator at reduced pressure and at a temperature not exceeding 60°C. The crude extracts were stored in a refrigerator at -4°C until use. The process yielded MeOH extract of J. variegata leaves (Ex-1, 1.8g; 3.6%), MeOH extract of J. variegata stems (Ext-2, 2g; 4%) , MeOH extract of J. variegata roots (Ext-3, 110g; 73%), MeOH extract of J. spinosa stems (Ext-4, 3.6g; 7.2%) and MeOH extract of J. spinosa roots (Ext-5, 125g; 8.3%). Both methanol extracts (Ext-3 and Ext-5) were suspended in H2O (900 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 600 mL). The solvent was removed by distillation to yield CH2Cl2 fraction of J. variegata roots (Fr-6, 21 g; 1.4%) and to yield CH2Cl2 fraction of J. spinosa roots (Fr-7, 19 g; 1.2%). The aqueous remaining fractions of J. variegata (49g; 3.2%), and J. spinosa (65g; 4.3%) were passed through Diaion-HP20 (4 × 20 cm) and eluted with 100% water (500 mL), 50% MeOH (500 mL) followed with 100% MeOH (750 mL) to give Fr-8 (15g), Fr-9 (26g), Fr-10 (4g) and Fr-11(4g).
The methanolic extracts(s) were analyzed by Ultra High-Performance Liquid chromatography/diode array detector/Quadrupole Time-Of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (UHPLC/DAD/QTOF/MS) and were biologically tested.
LC–MS analysis
UHPLC-QTOF-MS/MS profiling of the crude extracts and fractions
Using an Agilent UHPLC-MS system made up of an Agilent 1290 Infinity II UHPLC connected to an Agilent 6545 ESI-Q-TOF–MS in both negative and positive modes, aliquots (1 µl) of methanol extracts at a concentration of 2 mg/mL were examined. The following were the chromatographic conditions: Flow rate is 0.4 mL/min, a Kinetex phenyl-hexyl (1.7 µm, 2.1 50 mm) column was eluted with an isocratic elution of 90% H2O/MeCN for 1 min, followed by a 6-min linear gradient elution to 5% H2O/MeCN with 0.1% isocratic formic acid as modifier. The capillary temperature was set to 320 °C, the source voltage to 3.5 kV, and the sheath gas flow rate was set to 11 L/min for ESI. Ions identified with an intensity greater than 1000 counts per scan at 6 scans/s, with an isolation width of 1.3 m/z, a maximum of 9 selected precursors per cycle, and ramping collision energy (5 m/z/100 + 10 eV). Purine C5H4N4 [M + H]+ ion (m/z 121.0508) and hexakis (1H,1H,3H-tetrafluoropropoxy)-phosphazene C18H18F24N3O6P3 [M + H]+ ion (m/z 922.0098) were used as internal lock masses for positive mode while TFA C2HF3O2 [M − H]− ion (m/z 112.9855) and hexakis (1H,1H,3H-tetrafluoropropoxy)-phosphazene C18H18F24N3O6P3 [M + TFA − H]−ion (m/z 1033.9881) were used as internal lock masses for negative mode.
Biological activity
Cell culture
Nawah Scientific Inc. (Mokatam, Cairo, Egypt) provided the hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2), lung cancer (A-549) , breast adenocarcinoma (MCF-7) cells and human skin fibroblast (HSF) cells for this study. The cells were kept in DMEM medium supplemented with 100 mg/mL streptomycin, 100 units/mL penicillin, and 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum at 37 °C in a humidified, 5% (v/v) CO2 atmosphere. Additionally, cells for HSV type 2, H1N1, and Vero were purchased from Nawah Scientific Inc. in Egypt. In DMEM medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 0.1% antibiotic/antimycotic solution, Vero cells were cultured. We tested the cytotoxicity prior to this assay by seeding cells at a density of 2 × 104 cells/well in a 96-well culture plate. The following day, we cultured the cells in culture media containing serially diluted samples for 48 h before removing the medium and washing the cells with PBS.
Cytotoxicity assay
The SRB assay was used to determine cell viability as described by Skehan29. In 96-well plates, aliquots of 100 L of cell suspension (5 × 103 cells) were seeded and incubated in complete media for 24 h. The cells were subsequently treated with 100 L medium containing various doses of medicines. Cells were fixed 72 h after drug exposure by replacing medium with 150 L of 10% TCA and incubating at 4 °C for 1 h. After removing the TCA solution, the cells were washed 5 times with distilled water. Aliquots of 70 L SRB solution (0.4% w/v) were added and incubated at room temperature for 10 min in the dark. The plates were cleaned three times with 1% acetic acid and air-dried overnight.
Antiviral assay
Cell viability was determined by inhibiting the Cytopathic Effect (CPE) with crystal violet. Vero E6 cells and Vero cells were cultured in DMEM medium with 10% fetal bovine serum and 0.1% antibiotic/antimycotic solution. Gibco BR (Grand Island, NY, USA) provided the antibiotic and antimycotic solution, trypsine-EDTA, fetal bovine serum, and DMEM medium. Schmidtke et al. described the crystal violet method for evaluating antiviral and cytotoxicity activity30. In brief, one day before infection, Vero cells were planted at a density of 2 × 104 cells/well in a 96-well culture plate. The culture media was withdrawn the next day, and the cells were rinsed with PBS. The crystal violet method was used to measure H1N1 infectivity, which monitored CPE and allowed the percentage of cell viability to be estimated. The antiviral potency of each test sample was assessed using a concentration range of 0.1–100 g/mL that had been twice diluted. The assay was conducted with viral controls (virus-infected, non-drug treated cells) and cell controls (non-infected, non-drug treated cells). The culture plates were cultured for three days at 37 °C in 5% CO2, and the progression of the cytopathic effect was seen under a light microscope. The cell monolayers were fixed and stained using a 0.03% crystal violet solution in 2% ethanol and 3% formalin after being cleaned with PBS. After the plates had dried and been washed, a spectrophotometric measurement at 540/630 nm was used to determine the optical density of each individual well. This allowed for the calculation of the percentage of antiviral activities of the tests compounds according to Pauwels, et al.31 using the following equation:
Antiviral activity = [(mean optical density of cell controls − mean optical density of virus controls)/ (optical density of test − mean optical density of virus controls)] × 100% using the DIAS. Based on these results, the 50% CPE inhibitory dose (ID50) was calculated.
Results and discussion
UHPLC-DAD-QTOF-MS/MS profiling of methanol extracts
The metabolite profiling of the methanol extracts of roots of J. variegata and J. spinosa (Ext-3 and Ext-5, respectively) with potential cytotoxicity and antiviral activities were analyzed using UHPLC-DAD-QTOF-MS/MS analysis. Some classes of compounds, such as sesquiterpenes and diterpenes, were well-identified in the positive ionization mode, whereas flavonoids, phenolic acids, and quinic acid derivatives could be detected in the negative ionization mode32.
Figure 1 depicted the base peak chromatograms (BPC) of both species' MeOH extracts in negative and positive modes. In both extracts, the analytical setup in both ESI modes resulted in the detection of 73 metabolites (Table 1). The UV spectra, accurate mass, and MS fragmentation patterns were used to characterize the metabolites. The mass spectra were also compared to those in the phytochemical dictionary of natural products database (CRC) and the published literature33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44. The identified compounds are represented by 10 phenolic acids and phenolic derivatives, 12 fatty acids, 11 flavonoids, 6 coumarins, 14 diterpenes, 7 nitrogenous compounds, 5 triterpenes and steroids, 2 sesquiterpenes and 6 miscellaneous compounds.
Phenolic compounds
The UHPLC-MS analysis of tested samples revealed the presence of 11 flavonoids, 10 phenolic acid conjugates, 6 coumarins, and 1 lignan were identified. Flavonoids were found primarily as C-linked hexoses (5 flavonoids), which were easily distinguished by a neutral loss of 120 Da., as observed in compounds as homoorientin (3) and vitexin (10), vitexin was differentiated from its structural isomer isovitexin by the intensity of the fragment ion at 283 m/z, also homoorientin was differentiated from orientin by the intensity of the fragments 298 and 327 m/z.
Flavonoids O-glycosides were characterized by the neutral loss of 162 Da for hexoses as observed in eriodictyol-hexoside (1) quercetin-O-hexoside (4) and naringenin O-hexoside (9). Most of these flavonoids were detected in Jatropha species33,35,36.
Phenolic acids in J. variegata and J. spinosa extracts were detected and eluted first in the chromatogram, as seen in Table 1. Among the phenolic acid esters that have been annotated, only tetradecyl ferulate has been documented in the genus and has been isolated from both J. curcas45, and J. multifida46, and was previously detected in J. integerrima33.
Nitrogenous compounds
In J. variegata and J. spinosa extracts, seven simple nitrogenous compounds were identified, including choline and its glycoside. Other simple nitrogenous compounds including arginine and N-gucosylarginine, as well as indol carboxyaldehyde, betaien, and adenine, were also detected in the extract.
Terpenoids
The most frequent secondary metabolite group found in J. variegata and J. spinosa roots was composed of terpenoids, including two sesquiterpenes, five triterpenes and steroids, and 14 metabolites of diterpenes. Free diterpenoids esters, predominantly phorbol esters, were the first to be eluted in this investigation at retention time (2.8–3.5 min), which could easily be distinguished because to the neutral loss of acetic acid (60 Da), as seen in 12-deoxyphorbol, 4,9,12-trideoxyphorbol, and 12-deoxyphorbol. Additionally, at retention time 4.3–6.2 min, free diterpenoids were eluted, and were tentatively identified as jatrophone, curcusone, spruceanol, mutifidone, jatropholone B, jatrocurcasenone E, and ferruginol, containing one to three oxygen atoms. Most of these diterpenes were isolated and previously identified in the genus Jatropha36,37.
Ferruginol diterpene which was the first compound identified in the genus Jartopha by observing a mass ion at m/z 287.2356 [M + H]+ and fragments at m/z 201 [M + H-C6H14 ]+, 189 [M + H-C7H14] +, 175 [M + H-C8H16]+. This chemical has previously been discovered in Euphorbiaceae plants and in Juniperus procera leaves and stems47.
Five triterpenes and steroids have been annotated in the UHPLC/MS chromatograms of J. variegata and J. spinosa including stigmasterol (51), stigmastane 3,6 dione (53), taraxasterol(50), dioxo-olean-12-ene (49) and stigmast-4-en-6- β-ol-3-one (52), all of which were earlier isolated and identified in the genus Jatropha4.
Two sesquiterpenes were identified in both species, namely cuparene (66) and dihydro-pulicaric acid (67). Dihydro-pulicaric acid (67), a dihydroderivative of pulicaric acid, was identified in the genus Jatropha and in the family Euphorbiaceae for the first time, but was previously identified in Pulicaria crispa and P. incise48 . It was identified by observing mass ion at m/z 249.1492 [M-H]- and fragments at m/z 205 [M-H-CO2 ]-, 187 [M-H-CO2-H2O). Cuparene sesquiterpene was not identified from genus Jatropha but was identified in Euphorbia macrorrhiza49, according to the fragmentation pattern with mass ions at m/z 203.1782 [M + H]+, 188 [M + H-CH3]+, 175 [M + H- C2H4]+, 161 [M + H-C3H6]+, 147 [M + H- C4H8]+, and 133 [M + H- C5H10]+..
Fatty acids and their conjugates
Fatty acids were found in the form of free fatty acids and fatty acid glycerides, which accounted for 12 metabolites. The most prevalent fatty acids were unsaturated (C-18), including oxo-phytodienoic (C18H28O3), linolenic (C18H30O2), oleic acid (C18H34O2), hydroxy-octadecatetrienoic acid (C18H30O3), oxo-octadecatetraenoic acid (C18H26O3), 9,12,13- trihydroxy-10,15-octadecadienoic acid (C18H32O5) and linoleic acid (C18H32O2). Only two fatty acids derivatives had annotations in the extracts including, 2-monopalmitate monoglyceride (16:0) and monosteirin. One saturated fatty acid was identified as palmitic acid (C16H32O2).
Five hydroxyfatty acids [hydroxy-octadecatetrienoic acid (54, C18H30O3), oxo-phytodienoic acid (55, C18H28O3), oxo-octadecatetraenoic acid (56, C18H26O3), 9, 12, 13-trihydroxy-10,15-octadecadienoic acid (58, C18H32O5), hydroxyl octadecanedioic acid (59, C18H34O5) were identified from the loss of two water molecules (2 × 18 amu). Based on the fragmentation pattern of hydroxy-octadecatetrienoic acid with ions at m/z 295.1866 [M + H]+, 277 [M + H-H2O]+, 259 [M + H- 2H2O]+, also the fragmentation pattern of oxo-phytodienoic acid with ions at m/z 293.1708 [M + H]+, 275 [M + H-H2O]+, 257 [M + H- 2H2O]+.
Miscellaneous compounds
Six miscellaneous compounds were annotated in J. variegata and J. spinoa extracts including a sugar, a lignan, an anthraquinone, a dicarboxylic acid and two tricarboxylic acid derivatives, namely sucrose, eudesmin/epieudesmin, emodine, azalic acid, ethyl aconitate hexoside, and ethyl aconitate dihexoside, respectively. Most of these compounds were identified in the genus Jatropha33,35. Only emodin anthraquinone was not detected in the genus Jatropha but was identified in Euphorbiaceae family50. The elimination of CO to create m/z 243 was followed by the loss of one hydroxyl group to produce m/z 225 in the fragmentation of emodin (C15H10O5).
In vitro cytotoxic activity
This is the first report evaluating the in vitro cytotoxic activities of J. variegata and J. spinosa extracts against three human cancer cell lines, namely breast adenocarcinoma (MCF-7), hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2), and lung cancer (A-549). The curves of the concentration response for the doxorubicin control drug, methanol extract and methylene chloride fractions against the three human cells lines are shown in Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. The results of the in vitro antiproliferative assay with human cancer cell lines are displayed in the Table 2.
The potential cytotoxicity of eleven extracts and fractions of J. variegata (leaves, stem, and root) and J. spinosa (aerial parts and roots) including total methanol (Ext-1, Ext-2 , Ext-3, Ext-4, and Ext-5 ), CH2Cl2 fractions of J. variegata and J. spinosa roots (F-6 and F-7), and diaion column fractions of J. variegata and J. spinosa roots ( F-8: 50%: MeOH, F-9: 100% MeOH, and F-10: 50% MeOH, and F-11: 100% MeOH) were assessed using sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay against MCF-7, HepG2, and A-549.
J. variegata and J. spinosa extracts and fractions were tested in vitro against three cell lines (MCF-7, HepG2, and A-549) compared with doxorubicin, and the results are demonstrated in Tables 2, 3 and Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. Based on the IC50 values of all tested samples, the CH2Cl2 fractions F-6 and F-7 demonstrated most strong cytotoxic activity. F-6 showed IC50 values of 1.4 µg/ml, 0.64 µg/mL and 0.70 µg/mL against MCF-7, HepG2, and A-549 cell lines, respectively, whereas IC50 values of F-7 were 1.0, 0.24 and 0.5 µg/mL against MCF-7, HepG2, and A-549 cell lines, respectively, whereas IC50 of doxorubicin was 3.83, 4.73, and 4.57 µg/ml against MCF-7, HepG2, and A-549 cell lines, respectively. Ext-3 and Ext-5 demonstrated greater anticancer activity against MCF-7, HepG2, and A-549 cell line, (4.0 and 10.0 µg/ml; 4.0 and 12.5 µg/ml; 16.5 and 38 µg/ml IC50, respectively) compared with other extracts, whereas DOX showed IC50 of 3.83, 4.73, and 4.57 µg/ml of IC50 against MCF-7, HepG2, and A-549 cell line, respectively. In case of fractions F-8, F-9, and F-10, no activity was observed against the three cell lines. The activities of Ext-1, Ext-2, and Ext-4 extracts showed efficient activities for the three cell lines tested when compared to DOX, with in vitro antiproliferative activities ranging from 19.0 to 38.0 μg/mL.
The cytotoxic activity of the most effective anticancer extracts (Ext-3 and Ext-5) and fractions (F-6 and F-7) was evaluated against non-cancerous cells, human skin fibroblast (HSF) cell line to test their selectivity for cancer cells and results are shown in Table 2. The tested extracts and fractions showed considerable cytotoxic activity against HSF cells with IC50 values of 1.54 ± 0.07, 1.08 ± 0.02 and for Ext-3 and Ext-5 and 0.69 ± 0.02 and 0.34 ± 0.01 for F-6 and F-7, respectively. Therefore, the selectivity index (SI) was calculated for the active extracts (Ext-3 and Ext- 5) and fractions (F-6 and F-7) and shown in Table 2. The potent antiproliferative activity of F-6 was accompanied with high selectivity in case of HepG2 and A-549 (SI 1.078 and 0.986, respectively) and a moderate selectivity for MCF-7 (SI 0.49). Also, F-7 displayed strong SI in case of HepG2 (SI 1.417).
The diverse bioactive metabolites in Jatropha species may be responsible for the variations in the efficiency of the extracts against cancer cells. So, using UHPLC-DAD-QToF, untargeted metabolite profiling of the MeOH extracts was carried out. The LC–MS profile of the extracts showed the presence of six coumarins, including propacin, fraxidin, fraxetin, 3,4-dihydrocoumarine, coumarin, and 7-methyl coumarin, as well as major components including diterpenes (seen in positive mode) and flavonoids (indicated in negative ion mode). These coumarins, flavonoid and terpenoids enhance the active MeOH extracts as revealed in LC–MS and are well known for their anticancer properties.
In vitro antiviral activity
The antiviral activities of CH2Cl2 fractions F-6 and F-7 of J. variegata and J. spinosa roots are presented in Table 4. These fractions showed the most significant activities against Human Herpes Simplex Type 2 (HSV-2) and Human Influenza (H1N1) cell lines (IC50 4.88, 4.24, 3.4, and 3.06 μg/mL, respectively), whereas methanol extracts Ext-3 and Ext-5 of J. vriegata and J. spinosa roots were less active (IC50 > 50 μg/mL) as shown in Figs. 7, 8, 9, 10, whereas acyclovir showed IC50 of 83.19 µg/ml against HSV-2 cell line and ribavirin showed IC50 of 52.40 µg/ml against H1N1 cell line. F-6 and F-7 factions showed greater activities than other extracts when compared to standard drugs, with in vitro antiviral activities ranging from 3.06 to 4.88 μg/ mL. The determination of selectivity indices for the extracts and fractions revealed significant differences. The extracts Ext-3 and Ext-5, with IC50 values greater than 50 μg/mL, exhibited weak selectivity, ranging from SI 0.2 to 1.71. On the other hand, F-6 demonstrated high selectivity in terms of antiviral activity against HSV-2 (SI 5.9) and H1N1 (SI 3.4). Similarly, F-7 displayed good selectivity against H1N1 (SI 5.2). Both Fractions (F-6 and F-7) showed higher SI than each of acyclovir and ribavirin (Table 4).
Biological findings
Cancer is a disease caused by the unregulated division of aberrant cells in a single location of the body, and it has the potential to infiltrate surrounding tissues51. There are about 200 different forms of cancer, with the most prevalent being breast, colon, lung, and prostate cancer. Brain tumors, carcinomas, leukaemias, lymphomas, and sarcomas are the five forms of cancer. Cancer is predicted to impact one in every two persons in the UK over their lifetime, and it is currently the world's second biggest cause of death52.
In both the treatment and prevention of cancer, natural therapies have been extremely important. Vincristine in 1963 and vinblastine in 1965, the vinca alkaloids isolated from Catharanthus spp. (Madagascar periwinkle plants) growing in the Philippines and Jamaica, were the first naturally derived anticancer drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States53, the most prevalent genital cancer is cervical cancer, which is also one of the main reasons why women die. It accounts for about 12% of all female malignancies worldwide, particularly in underdeveloped nations54.
The increasing number of cancer-related fatalities has prompted researchers to search for novel anticancer medications. Synthetic drug-based chemotherapeutic treatments have been used to treat cancer, but their usage has been limited by their high cost and potential for toxicity. The study of plant-based anticancer drugs is now advancing rapidly. According to a recent assessment, the majority of secondary metabolites isolated from numerous plant families have shown potential for development as anticancer medicines55,56. According to the WHO, natural drugs have the potential to treat between 65 and 80% of human diseases. Natural products are less expensive than synthetic drugs and have fewer side effects, which has led to an increase in the use of medicines derived from natural products57.
The possible cytotoxic properties of J. variegata and J. spinosa, two well-known bioactive medicinal herbs, were therefore examined in this work, as well as their potential impact on the cytotoxic profile of MCF-7, HEPG2, and A549 cell lines. To the best of our knowledge, no in vivo or in vitro studies of J. variegata and J. spinosa's anticancer and antiviral activities in various types of malignancies have been published before. This is the initial study of J. variegata and J. spinosa's effects on cancerous and viral cells.
Conclusions
In conclusion, our study demonstrated the promising cytotoxicity and antiviral activities of various extracts and fractions derived from J. variegata and J. spinosa. These beneficial effects can be attributed to the high content of flavonoids and terpenoids present in these extracts and fractions.
Metabolomics profiling of J. variegata and J. spinosa revealed the presence of numerous compounds with well-established cytotoxic and antiviral activities. Among them, 14 diterpene compounds such as jatrophone, ferrugenol, curcusone, multifidone and 11 Flavonoids such as taxifolin, vitexin, and quercetin. These findings highlight the potential of J. variegata and J. spinosa extracts and fractions as a source of bioactive compounds for the development of cytotoxic and antiviral agents.
Overall, our results underscore the importance of exploring phytoconstituents derived from J. variegata and J. spinosa, as they hold promise for the development of novel therapeutic interventions against cancer and viral infections. Further research and investigations are warranted to elucidate the mechanisms of action and evaluate the potential clinical applications of these bioactive compounds.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].
References
Ramalho, S. D., Pinto, M. E. F. & Ferreira, D. Biologically active orbitides from the Euphorbiaceae family. Planta Med. 84, 558–567 (2018).
Dehgan, B. Novel jatrophas for Florida landscapes. Proc. Florida State Hortic. Soc. 95, 277–280 (1982).
Khulaidi, A.A. Flora of Yemen, Sustainable Environmental Management Programme. (YEM/97/100, Sub-Programme II.–[sine loco], 2000).
Cavalcante, N. B., daConceiçãoSantos, A. D. & daSilvaAlmeida, J. R. G. The genus Jatropha (Euphorbiaceae): A review on secondary chemical metabolites and biological aspects. Chemico Biol. Interact. 318, 108976 (2020).
Sabandar, C. W., Ahmat, N., Jaafar, F. M. & Sahidin, I. J. P. Medicinal property, phytochemistry and pharmacology of several Jatropha species (Euphorbiaceae): A review. Phytochemistry 85, 7–29 (2013).
Wu, Q., Patocka, J., Nepovimova, E. & Kuca, K. Jatropha gossypiifolia L. and its biologically active metabolites: A mini review. J. Ethnopharmacol. 234, 197–203 (2019).
Sharma, S. K. & Singh, H. A review on pharmacological significance of genus Jatropha (Euphorbiaceae). Chinese J. Integr. Med. 18, 868–880 (2012).
Huang, J.-D. et al. Isolation and identification of five new diterpenoids from Jatropha curcas. Hytochem. Lett. 40, 37–41 (2020).
Félix-silva, J. et al. A review of traditional uses, phytochemistry, pharmacology, and toxicology of this medicinal plant. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2014, 2–32 (2014).
Al-Sobarry, M., Alwashli, A., Cherrah, Y. & Alaoui, K. Analgesic activity of methanolic extract of Jatropha unicostata balf as endemic plant in Yemen. Int. J. Pharma Bio. Sci. 2, 375–381 (2011).
Fleurentin, J. & Pelt, J. M. Repertory of drugs and medicinal plants of Yemen. J. Ethnopharmacol. 6(1), 85–108 (1982).
Mothana, R. A. et al. Antimicrobial, antioxidant and cytotoxic activities and phytochemical screening of some Yemeni medicinal plants. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 7, 323–330 (2010).
Masaoud, M., Ripperger, H., Porzel, A. & Adam, G. Flavonol Glycosides from Jatropha variegata. Journal für Praktische Chemie/Chemiker-Zeitung 337(1), 43–45 (1995).
Bangar, S. P. et al. Kaempferol: A flavonoid with wider biological activities and its applications. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutrit. 63(28), 9580–9604 (2023).
Alhaj, W.T. et al. The potential of jatropha variegata fruits as a natural contraceptive: Antifertility activity and phytochemical analysis. Evid. Based Complement. Alternative Med., Article ID 1365526 (2022).
Al-Maqtari, T. & Al-Doaiss, A. A. Antioxidant, Antimicrobial and Wound Healing Potential of Jatropha variegata-An Interesting Plant Endemic to Yemen. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. PJBS 23(12), 1581–1590 (2020).
Al-Doaiss, A. A. & Jarrar, Y. B. Investigation of in vivo protective effect of orally administered vitamin E and selenium against gentamicininduced renal and hepatic toxicity. Trop. J. Pharmaceut. Res. 18(7), 1435–1442 (2019).
Al-hood, F. A. N. & Ali, K. S. Antimicrobial activity of the Jatropha Spinosa extracts on the selected pathogenic microorganisms. World J. Pharmaceut. Res. 4(11), 2050–2056 (2015).
Islam, M. M., Islam, A. & Hossain, M. S. In-vivo antiemetic and antinociceptive, cytotoxic and in-vitro thrombolytic potential of methanolic extract of stem and leaves of jatropha gossypiifolia. Discov. Phytomed. 4(4), 35–40 (2017).
Ahmed, A. M., Ibrahim, M. M., El-said, M. A. A. E. & Elsadek, B. E. Anti-cancer activity of curcin and latex isolated from jatropha plant (Jatropha curcas l). J. Agric. Chem. Biotechnol. 11(11), 339–344 (2020).
da Silva, C. E. et al. Chemical composition and cytotoxic activity of the root essential oil from Jatropha ribifolia (Pohl) Baill (Euphorbiaceae). J. Brazil. Chem. Soc. 26, 233–238 (2015).
Zhang, J.-S. et al. Cytotoxic macrocyclic diterpenoids from Jatropha multifida. Bioorg. Chem. 80, 511–518 (2018).
Yuan, H.-T. et al. Lathyrane diterpenoids from Jatropha podagrica and their antitumor activities in human osteosarcoma cells. Natl. Prod. Res. 35, 5089–5095 (2021).
Dahake, R., Roy, S., Patil, D., Rajopadhye, S. & Chowdhary, A. Potential anti-HIV activity of Jatropha curcas Linn Leaf extracts. J. Antivir. Antiretrovirals 5(7), 160–165 (2013).
Mothana, R. A., Mentel, R., Reiss, C. & Lindequist, U. Phytochemical screening and antiviral activity of some medicinal plants from the island Soqotra. Phytotherapy Res. 20, 298–302 (2006).
Falodun, A. et al. Isolation of Diterpenoids from Jatropha podagrica against Hepatitis C virus. J. Afr. Assoc. Physiol. Sci. 2, 21–25 (2014).
Mulongo, E. K. et al. In silico screening of natural compounds from Jatropha curcas (Euphorbiaceae, Linn) and Jatropha gossypifolia (Euphorbiaceae, Linn) against SARS-CoV2, a COVID-19 main protease, using molecular docking approach. Indonesian J. Fundament. Appl. Chem. 7, 148–157 (2022).
Chokchaisiri, R. et al. Anti-herpes simplex type-1 (HSV-1) activity from the roots of Jatropha multifida L. Med. Chem. Res. 29, 328–333 (2020).
Skehan, P. et al. New colorimetric cytotoxicity assay for anticancer-drug screening. JNCI J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 82(13), 1107–1112 (1990).
Schmidtke, M., Schnittler, U., Jahn, B., Dahse, H. M. & Stelzner, A. A rapid assay for evaluation of antiviral activity against coxsackie virus B3, influenza virus A, and herpes simplex virus type 1. J. Virol. Methods 95(1–2), 133–143 (2001).
Pauwels, R. et al. Rapid and automated tetrazolium-based colorimetric assay for the detection of anti-HIV compounds. J. Virol. Methods 20(4), 309–321 (1988).
Ruan, J. et al. Comprehensive chemical profiling in the ethanol extract of Pluchea indica aerial parts by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry analysis of its silica gel column chromatography fractions. Molecules 24, 2784 (2019).
Mahrous, E. A., Elosaily, A. H., Salama, A. A., Salama, A. M. & El-Zalabani, S. M. J. P. Oral and topical anti-inflammatory activity of jatropha integerrima leaves extract in relation to its metabolite profile. Plants 11, 218 (2022).
Mohammed, A. E. et al. Silver nanoparticles formation by jatropha integerrima and LC/MS-QTOF-based metabolite profiling. Nanomaterials 11, 2400 (2021).
Tinco-Jayo, J. A., Aguilar-Felices, E. J., Enciso-Roca, E. C., Arroyo-Acevedo, J. L. & Herrera-Calderon, O. J. M. Phytochemical screening by LC-ESI-MS/MS and effect of the ethyl acetate fraction from leaves and stems of Jatropha macrantha Müll Arg. on ketamine-induced erectile dysfunction in rats. Molecules 27, 115 (2021).
Zengin, G. et al. Chemical composition and biological properties of two Jatropha species: Different parts and different extraction methods. Antioxidants 10, 792 (2021).
Coelho, I. P. et al. Chemical profile and gastroprotective effect of Jatropha elliptica (Pohl) Oken roots. Fitoterapia 146, 104707 (2020).
da Silva, L. C. et al. Molecularly imprinted polymer-coated probe electrospray ionization mass spectrometry determines phorbol esters and deoxyphorbol metabolites in Jatropha curcas leaves. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 30(10), 2051–2059 (2019).
Ye, M., Han, J., Chen, H., Zheng, J. & Guo, D. Analysis of phenolic compounds in rhubarbs using liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 18, 82–91 (2007).
Thi, H. T. et al. Screening of fatty acids, saccharides, and phytochemicals in Jatropha curcas seed kernel as their trimethylsilyl derivatives using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B 1102, 66–73 (2018).
Álvarez-Fernández, M. A. et al. Composition of nonanthocyanin polyphenols in alcoholic-fermented strawberry products using LC–MS (QTRAP), high-resolution MS (UHPLC-Orbitrap-MS), LC-DAD, and antioxidant activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 63, 2041–2051 (2015).
Pontes, M. C. et al. Chemical constituents and antibacterial activity of Bromelia laciniosa (Bromeliaceae): Identification and structural characterization. Phytomed. Plus 2, 100215 (2022).
Ugbogu, A. et al. Quality assessment profile of Jatropha curcas (L) seed oil from Nigeria. Int. Food Res. J. 21, 735 (2014).
Vega-Ruiz, Y. C., Hayano-Kanashiro, C., Gámez-Meza, N. & Medina-Juárez, L. A. J. P. Determination of chemical constituents and antioxidant activities of leaves and stems from Jatropha cinerea (Ortega) Müll. Arg and Jatropha cordata (Ortega) Müll. Arg. Plants 10, 212 (2021).
Ravindranath, N. et al. New lathyrane and podocarpane diterpenoids from Jatropha curcas. Chem. Pharmaceut. Bull. 52, 608–611 (2004).
Das, B. et al. New macrocyclic diterpenoids from Jatropha multifida. Chem. Pharmaceut. Bull. 57, 318–320 (2009).
Salih, A. M. et al. Phytochemical compound profile and the estimation of the Ferruginol compound in different parts (roots, leaves, and seeds) of Juniperus procera. Separation 9, 352 (2022).
El-Sabagh, O. A. et al. Metabolite profiles of Pulicaria crispa and P. incisa in relation to their in-vitro/in-vivo antioxidant activity and hepatoprotective effect: A comparative mass spectrometry-based metabolomics. Separations 194, 113804 (2021).
Lin, J., Dou, J., Xu, J. & Aisa, H. A. J. M. Chemical composition, antimicrobial and antitumor activities of the essential oils and crude extracts of Euphorbia macrorrhiza. Molecules 17, 5030–5039 (2012).
Mitra, S. et al. Exploring the journey of emodin as a potential neuroprotective agent: Novel therapeutic insights with molecular mechanism of action. Biomed. Pharmacotherapy 149, 112877 (2022).
Sarker, S. D., Nahar, L., Miron, A. & Guo, M. Anticancer natural products. Ann Rep. Med. Chem. 55, 45–75 (2020).
Gezici, S. & Şekeroğlu, N. Current perspectives in the application of medicinal plants against cancer: novel therapeutic agents. Anti-Cancer Agents Med. Chem. Formerly Curr. Med. Chem. Anti-Cancer Agents 19(1), 101–111 (2019).
Kinghorn, A. D. et al. Discovery of anticancer agents of diverse natural origin. Anticancer Res. 36, 5623–5637 (2016).
Ali, C., Makata, N. & Ezenduka, P. J. G. O. Cervical cancer: A health limiting condition. Gynecol. Obstet. 6, 2161 (2016).
Bhanot, A., Sharma, R. & Noolvi, M. N. Natural sources as potential anti-cancer agents: A review. Int. J. Phytomed. 3(1), 09 (2011).
Jain, R. & Jain, S. K. Screening of in vitro cytotoxic activity of some medicinal plants used traditionally to treat cancer in Chhattisgarh state, India. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 1(2), S147–S150 (2011).
Abdalla, O. M., Koko, W. & Saadabi, A. M. In vitro anticancer activity and cytotoxicity of Solarium nigrum on cancers and normal cell lines. Int. J. Cancer Res. 10(2), 74–80 (2014).
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Agricultural Engineer Abd Alhabib Al-ghadasi in the Agriculture Research Institute of Yemen (Yemen) for identification of plant materials.
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All the authors contributed to the study design. K.S.: resources, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, writing original draft. O.G.M.: data curation, formal analysis, investigation. K.M.M.: conceptualization, supervision. A.T.: formal analysis, investigation, supervision. A.E.K.: conceptualization, supervision. E.A.S.: conceptualization, supervision, methodology. R.A.E.G.: resources, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, writing original draft. All authors contributed to writing, review and editing the final version of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interest.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Shari, K., Mohamed, O.G., Meselhy, K.M. et al. Cytotoxic and antiviral activities of Jatropha variegata and Jatropha spinosa in relation to their metabolite profile. Sci Rep 14, 4846 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55196-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55196-1
- Springer Nature Limited